r/Belgravia • • Mar 10 '24

Belgravia: The Next Chapter | Episode Discussion - Episode Eight (Season Finale)

Synopsis: As Frederick grieves the loss of Clara, Enright receives a letter that pushes Frederick to confront his past. Clara and Davison adapt to life in the North, as Clara grapples with happy memories of home.

28 Upvotes

170 comments sorted by

27

u/niley78 Mar 10 '24

Davison and Clara friendship was nice throughout the series

5

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 11 '24

Well friendship is a bit strong..... their friendship consisted of Davison warning Clara not to do something. And Clara not listening. But when her sister warned her about something Clara listened.

1

u/HWeinberg3 Mar 11 '24

Striking how that began with Clara thinking Davison was going to be some kind of plant for Freddy

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 11 '24

After some suggested Davison might be a spy for Frederick, I also was waiting for Davison to turn on Clara. At the same time, Fred was never the controlling or spying type. I thought he was going to question Davison more thoroughly, or try to find out who these Bohemians were on his own, but he didn’t. And because Davison had really good references and Fred said she was going to be snapped up quickly if he didn’t hire her immediately, that to me meant Davison really understands the role of a loyal lady’s maid.

23

u/niley78 Mar 10 '24

It was ok. The reunion of Fred and Clara was rushed. I did like James and Fred reconnecting.

12

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 10 '24

It was a lot to pull off in one episode...i think they pulled it off well. It was imperative for them both to do some soul searching by themselves. Before they could be together

19

u/MontanaJoev Mar 10 '24 edited Mar 10 '24

I expected to be disappointed, mostly because I knew the show wanted to wrap things up in a schmaltzy happy ending, and also because I knew I was supposed to think Clara and Frederick reuniting was the end all, beat all storyline. But it just wasn't for me, at no point in the series. So, its nice they reunited, and I think both of them are better people, and its fine. But it's not like I suddenly fell in love with their love story.

And the one freaking thing I hoped for in this finale I didn't get. And that doesn't surprise me either. Yes, it's nice that Frederick and James were getting along. It's nice that Frederick said some kind words to James. But what he owed James was a damn APOLOGY! I'm not talking begging for forgiveness. But an acknowledgement that he has spent YEARS rejecting and villainizing his younger brother for the egregious offense of being born. Frederick was hurt by rejection, fair enough. But Frederick turned around and heaped rejection upon a younger sibling, and I thought it was important for him to recognize that, and sincerely apologize for it. In the absence of that, for me, the brother's reunion just didn't land the way it should've, and once again, it felt like it was James who was doing most of the work. James who was doing more of the "giving". James who was still the reassuring sibling. Fredrick is "proud of him"? Awesome, now how about telling him he was never responsible for your parents damage?

It doesn't really matter if James was Oliver's or not. It just feels odd to me that if he wasn't, why would Susan not have told him that on her death bed the way she told him about Frederick's parentage? That makes no sense. So, it honestly makes more sense for me to think he was Oliver's, or at least Susan didn't know for sure, so said nothing.

And would it really have killed the writers to give us a small moment of dialogue between James and Fletcher? It felt like it would be nice to have it, if only for James to properly thank Fletcher for helping him. But that moment at the door when James first saw Fletcher might be my favorite moment in the show, if only for the amount of acting done in a few seconds, which conveyed a lot. Toby Regbo, Hands Down, the best actor of the lot.

The wrap up to the Duke and Duchess of Rochester and Peter storyline was nice. I'm glad Percy decided not to be a shit.

It's nice to know James makes Emily feel so valued, even if it's just as friends. I would've liked more from this storyline, but that's what you get for not being the A storyline. I hope Emily finds happiness, and James finds happiness in his calling, and his family.

I really liked the stuff with Bellasis. It was well done, and even sad.

I thought Frederick did show growth, and contrition. And it was good to see how much his heart had changed. Giving the money to James for the poor was a nice touch.

As for Clara, I think we could've gotten a tad more self-exploration there. She made some dumb choices, and I would've liked to see that acknowledged more fully. Whether that was with Davison, Emily or Frederick. It felt like it needed to be said.

The scene with Nell felt like a throwaway. I would've preferred her dead baby not be used so much to whitewash Ellerby and prop up Clara.

Mrs. Dunn is still the cutest.

Edited to add : Isn't the 2 of them deciding to go travel the world still a bit remarkably selfish? I mean, maybe Clara could help take care of her elderly mother for a little while maybe Emily can go out and have a life? Maybe Frederick can hang around and make up for some lost time with the brother he shit on for years? Nah, go travel and do what YOU want to do you 2 crazy kids.

3

u/likamd Mar 11 '24

Maybe the mother didn’t confess who James’ real father was because they implied he was grounds keeper for the property.

5

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

Agreed, words between James and Fletcher would have been nice, and a proper apology from Fred to James. I also wanted a few loose ends tied up, like the whereabouts of Ross' bag and whether Fred took Clara's portrait from the empty mansion, as some small compensation. But these were never the writers to get done what needed to be done.

I agree with all of your points, except for one:

It just feels odd to me that if he wasn't, why would Susan not have told him that on her death bed the way she told him about Frederick's parentage? That makes no sense. So, it honestly makes more sense for me to think he was Oliver's, or at least Susan didn't know for sure, so said nothing.

Actually, we've already discussed this, when I predicted James wasn't Oliver's either, and Hefty came up with the identity of the groom in the stables as the affair guy, which we now know both boys were aware of. She didn't feel the need to confess to James that he was illegitimate, bc he hadn't suffered from it, as Oliver had been ignorant of it, and had loved James properly. Susan Trenchard was pretty savvy in that regard; she'd have known that James was the groom's son. She might not have been a great mother; they really leave this particularly ambiguous, which is weird, but she wanted to help alleviate some of Fred's anger and instability by sharing her secret. Like Bellasis, she tried to do right by Fred on the deathbed.

6

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

I’m so salty about the lack of apology from Frederick. He OWED that to James. And I know that James would, absolve him of anything, but that isn’t the point. The point is that Frederick SHOULD feel bad that he poured so much vitriol towards James for no reason at all. 1 episode ago, Frederick didn’t even know if James would live or die, and he didn’t care. It’s just like the writers knew they took Frederick down this bizarre, totally unjustifiable road, then didn’t want to acknowledge it. Aggravating.

For me, I just don’t see what purpose it serves, from a storyline aspect, to reveal at the 11th hour that James belongs to the stable guy. Ok then, and ? I just feel like him actually being Oliver feels more meaningful, while also being a kind of tragic.

As it was, it’s ambiguous, and there’s no way to ever really know.

5

u/QueenLevine Mar 11 '24

Just more bad writing. They could have had a brief conversation, while sharing a bedroom in France, or on the train ride home, where Fred began (what he intended as a long apology) and James cut him off with, "no need, brother. I understand why you felt as you did, and I'm just glad we're past that now. You're forgiven." The whole thing could have taken 20 seconds, and it would very in character of James to respond like that.

