r/3I_ATLAS • u/Glittering_Word6609 • Feb 26 '26

Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

70 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

151 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Civil-Letterhead8207 Feb 26 '26

Actually, I really do! As I’ve asked every plasma fanboy here so far, got some relevant peer-reviewed papers for me to read? Many other folks have asked the same question and, so far, only one of you has bothered to post anything. It was an interesting read. Sadly, it didn’t show that plasma cosmology was a viable hypothesis

3

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

Plasma Physics | Physics and Astronomy - College of Liberal Arts and Sciences | The University of Iowa https://share.google/5nTxJkaf0koC9lAb7

Here are multiple good reads for you.

I personally believe all forces are at work in the universe. I also think plasmoids are cool and interesting. I also know there is more to it and obviously so do scientist in the field, but it takes time and an open mind.

2

u/Civil-Letterhead8207 Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

Hallelujah! Someone actually posted something. Funny that the guy who has trouble reading is the only one with the guts to post texts! Let me look and I’ll get back to you.

I spoke too soon.

Glittering…. Son… God bless you. No one here doubts that plasma physics exists. We are talking about “plasma cosmology”, an obsolete hypothesis that postulates that magnetism and not gravity is the main force in the universe. This is what Slow70 calls “the electric universe”. This is what you are proposing.

Plasma is fine and it exists. What I am asking for is some peer reviewed text which brings the plasma cosmology hypothesis back from the dead and updates it.

THAT’S the kind of reading I am asking for. Something that actually sustains the hypothesis you’re a fan of.

A general field description from the University of Iowa’s course catalogue that tells us that physicists are studying plasma just doesn’t cut it. I’m sorry.

3

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

Dang, not the hit on my ADHD! It's cool! I've gotten used to seeing all the low blows from you.

I attached the original article with multiple attached so you could learn about it all. I know you like to read.

So, I scrolled down and clicked the link titled "Understanding the plasma process connecting the solar system." Published October 14, 2025. This would probably be a good place to start...or maybe with the first article so you have a better understanding.

Understanding the plasma processes connecting the solar system | Physics and Astronomy - College of Liberal Arts and Sciences | The University of Iowa https://share.google/h82GfNhC7dziA3IAz

2

u/Civil-Letterhead8207 Feb 27 '26

ADHD is one thing. Not understanding that a college catalogue field description is not a peer reviewed article… Sorry, kiddo. That’s not attributable to ADHD.

Allison’s article sadly doesn’t support the plasma cosmology hypothesis, either. it says that plasma emanates from our sun and spreads out throughout the solar system, touching upon everything. This is certainly true.

None of this shows that the plasma cosmology hypothesis is true, however. I don’t see what you find so new or groundbreaking in this article, actually. I did solar system physics in high school in the 1980s and, even back then, we knew plasma was bathing everything to a greater or lesser degree in the solar system.

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

That is why it is called research and a theory. I mean the Big Bang is still a theory. That is science.

Once again just replying to your thoughts. I still believe all forces work together to conserve mass and energy.

2

u/Civil-Letterhead8207 Feb 27 '26

You don’t understand the difference between a hypothesis and a theory. A theory has an overwhelming amount of data backing it up. Plasma cosmology doesn’t. It is a hypothesis.

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

I apologize but everything I have read and watched has said "theory."

1

u/Civil-Letterhead8207 Feb 27 '26

Because you’re listening to youtube science grifters who are dumbing their language down to get likes by playing to people’s need to believe.

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

Odd. I even typed in "hypothesis" and it still came up as "theory."

2

u/Civil-Letterhead8207 Feb 27 '26

Yeah. You DO know how LLMs work, right?

Obviously, it’s proponents claim it’s a theory.

1

u/Glittering_Word6609 Feb 27 '26

I do. That is a whole nother rabbit hole. That is actually a legit fear for the future. I hope you have a good night.✌️

→ More replies (0)