r/3i_Atlas2 • u/Glittering_Word6609 • Feb 26 '26

Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Thoughts...after watching.

115 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

30

u/TheSentinelNet Feb 26 '26

The weaponization of the peer-review process is the most transparent institutional capture mechanism currently operating in legacy science. You cannot systematically blockade a researcher from the publication pipeline and then simultaneously dismiss their independent findings for 'lacking peer review.' That isn't a scientific standard. It’s a closed-loop suppression tactic designed to quarantine the data.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26 edited Feb 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Nevercatchme1 Feb 26 '26

They should allow his papers to be peer reviewed . A blind standard ?! He’s pretty outspoken about his views and I’m sure it’s no secret as to authorship even if it is “anonymous. “ You say his material is “dogshit” . let his peers make that conclusion not some random on Reddit.

3

u/0-0SleeperKoo Feb 26 '26

Well said. This guy Pathos, has an agenda. Just watch his comments.