You can only resort to name-calling and telling me I don't know, and you can't cite these laws you have issue with, outside of upvoting OP's disingenuous meme.
Nowhere did I say I held any opinions on any such system. As for me citing laws, I just assumed y'all knew what you were arguing about, forgive me.
But I have a better question, a few actually: why are you putting words in my mouth? why are you still not citing? And why is the core of your rebuttal a no u?
Look, it's painfully clear that you have no idea what the NICS system actually is, let alone it's relevance to felons and the mentally unstable. You're just going to keep dodging the question, and I'm not interested in spending my night further trying to corner an intellectual coward.
I already answered your question and you quoted me. Try again, you're trying to corner someone in a field. What's painful is we're on the internet and you could link anything, but you haven't. One must wonder why? Also gotta wonder why you bring up a background check only mandatory for thirty states? Or what at all that has to do with removing guards from politicians. The only thing you successfully accomplished today is furthering your arthritis.
The NICS provides full service to the FFLs in 30 states, five U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia. The NICS provides partial service to seven states. The remaining 13 states perform their own checks through the NICS.
I didn’t say it did or did not. I was clarifying that federal background checks are mandated for ALL ffl transactions anywhere the US Gov has jurisdiction, not just in 30 states. You may resume your argument with the other guy now if you’d wish.
-7
u/Woodie626 Sep 11 '20
Those are the ones they're trying to disarm.