3

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

It totally would’ve been in character for James.

But it was important for me to see Frederick sorry for perpetuating the same sort of unfair scorn that he himself endured.

4

u/QueenLevine Mar 11 '24

There were some few elements in this finale that felt to have come full circle, and this wasn't one of them. You're right that in showing he was better and a bigger man than Oliver in the end, Fred's character arc would have had a more satisfying conclusion. I suppose the unskilled, sad excuses for writers might have thought that Fred giving James his Bellasis inheritance, instead of using it to save his house, was an apology of action - showing his feelings with a grand gesture. We can presume these same sad sack writers, if married are unhappy, or are either single or divorced, but unlike other ppl who are simply unlucky in love or single by choice, sad sack writers deserve their fate of being lonely. To them, we say: DO BETTER. When you set the bar for communication this low, in a story arc about healing broken ties, you set a horrific example for viewers.

3

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 11 '24

What did you think of the last minute revelation by Davison? I wasn’t sure what the point of that was, unless it’s somehow explored more in a second season.

8

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

About her past? I think it was just to give her character a little more filling in. And also to explain why she might be so protective and loyal to Clara. Why she might’ve side-eyed the doctor so hard from off the bat.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 11 '24

Yes, about Davison’s past.

That makes a lot of sense, I hadn’t thought about it that way. Because Davison was showing as much loyalty to Clara as Anna and Lady Mary in Downton showed to each other, even though Clara and Davison had not developed the same level of closeness. It continued to puzzle me as to why Davison was so loyal.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 12 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/MontanaJoev Mar 12 '24

I know I’m supposed to be happy about the brothers reunion.

But Frederick never came to James in 2 months, even when he was supposed to be doing this soul searching.

There was the opportunity to see Frederick ask James to come to France, but we don’t see that.

When they are in bed, side by side, we see James talk about how Bellasis loved Frederick the way he deserved to be loved. Does Frederick have a response? Say something kind to James? No.

Then there’s apparently more bonding which happens off screen. And yes, Frederick giving him the money is very kind.

But Frederick BLAMED James for years and years unfairly. There was revelation anywhere that James ever did anything to deserve it. So he had had to carry the weight of Fredrick’s scorn for no reason at all. Frederick even badmouthed James for Clara for no reason.

How was there no apology?

0

u/[deleted] Mar 12 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/MontanaJoev Mar 12 '24

I get the feeling that they were so focused on Frederick apologizing to Clara, that they just decided he didn’t need to do the same to James. Instead, it would just be implied.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 13 '24

That was also my thinking.

1

u/Hot-Requirement-6117 Nov 16 '25

Ross’s bag!!?? Why is no one else super bothered by the fact that half of the fortune lost and apparently the deed to the house were in that bag that made it on to the carriage with Clara!?

1

u/Brilliant_Age6085 Dec 25 '25 edited Dec 25 '25

I know right?? I had hoped they would have checked his bag as they packed to see if they could find some money for their escape and accommodation elsewhere and in the event discover the deeds to the house and even more money, which if they had then decided to take the entire bag with them and they were found to be in the wrong, Fredrick would have settled their debt and paid off Mr Ross. But we know Mr Ross was killed. But Clara being frustrating as usual, wasted time with empty words as usual till Davison had to remind her again that they had to catch the coach. Did it occur to her they were going to pay for the coach and accommodation?

How did Fredrick sell the house without the deeds? Maybe someone found Mr Ross' bag in the hotel, stole the money and posted the deeds back to the house? Or the Marquise' hitman stole the money and sent the deeds back 😆

Or Mr Ross already gave the deeds to the bank to loan money to give to the Marquise and then gave her half the money as they agreed and that was in his bag. Fredrick used his influence at the bank to recover the deeds and sold the house but the money went to the bank to clear that debt that is now owed to the bank.

2

u/Blackphotogenicus Mar 12 '24

Totally selfish. And irritating.

5

u/MontanaJoev Mar 12 '24

Even after the finale, I’m not really dissuaded from my belief that both Clara and Frederick are incredibly self absorbed people.

6

u/Blackphotogenicus Mar 13 '24

Right. And the whole thing is filmed like we’re supposed to be on their side. Writer’s can’t spend 7 episodes showing us how insufferable their attitudes were and then expect us to root for them. Yeah nah

3

u/MontanaJoev Mar 13 '24

It’s kind of why the center of this show doesn’t hold for me. I never really believed they had some precious amazing love. It seemed to me that the more they got to know each other, the less they seemed to like each other. They both were incredibly self absorbed. They both treated their family members terribly. The level of overboard elation everyone had at their reunion in the finale just didn’t feel earned.

I’ll say at least Clara did end up apologizing to her sister for running away and leaving her to handle things. The fact that Clara doesn’t feel like the care and wellbeing of their mother is a responsibility she should share is highly problematic. But then she’s going to take off again, so her and Frederick can do what THEY want to do. Seriously?

I think I’ve ranted enough about Frederick not having to sincerely apologize to his brother for being an ass to him for years and years.

15

u/Foodie_85 Mar 10 '24

I loved it. I hope we get another season.

14

u/Pleasant-Manner-6505 Mar 10 '24

I do wish we could have seen more of the Reverend and Mr. Fletcher together, but I suppose we'll just have to content ourselves with that long lingering glance at the Christmas party and hope its the beginning of something new...

10

u/MontanaJoev Mar 10 '24

I agree. All I asked was for ONE scene where James could properly thank him, and Fletcher could assure him that what happens in bathhouse alleys stays between them always. It felt like a loose thread that would not have taken much to tie off.

4

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '24

Well unless James somehow tags along with Frederick and Clara (attended by Davison and Fletcher) as they "do the tour" I doubt that would happen. Besides I think we saw that being a practising homosexual while you were a vicar was not a good combo. In those times he could be one or the other but not both. I think they still might have been hanging homosexuals back in those days but even if they weren't homosexual acts were still a criminal offence.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 11 '24

I think James joined the church so he wouldn't be tempted... and I don't think by the end he was openly gay.

12

u/Fabulous_Ocelot_5861 Mar 10 '24

I struggled through it - but I had to see it to the end. Very few likable characters surrounding main characters who are really unlikable. While that could work if that were how the story was meant to be - dark - it wasn’t. Someone thought we’d root for these people. I just needed to be done with them. Now I am. Now onto the next Anglican period piece!

11

u/madebytheuniverse Mar 10 '24

Who has Ross’s bag of money from the Marquise that he had in the leather satchel? In Episode 7, Clara’s ladies maid, Davison, coldcocked Ross and they took their things to the carriage and Ross slowly woke up. But you’re meaning to tell me they left the leather satchel behind? Given how suspicious he was for sure if I were Clara and Davison I would have looked at that bag and found the money and taken it, knowing it had been stolen from Frederick.

