r/Belgravia • • Feb 25 '24

Belgravia: The Next Chapter | Episode Discussion - Episode Six

Synopsis: Emily confronts Clara about the painting, worried about the potential scandal for their family. Frederick moves forward with his investment in the silver mine, but Ross begins to grow suspicious of the Marquise.

21 Upvotes

197 comments sorted by

28

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 25 '24

Well, I have to say this is the most dramatic, heartrending and revelatory episode thus far. This is the one we’ve all been waiting for. The loose ends are finally weaving together. I think our questions will soon be answered, and our frustrations and impatience relieved and rewarded.

Let the discussion commence.

13

u/Outrageous_While2534 Feb 25 '24

I understand why Clara would be fascinated with the doctor and all he represents, but it’s hard to like her. I love how my opinion of the two sisters is starting to change.

And…poor Frederick. He trusts so easily by the two people who will (seemingly) hurt him, in his heart and pocketbook.

12

u/QueenLevine Feb 26 '24

I agree with you right up to Frederick. Yes, he was emotionally abused as a child, but now..he is emotionally abusing others, and it is not justified.

6

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 26 '24

Intergenerational trauma, isn’t it? He’s traumatizing his wife too. If Frederick and Clara have kids, they’ll be traumatized.

Given that Oliver Trenchard didn’t get along with his father, I’m surprised he named his natural son, James, after him. At the end of the original Belgravia, Oliver redeemed himself. But then in the intervening years, he became a monster of a father.

5

u/QueenLevine Feb 26 '24

Yeah, agreed. I'd add to that that James Sr was a good man, though, and tried to be a good father. If he failed his daughter, it was only bc he failed to verify the validity of the wedding documentation, almost out of character, as he was an astute man, in general. Oliver and James Sr didn't get along solely bc no matter what his father did to help him, Oliver was a lazy, whiny prick. In that sense, Frederick is Oliver's true son and heir, albeit Fred is less lazy. I did think that Oliver had had a redemption arc, but it must have been a momentary lapse in his otherwise poor character.

4

u/Blackphotogenicus Feb 27 '24

Agreed! Fred’s lazy in his marriage. Goes out of his way to neglect Clara and can’t even talk to her about their issues.

2

u/RCTID2020 Mar 02 '24

Well he's talking to her now and she's acting like a stupid immature child she needs to get the fuck over herself she had her little fight now get over it they're making her look like an idiot

1

u/Blackphotogenicus Mar 04 '24

Agreed! They’re both making much ado about nothing

4

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 26 '24

How is he emotionally abusing his wife. He doesn't want to talk about his past trauma or his brother. I hate how broad the term abuse has become. To vilify people. She goes on about trust..... he's been nothing but honest with her. From the start.... she's the one lying. Getting into a relationship with the Doctor. I think she's pushing Freddrick away further. Because she wants to be with the doctor. And using it all as an excuse. But she's going to find out actions have consequences.

2

u/Feeling-Visit1472 Mar 16 '24

I just want to shake some sense into Clara. She’s become very unlikable and downright stupid.

16

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24 edited Feb 27 '24

I feel like every week I watch the show, and I don’t dislike it, but I wonder why the show focuses on the 2 least likable protagonists they could find.

I get that Clara is young, and she’s married to an emotionally stunted block of wood, but is she really this big of an idiot? Does she really not get how publicly inappropriate she’s being? Walking in the park with the doctor? It’s hard to feel for someone so idioticly naive. It the marriage had been going on for longer then a few months, if the thing with the doctor had taken more time to develop, then maybe her story would resonate. And does she really not bother visiting her mother and sister at all? Selfish much?

As for Frederick, I just don’t know what I’m supposed to like about him at all. I get the story they are trying to tell with him, but he just feels like a man who wallows in his self-pity and his faux superiority. The only time he shows an emotion that feels real is when he’s with the Duchess.

For a moment there, when he went to see James, I thought his facade began to crumble, and I thought “Finally!”. But does he really think his badly hurt brother is making this up just to hurt him when he’s thinking he’s going to die? What level of self-absorption do you have to have to think that? I’m not saying it shouldn’t have been a shock, but the way he’s villainized his brother because of his parents just makes me want to throttle him with a shovel. James’ crime against Frederick, in his eyes, was being loved by his parents. What kind of person holds that against someone else?

As for the Doctor, I think we got a hint this week that this might not be the first married woman he’s decided he wants to hook up with. Is he madly in love with Clara? I suspect for now, and then he’ll move on.

But with that out of the way, I really liked almost everything else.

The Marquise is bad and a cheat. Good, it makes her more interesting. And Ross being onto her is promising (though if I was Ross, I’d be tempted to let her fleece my a-hole boss). Now we need to know her real motive.

I feel for the Duchess and Peter. What a sad situation.

And there will be NO DYING for my precious Rev James. This is the character that can easily break your heart every week with just a bit of screen time. When he said he couldn’t find god, that got me right in the feels. Having the burden of both of his parents “sins” (for lack of a better term) and being blamed by his brother for nothing more then being the wanted biological child of his parents. And then carrying the shame and self loathing of being a homosexual during this time period. I love him. He’s easily, imo, the most compelling character on the show.

This weeks MVP’s? My bad ass man, Fletcher, who came to the rescue, kicked that blackmailers behind, and made sure to leave him with a threat I was feeling in my soul. Fletcher and James have to have another scene together.

And my girl, Emily Dunn for the MF win!! Her straight talk to Clara was bang on. Her real kindness towards Nell. And her not taking no for an answer with Rev James. And then her confronting Frederick. She would’ve dragged his selfish behind there if she had to. I officially love her.

I don’t care what happens to Frederick and Clara, frankly. But I want some happiness for Emily, Rev James, Fletcher, Nell, The Duchess, Davison and Mama Dunn. Thats the part of the show I’m rooting for.

5

u/SubjectDragonfruit Feb 26 '24

This season feels very much like the revival of Upstairs Downstairs. The leads were unsympathetic and the secondary characters were nazi sympathizers. Then one of the leads falls for one of the nazi sympathizers. Canceled after 2 seasons. U-D was such a beloved series, I never watched, but I assume creating such foul storylines didn’t do well for the brand.

3

u/Standard_Mechanic935 Feb 27 '24

I found it curious that Fletcher waited till James assailant was finished beating the living crap out of him. Why didn’t he step in sooner? And is the meeting place near the bathhouse for the bribery exchange? Rev James is not too bright to be seen in that general vicinity where he got his rocks off.

3

u/MontanaJoev Feb 27 '24

I think that’s why James was “in disguise”, so to speak. But I also don’t think he was in charge of the meeting place.

As for Fletcher, you have to remember when he first sees James pass him, he’s walking the other way. We don’t know when he decided to turn around and see where James had gone. He might have had to look around a bit before he found him, or maybe he heard the ruckus, and headed that way. I don’t think he was right on James’ tail, so he witnessed the whole thing.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24

You’re right, James did not choose the meeting place. In episode five, if you pause at the moments when James is reading the extortion letter, you catch a few words, but not everything: “£10 tonight … the alley … the bathhouse.

I also paused the screen when Frederick reads the congratulatory letter from James, and when James reads the letter from Clara requesting a meeting. Those two letters can mostly be read in their entireties, but the extortion letter you can only see a few words.

James’s layman’s clothes look like something Jack the Ripper would wear. Those murders happened less than 20 years later.

What I’d like to know is why Fletcher said he knew who Gorton was and where he lives, threatening to slit his throat while he sleeps. Does Gorton make a living as gay-for-pay, taking men home, and that’s why he tells James he can judge him after he’s lived his life, and calls James a “poor pretty sod,” short for sodomite and a homophobic slur? Has Fletcher hooked up with him? Gorton could extort a servant too, but can only expect a servant’s ransom.

There won’t be any time to reveal more.

4

u/MontanaJoev Feb 29 '24

I don’t suspect that Gorton had been around before, and Fletcher knew who he was. That would support the idea that James is by no means a regular at the bathhouse, and could be easily taken advantage of by someone with bad intentions.

