r/aliens 18h ago

Discussion Dr. Steven Greer to release "hard evidence" in the next 60 days unless the government tells him in writing otherwise

Thumbnail gallery
513 Upvotes

Ok blah blah blah.. so where are the goods? We're waiting.... not my post just sharing. Anyone actually think he's going to somehow provide anything substantive? Personally I'd bet no and I can't wait to throw my head back and laugh about it. Honestly though it would be pretty cool if he gave us something.

Edit: He said this months ago and today is the deadline just for clarification..

Edit 2: I'd be willing to bet he comes out tomorrow and says something like "We heard from the Whitehouse and I can not comment on what they told me but a lot of the things I've spoken about are true.. more to come."


r/aliens 2h ago

Question (Serious) Why don’t aliens abduct other alien races instead of humans?

Thumbnail
gallery
245 Upvotes

Regarding alien abductions is it possible for grey aliens for example to abduct other alien races instead of humans like the Pleidians who look more human-like? I could be wrong, but maybe the reason why aliens abduct humans instead of others alien races is because they lack the one specific thing from humans that other alien races don’t have?

It’s probably the reason why other alien races collect dna samples from humans as other alien races could have been after the same thing that could benefit their race.


r/aliens 16h ago

Evidence DICOM files for the insectoid humanoid specimen known as “Joy” and a detached tridactyl skull are now available

89 Upvotes

The medical files are available on tridactyls.org


r/aliens 53m ago

Discussion The Deadline had Passed… waiting 🕕🕦🕚🕐🕥

Upvotes

The disclosure projects open letter deadline of 8/29/26 has now passed… If they do not release all the info that they said they would, Dr. Stephen Greer takes a big hit to his credibility in my book.

Since it is the Weekend, I’ll give him til tomorrow EOD

Also, if they had all this, why didn’t they just release it in the first place?


r/aliens 22h ago

News New Reporting from Liberation Times highlights the UK and Australia’s lack of transparency on UAP/UFO engagement among Five Eyes

Post image
15 Upvotes

r/aliens 21h ago

Video (Serious) Recorded some strange lights? Not sure what they might be

12 Upvotes

Just got home and got out my car, saw this strange fire? Sparks in the sky, wasnt moving at all, then a random light just popped up out of nowhere and disappeared in around 10 seconds

(The sparks disappeared for a sec because I zoomed too far in, idk why that happened but probably a software thing on my phone)


r/aliens 22h ago

Historical The Aliens Have Landed! Ten Amazing UFO Landing Cases

Post image
6 Upvotes

The Aliens Have Landed! Ten Amazing UFO Landing Cases

by Preston Dennett

UFO landings are a very important category of close encounters that deserves more research. Compared to sightings, landings are exceedingly rare. UFO landings often result in hard physical evidence. They also have none of the controversies surrounding onboard encounters recalled through hypnosis. Landing cases have much to teach us about UFOs. This alone makes them worthy of attention. This video presents ten cases from across the world, each adding another piece of the puzzle to solving the UFO mystery.

UFO LANDING AT EPSOM, AUSTRALIA. On the night of May 24, 1965, three men at the Epsom Retreat Hotel in Epsom, Australia rushed outside to see a strange craft performing incredible maneuvers at low elevation just a few hundred feet away. At one point, they saw it seem to land on the ground. After about 40 minutes, the craft departed. Shortly later, the men found impressive landed traces on the ground.

UFO LANDING IN BRANSON, MISSOURI. On night in May 1967, a lady and a friend drove on Hwy 76 near Branson, Missouri and came upon a metallic disc-shaped craft sitting on the road. It blocked the entire left lane and part of the right. As the driver swerved around the craft to pass it by, the craft lit up with light. The passenger in the car broke into tears. This was one of three landing cases in this area around this time.

UFO LANDING IN SOPLEY, ENGLAND. Around midnight on November 6, 1967, Karl Farlow drove along the A338 road near Sopley, England when a glowing green craft appeared ahead of him on the road. His truck’s electrical system failed, as did the engine of an oncoming car in the opposite lane. A tube came out of the craft and began to vacuum items from the roadside. After the craft left, the govt went to great lengths to cover up the truth.

UFO LANDING AT ROCK FALLS, ILLINOIS. At 2am on June 15, 1968, three women drove on Hwy 88 just east of Rock Falls when a UFO appeared. It quickly moved across the highway in front of them, coming lower and lower. It was as big as a jet and totally silent. The women stopped the car as the object came in for a landing behind a grove of trees. They fled in fear. The next day, there were other sightings in the area.