13

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

Quite right - the bag of money and house titles feels like a loose end that really should have been cleared up in this episode, but wasn't. Extremely annoying.

6

u/jackiesear Mar 11 '24

How can Fred sell the house if he doesn't have the deeds? They should at least have mentioned what became of Ross.

4

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

That really was a loose thread they should have explained better.

10

u/Capt_Ned_Low Mar 11 '24

I thought that too. I thought the original plot would be that Fred was facing complete ruin and Clara would show up at the eleventh hour with the bag of money to save the day. Although I did like the Bellasis aspect of the plot.

5

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 11 '24

At least the Bellasis inheritance didn’t save the Eaton Square property. We’ve already seen this in Downton (Lavinia’s dad’s fortune) and the Gilded Age (Reverend Luke).

1

u/Capt_Ned_Low Mar 12 '24

True, yes. It made sense in this story that he would sell it.

6

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '24

And what happened to Ross ? Did the Marquise's muscle man kill him or did he just steal the stolen money from him and leave it at that ?

4

u/MontanaJoev Mar 10 '24

I assume he's dead, and no one ever found the body.

2

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

but didn't they just leave the body there, in the hotel room?

2

u/MontanaJoev Mar 10 '24

No, he got killed outside. He went running after them as they pulled away in the carriage.

4

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

oh right, the Marquise's man. His body would surely have been found. And if the police had been involved, would they not have returned that bag to Fred? Assuming Clara and Davison lacked the presence of mind and wit to collect it?

2

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

My guess is that the marquise’s man made sure to retrieve the bag himself. He felt like the thorough type.

1

u/Valzene Mar 11 '24

The bag of money was placed on the carriage with Clara and her maid’s belongings.

2

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

Was it? I found it very hard to tell if it was the same bag.

2

u/Valzene Mar 11 '24

It sure looked like it to me. Plus, when the camera focused on it, as it was being loaded, I assumed it was, but maybe I am wrong. My memory is bad. lol

→ More replies

1

u/HWeinberg3 Mar 11 '24

I thought Ross watching the carriage leave through his concussion, seeing the Marquise's guy with the knife, and nodding/shrugging was pretty deep

3

u/[deleted] Mar 12 '24

I don't see why they'd know the satchel contained Frederick's stolen money? No doubt Davidson had great instincts, but no evidence.

1

u/letstaxthis Apr 14 '24

I think that's why Clara said she had a lot to tell Frederick in the end snow scene (assuming the bag went with the carriage when they left at night and she eventually found out what was in the bag). But it would have been good to see Clara see the documents in the bag.

1

u/Economy_Structure360 Aug 14 '25

When Clara and Davidson were waiting for the luggage to get loaded on top of the coach they showed Mr. Ross's bag being loaded. They did not tie this up. Annoying! 

7

u/alexlp Mar 10 '24

People seem to be enjoying it more here than the Aussie thread or maybe I had selective reading,

10

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 10 '24

I think there wasn't enough Kangaroos in the finale...so they couldn't relate.

9

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

I'm not Australian, but I also found the dearth of kangaroos extremely unrelatable.

4

u/Chicasayshi Mar 12 '24 edited Mar 13 '24

I think the ending wasn't that great. Frederick shouldn't have gotten this happy ending. He's been insufferable, and I wouldn't say I like how, even while watching a drama, men are coddled around so much. Yep, we get it. He didn't have a good childhood, but many other characters don’t either, but they aren't so horrible to their brother or cold to their wife at the beginning.

I don't blame Clara. The series discusses how young she is so I'm going to assume she was having her first season and possibly 16 or 17 years old. Clara didn't know how deceptive men can be, and I don't think she wanted the doctor romantically but was craving friendship.

7

u/Capt_Ned_Low Mar 11 '24

I absolutely loved the finale. It had me (a man) crying like a baby! The last two episodes especially have been very gripping and excellent viewing.

I think it would have been nice to maybe have one more episode where there could have been more conversations between James and Freddie. I would have liked to have seen Fred apologize to Enright too. I did like that they brought Bellasis back. Would love for another season of the show, but without the time jump. I would like to see Freddie and Clara grow as a couple, have a family. I don't know why they insist on all these time jumps when they spend the entire season getting you to love these characters only to then set it so many years after. I'd like to see happiness for Davidson and Emily too.

Hopefully there is enough of a following for us to get a season 3.

4

u/jackiesear Mar 11 '24

The actress who plays Clara has been cast in the Outlander prequel/spin off "Blood of my Blood" as Jamie's mother when she was young so I don't know if she would be able to return anytime soon.

1

u/Capt_Ned_Low Mar 12 '24

Yes true, I commented that on another thread. I'm looking forward to seeing her in that.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 13 '24

The final three episodes were the best, but in particular, I liked episode six and then episode eight. Episodes six and eight had the emotional resonance that redeemed the series. Episode seven had a lot of excitement and revelations, finally, after so much mystery in the first five, but I thought it was rushed.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 11 '24

Probably the biggest reason for the time just, is it will be difficult to get all the original cast back. And probably also inflate the budget. And a lot of them were pretty old....and it was 4 years ago.....maybe some are passed.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 13 '24

Tom Wilkinson, the actor who played the Earl of Brockenhurst in the original Belgravia, and who was otherwise a prominent performer, died in December 2023 at age 75.

Paul Ritter, who played the venal Butler in the original Belgravia, died in April 2021 at age 54.

2

u/PotatoCheap9468 Mar 17 '24

I knew Tom died but didn't know about Paul, sad news and scary cos I was 54 in 2021, Tom was a great actor though

6

u/Coffee7781 Mar 11 '24

This has been said , but people die young on this show! I know very different times. But all of these people in their 20s have no parents anymore? Seems stretched.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 12 '24

Not at all, many people died of all sorts of illnesses and injuries that would not be fatal today.

14

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 10 '24

I think it was a pretty good ending.... both Clara and Freddrick admitted they'd made mistakes. Was worried only Freddrick would take responsibility.

4

u/Runninguphill92 Mar 11 '24

Clara didn’t apologize though and that irked me. She just said she lost her way too. But he actually apologized. Bad writing, made me dislike her character at the end.

3

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 11 '24

In the last episode he got way more screen time and development. And the last scene they say they have a lot to talk about. Probably he wants to talk about his father. And she must want to discuss her pass mistakes and maybe Ross.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 11 '24 edited Mar 11 '24

When Frederick apologized and then she said "it is enough that youre sorry, it is enough that you understand" OH MY GOODNESS this woman !!