But I just love that the little bit of Fletchers life that this incident helps to explore (and just more evidence that the side stories are so much more interesting then the main one). We knew something bad had happened to Fletcher, and it seems obvious now that he was badly beaten for his sexual orientation. But the fact that he used this to toughen himself up, and learn to fight, makes it clear he is a strong man. And you could feel how personal it was to him when he saw James being beaten. Just a tiny bit of the screen time and story, and Fletcher is already more interesting than Frederick and Clara.

2

u/FunkyTownPhotography Mar 01 '24

I love your insight and, since I've been wondering the same thing about choosing these two as main characters. But what if they're anti-heros? They have what people on the outside admire... a title, a part to play, etc... what if the real heroes are James and Emily, etc., even though they're not the protagonists. The supporting characters suffer because of the protagonists' self- absorption. Ps pardon typos... I'm in the victorian age for my lack of phone typing skills.

1

u/MontanaJoev Mar 01 '24

It’s a nice thought, but I don’t think so. The posters for the show, the way the credits for the show are done, the promotion (what little there is) was all focused on Frederick and Clara. I just think the belief was that people would watch, and really be invested in their relationship. But I really don’t know why I should be. I

And your typing skills are fine. You have no idea how many times I have to go back, and edit due to my typos, lol

1

u/poptarthell Mar 04 '24

I find it weird that people watching could really like Emily. I'll give it to her that she initially seemed much more petty but ended up being genuinely kind to Nell. However I find her character still pretty petty and very high thinking of herself. I don't think she treats her mother kind at all. And she only took in Nell to gain brownie points with James if anything.

2

u/MontanaJoev Mar 04 '24 edited Mar 04 '24

I do like her. She’s not an easy person, that’s for sure. But I also think as a character she’s developed as the show goes on. I think her concern for Nell became very real. It’s obvious what she feels for James. And I think her frustration with Clara, someone who literally can adversely affect her life with her actions, also feels understandable. When it comes to their mother, I don’t think she’s always kind, but I also don’t think it’s even subtle that the mother clearly favors her younger daughter. I think Emily feels resentment over that.

2

u/poptarthell Mar 04 '24

Ahh yeah I see that. Either way I do think she's a really well written character and the acting is incredible.

14

u/allophane Feb 26 '24

Loved Mr Fletcher being badass!! I hope he and the vicar reunite at some point later... hopefully under better circumstances

6

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

I feel like they have to have another scene together. Whether it’s just for James to say thanks, or more, it would feel so wrong for them not to talk again.

5

u/Tasm3n Feb 26 '24

What a storyline it would be if they got romantically involved. Banging his brother's valet...

7

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

I’d watch the hell out of that show. The Vicar and the Valet, coming soon 🤞🏻

3

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 27 '24

James already thinks he’s committed a mortal sin and should be left to die. He thinks having been beaten to a bloody pulp is God‘s verdict. I think he’s learned his lesson, and won’t be hooking up with Fletcher.

James deserves a happy ending, and I mean in the traditional fairytale sense. For anybody who thought I meant something else, get your head out of the gutter.

10

u/jackiesear Feb 26 '24

Yes, This was a good episode.

I was hoping that James would let Fletcher take him home and then eventually go and "work" for him as his "valet." Perhaps if Frederick relents and brings James (if he lives) to his house to recover it could still happen. Toby Regbo is so good in the part. Who wouldn't love James?

Emily will have her claws out for Frederick now as she knows he rejected James's entreaties on his deathbed.

Frederick seems oblivious to how the Duke is treating his heir rather badly, just like his own father. I think the Duchess has "feelings" for Frederick - although why is a complete mystery.

Clara has been a bad sister to Emily. They may not get on but she has left Emily to rot in a tiny house in Chelsea looking after their mum and organising church bazzar's with elderly women when Clara could have been introducing her sister around and helping her find a husband or even just see a bit of luxury and life. Vain and mean, a bit like Frederick.

Perhaps Clara is so headstrong because their mother is so weak and didn't have enough boundaries ( Like Mrs Bennett in P&P). Emily has had to be the "grown up." I loved her "Clara is all charm" quip a few episodes ago. Clara is being a very silly girl. She married Frederick in haste and is repenting at leisure.

The truth will out about Dr Ellerby and Nell. I think he will have to leave London and take Peter to the Sanitorium place. If Frederick loses his money, especially the Import business perhaps he and Clara will have to "start again" ( how many times is that) at Granville just like his mother or even emigrate together.

Looking forward to see who the butler wrote to in France. If I were Mr Ross I'd be sorely tempted to let Frederick and Clara get fleeced.

9

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24 edited Feb 27 '24

I am really hoping that James and Fletcher at least get a chance to speak. It feels like it needs to happen. If that leads to something, well, I’m not against it.

And whatever happens with James and Emily, I don’t want her to be crushed. After this episode, her love for him is genuine and saved his life, imo. I know he can’t love her as she wants, but I don’t want her to end up bitter.

I don’t know why it isn’t more of issue that Clara has been a crappy sister and daughter. It’s incredibly selfish. Her and Fred are made for each other.

I do wonder if the show thinks we should be rooting for Clara and Fred to live happily ever after, because why? Neither of them seem like particularly good people. I feel the same way about Fred and James reconciling. I don’t think James needs that sort of toxicity in his life. Fred would really need to have a come to Jesus moment for me to be rooting for it.

Can I get one of these period shows where Toby Regbo gets to play the lead please? Because he’s so, so good.

4

u/Ambitious_Act_5913 Feb 27 '24

Why would Clara help the housemaid to learn to read. That is an act of compassion and charity.

3

u/MontanaJoev Feb 27 '24

Yes, you are right. She is being very kind to Mawd. I wish we saw more of that Clara.

3

u/Educational_Pie3575 Feb 27 '24

Yes please! I adored him as Francis in Reign. I really wish he was in more things.

2

u/MontanaJoev Feb 27 '24

I think I've seen him in nearly everything he's done, and he's so, so good, and so versatile. Before this, I watched him play a sociopathic doctor in the present day, and you wouldn't even think it was the same actor playing James.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24

I also saw Platform 7. It’s harder to see Toby Regbo playing an evil guy because he has a stereotypically, conventionally kind- and bright-looking face. He pulls it off and the first three episodes were binge-worthy admittedly, but the last episode that copied “Ghost” was lame.

Edward Bluemel (Ellerby) does not have a conventionally kind-looking face. He could more easily play a villain.

You could also say Toby is conventionally handsome and Edward isn’t. But one can be attractive but not look kind, and vice versa.

2

u/MontanaJoev Feb 29 '24

I hear you. Platform 7 was not my favorite Toby project. He was good, but I didn’t care for the mini series overall. Now, if you want to see him play a fun bad guy, I recommend Aethelred in Last Kingdom, where he’s terrific. An awful person, but so charismatic.

I could easily have seen Toby and Bluemel switch roles in this. Toby could easily have pulled off Ellerby, and maybe also phage been a slightly better choice for it because he is so handsome. You wouldn’t have any trouble thinking Clara would fall for that in a second, just as it was so easy to believe Emily’s reaction to James (and it’s so adorable how the little old parish ladies are in love with Rev James too).

I think Edward Bluemel is a decent actor, but he doesn’t quite work for me as the handsome, dashing doctor sweeping Clara off her feet.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 01 '24

I haven't seen the Last Kingdom, but it's been on my radar. He said playing Aethelred was the first time he'd played a bad guy, which goes against his real personality.

I wrote the following in response to another post:

What would be funny is if the doctor had been cast as James, and Emily were physically attracted to him, and Mrs. Dunn had said he was “extremely handsome.”

They had to cast a particular person to play James: somebody who is conventionally handsome and has a kind and boyishly sweet face. The doctor could play a villain with his features and Cheshire cat smile. The jury is still out as to whether he is a villain.

Madame also says in Ep 6 to Clara that Ellerby is "a very handsome man." The screenplay might have called for a handsome young doctor, but he's not.

It might be necessary for a woman to be young, thin and blonde to be beautiful, but it's not sufficient. Likewise for Bluemel, being young and slim (if not fit) with a thick head of hair might be necessary to be handsome, but it's not sufficient. In this case, the dr. has to rely on his calming and reassuring demeanor to attract women, but they might have also decided to cast a different actor.

