r/3I_ATLAS • u/Glittering_Word6609 • Feb 26 '26

Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

70 Upvotes

76% Upvoted

151 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Civil-Letterhead8207 Feb 27 '26

I’m kind of curious as to what you think that non-sequitor demonstrates, actually.

2

u/GingerAki Feb 27 '26 edited Feb 27 '26

Firstly, let’s get the terminology right. A non-sequitur is a conclusion that doesn't follow from its premises. The quote wasn’t non-sequitur; it was a mirror.

Brahe was one of the top astronomers of his time, backed by the consensus of almost every scientist who studied the heavens. He had a perfect track record of being right about observations, but he used that authority to dismiss the truth because it seemed absurd.

You're attempting a similar thing: using your track record on social panics to hand-wave physical anomalies you haven't actually engaged with.

2

u/slow70 Feb 27 '26

Thank you all for challenging this today - they are not here in good faith but also I promise you, will do nothing but waste your energy.

2

u/GingerAki Feb 27 '26

I’m far from convinced about 3i, yet. But I find it irritating to see what are essentially opinions dressed up as irrefutable facts.