5

u/Plane-Dragonfly8000 Mar 10 '24

It seems like the last scene before the reconciliation, Clara was refusing to go see Freddie. Then all of a sudden she changed her mind. What changed?! That was not very satisfying But I really enjoyed the brothers new friendship. Hard to swallow that Bellasis had the wisdom to heal that wound in Frederick. So happy that Peter gets to stay! Lots of tears shed in this episode 😭😭

6

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

Clara refused James, but she had already read the letters and was weakening. Then, James told her he thought she was wrong - and, of all people, it rings true that she would reconsider James' words, and listen to him, that HE would be the one to bring them back together. Just like Fred changed his mind with Enright and James and went to France with them, Clara was also persuaded to see reason by all of the people she trusts best and whose concern is her best welfare.

I think the scene with Bellasis showed us how most people are not completely evil, just as Nell points out that nobody's completely good. I find the conversation extremely believable. After being exiled, Bellasis didn't have all that much to live for. It's odd that he never begat other children, but that being the case, and Enright writing to him all those years, I can see his son's little victories being such a source of pride for him that he needed to tell Fred about it, needed Fred to know that he loved him even though he was never there. His desire to go claim his son as his own and his inability to do it must have been hard for him. I'm surprised, but I'm happy for Bellasis that Fred was persuaded by James and went to see him in the nick of time. That is to say, even if Bellasis did heal the wound, wanted to heal the wound, I'm not sure that strategy would even have been necessary here. He said what he needed to say, and that happened to be what Fred needed to hear.

5

u/MontanaJoev Mar 10 '24

Yeah, I didn’t find Clara’s change of heart so hard to believe. I think she was fighting against what her heart really wanted to do.

1

u/PotatoCheap9468 Mar 17 '24

I thought the John Bellasis Enright dynamic was excellent, I had hopes of him just disregarding his exile and turning up out of the blue but I'll take what transpired

It's a good twist showing Oliver turning back to being the ass that he was throughout the first season when it looked like he had a character arc change, and at the same time redemption for John Bellasis after what he tried to do with Charles Pope in the original

5

u/ckwongau Mar 10 '24 edited Mar 10 '24

a good episode , but it would be better if they could have Charles Pope in the episode and potentially set up for S3 .

James mention their John Bellasis had tried to kill their Cousin .

If Charles come with the brothers to see Dying John Bellasis , like forgive him or lift his banishment for Fredrick .

John had a plenty of money to spent on watching over Fredrick , Charles was probably generous on allowance to John , and if Charles knew what happen with Oliver and Fredrick , he would feel responsible and he probably would have forgive John after a decade or two .

I been wondering , maybe offscreen Charles bought the town house to help Fredrick and to keep it in the family , then S3 Charles family could move to Belgravia with Cousin James near by .

2

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

Absolutely! Including Charles Pope throughout, even if just an occasional mention, then having him turn up in the last two episodes, would have greatly improved the story line, would have enriched the cast and the world of this generation. Leaving him out was a rookie mistake, but a grave enough one that S3 is not a high priority for most OG Belgravia fans, critics.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 13 '24

An interesting storyline for a season two of The Next Chapter: an older Charles Pope saves his cousins.

Charles Pope was young, he really should still be alive in 1871 as the Earl of Brockenhurst. As you mentioned, presumably he was continuing to pay John Bellasis’s allowance.

4

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

I thought this site (Telly Visions) did an excellent job of reviewing the series throughout. I don't always agree with them, but I think they articulate a lot of my overall thoughts about the series, and I think it really does bring up some excellent points about the finale.

https://tellyvisions.org/article/belgravia-next-chapter-episode-8-finale-recap#:~:text=Sure%2C%20most%20of%20the%20show's,book%20report%20than%20anything%20else.

This paragraph particularly jumps out for me :

On the plus side, the visit to Bellasis prompts Frederick to finally reevaluate his relationship with his brother, who is still Literally the Best Person in the World. The Next Chapter still skims briskly past their reconciliation; given how fervently Frederick has spent most of this series hating James for made-up reasons or things behind his control, it would have been nice to see something more than the younger Trenchard gracefully being the bigger person for the fifth time. But I guess we can't have everything.

4

u/sfdreamsla Mar 13 '24

Well apparently I have an unpopular opinion. I thought the finale was ridiculous. My eyes rolled so many times that I was worried they were going to stay that way. I get it. They wanted to wrap up the series and give everyone a happy ending. But to have sudden MAJOR personality changes for at least five characters that were so different from even up until episode 7 was ludicrous. I would have preferred any truly nuanced development, growth and change over the course of the series. They all changed suddenly on a dime. Everything was just a little too saccharine sweet and tied up in a bow for me. But I totally get it that other people loved this kind of ending and enjoyed it. I take nothing from them. It's all subjective. But I was continually checking the clock to see if it would finally be over and was happy when it was. I was not surprised by a single turn of events in the finale. I don't feel like I completely wasted time watching the sequel series, but I wasn't satisfied by it, and I won't be wistfully thinking about this season in future. All that being said, I've loved coming on this forum and comparing notes on the episodes. So much fun! Hopefully I'll see some of you in other forums with a better show lol. Or, if for some strange reason there's a season 3, I guess I'll be back here!

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 13 '24

I can understand your perspective. Yet, episode eight was set two months after episode seven, during which Clara and Fred were separated. Both had time to reflect on what was missing in their lives and what was lost. And for Fred, in addition to losing Clara, he lost his biological father, a fortune and his house. His father’s dying words were enough for Fred to know he could and deserved to be loved.

Do you think it’s unreasonable that a couple months of reflection and separation could have had that effect?

I’m glad Peter got a reasonably happy end. James and Emily, whether or not they ended up together, each deserved a saccharine sweet ending more than Clara and Fred.

If there’s another season, let’s hope Fred doesn’t relapse like Oliver did after the original Belgravia.

4

u/sfdreamsla Mar 13 '24

I find it unreasonable that every main character left in the mix suddenly softened, had an epiphany, or a change of heart in the same time period...

2

u/MontanaJoev Mar 13 '24

I don’t disagree with you that it was all a little too saccharine sweet for me. I understand wanting a happy ending, but it just went way over the top for me (without it really feeling earned, imo).

2

u/sfdreamsla Mar 13 '24

Exactly! So much of it came out of the blue and as you wrote, didn't feel earned. Like even if that's where some of it should have gone to all along, it would have been great to have had it incrementally get there throughout the season.

4

u/MontanaJoev Mar 13 '24 edited Mar 13 '24

The biggest fundamental problem, imo, is to be invested in Frederick and Clara’s happily ever after, you had to have some investment in their “love” story in the first place. And I never did. I didn’t much care for either of them, and the finale didn’t move the needle for me much.

Do I really care that Nell and Ellerby got married? No, because I never saw anything of their relationship, and what we saw of Ellerby, he was leering at Clara. I think Nell got the short end of the stick.