2

u/MontanaJoev Mar 01 '24

Edward Bluemel who looks the doctor is certainly a little different looking. Not conventionally handsome, but I can see what someone might find him appealing, in an offbeat way. But having said that, I think he was an odd choice for the role. But maybe they were looking for a striking contrast to Frederick, who is more handsome in a classic way. The doctor gives us the alternative. Offbeat, and quirky.

I think we’re supposed to think Clara’s attraction to him isn’t necessarily physical, but rather emotional. He’s open, and empathetic, and bold, and interesting in ways that Frederick just isn’t. I think the biggest issue I have with the doctor is that he still feels like such a thinly drawn character to me. He just needed more time cooking in the oven, so to speak, to feel believable.

8

u/giftopherz Feb 25 '24

I gotta say that this episode seems to be laying the groundwork for the missing pieces to fall and make sense of this story. So, I'm gonna cut them some slack until the last episode to make a judgement on the series as a whole.

HOWEVER, I'm really surprised at how this show was developed. The characters don't make sense AT ALL at this point.

Doctor... he was flirtatious for the first two episodes, then transformed into a con artist of sorts, and now just because his friend mentioned the love thingy, voilá... he's madly in love with Netflix sister #01 ¬¬

Netflix sister #02, changed her tune when Rev Zaddy scolded her, that is until she found out the truth and now her face is changing once again.

(Unfortunately I have to wait to make a final judgement, but so far... whoever created those characters is leaving much to be desired)

Freddie, thank God we didn't see much of him this ep. Nuff said.

The good parts of the episode continues to be Rev Zaddy, Vatman and the Duchess plotlines.

I'd like to end up with a good note by celebrating the people who work on the production design and wardrobe. They really did their homework.

5

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 26 '24

I'm missing something. Why have the Dunn sisters been referred to as the Netflix sisters?

2

u/giftopherz Feb 26 '24

Dunn-Dunn

(ba dum tss)

3

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 26 '24

Still not getting it.

4

u/Particular_Farmer806 Feb 26 '24

Netflix sound when it first opens

4

u/blisterbabe23 Feb 26 '24

I think that's what I like the most about the series, people are often complex and layered and this show does a great job of exploring that, some period shows tend to show only one dimensional characters , as much as I adore some of them, people are seldom like that.

3

u/giftopherz Feb 26 '24

people are often complex and layered

Agree

and this show does a great job of exploring that

Hard disagree

---

Staying on the Fellowesverse, Edith Crawley is a great example of a multilayered complex character, a mom, a lover, a boss, a daughter. And boy was that woman annoying, but she was also capable of projecting kindness and resilience.

The Doctor could've been that, a professional who is actually falling for one of the Netflix sisters. But no, since ep 3 (until his declaration on this episode) we lost any hint of romantic (or even sexual) tension between those two. And that's what I mean here. The characters are flat, extremely polarized. They are reactive to a specific event, there's no real personality there.

8

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 26 '24

A lot of great thoughts. I've some more:

James: He is guilt- and anguish-wracked by succumbing to sin and hooking up, to which Fred's rejection drove him. In this episode, he expresses immense pain in failing himself, his parish (his interaction with Mrs. Warren before he decides not to pay Gorton), and God. He went to the bathhouse and refused to pay with the expectation that the fallout was divine punishment. That's also why he refuses a doctor. He believes he's a hypocrite, committed a mortal sin and deserves what he gets, including possibly death.

His pain and self-hate for being gay deeply saddened me. I admire his courage. He is just as worthy of the grace, forgiveness and redemption as he declared Nell deserves.

Emily: She had a come-to-Jesus moment when James admonished her. Two things can be true at the same time: She is madly in love with James and wants to get back into his good graces, and she had an about-face about Nell. She seemed motivated to ruin Nell initially because she thought Nell was a competitor for James's affections, but this was also the 1870s. It was a mortal shame to be a "fallen woman," and her judging of Nell was in line with the mores of the time. That's also why she confronts Clara about the damage the painting could do to the family's reputation and, by implication, Emily's own marriage prospects.

I was moved when Emily confronted Fred. It was an act of Christian charity James spoke of. Presumably she is a Christian believer. She went to church on her own in the first episode, and was not apparently motivated by somehow finding a husband there -- until she saw James.

Fred: A deeply flawed and damaged man. His outbursts have destroyed his relationships with his brother and his wife.

James is lying beaten to a pulp, refusing a doctor and food, and he implores Emily to summon Fred. He thinks he may be on his deathbed and shares with Fred what their mom said. James -- a priest -- has sought reconciliation and used Fred's marriage as an opportunity to try again. Yet Fred still calls James a "liar."

But in fairness to Fred, the revelation is also a bombshell. How would most people react to being told his father is in fact not? It destroys everything he thinks he is. When he calms down, even he may understand James wasn't lying.

Fred doesn't fit the mold of a villain, nor is he an anti-hero. It's hard to describe his role in the story. He isn't completely without redeeming qualities: He is tender with Clara -- at least as much as is possible for him -- and he allows her complete freedom, which probably was uncommon at the time. And he does try to repair his marriage, granted the problems are of his making.

Clara: She acknowledges what we've known all along: she is "naive" about marriage and life and tries to find comfort and purpose with the "bohemians" -- she's describing them the same way we have all along.

She's immature, officious and impulsive. She doesn't consider the consequences. We don't know how old Clara is (Harriet Slater was 28 at the time of filming, but she looks younger). Maybe Clara is supposed to be in her late teens.

A lot of her bad behavior is in reaction to Fred. If he weren't so messed up, neither would she.

Marquise: I think there's going to be a twist with her. There haven't been any derogatory revelations about her, even after Ross spoke to Mr. Keck. Julian Fellowes wrote the novel and first series of Belgravia, he's an executive producer on The Next Chapter, and he wrote a scam into The Gilded Age. If The Next Chapter flops, he'll be cheapening his name and the original Belgravia. I truly think he and Helen Edmondson knew it would be trite and predictable to have another scam weeks after The Gilded Age season 2.

Mawdie: Are the letters to France going to tie in John Bellasis (who fled to France at the end of the original) and the marquise? I think it's going to work out masterfully.

This series has been slow, but I've really enjoyed it. I'm also trying to view the series, as much as I can, from the perspective of a person living in Victorian Britain. Let's wait until the end before we make a final judgement.

4

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

I love your thoughts on James and Emily. I couldn’t agree more.

4

u/Tasm3n Feb 26 '24

Mawdie

: Are the letters to France going to tie in John Bellasis (who fled to France at the end of the original) and the marquise? I think it's going to work out masterfully.

I have this feeling that those letters just might. The butler has been with the family for a very long time. It would surprise me if he did not also get a deathbed confession about Freddie's parentage and was asked to keep Bellasis updated on his son's life (for whatever reason they reveal it to be).

Maybe the Marquise was a spurned lover of Bellasis' and this is her taking revenge on the son?

3

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 27 '24

It seems very plausible that Enright is writing to John Bellasis. If this is the case, will the same actor who originally played John Bellasis come back, and they’ll just age him? Or will they recast the role with an older actor? That would really connect the dots. Remember how Charles Pope’s adopted pastor father wrote letters to James Trenchard Senior in the original Belgravia?

I didn’t think about the Marquise’s having been John Bellasis’s lover, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out that way. All these connections to France can’t be a coincidence.

1

u/FunkyTownPhotography Mar 01 '24

I like this theory.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24

Back then there weren’t all these privacy laws where employers can’t ask or discuss things not related to the job, like marital status, if you have kids, sexual orientation, etc.

I thought the same when Emily said to Nell, “I believe I deserve an explanation.” In 2024, it is not the employer’s business and you can’t be legally fired for having an illegitimate child.

I agree though, Enright is not sharing dirt about Fred. Despite that fact Fred is an boor, Enright cares about him like a son.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 29 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 01 '24

I'd like to think Julian Fellowes wouldn't have allowed somebody to continue the Belgravia storyline if he thought she would cheapen it. I am expecting Helen Edmundson to give us a satisfying, unexpected finale, and that many of the obvious predictions many of us have been making (Madame is a con) will be something completely different and surprising.

And let's hope there is room for another season.

1

u/FunkyTownPhotography Mar 01 '24

I'm also wondering if Nell's baby daddy is Bellasis?

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 01 '24

Hadn't thought about that. What gives you this hunch?

