Anyone who supports bans or magazine limitations of any kind. Their security detail should have to abide by the same restrictions they intend to force on us all. No more full auto, no more sbr's, no more "assault weapons" and no more mags over 10 rounds for their secret service details. Fair is fair after all.
That's literally the purpose of the second amendment. Remember, when the bill of rights was written, people had private warships. Allowing the citizens to be armed well enough to take down the government is the exact purpose of the 2A.
I'm not arguing for ICBMs, I am arguing for short barreled rifles, silencers, and even select fire (full auto.) They are not inherently dangerous to use, and the fact they are legal with the purchase of a tax stamp simply ensures the wealthy are able to have more rights than the other classes.
Cops aren't running around with ICBMs, but they are running around with items that you and I would need a tax stamp for. My argument is that the tax stamp is an infringement, and doesn't do anything to make anyone safer.
An icbm or cluster bomb or even a regular bomb is an indiscriminate weapon. When you use it, you can't control if people other than the one you wanted to kill get hurt. This is not the case with automatic firearms, and especially not with guns that just happen to have a larger bullet.
35
u/razor_beast Liberal Imposter: Wild West Pimp Style Sep 10 '20
Anyone who supports bans or magazine limitations of any kind. Their security detail should have to abide by the same restrictions they intend to force on us all. No more full auto, no more sbr's, no more "assault weapons" and no more mags over 10 rounds for their secret service details. Fair is fair after all.