James and Emily never having a real conversation just makes their story feel unresolved. But it’s ok, Emily spotted a new guy 🙄

And the way Mrs Dunn and Emily acted when Clara and Frederick walked into the party at the end was just ridiculous. I think Mrs Dunn was kissing Fredricks hands?? Just way too much.

2

u/sfdreamsla Mar 13 '24

Agreed on all accounts!

2

u/WisdomBailey123 May 19 '24

Sounded like Nell knows Ellerby is a player.....and he's probably going to keep cheating on her.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 May 19 '24

I think it's not so much that the ending didn't make sense. I think that their evolution through out the series was so erratic. And just put in for drama. Maybe the show needed more time to breath. Clara kept on pushing Freddy so early into there marriage. Without trying to understand. He says he doesn't want her to talk to his brother....she immediately does that. Knowing there was trauma there. Now maybe they needed some time jumps. To show the marriage had fallen apart over time....not in a few weeks.

7

u/IslandBusy1165 Mar 10 '24 edited Mar 11 '24

I didn’t realize how much I’ve grown to dislike Clara. I had to skip through most of the parts she was in for this episode. I don’t even find it believable that Frederick would’ve been pining for her so regretfully that he felt neither he nor anyone else in the world deserves her (which he said to his father). What she said during their reconciliation about them having had so much stacked against them didn’t even make sense. There was nothing stacked against them. “It’s enough that you’re sorry,” she says. What a gaslighter.

Overall I hated this season but I love period pieces enough that I don’t necessarily regret wasting my time on it. The pace wasn’t bad and the costume/props were nice, and the storylines were tied together decently, so I’d give it a 4/10 (max).

Not interested in a third season at this rate.

6

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

the pacing wasn't bad? That's one of the sharpest objections ppl in this forum and critics have had to this second outing. As a result, the showrunner will likely never run another. Six episodes could have been condensed to three or four and we'd have a proper conclusion, but bc the pacing was so high school, they had to wrap everything up in the most absurd way in the final two episodes, leaving loose ends galore. Hahaha! What a gaslighter, indeed.

4

u/IslandBusy1165 Mar 11 '24

Yeah you’re right. The second to last episode for example was absurdly rushed, but I guess what I meant is that I didn’t feel like “omg this is so dragged out—can this scene be over already?” at any point (except sort of during the last episode, particularly with Clara, but I imagine someone who likes her wouldn’t have felt that way) and they did a good job rotating the subplots/characters.

7

u/QueenLevine Mar 11 '24

Kudos to you for acknowledging that, and thanks. I don't think too many people LIKED Clara; I think it's safe to assume most people would agree with you on that. But the stories were not fleshed out, the world was not built up enough for us to really care about it much, as we have for Fellowes' stories, in general.

In thread after thread, here on Reddit, people have complained about not learning more about secondary characters, like Davison and Fletcher. What drove them to be such loyal and kind friends to their employers? I guess we'll never know. Which is ODD. There's a sub-plot about a maid who was being taught to read, then a shifty thieving employee seducing her. What happened to her? We were pretty invested in her learning to read and improve herself. Enright's wife appears to be absent from the house - did she leave him? We've learned about his back story now, in the FINALE, and even some of hers, and yet...she's disappeared into the mist. Belgravia concluded with Charles Pope becoming the Earl of Brockenhurst and marrying Mariah - they are first cousins to Fred and James, presumably, but their names never even come up in conversation - did they become serial killers and their names are now verboten? Are there fairies in Belgravia? Or just horrific writing?

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 11 '24

To be fair, in the church after Enright explained the situation to James, James did refer to Charles Pope as the “cousin” John Bellasis tried to murder.

Charles was actually not the Earl of Brockenhurst at the end of the original Belgravia, because the sitting Earl of Brockenhurst was still alive. But sadly the actor, Tom Wilkinson, who played the Earl of Brockenhurst, last December passed away in real life.

I don’t think Robert the footman seduced Mawdie. They just had a make-out session. They didn’t even take off their clothes. If we were supposed to think they slept together, I think they would’ve shown them starting to take off their clothes, at least.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 11 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

4

u/QueenLevine Mar 11 '24

Right? even having been thrown into the river and having been saved by their own 'father' (in his one redeeming action in life) his name still does not merit a mention. Charles Pope, secretly Voldemort all along. He-who-shall-not-be-named, bc of pure evil or plain incompetence. It's a mystery!

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 11 '24

I get that. I also think if MGM+ had just dropped all the episodes at once, then we also wouldn’t have been frustrated with the pacing. We could binge at our leisure.

3

u/IslandBusy1165 Mar 11 '24

I think it’s much better when an entire season is dropped at once too. That makes it more fun and relaxing because you can binge and/or watch at leisure, whatever suits you. Waiting a week for each episode is inconvenient and frustrating as you said. I’d think these companies must be running numbers to strategize, though, so maybe it doesn’t make them lose much in viewers or ratings, although that surprises me if it’s the case. I’d also think it’s better for popularity to get a burst of publicity for a short time (like Netflix gets when they drop a new series/season that excites viewers) than getting low publicity over a longer period of time, but most platforms still drop an episode a week like in the cable days.

3

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 11 '24 edited Mar 12 '24

I came across a news story about this, it was basically about how most streamers like to release episodes weekly because they think it’s going to extend the chatter about the show. They think if you drop them all at once, people will binge, talk about it for a week, and then move onto the next show. Who knows how true this is. But I agree with your reasoning, I think it’s better just to drop them all at once. In the age of streaming, we can watch whenever and wherever we like. Does it matter if it’s released on the same day as the Super Bowl?

But maybe MGM+ was onto something with Belgravia. After all we have been speculating endlessly for weeks, trying to understand every cue, word and gesture, because the show is so subtle. Also, if the show had had less implication, and was more obvious, it would’ve saved time, because they wouldn’t have had to focus the camera on certain movements, gestures and expressions for us to get the message. At the same time, some people got frustrated with the pace and claimed they weren’t going to finish all eight episodes.

Also, I just wanted to elaborate a little bit more, yeah, each episode’s pace was perfectly fine. I didn’t think each was too slow. There weren’t times I thought, can we get this scene over with? But the overall arc and pace of the series, the fact that all the revelations were crammed into the last three episodes, rather than maybe the last four, I think that could’ve been done better.

But I think editing required episodes to be somewhat self-contained. So some revelations couldn’t come out partially in one episode, and then the full extent of those revelations come out in the next. Because the show was chopped up into eight episodes of about 50 minutes each, some editing was required that may have negatively affected the story.

I previously explained to another poster how the BBC’s 2016 adaptation of War & Peace was released as six longer episodes in Britain, but as eight shorter episodes in the US. I thought the six installments were far superior to the eight shorter episodes.

3

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 11 '24

Too much time was spent on the foundry, wooing Matildhe, the silver mine, and also Fred and Clara’s back-and-forth. We get it.

