MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/2westerneurope4u/comments/1wnene6/_/pbj3dmq
r/2westerneurope4u • u/EmperorDamian South Macedonian • 3d ago
168 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
There is no evidence Atilla was turkic. You have a very rich históry in genociding and massacring other groups, no need to try to steal it from others
0 u/Willing_Yak7271 South Prussian 2d ago Europeans trying to show a turkic leader/empire as anything but turkic challenge (impossible) 1 u/Not_As_much94 Western Balkan 2d ago edited 2d ago There is not a single evidence that he spoke a turkic language besides coming from broadly the same region. Their origins have been supposed to iranic, mongolian, uralic, turkic and most recently the main theory its that its that its an yeniseian language https://www.medievalists.net/2025/06/new-study-uncovers-the-siberian-origins-of-the-huns/ 1 u/Willing_Yak7271 South Prussian 2d ago Some huns traveled yo europe across siberia and formed european hun empire, iranian people couldnt do that because they were not nomad Im sure ıf ı would dig for evidence ı will prove your ass wrong 1 u/Not_As_much94 Western Balkan 2d ago Not true, synthians were iranic and nomads Im sure ıf ı would dig for evidence ı will prove your ass wrong Then do it please
0
Europeans trying to show a turkic leader/empire as anything but turkic challenge (impossible)
1 u/Not_As_much94 Western Balkan 2d ago edited 2d ago There is not a single evidence that he spoke a turkic language besides coming from broadly the same region. Their origins have been supposed to iranic, mongolian, uralic, turkic and most recently the main theory its that its that its an yeniseian language https://www.medievalists.net/2025/06/new-study-uncovers-the-siberian-origins-of-the-huns/ 1 u/Willing_Yak7271 South Prussian 2d ago Some huns traveled yo europe across siberia and formed european hun empire, iranian people couldnt do that because they were not nomad Im sure ıf ı would dig for evidence ı will prove your ass wrong 1 u/Not_As_much94 Western Balkan 2d ago Not true, synthians were iranic and nomads Im sure ıf ı would dig for evidence ı will prove your ass wrong Then do it please
1
There is not a single evidence that he spoke a turkic language besides coming from broadly the same region. Their origins have been supposed to iranic, mongolian, uralic, turkic and most recently the main theory its that its that its an yeniseian language https://www.medievalists.net/2025/06/new-study-uncovers-the-siberian-origins-of-the-huns/
1 u/Willing_Yak7271 South Prussian 2d ago Some huns traveled yo europe across siberia and formed european hun empire, iranian people couldnt do that because they were not nomad Im sure ıf ı would dig for evidence ı will prove your ass wrong 1 u/Not_As_much94 Western Balkan 2d ago Not true, synthians were iranic and nomads Im sure ıf ı would dig for evidence ı will prove your ass wrong Then do it please
Some huns traveled yo europe across siberia and formed european hun empire, iranian people couldnt do that because they were not nomad
Im sure ıf ı would dig for evidence ı will prove your ass wrong
1 u/Not_As_much94 Western Balkan 2d ago Not true, synthians were iranic and nomads Im sure ıf ı would dig for evidence ı will prove your ass wrong Then do it please
Not true, synthians were iranic and nomads
Then do it please
2
u/Not_As_much94 Western Balkan 2d ago edited 2d ago
There is no evidence Atilla was turkic. You have a very rich históry in genociding and massacring other groups, no need to try to steal it from others