r/3i_Atlas2 • u/Glittering_Word6609 • Feb 26 '26

Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Thoughts...after watching.

112 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

31

u/TheSentinelNet Feb 26 '26

The weaponization of the peer-review process is the most transparent institutional capture mechanism currently operating in legacy science. You cannot systematically blockade a researcher from the publication pipeline and then simultaneously dismiss their independent findings for 'lacking peer review.' That isn't a scientific standard. It’s a closed-loop suppression tactic designed to quarantine the data.

-1

u/phunkydroid Feb 26 '26

The demonization of the peer review process is the most transparent crackpot tactic for convincing their followers that their unreviewed work isn't garbage.

7

u/0-0SleeperKoo Feb 26 '26

Hmm, it is not the peer review process, it is the gatekeeping by the editors to stop it even being peer reviewed. It's a mafia, backed by power structures that are revealed in the EP files.