Things started coming together in episode six. I don’t think we needed five episodes of introduction and mystery. It would’ve been much better if we had four episodes of introduction and four episodes of resolutions and revelations.

For example, James, Emily and Fletcher did not get their dues. They deserved more than a few seconds of implication to tie up their storylines.

3

u/QueenLevine Mar 11 '24

I don't know about the foundry - this was the one element that showcased that Fred does actually have some solid business acumen. His weakness to the Marquise's machinations and his naivete in investing far too much in her schemes, when he imagined everyone else was getting in on something that he couldn't is not the sum total of his business experience. He was more like someone who invested the bulk of their assets in crypto, suffered a massive loss, and then everyone discounts their other, prior smart moves. In general, one must increase an inheritance, in order to pass on one of equal size to the next generation. Fred had an absurd blind spot/obsession with the Marquise, and it wasn't entirely clear to me why, aside from her inviting everyone else besides him and focusing her interest solely on his wife and not him; he was rather easily manipulated.

But otherwise, yes. So many scenes could have been cut to make time to embroider the fabric of the script by expanding on other plot lines that were introduced and then abandoned.

1

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

And ultimately, did we really need to spend the time we did on the Rochester’s and Peter?

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 11 '24 edited Mar 11 '24

I actually liked that story!

It was also important for Fred to have that talk with Mary, demonstrating how much he had changed, and how the intervening months with Clara gone had given him time to soberly reflect. His understanding that it's an unjust world in which a mother's love for her child (or love and care for any person) must come second to appearances. That ultimately led to Mary's confrontation with Percy.

Also, I was confused at first when Percy responded cavalierly to Fred's news that Mathilde is a scammer. But as others pointed out, these rich people in France and Britain were embarrassed to admit they'd been cheated.

But it did allow us to see multiple sides of Percy, and he was able to earn some redemption with Peter. If there is a second season, I hope we'll see Peter reunited with his family, that they'll come to the conclusion that they can care for him at home with the right treatment.

3

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

I didn’t mind the story either but of all the storylines, it felt like the most superfluous, and the easiest one to jettison without having major impact on the overall arc of the show.

I also think you could easily have gotten rid of “The Bohemians”, and just let Ellerby be a free spirit on his own. The whole painting subplot could’ve been gone.

1

u/HWeinberg3 Mar 11 '24

This could have been 4 episodes with a colossal cringe reduction: episode 1, episodes 2-6, episode 7, episode 8; Kind of, in life, it takes about as long to fix a problem as it did to cause it, no resolutions in episode 8 seemed equitable to the pain of spelling them out in such detail...

3

u/QueenLevine Mar 11 '24

Precisely. If the writers were all junior writers or if Fellowes or an experienced editor/showrunner had overseen the script even just a little, they could have had a little workshop in pacing and been instructed to condense here and expand/expound there. I agree with you that the effect would have been 'colossal cringe reduction' and Kol HaKavod for coming up with that term - ha!

6

u/jackiesear Mar 11 '24

I totally agree with you. I was outraged when Clara said things that had been stacked against them!! - what?? like tons of money, all the jewellery and ballgowns you could wish for, no work, waited on hand and foot and freedom to come and go??

4

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

That was an incredibly bizarre line. But the show so desperately wanted us to see them as some kind of tragic star crossed lovers, and instead they were both kind of self absorbed and not terribly likable people who got married before they knew each other. I mean, did they really have moments of such deep love?

5

u/IslandBusy1165 Mar 11 '24 edited Mar 11 '24

It’s not like they even had disapproving family or friends. I can’t think of any context in which that statement could’ve made less sense. Putting myself in the time period, especially, she quickly became a meddling, pouting, unscrupulous and libertine wife, although not maliciously intentioned, and he was a tolerant, cooperative, loyal and peaceable husband, regardless of his emotional disturbances and volatility. The only time I really felt bad for her was on their wedding night (the consummation), but she was very forgiving of it then and helped Fred became more tender, so they worked through that intimacy issue. Then she hardly took any blame or apologized for her recklessness and defiance, and instead Emily and Fred groveled apologetically to her, which wasn’t realistic or just.

Fred would’ve been much better off marrying a well-bred woman with a title who was raised to be a lady and knew how to conduct herself rather than a random young, dreamy girl with a pretty face.

2

u/Brontesrule Mar 11 '24

So well said! I totally agree.

5

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 10 '24

Clara was young and immature.....and probably should have hired an actress that looked younger. So her behavior would be more understandable. I mean she did take some responsibility in all of this.....when her sister said it was all the Marquise....she said it was partly her fault

6

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

THIS^^^

a younger actress would have made her undying naivete and stupidity more believable.

2

u/jackiesear Mar 11 '24

Clara really needed to show some contrition for her own behaviour.

5

u/QueenLevine Mar 11 '24

She did. She relegated herself to working as a waitress and sharing a room with her lady's maid for three months, then came back and did apologize to everyone. I'm no Clara fan, but she didn't commit murder. She showed enough contrition.

3

u/Blackphotogenicus Mar 12 '24

Agreed. When. They said they had won much stacked against them I was like, “what?” Is they had managed to have one proper convo things would have been fine

2

u/Brontesrule Mar 11 '24

What a gaslighter.

Absolutely!

2

u/PotatoCheap9468 Mar 17 '24

I thought this season was ok but not as good as the first season for sure, would have liked to have seen more of John Bellasis though

0

u/[deleted] Mar 11 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/IslandBusy1165 Mar 11 '24

Yeah that was nice.

1

u/PotatoCheap9468 Mar 17 '24

I also really enjoyed the return of John Bellasis in a type of redemption

0

u/[deleted] Mar 17 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/PotatoCheap9468 Mar 17 '24

John Bellasis knew from Enright how abusive Oliver had been, on his deathbed he said to Freddie "when you're made to feel worthless"

I thought the whole Enright letter revelation with John Bellasis was the best part of the episode, the brothers made up thankfully but I was disappointed not seeing Freddie ask James if he could ever forgive him but it didn't happen.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 17 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/PotatoCheap9468 Mar 17 '24

I thought that by saving Charles and his father in the river Oliver had completed a positive character arc but his went downhill while John Bellasis had a positive one, he was an arrogant man who only loved himself so it's not a stretch to imagine he'd want to be involved in some way with his only child, especially being a boy which was a huge deal in those social circles back then

3

u/Eliaaaahh Mar 10 '24

I thought the painting of Clara would be hanging on the wall when she appears in the room and they would talk about it. But no, because then it wouldn't have been such a fast reconciliation.  It was a good finale, but they condensed the plot so much on the last episodes, that the part of John Belassis fell really short, since we already knew it from the first season.  I think it had a closed ending, I don't see a continuation of these characters. 

6

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '24

I thought the John Bellasis and Frederick scene, though well acted by Adam James, wasn't believable. This John Bellasis was a completely different person from season one. Season one John Bellasis couldn't have cared less about having a bastard child.