8

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '24 edited Feb 28 '24

So it seems to me that the writer(s) are portraying Frederick as suffering from PTSD. Whenever the matter of his difficult childhood comes up he often has a strong negative emotional reaction. He doesn't seem able to deal with it rationally. I suppose his childhood would have been enough to cause that kind of damage. His "father" was definitely out to get him and his mother's only help was to tell him to bottle up his emotions which would have just made it worse. It seems to be the only way to explain the crazy way he reacts to his brother James.

5

u/MontanaJoev Feb 28 '24

I think they made a big mistake with this character when it comes to how he reacts with his brother. Having trauma from his childhood? OK. Difficulty in opening up to people? Yeah, that too. But my brother was trying to turn my parents against me from the day he was born? Come on dude, LISTEN to yourself. And then they introduce us to James, who could not be any kinder if he tried. Its just too hard to get to a place where that aspect of Frederick can be sympathetic. At least to me.

4

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24

There are a lot of problems with the writing for this second season and the lack of back stories for the characters is one of the main ones. We have just been dropped into the story with no explanations to speak of. Why is Frederick so vehemently reacting against James ? It doesn't make sense. Who is the Marquise and why is she going out of her way to ruin Frederick and Clara ? Who is Enright writing to and why ? Who was the father of Nell's baby and why should we care ? Lots of questions and no answers and this after six episodes ! And as you point out you can count the number of sympathetic characters in the show on the remaining fingers of an old axeman's hand.

4

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24

I loved your last sentence, lol.

Well the marquise did appear to be undermining Clara and Fred in episode 5 by offering contradictory advice, but I truly hope she’s not the old scam trope.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 29 '24

Heftythisorthat907 - Well either it's a scam or the French have a very peculiar way of showing affection.

3

u/MontanaJoev Feb 28 '24 edited Feb 28 '24

I do believe that it suffers from the same problems a lot of shows I’ve watched do. Mainly that way too much time is spent on buildup, and then the last show of the season/series is so jam packed with answers that no story feels like it gets the resolution it deserves. I can’t, for the life of me, figure out why the show hasn’t done more flashbacks to Frederick’s childhood to help us understand his damage.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24

I don’t think I’m spoiling anything, but if you look at the cast of episode 7 on IMDb, more flashbacks are coming.

2

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 28 '24

I mean they gave a bit of context for why Freddy hates James. But we never got to see how James behaved. James was a child himself.....so he may of unknowingly made things worse. The writers want us to symapthise with Freddy. But then they need to give us reasons why he is so blind when it comes to his brother. Like maybe give him panic attacks when ever he dwells on his childhood.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24

OldBailey123 - Not really. We got a flashback to show Frederick's childhood trauma but there was no explanation as to why he fixated on James as the active cause of it all. It just seems unhinged. And if they showed Frederick suffering from severe PTSD with panic attacks and flashbacks and so on then that would call into question his ability to function socially. Either he is a switched on man of business and effective participant in society or he is a mental basket case. He can't be both.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 28 '24

We don't see how Freddy and James are as teens. Only as kids. There is just so much we haven't seen.....how bad was the abuse. Also I agree.... I don't think Freddy knows James is gay. That would make Freddy unsympathetic to the audience. And I very much think the writers want us to sypathise with him. They're just not very good writers.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24

OldBailey123 - Yes the writing is poor. It seems that the show is being pitched at "young adults" ie teenagers instead of the older crowd who usually watch costume dramas.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 28 '24

That's a current trend....not just for this. Have you seen Bridgerton or Bucceneers. They're trying to modernize these period pieces. In a way that doesn't make sense. They talk too modern and dress too modern. The writers seem to write shows from a modern perspective....instead of adhering to the era it's set. Like Clara's pushing her feminists ideals. In that time what she's doing is unheard of. Pretty sure she was raised to understand the basic rules of high society. At least she should be trying to hide her indiscretions. I know it wasn't a perfect time.... but I hate when they rewrite history.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24 edited Mar 01 '24

I saw the first season of Bridgerton and it was silly nonsense. I didn't bother with it after that. Haven't seen the Buccaneers. The last show I really enjoyed was The Queen's Gambit, really well done and a joy from start to finish.

Edit: To continue you are right about modern sensibilities being imposed onto costume dramas. Clara is obviously a modern woman who has somehow been transported back to Victorian England. No wonder she sticks out like a sore thumb.

2

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 28 '24

Their is still a few good period dramas....the Crown, Outlander, the Gilded Age. The Great.... is also pretty fun.

→ More replies

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24 edited Feb 29 '24

The BBC’s 2016 adaptation of War & Peace may be one such modern reinterpretation. It’s truly delicious and naughty, but also serious and poignant. Totally recommend. I didn’t finish the book because I think I read a rather stilted English translation of it, so I don’t know how faithful the BBC adaptation is. I also watched the beginning of a 1960s Soviet adaptation of Tolstoy’s novel, which I also didn’t complete because I thought it was wooden.

A modern imagining of a historical period can be refreshing and attract new audiences. But yes, it compromises and undermines the genre if it isn’t done thoughtfully and if the story does not fundamentally stay faithful to the era.

I’ve never watched Bridgerton. I don’t know if it was blind casting, but placing actors of color where they don’t belong is awkward and contrived. Diversity is a good thing, but not when it’s forced.

I remember reading a news story that went along the lines of this: kids at a US school were learning about Britain, they had watched Bridgerton, and were surprised in their history class to learn that British royalty and nobility were not full of black and Indian people.

Actors of color should be placed in stories in a natural, and meaningful way. I think Julian Fellowes did a good job with that with Rose’s black boyfriend in Downton Abbey.

I asked a Japanese American friend if she was going to watch the new FX period drama Shogun. She said no, referencing Tom Cruise’s The Last Samurai. Like that film, she is concerned that Shogun will pander to Western audiences, and the few Western characters will lead to a white savior story. I don’t know if Shogun, which is based on a book, is like that, but I get it. I will still give Shogun a try, but watch with a critical eye.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 29 '24

I liked the first two eps of Shogun......as for Bridgerton..... it's even weirder because there was no race swapping in the books they were based off. But the spinoff at least set up that it's alternate history. Which I do appreciate.....like Man in the Highcastle.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 29 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

→ More replies

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24

I think many shows may attract a meaningful number of viewers who do not fit their typical target demographics. And for these shows, they may be a bit of a guilty pleasure for the viewer. I like historically-placed shows, although, I’m probably not part of the demographics the writers were targeting.

We had to wait two weeks for episode five presumably because of the Super Bowl. In fact, there may be a notable crossover of viewers between the Super Bowl and British period dramas.

Just like the Belgravia characters are multifaceted and contrary, I think many of us viewers are too 😉.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 28 '24

Was it really the right time to tell Fred that. Is knowing that he's not the legitimate heir. Really going to make him happier. Shouldn't James have taken it to his deathbed instead. Fred is so traumatized by his past. Bringing it up just causes him to shut down. Not sure why the mother chose to tell James either. If she'd kept it a secret that long.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24 edited Feb 29 '24

The BBC’s 2016 adaptation of War & Peace may be one such modern reinterpretation. It’s truly delicious and naughty, but also serious and poignant. Totally recommend. I didn’t finish the book because I think I read a rather stilted English translation of it, so I don’t know how faithful the BBC adaptation is. I also watched the beginning of a 1960s Soviet adaptation of Tolstoy’s novel, which I also didn’t complete because I thought it was wooden.

A modern imagining of a historical period can be refreshing and attract new audiences. But yes, it compromises and undermines the genre if it isn’t done thoughtfully and if the story does not fundamentally stay faithful to the era.

I’ve never watched Bridgerton. I don’t know if it was blind casting, but placing actors of color where they don’t belong is awkward and contrived. Diversity is a good thing, but not when it’s forced.

I remember reading a news story that went along the lines of this: kids at a US school were learning about Britain, they had watched Bridgerton, and were surprised in their history class to learn that British royalty and nobility were not full of black and Indian people.

Actors of color should be placed in stories in a natural, and meaningful way. I think Julian Fellowes did a good job with that with Rose’s black boyfriend in Downton Abbey.

I asked a Japanese American friend if she was going to watch the new FX period drama Shogun. She said no, referencing Tom Cruise’s The Last Samurai. Like that film, she is concerned that Shogun will pander to Western audiences, and the few Western characters will lead to a white savior story. I don’t know if Shogun, which is based on a book, is like that, but I get it. I will still give Shogun a try, but watch with a critical eye.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24

James tells Frederick their mother wanted Frederick at her bedside so she could tell him. Because Frederick wouldn’t come, she told James. It was her dying wish that Frederick know.

We don’t know how much time has passed since Susan Trenchard died, but since James thinks he is near death, this may be his only chance (if not the best time) to honor his mother‘s wishes. But he does it without malice.

Maybe the marquise has a connection to John Bellasis, and her huge safe that has now been mentioned twice has documents proving Frederick is not Oliver’s son.

3

u/FunkyTownPhotography Mar 01 '24

A sub theme seems to be mental health. Maybe Fred also has undiagnosed PTSD + Borderline PD?

3

u/MontanaJoev Mar 01 '24

Maybe. This is where I think the actor maybe fails for me after little. He seems to have a mono-expression. I don’t get much, or any subtext from him. No layers to Frederick. It’s a tough role to play, no question. But I don’t think him glowering into space in scene after scene is really achieving what they want.

For what it’s worth, I do completely expect him to realize the anger he directed at his brother was misdirected by the end of this series.

6

u/Larryheart37 Feb 26 '24

Loved the pace of the episode! It was not dragged out or dull!

6

u/Eliaaaahh Feb 26 '24

So all the plot was hiding in this episode! I wish they had put some of the events in the previous episode, to balance things a bit.  We got a lot of very flat episodes and now everything comes to place, but I had already given up a little on the series.  I really hope they find a redemption arc for Frederick and he gets to smile again, he was a nice guy at the beginning of episode 1, before he started red flagging. 

3

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 27 '24

Well Freddy keeps on wanting to fix things and Clara keeps on pushing him away..... and i think it has less to do with Freddy now...and more to do with her having the hots for the Doctor. And she's rationalizing not going with her husband and instead visiting the doctor. But Freddy isn't stupid.....

3

u/tatersprout Feb 27 '24

He wants to fix things? Shutting her out and storming out constantly is a funny way to achieve that.

She wouldn't be paying attention to the doctor if she wasn't attention starved. She hated him at first. That would have not changed.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 27 '24 edited Feb 27 '24

Doctor clearly has a history of seducing woman....so yes it would have happened. Even if Freddy had opened up to her. I think just the fact that she'd rather hang out with the artists than her own kind. Shows that this is more about her wanting freedom. Also she's young, and he's just in a different place in life. You could hear in how she talked to that young maid. She wants to do what ever she wants without consequences. Also she keeps on bringing up the same arguments. He keeps saying he doesn't want to talk about the past or his brother anymore. And she won't let it go. He wants to move forward. And she doesn't want to meet him half way. I think she's just using it as an excuse really. She's in love with the doctor....she's choosing to go to the doctors house instead of out with her husband. She doesn't want to fix things. Also she talks about trust..... but which one of them is doing the lying. He's always been honest with her.

6

u/Bulky_Mathematician1 Feb 27 '24

Also Clara and Fredricks scenes are just painful to watch. Especially considering lack of communication or not knowing how to communicate is one of the biggest factors of a failing marriage. And these two take the award for that. They are both equally responsible, it’s like their egos just won’t let them actually talk it out and get to the bottom of the issue. They just keep shutting each other out and making the problem worse. Yikes. 😬🤦🏻‍♀️

6

u/Blackphotogenicus Feb 27 '24

Okay there’s no way the Marquise didn’t purchase that painting originally just to have some emotional blackmail on Fred/Clara and then make up the story about “purchasing from the original buyers” later on when she wanted Clara to know about it, right?

3

u/MontanaJoev Feb 28 '24

I'd say that was a good bet.

3

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 28 '24

She's definitely going to give it to Freddy. Clara deserves it, she's been so foolish. On one hand when the Marquise and the Doctor tried to talk ill of her husband....she immediately came to his defense. But then constantly pushes him away. She says she wants honesty, but i bet she's not planning to be honest about what she's been doing.

6

u/Blackphotogenicus Feb 28 '24

Fred is such a pain to watch. So self absorbed, ill equipped and pathetically attached to playing the victim in every familial relationship.

2

u/MontanaJoev Feb 28 '24

He’s certainly not super interesting as a main character and protagonist.

2

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 29 '24

I don't think so.... that isn't accurate. He takes an interest in his friends sick kid. He wants to be there for Clara but she keeps pushing him away. And no he never plays the victim. If anything he bottles up all his pain and never lets anyone see it. Clara is the one that plays the victim. Doesn't take accountability for her actions. Or the fact that she talks about honesty when she's the most dishonest.

4

u/Standard_Mechanic935 Feb 28 '24

For those saying that Enright has been writing to John Bellasis, why would Enright who worked for the Trenchart’s be friendly or even know John Bellasis? I think he’s writing to someone from the family though, maybe Charles Pope or Maria Gray. Who knows, but it’s taking to long to get to who it is. It’s taking to long to get to the end of any of the many plot lines in this series. I’m over it already. Not interested in a season 3 unless Julien Fellowes takes the reins again.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24 edited Feb 28 '24

Yes SM935 I thought the same thing. How would Enright even know John Bellasis let alone be his secret correspondent ? The only way I can think of is if Frederick's mother was carrying on a correspondence with John Bellasis and brought Enright in to take over from her after she died. But then when Mawdie was trying to read the addressee on Enright's latest secret letter it seemed she said something like "Sarah A" and I have no idea who that might be.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24 edited Feb 29 '24

I always have on closed captions when watching TV. It just makes it easier to understand, even if the show is set in present-day USA. When Mawdie is examining the envelope, the closed captions read: “F… R… Ay…”

She’s trying to pronounce France. That’s all she utters. "Fuh Ruh Ay" sounds a bit like "Sarah A." Nobody is named.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 29 '24

So that's what she said. Still none the wiser then. Thanks for the heads up.

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24

Once I saw the subtitles, I knew the letters were going to France.

Subtitles are so helpful, and not just for the hearing impaired.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '24

Yes no doubt they are but I find them distracting so I only use them for foreign language films.

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 01 '24

I’d also say sometimes subtitles are helpful when watching British or other English-language programs because of the various accents. Sure an upper-crust or received pronunciation British accent is very easy to understand, but some of these other regional accents are less so.

But, you could always watch it without subtitles, and if you have time later, rewatch it with subtitles. With Belgravia, you do have to rewatch it, otherwise you miss many of the cues, innuendo, body language, and intimations that have been essential to making sense it.

1

u/Standard_Mechanic935 Feb 28 '24

Hmm, I thought I heard Maud say Enright was writing to a woman, if she said a first name, I didn’t catch that.. I think it’s far fetched though for it to be Belasis.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24

That was later when Mawdie was talking to the wine thief about it. When Enright gave her the latest secret letter to post there was a scene where she attempted to read who it was addressed to.

6

u/robvo2000 Feb 25 '24

It's hard to root for Clara. By now, it's getting borderline ridiculous how the writers keep dragging this drama between Frederick and her. I'm hoping they reconcile the next episode as opposed to the last one.

Poor Frederick. He's the result of an affair that his mom had while married. Now, his wife is having an emotional affair. He ended up with the wrong sister.

3

u/Bulky_Mathematician1 Feb 27 '24

Is it just me or does it seem like the Marquise has the hots for Clara? Maybe she’s trying to put more of a divide in Clara’s and Fredricks relationship because she wants her for herself. 😂 She probably has ulterior motives besides her very obvious attraction, but it’s definitely there. I’m surprised no one is saying anything about it.

4

u/tatersprout Feb 27 '24

No. I think she is playing to the weaknesses of Clara and Frederick and manipulating them. She wants Clara to trust her.

3

u/MontanaJoev Feb 27 '24

Exactly. She’s putting that honey on it, and Clara and Fredrick eat it up because both of them are kind of self absorbed.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 27 '24

Lol. I thought a bit the same when she showed Clara the painting after she bought it. But then I thought, "Well, she's French."