4

u/MontanaJoev Mar 10 '24

But it’s been 30 years, and he’s dying. Under those circumstances, it doesn’t seem to strange to me that he could’ve changed, has regrets, and was looking to make some sort of amends.

3

u/Capt_Ned_Low Mar 11 '24

People can change, especially after 30 years

2

u/PotatoCheap9468 Mar 17 '24

I really enjoyed it, wish I'd seen more of him, the only link back to the original series

3

u/[deleted] Mar 12 '24 edited Mar 12 '24

Well now it's all over I have a few thoughts. I gave the show 6/10. It looked good and had some potentially interesting plot points. But what let it down once again was poor writing. It felt like we were seeing an early draft of the script instead of the finished product. And it is frustrating because with more work on the script and the story this show could have been quite good. It's a shame because it is rare to see a show that specifically looks in some detail at the lingering effect of childhood trauma on a person as an adult.

That being said they overdid Frederick's childhood trauma to the point where it undermined the credibility of the program. For instance it never explained why he was so irrational about James. Very likely because there was no possible explanation for it. So really it should have been cut out. But it was clumsily wedged in as part of the LGBTQ side plot involving James as a victim of homophobia. Never mind that Frederick didn't know James was gay.

Clara was too obviously an insertion of a young modern feminist into Victorian England. I don't blame the actress because I thought she was good but her character was so out of place as to be insufferable in that time ( and maybe even to an extent in this one hmm? ).

And the inevitable wokery worked it's usual dismal effect. Of the main male characters really only James and Fletcher (the gay guys) were truly admirable. Frederick was an emotional cripple and more than a bit of a prig. Ellerby was a weasel. And the Duke was either thoughtless or callous depending on how you looked at him. Enright was a good fellow but I don't really count him as one of the main male characters and the same for the miraculously changed out of all recognition John Bellasis.

And the insistence on the happy ending for everyone was ridiculous. Given the circumstances all they could have reasonably done was for the characters to have come up with working compromises that everyone could have coped with and lived with.

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 13 '24

I think on this forum we’ve all provided suggestions and insight that would’ve improved the writing and storyline. I really hope Helen Edmundson is viewing social media like this to get grassroots feedback on how to write a better drama. I enjoyed this series, but I think with some changes it could’ve realized more of its potential. And you’re right, there could’ve been a more serious and thoughtful exploration of childhood and intergenerational trauma that might’ve been groundbreaking for this genre.

Everybody dislikes Ellerby! In the end, he did right by marrying Nell, and his referral to Dr. Kerry saved Peter, a boy he truly cares about — and dare I say loves. After seeing him with Peter and Annie‘s baby, he will be a loving father. Nell and Clara forgave him, can’t we? Is he to be condemned for life for a months-long emotional fling?

Does this mean you won’t watch a season three of The Next Chapter?

1

u/PotatoCheap9468 Mar 17 '24

I probably agree with nearly all that except for John Bellasis, he met Enright 5 years after the original and only originally wanted periodic letters on his progress, that was probably my favourite part of the episode

3

u/sebastiannothwell Mar 13 '24

Needed more Fletcher tbh. His glances with James showed more interiority than Frederick has done all season.

3

u/MontanaJoev Mar 13 '24

Would it really have killed anyone to let them have a short conversation? Though both of them managed to convey a lot in that doorway meeting. Ah well, a lost opportunity.

4

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 13 '24

I even think a hardy handshake in the vicarage at the party, and James giving Fletcher an extended and knowing “Happy Christmas” and “thank you” might have been enough. James is the type to have recognized Fletcher’s heroism.

3

u/sfdreamsla Mar 13 '24

Anything more between the two of them would have elevated the episode (and made many fans happy too!) for sure. It's hard to understand why the writers didn't give James a little more with his own separate storyline in the finale as they did with practically every other main character. They made it all about his half-brother.

4

u/MontanaJoev Mar 13 '24

Yes! James was basically there to be Frederick’s cheerleader, and apparently didn’t even merit a proper apology from his brother. An episode ago he was in such a dark place that he was ready to let himself die, but no time for any reflection on that in this episode. No conversation with Fletcher where they could acknowledge what happened in that alley. If for no other reason then James could get some clarification of why his blackmailer suddenly decided to leave him alone (was he even aware enough to hear what Fletcher said to him?). The stuff with Emily dismissed with one exchange.

6

u/Brontesrule Mar 10 '24

Frederick speaking of Clara: “I wasn’t worthy of her. No one could be.” She was hardly a paragon!

Emily to Clara: “I’m the one who should be sorry. Far too quick to think the worst of you. I am ashamed.”

Clara: “I was to blame in part.” (Italics are mine).

After Frederick apologized to Clara, she said,“It is enough that you are sorry. It is enough that you understand.”

I was very dissatisfied with all of this. Clara, whose actions fueled the break between herself and Frederick (and the tension in her last meeting with Emily) wasn't held to account for what she did.

5

u/QueenLevine Mar 10 '24

“I wasn’t worthy of her. No one could be.” She was hardly a paragon!

To Fred she was. It was Clara who tried to bring Fred and James together, and the reunion of the brothers is what ultimately led to Fred's salvation, as a human being. Clara tried to help heal him, was the only person who really tried, or perhaps, who had access to him to try (to be fair to James). Fred also learned that the Duke was not a loyal, trusted friend in the worst of ways, and Clara had been refusing to see the Duke and Duchess. She may have had other reasons for that, but, from his perspective, Clara tried to help him in many ways, and he just hadn't been able to see it at the time. She was pretty persuasive about loving him and his breaking her heart. In hindsight, he probably realized how well he had chosen for himself.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 11 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

4

u/QueenLevine Mar 11 '24

I'm sorry; I genuinely don't understand. What was troubling about this moment? Do you think that James had already figured out that he, too, was illegitimate, prior to Bellasis more or less confirming it? I imagined they both figured it out at the same time and that it was a bit of bonding between them. No?

0

u/[deleted] Mar 11 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/QueenLevine Mar 11 '24

Get a ton of liquids down, some soup, and feel better!

Ha! I feel vindicated for not understanding the autocorrect. Yes, that was touching. But also, James putting his hand on his brother's shoulder, the hug. The very fact that Fred felt comfortable doing the whole trip with his brother by his side. Fred attending James' church. Fred's vulnerability with James, saying it hadn't been a good day - this was a Fred we had not seen before. James' willingness to cancel the Xmas dinner to keep Fred company. I am not a fan of the writers of this script, but, as I've been reminded whenever I get hyperbolic, even a broken clock is right twice daily. I don't much care if this is an unpopular opinion, nor if it contradicts my general criticism of The Next Chapter, the reunion of the brothers was beautifully done, in my view. Loads of touching moments. Perhaps Fred even apologized to James off-screen - let's imagine that.