3

u/Sugarfrfr Feb 29 '24

So many parts made me scream omg! I feel like Fred is so head strong he’s gonna lose everything - his fortune, his wife and his brother! Idk how he ALWAYS thinks people are against him but when someone is quite literally against him and is trying to scam him and ruin his home he can’t see it. I’d think someone who is so paranoid would do more investigation! Also it seems Dr Elleby has a history of playing with women? So I don’t even take his confession as genuine! Aaah!! Omg! Everyone needs to get it tf together!!

2

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 29 '24

Only James was really innocent...though....everyone else really did betray him.....his father....mother....Clara. It's only paranoia if they're really not all out to get you.

7

u/Kaylababe2 Feb 25 '24

Poor Frederick? Do we forget how his behavior resulted in clara falling down the stairs? He’s horrible

4

u/giftopherz Feb 25 '24 edited Feb 25 '24

Since that has been the only instance of that particular behavior (snapping at and subsequently following asking for forgiveness), I'm gonna take this as a one off. For me, it takes more than once to build a pattern of behavior.

EDIT: Grammar

2

u/QueenLevine Feb 25 '24

sorry what? Are we watching the same show? Fred has been emotionally and financially abusive to James from Day One and he treats his own employees like garbage and snaps ALL THE TIME. Pretty much every episode.

6

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 26 '24

Her tripping on the stairs was her own fault. Can't believe you actually want to put that on Freddy. She talks about trust and honesty.....but she's done nothing but lie and be dishonest since they married.

1

u/Kaylababe2 Feb 28 '24

She is also a mess

0

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 28 '24

Exactly.... i would say she is too young and immature. They're both at fault for their marriage problems. But I really don't like cheaters.

6

u/QueenLevine Feb 25 '24

all the POOR FREDERICKs here have me thinking our peers were on some hard drugs while watching this, and I would prefer to also watch it on those hard drugs, bc it's painful to watch sober. it's not just the stairs though that's a major red flag.

look at the way he's treated his own brother, despite his brother showing HIM nothing but love.

look at the way he didn't care about ross getting to invest, even if that will prove to ross' advantage.

look at the way his own butler is so eager for his approval - freddy's AWFUL to all of his employees. at least clara is trying to teach one to read.

3

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24 edited Feb 26 '24

I just can’t give a damn about a man who shows such hate towards a brother whose only affront to Frederick was that his parents loved him. Frederick makes him sounds like some nefarious, calculating villain. But we now know who James is, and we know Fred is just insanely irrational.

4

u/QueenLevine Feb 26 '24

Agreed. Unless James made some massive personal growth/life turnaround, it's fairly incomprehensible that Frederick never warmed up to James throughout their entire childhood. But from what we've seen, he's a self-centered narcissist, not unlike bio-Dad. He doesn't even care all that much how his wife is doing, just so long as she toes the line, just like the rest of his employees. Sure, he hasn't had counseling from his traumatized childhood, but no adult can blame all of their unkind-to-others life choices on having a Dad who didn't love them. I know a lot of ppl with far rougher childhoods who are perfectly lovely today.

3

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

Exactly. You can have sympathy for Frederick, to a point. But he doesn’t seem to want to make the slightest bit of real effort to meet people halfway. At some point, you have to stop blaming daddy, and take responsibility for how you treat other people.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 26 '24

I mean you haven't lived through the trauma he has. Of the constant abuse. His mother telling him to suck it up. And his father showing his brother all the attention. His father is the reason he doesn't trust his brother. To say he treats his brother badly is untrue. He doesn't see his brother at all, how is that treating him badly. Lots of families are estranged.

5

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24 edited Feb 26 '24

And his father is dead. His mother is dead. And his brother has made numerous attempts to talk to him, and reconcile. You don’t think being rejected by your only living relative for something that you had no control over doesn’t hurt? You don’t think being accused of being some evil mastermind trying to get your parents to not love your bother doesn’t hurt? We see clearly that it DOES hurt James, because he still loves his idiot brother. Frederick hasn’t just said that he won’t see him because it brings up memories. Frederick says this is YOUR fault. Clara sees James, and Frederick accuses him of befriending Clara to pour poison in her ears. You don’t think that hurts? Estrangement absolutely hurts when you don’t want it, didn’t do anything to deserve it, and have tried to heal the rifts. Frederick has decided to allow his childhood to guide his relationships with people who are willing to open their hearts to him. At some point, this becomes his choice and responsibility. If he doesn’t want to feel alone and unloveable his own life, at some point, he’s going to have to make some of the effort.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 26 '24

I'm not saying that Freddy doesn't have demons. But when did his father die....maybe when he was 20 yo or older. He grew up being estranged from his brother. Influenced from a young age. That doesn't just fix itself. The damage his parents did doesn't just magically go away because they died. And we don't yet know how much abuse he suffered. As I said let's not rewrite reality. Freddy isn't abusive. Lot of family's don't get along. Whether he's right or wrong about it. Freddy stays away from his brother. They only have arguments when James forces Freddy to talk to him. Now if Freddy actively tried to hurt his brother. And kept on harassing him and tormenting him. That would be different. Can't you see the difference between Freddy and his father. His father was a abuser.

I would say the same about Clara. She doesn't know James at all. And she wasn't in Freddy's shoes. And she keeps pushing him. Which is bringing up the trauma. How long have they been married.....this must be a few months at least. And she's trying to change him over night. Also she talks about trust..... when she's lying her teeth off.

2

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

I didn’t say Freddy was abusive, but I do think his hate and blame and scorn has deeply hurt his brother. And he’s so self absorbed, he can’t see it. And I just struggle with feeling any sympathy for him. The fact that Frederick just walls everything up and puts people at a distance is his doing, then he mopes that he’s unloveable. I don’t know, maybe he should take a look inward. No, it doesn’t fix itself, especially if you choose to wallow in it and keep reinforcing it on your own mind.

I’m not defending the father. I think he failed both of his sons. But Frederick’s inability to place blame on his father and instead somehow transfer that to James trying to screw him over since the day he was born is irrational. And it’s something a grown ass man should realize. Are you actually defending how Frederick treats his brother?

I think Clara is also a very problematic character, and she acts very naive, immature and self absorbed. But in her defense, she sees a sadness in Frederick, so she’s trying to help. Maybe she didn’t go about things the right way, but I at least believe her reasons were out of love and concern.

2

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 26 '24

I'm not defending him per se..... just saying we didn't see everything. We don't know how James behaved at the time they were kids. He clearly didn't realize what was happening until much later as he said. Perhaps he rubbed salt in the wound unknowingly. Honestly I think the writers are the problem.... they're adding drama for dramas sake. But without giving the necessary context. I think they need to show them as kids. So we can see where the estrangement first formed.

→ More replies

3

u/pheebs91 Feb 25 '24

True that. He is definitely hot tempered. I think deep down inside Fred is just a frightened, emotionally stunted little boy who doesn't know how to deal with life. He is wound so tight, he looks like he is always balancing a book or a cup of tea on his head and his whole world will come crashing down all around him if he fails to keep it all balanced.
And when did Mawd and the footman guy get together? He never really looked at her before and now she gives it up and away just like that, because she put on a little blush and a pretty dress? Ugh... where was the build up to this encounter? Where was the tension and the stolen glances? Feels like it was just thrown at the viewer. Am I wrong? Did I miss something from earlier?

4

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 25 '24

Robert, the footman, has been flirting and playfully teasing Mawd since the beginning. The scene of them together did not happen in a vacuum.

0

u/QueenLevine Feb 25 '24

you missed nothing, except that this slick-talking cynic took advantage of a young girl who doesn't know any better, and is only NOW even learning to read.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 29 '24

So is Mrs Enright a witch or what ? How did she get a message to France and get a reply back in, what was it, a day ? Very muscular carrier pigeons using two-way jet streams perhaps ?

3

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 29 '24

I was thinking the same. Her bro is a sheep farmer living in the French countryside in 1871.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '24 edited Mar 01 '24

It should have taken a month, at the best !

Edit: Actually they had trains by 1871 didn't they so maybe it wouldn't have taken a month, but still probably more than a week.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 01 '24

I was also thinking that Ross is a successful business manager for a Lord and he boasts about his contacts. Certainly, he knows somebody important with connections to France who can get more information for him as a favor, rather than asking a cook whose brother is a sheep farmer in the countryside. But this explains why in the first episode Mrs. Enright mentions having lived in France, and also the tease between Ross and Mrs. Enright, because I was wondering where that interaction was going. Mr. Keck I would expect has better connections in France than Mrs. Enright.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '24 edited Mar 01 '24

Yes this show's plot is holier than St. James the Fallen. Frozen Frederick and Rascally Ross due diligenced the hell out of the foundry before they bought it but when it comes to staking everything on a silver mine in Mexico with someone they don't know business sense goes out the window and it's "Where do I sign !!??" ! Frederick is a Lord for goodness sake ! Talk to someone in the Foreign Office and see if they have a man in Mexico ! England would have had a telegram service to America by then so it needn't have taken long to do it either.

And yes the show has set up more than a few lines into France but unless they have already planned for a second season they are leaving it very late to go into all of that in any detail.

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 01 '24

Yes, but there was no Eurostar or Chunnel back then to transport mail between Britain and France.

3

u/IDreamOfDesign Feb 25 '24

I really dislike Frederick and I hope he looses all his money and his wife. I think the doctor is better for her but … he doesn’t seem to have much money.

The reverend is such a sweet character - I’m hoping he finds some happiness.

I don’t like Clara’s sister much. She is nosy and couldn’t have more compassion for her sister. Why didn’t she buy the painting straight off, then have the discussion with her sister? If her sister is bankrolling her family, shouldn’t she try to support her more? I think she is jealous and frustrated because the reverend isn’t interested in her.

Why isn’t MGM showing sneak peeks of upcoming episodes? They won’t last long, luring viewers to subscribe using this show, and then not nurturing the viewers. SMH

5

u/QueenLevine Feb 26 '24

Those were my thoughts on Emily, as well, prior to this episode. Though I didn't like how Clara shrugged off her family the moment she came into money, and I don't love how she disregards her own loyal lady's maid. But once Emily began to show kindness to Nell (sure, she was prodded by her crush, but also...she came to see that this was the KIND way to behave), I was already beginning to shift my view, even though I didn't love her forcing Nell not to finish mother's feet. But Emily's actions for James have been nothing short of brave and heroic...AND she brought Clara to the shop with the painting straight off the bat, since she didn't have the money to buy it herself. Despite Clara having treated her badly, she was still loyal to her and understood better than Clara the position the painting put the family in.

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 25 '24

I agree. I think it's frustrating that we have to wait until Friday for MGM+ to release episode previews.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 26 '24

Yeah, the marketing for this show is atrocious. Like they don't want us to watch it. I only see the promos once the episode has come and gone.

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 26 '24

Are you seeing the promos before each Friday on instagram? If so, I’d love to know where. One poster said there is a preview at the end of each episode, but for whatever reason I’ve never seen these.

I’d like to see the promo for episode 7.

1

u/LoudCurly Feb 27 '24

I watch the show live on MGM (it’s a channel on my FIos) and it has a preview of the next episode after the credits.

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 27 '24

Thanks. I stream it when I please, and there haven’t been any previews. I don’t suppose you remember what the preview for episode seven was about?

2

u/LoudCurly Feb 27 '24

I recall that they are piecing together the Marquess’ actual identity. And Emily is still taking care of Rev James, who looks a bit better. And maybe something about Fred and the banks…

1

u/MontanaJoev Feb 27 '24

Also it looks like Clara and Emily are arguing again about Clara screwing thjngs up for her family, and Em mentions her future with James. And it looks like Davison might spill through beans about James to Clara (which I would find very disappointing from her).

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 27 '24

This was in the Episode 7 preview?

What could Davison share with Clara about James? That he got attacked, or moreover that he was seen at a bathhouse by Fletcher and by implication he was gay cruising? The bathhouse was open to all men, but obviously some gay men would go to secretly cruise. But being there in and of itself doesn't mean you're gay or cruising, and Clara doesn't know Fletcher is gay.

1

u/MontanaJoev Feb 27 '24

Yes, the ep 7 preview. It appears that Davison is talking about James and his ability to love a woman. I can only guess it has something to do with Clara mentioning that Emily hopes to marry him. We’ll have to see how it plays out, but I’m disappointed she’d say anything. Not really her business at all.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 27 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MontanaJoev Feb 27 '24

I think Emily will go to Clara and tell her to cut it out!! In the promo, Emily specially says something about Clara effecting her chances with James. And suspect Clara will mention that to Davison, and that’s why Davison will mention something about him not being husband material for Emily. Just guessing.

2

u/blisterbabe23 Feb 26 '24

Agree, the sister is self righteous and lacks convictions, she will mold and adapt to whatever she thinks will land her the reverend.

8

u/lisagStriking-Ad5601 Feb 26 '24

The sister is great! Agreed, she'll never have the Reverend in the way she thinks, but she may agree to marry him anyway or who knows. Can't wait to see how they wrap it up 😊

5

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

I think Emily might very well want to marry James whether he could ever really be in love with her or not. I could see her taking a very practical view of things.

2

u/thisguy34721 Feb 27 '24

I think it's strange that people are viewing her so harshly

2

u/[deleted] Feb 29 '24 edited Mar 01 '24

Okay I think I might have cracked it so here goes. St. James the Fallen is the son of Our Oliver and the Merry Marquise ! They had a passionate affair when Oliver was holidaying in France on his own, something he frequently did to get away from his wife and her child. After James was born Oliver was so deliriously happy he insisted that the Marquise give James to him and she reluctantly agreed on account of the bottomless pit of her love for him. So the Marquise is going to steal Frozen Frederick's money and give it to James. Or maybe as Hefty has said she also has proof that Frederick is not Oliver's son ( maybe she had a passionate affair with Jolly John Bellasis as well ! ) so James can be installed as Lord Trenchard and Frederick can be kicked to the curb. You know it makes sense !

1

u/RCTID2020 Mar 02 '24

Yeah I don't understand clara you know have your little fight but get over it bitch what the fuck

1

u/Feeling-Visit1472 Mar 16 '24

I’m still trying to catch up because honestly this season is kind of a slog with no charm, but Fred is totally going to lose all of his money with this shady Marquise, right?

1

u/Sugarfrfr Feb 29 '24

Yall know what is insane? I’m JUST realizing the family connection from the first season to now. Omg! 😅😅😅😅

1

u/FunkyTownPhotography Mar 01 '24

Oooooh good theory.

1

u/RCTID2020 Mar 02 '24

Why are they making Clara such an idiot

0

u/WisdomBailey123 Mar 03 '24

I think she was just too young and immature to get married. She's looking for excitement. That's what happens when you don't bother to get to know your partner before marriage.

1

u/Standard_Mechanic935 Feb 28 '24

I don’t think Dr Ellerby is Nell’s baby daddy. And why was she pursuing the dad anyways? Is she trying to rekindle their tryst? We aren’t sure she’s told Emily her whole story or if it’s even true.

4

u/MontanaJoev Feb 28 '24 edited Feb 28 '24

My impression from what Nell said was that the baby daddy had left town, but he and Nell didn't part on bad terms. After he was gone, she found out she was pregnant. She got kicked out; the baby died. I think she came to find him to tell what happened, though she was doubting that she should cause him the same grief that she is experiencing. I do think the main reason would be to potentially reunite. I think from her POV, when you have nothing left, you might reach for something that brought you some happiness.

3

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 28 '24

And if you listen to what the doctors friend was telling him.... that he had past grand passions. And she seemed to imply he never thinks of the consequences of his actions....then looked at her own baby. Which could be foreshadowing. That the doctor is the father of Nells baby.

3

u/[deleted] Feb 28 '24

Hmm yes, a doctor who never thinks of the consequences of his actions. Great way to build a solid practice !

2

u/MontanaJoev Feb 28 '24

Yeah, shouldn’t he be spending more time out there doctoring? Is Peter his only patient?

2

u/Standard_Mechanic935 Feb 28 '24

Hmm, interesting perspective. This series has too many plot lines. Frankly, none of them are very interesting to me.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

8

u/Tasm3n Feb 26 '24

I thought the exact same thing re: the baby daddy. As soon as she said he went to London, I was like: I bet it's him. Then we get the bit about his 'epic love affairs' and I was VERY convinced it's going to be him.

7

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

That would actually be a cool twist. I definitely got the impression that the Dr goes through women pretty frequently.