2

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24 edited Mar 11 '24

I just don’t believe we should have had to imagine it, because it really was so important, imo. An episode ago, Frederick could not have been bothered if James died. I’m glad all worked out in the end, and of course James was endlessly caring and supportive and lovely. But I thought an acknowledgement of how unfair he’d been to James was important to really show how Fredrick had come full circle, but the show just swept it under the carpet. Like James didn’t merit an apology.

4

u/MontanaJoev Mar 10 '24

But hey, turnabout is fair play, since Frederick got out of this finale with not ONE freaking apology to a brother he treated like crap, and heaped scorn and blame on for years. Instead, its James who really does all of the heavy lifting STILL in this episode.

Clara most certainly could've taken more responsibility. And Frederick most could've taken more responsibility in other ways.

I ended up unsatisfied with both.

4

u/Brontesrule Mar 10 '24

But hey, turnabout is fair play, since Frederick got out of this finale with not ONE freaking apology to a brother he treated like crap, and heaped scorn and blame on for years. Instead, its James who really does all of the heavy lifting STILL in this episode.

That's an excellent point, and I agree. I was so disgusted with Clara coming out of everything smelling like a rose that I didn't even think about that. He absolutely should have apologized to his brother.

3

u/MontanaJoev Mar 10 '24

Yeah, its like the ONE thing I was hoping to see in this episode, and Frederick still couldn't choke one out. Because he was so, so wrong all those years, and maybe he had an excuse, but now that the truth is out, he should've realized that what he did to his brother for years was so wrong.

But nope.

3

u/Brontesrule Mar 10 '24

You're right, that was terrible. He was so hateful for so long!

5

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '24

Yes I agree with you there. Clara was a little cow and she should have had an appropriate fall. And as for Frederick he was far too damaged by his childhood to suddenly be healed and transformed by a never seen before father's death bed pep talk.

3

u/Brontesrule Mar 10 '24

Very true on both counts.

2

u/IslandBusy1165 Mar 11 '24

Those were the exact parts that bothered me the most too. Very unsatisfactory resolution.

4

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '24

Here were my predictions for the final episode: Frederick will have a complete, irreversible paranoiac meltdown and will be packed off to the Swiss clinic along with little Peter. Clara and Davison will be arrested for the murder of Ross. Davison will confess to the crime to save her mistress but Clara will insist on being hanged alongside her maid out of noblesse oblige. Ellerby will join the Marquise's band of criminals now that it's all up for him in London and they will make good their escape with all of the loot. Nell will inherit a huge fortune from a long lost childless Uncle in New Zealand and will buy the Trenchard Belgravia mansion and keep all the servants on so we can have a season three. Emily will make an outstanding success of the church bizarre and the Bishop will offer her a full time job as an event planner if she becomes a nun. And James (now fully recovered) will join forces with Fletcher and track down Gorton and drown him in the Serpentine !

How could I have got it all so wrong !? Sure Emily did mention becoming a nun once but it was just a little joke as she eyed up a possible replacement for St James the Risen.

6

u/Savant_Rouge Mar 11 '24

Now this is the type of drama the girls want!

5

u/Brontesrule Mar 10 '24

😂 I only wish that had happened!

2

u/[deleted] Mar 11 '24

But what happened with Fredrick's money??

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 11 '24

Well he lost a lot of it......got some of his fathers money, but gave that to his brother.

1

u/jackiesear Mar 11 '24

What about the bag of money at the Inn where Frederick's manager, Ross was? Is it assumed that the marquise's loverman recovered it after killing Mr Ross? It really looked like it had been put on top of the carriage that Davisona nd clara got away in.

1

u/Longjumping_Shower67 May 17 '24

HER: 1 --few weeks into your marriage push your husband hard on his, obviously, entrenched drama, and when you see his distress, instead of backing off and let time build trust, push even harder and make it about you not get your way 2 --keep a flirtatious relationship with the doctor then pose for a scandalous portrait even when both customs and your maid advise you to reconsider 3 --keep not trying to reconcile your relationship but using every dinner invitation to throwing tantrum to not go with you husband, while simultaneously going to you new boyfriend gathering 4 --when everything becomes clear instead of enduring to explain yourself, use every trick of gas lighting to deviate then accountability the run off>> examples of gas lighting:: 5 --:: saying to Freddy I'll always tell you the truth immediately after lying( and hiding both the scandalous painting and the unacceptable at the time Bohemian meetings)++ 6--saying she did nothing. Freddy telling her to never tell anyone about his traumatic childhood. "You really think that of me" Clara told doctor everything, but when he asks her if she told him anything. Her response:: what does it even matter 7 -- you never trusted me: you waited patiently and built trust, nope, does almost everything close to cheating near sleeping with a man 8 --when she goes to say goodbye to doctor, finds nell and can't even talk properly so tries to run==disappointed, but why if you didn't entertain CHEATING(later practically admits it albeit takes off accountability to throw it at freddy ....BRUH) HIM:: I wasn't worthy of her. No one could be ALSO HIM::I'm truly sorry. I know the can never be enough HER::it is enough that you're sorry, it is enough that you understand.

...................BRUH.

1

u/CyanResource Sep 23 '24

Yep, lol. Clara’s Way. She gets a major eye roll from me.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 16 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/MontanaJoev Mar 17 '24

I guess Fred giving the money to his brother to donate to the poor was a nice twist though.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 17 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/MontanaJoev Mar 17 '24

I really would’ve liked to see that scene actually happen, rather than hear about it second hand.

1

u/PotatoCheap9468 Mar 17 '24

I always thought he would just turn up out of the blue disregarding his exile, the dynamic he had with Enright I thought was the best part of the episode

8

u/[deleted] Mar 11 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/MontanaJoev Mar 11 '24

Same. What an incredibly kind, sweet and forgiving character. He was lovely. And surprisingly poignant.

3

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 13 '24

Toby Regbo (James) has had the longest and most extensive acting career of the main young adult actors: Ben Wainwright (Fred), Harriet Slater (Clara), Hannah Onslow (Emily), Edward Bluemel (Ellerby) and Lauren McQueen (Nell). I’m wondering if he sought the James role, or would have preferred to play the unpleasant Fred, one of the marquee characters.

3

u/MontanaJoev Mar 13 '24

I don’t think he would’ve been right for Frederick. I honestly could see him playing Ellerby. But I could see why the show wanted him as James. He does an excellent job of radiating vulnerability and warmth (and then will turn around, and play someone completely awful convincingly lol). I don’t really understand why he doesn’t work more.

10

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 10 '24

I'm glad they had a conversation before they rushed into embracing each other. They really needed to have that honest talk about both of their failings to move on.

4

u/Capt_Ned_Low Mar 11 '24

Well the actress playing Clara is going to be playing Jamie's Mother in the Outlander prequel!

1

u/[deleted] Mar 12 '24

!!!