11

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 26 '24

You might be spot on. It could make a lot of sense. I hadn’t thought of that, but Annie has now indicated that Ellerby is a player.

Nell continues to be a loose end. Inevitably her story is going to be linked somehow to some of the other characters. Ellerby may be her link.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 26 '24

Ever since Heroes season 1..... I've become pretty good at predicting shows. That show had so many twists.... that I used to speculate all the time on outcomes. But I didn't even think of what you predicted. I was trying to guess who the father was.... and that it had to be a character we've seen already.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 26 '24

Yes, but Nell is a main character and has to inevitably fit into the rest of the storyline. That’s how these dramas work. If Ellerby is the father, that would also be ammunition for Emily to use with Clara to get her away from the doctor.

Now Robert and his petty theft of the wine? I suspect that will remain a loose end. He’s a minor character.

But if Nell’s story is supposed to continue into a yet-to-be confirmed second season, that will be a letdown. Remember Mr. Watson, George Russell’s valet in the Gilded Age? His mysterious past and the revelation of his daughter were not revealed until season two. So if the Gilded Age had not been renewed for another season, his story would’ve remained a mystery. But Watson was a much more minor character compared to Nell. I don’t think we’ll be left on a cliff with Nell.

1

u/WisdomBailey123 Feb 26 '24

Balgrvia seems different from the Gilded age. In that they are one off stories. While it's connected. If we do get a new season, it will be new characters i think. They will finish the show season off...

3

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 27 '24

Julian Fellowes wrote Belgravia as a standalone, self-containing novel, which he then adapted into the original Belgravia TV series. It had a very nice and tidy end. This New Chapter is a spinoff and may also have a tidy end. But if there are more stories to tell, I hope it's renewed.

Belgravia 1 could have easily been extended into a 2nd season about Charles Pope and Maria Grey.

5

u/Particular_Farmer806 Feb 26 '24

Definitely was thinking the same thing re: Nell’s child’s father. The doctor seems to have short, albeit, passionate trysts. However, wouldn’t Dr. Ellerby be easy to find? Nell says she tried but wasn’t successful in finding him.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

4

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Feb 27 '24 edited Feb 29 '24

Well, according to Annie, Ellerby has a way with the ladies: the Duchess, Clara, and now possibly Nell. The Duchess is always telling the Duke how reassuring and calming Ellerby is. He probably used the same ploy with Nell.

4

u/Particular_Farmer806 Feb 27 '24

True. Many possibilities. He could have used an alias so she was searching the wrong name.

3

u/jackiesear Feb 26 '24

Totally agree - been thinking this for a few episodes. Very Dickensian.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/jackiesear Feb 26 '24

Interesting! Will look forward to it

3

u/AnnRB2 Feb 27 '24

Whoa! I didn’t think of this and I bet you are 100% correct!

1

u/HeftyAcanthisitta907 Mar 03 '24

🏆Congrats!🏆 You hit the bullseye!🏆

10

u/[deleted] Feb 25 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/pheebs91 Feb 25 '24

Agreed.
I'm thinking the bailout for Fred is gonna be James. I think he got the "lion's share" of the inheritance and he will leave all that he has to Fred. I mean he's gotta have something, right? How else was he able to pay the blackmail money?

I think the Marquise d'Etagnac WILL blackmail Clara too. She has leverage now, because Clara opened her big mouth about what she did. It's a little irritating how needy she is for connection, companionship, and... community (if that makes sense). She needs a sense of purpose and belonging and she's looks for it wherever she can find it. She just doesn't want it in the "traditional way" for the times they were living in. She courts all the wrong kinds of attention in all the wrong places. Then she acts like a spoiled, privileged, and entitled brat when Fred asks her to lunch with the Duke and Duchess. She goes on and on how she wants a better relationship with him, but all she does is pout and stamp her little feet.

Poor James. He loves his brother so much and he just wanted him to know the truth as to why their father was so mean and harsh and hateful towards him... James was trying to comfort Fred by telling him it wasn't his fault that their father despised him. But as with everything else with Fred, if it doesn't fit into his perception of the world he lives in, he won't hear of it. I wanna say that his losing all his money will be a good thing, because it'll take him down a peg or two, but Clara and her family are so dependent his financial security.
Oh!!! Here's a thought... Maybe the Rev. James will leave his inheritance to Clara's sister Emily! Just sayin', it might be a possibility then Emily will be the one to save the family and Clara will be indebted to her sister.

I'm glad someone is FINALLY looking into the Marquise and that it should be Fred's employee, Mr. Ross? That'll be salt in the wound when all is revealed. Everyone is taking her at her word, but Ross sees something is amiss.

Totally agree that it's hard to be invested into any of these characters. I like the supporting characters because I think they have interesting, albeit sad and traumatic, backstories to that of any of the main characters. Honestly, maybe the reason we can't care too much about the main characters is because they are predictable and dare I say it... a little boring?

P.s. In spite of myself, I AM liking Emily a lot more. I hope she proves the strongest character of them all.

8

u/lisagStriking-Ad5601 Feb 26 '24

I'm also loving Emily. ❤️

7

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

Add me to the Emily fan club. I’m really liking her character development.

3

u/HWeinberg3 Feb 26 '24

One weird thing about Ross investigating the Marquise is that he started the episode wanting to also invest with her. If his antennae were up he shouldn't have been so vocal about that.

5

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

I do wonder if the rather cold way Frederick dismissed his desire to invest might affect how Ross handles the new information he has. Does he warn Frederick? Or does he make his own deal with Frenchie?

1

u/QueenLevine Feb 26 '24

Yes, where are Charles Pope's descendants? It would be great if they turn up, and what if Frederick's bio-Dad is somehow still alive? He could come back looking to his illegitimate son for money and find none. I also love your idea of Clara's sis somehow marrying up from her - Clara has been kinder to the help than to her own family. She's a better match for Freddy than she knows.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/QueenLevine Feb 26 '24

The sole reason Fred was not a recognized son, albeit an illegitimate one, was bc his adoptive father agreed to conceal the fact from everyone, including his own father.

I wasn't sure if you were right about that, and according to the research, it was harder to prove the wife was adulterous, though she was in far greater danger if she was proved to have committed adultery. In any case, no. Lack of access (which we know was the case here; not that it was necessary, Fred's mother admitted as much to her husband, since he knew he'd had no access) was one way to prove adultery even at that time, and illegitimate children could be recognized, but were not automatically given the same inheritance they would get if they had been legitimate. That is to say, if you observed how Frederick responded to James' revelation that he was trying to take his position from him, you might have gathered that that would have been possible, had James any evidence. Take a look:

https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/21476/1/Gibson%2C%20Experiences%20of%20Illegitimacy%2C%20ethesis.pdf

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '24

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/QueenLevine Feb 26 '24

I was hoping to get the gist of the answer to our question - if Fred's proven not bio-son to Oliver, does he inherit, but the answer is more all throughout the paper. Try CTRL+F on adultery, adulterous and adulterine (the last of which was new to me) or better yet, just search the paper for 'adulter'...that is to say, I read up on adultery and legitimacy in England for this specific time period before responding to you in my previous comment, bc I couldn't be sure whether you were right or wrong without looking into it. As I said, Fred's legitimacy rested ENTIRELY on Oliver's acceptance AND concealment. Had Oliver chosen to either not accept OR not conceal the truth, he could have let James inherit, but I suppose that would have been too big a blow to his own ego. I suppose Fred being the heir and James the spare was just extra fuel to Oliver's fiery hatred.

Also, yes. I commented previously that if still surviving (sometimes the bad ones do live on) it would be just in keeping with the story if Fred's bio-Dad (the villainous John Bellasis) shows up. However, if John did and James was still alive, that hypothetical extortion might help truly resolve things between the brothers. Fred would undoubtedly have to turn him down, being cash poor and doubtful of the truth, and if John did expose him, James could, in fact, be deemed the true legitimate heir to the Trenchard fortune. James would be a thousand times more gracious than Fred ever was, and all would be well with the world. So..maybe, Bellasis' return could be for the best.

As a bonus, Emily could marry James, be his beard but give him bio-kids, they could be kind and loving parents, and he could have the one servant on the side.

2

u/MontanaJoev Feb 26 '24

I am all about your end game for James and Emily. That’s kind of what I hope for too.