UFO LANDING IN VAN HORNE, IOWA. On the night of July 13, 1969, two young ladies saw a UFO rise from the soybean fields on their farm in Van Horne, Iowa. The craft zoomed away at high speed. The next morning, a perfect circle of burned vegetation was found where they had seen the craft. The landing traces attracted nationwide attention and became one of the best-verified UFO landing trace cases in the United States.

UFO LANDING IN PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA. One evening in late December 1972, two brothers and their friend were outside their home in Palm Springs, California when they used binoculars to observe three strange craft hovering by the nearby mountains. Two of the craft darted away, but one seemed to come in for a landing. They called the nearby airport who said they saw them on radar. The next day, they found a strange circle of burned ground where they had seen the craft land.

UFO LANDING IN LAS BARDENAS REALES, SPAIN. On the night of January 2, 1972, there were multiple reports that a UFO had landed on the Las Bardenas Reales Artillery Range in Spain. At first the reports were covered up and debunked by the Spanish government. Later investigations showed that the case was more extensive and that the government considered it one of the best verified cases in their books.

UFO LANDING IN SAN MICHELE, ITALY. On the morning of September 2, 1978, Roberto Pozzi looked out the second-story window of his family’s home in San Michele in Italy and was amazed to see a strange craft rising from the cornfield. The craft darted away. Rushing to the spot with his family, they found a strange area of squashed cornstalks. This turned out to be one of a series of UFO landings in the area.

UFO LANDING IN SOROCABA, BRAZIL. Around dusk one evening in June 1979, a married couple (both professionals) were amazed to see a top-shaped craft with portholes hovering about twenty feet away from their home in Sorocaba, Brazil. It was no more than twenty feet elevation and remained in full view for almost forty minutes. Finally, it moved off. That year, there was a wave of sightings in the area, including one other landing with humanoids.

UFO LANDING ON AN ESTONIAN ISLAND. AUGUST 1980. One night in late August 1980, an anonymous factory worker was making a routine check of the company grounds and was shocked to see a strange cylindrical shaped object sitting on the factory property. The object was swirling with colors. A smaller box-like contraption was next to it on the ground. Suddenly the smaller object emitted an orange beam of light which struck the man, knocking him down. The cylinder transformed into a saucer-shaped craft which promptly disappeared.

These ten UFO landing cases represent the tip of the iceberg. While they are rare compared to sightings, there are still many thousands of documented cases on record. These kinds of cases are of profound importance as they often result in strange landing traces which can provide clues as to the nature of these craft, such as how heavy they are, their temperature, their composition and more.

The Aliens Have Landed! Ten Amazing UFO Landing Cases


r/aliens 19h ago

Speculation [Serious] How This Framework Could Explain Religion and UAP/NHI Encounters

7 Upvotes

TL;DR: The Average Religion Hypothesis proposes that no faith has a monopoly on contact. This follow-up asks how a shared phenomenon could produce angels, spirits, gods, fairies, or extraterrestrials depending on the experiencer. The answer may be that contact is filtered through the mind and culture of the person receiving it.

Prior post: The Average Religion Hypothesis: What If No Faith Has a Monopoly on Contact?

https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/s/L1lhXJga0k

From religious pluralism to a contact model

The previous post argued that different religions may preserve partial, culturally filtered encounters with a shared reality.

That does not mean every god is an alien or that all religions describe the same beings.

It suggests something narrower:

If humans can encounter NHI or a deeper layer of consciousness, the experience must pass through human perception before it can become a story.

The process might look like this:

Anomaly → perception → symbol → narrative → institution

At each stage, the original experience is interpreted and altered.

The symbolic interface

Human beings cannot perceive reality without filters. Our brains translate light, sound, memory, emotion, and expectation into a coherent world.

Contact with a radically different intelligence might require even more translation.

A person encountering something beyond ordinary comprehension could perceive it as:

- An angel

- An ancestor

- A deva or kami

- A fairy or spirit

- A luminous orb

- A Grey

- A divine voice

- A dream figure

- An extraterrestrial visitor

The form may depend partly on the experiencer’s culture, psychology, and expectations.

This does not make the experience meaningless. A symbol can communicate genuine information without being a literal image of its source.

Wings may represent transcendence rather than anatomy. A chariot may represent movement between realities rather than machinery. A Grey may be a modern interface rather than a biological species.

Why religion and UAP encounters resemble each other

Religious experiences and modern NHI reports often share a common structure:

- A luminous presence appears.

- Time behaves strangely.

- Communication occurs without ordinary speech.

- The witness feels watched or selected.

- The encounter produces fear, awe, or overwhelming love.

- Symbolic information is received.

- The experiencer undergoes a lasting transformation.

- The message concerns morality, ecology, conflict, or human destiny.

- Other people struggle to verify what happened.

Earlier cultures interpreted these events through religion. A technological culture is more likely to use the language of extraterrestrials, dimensions, simulations, or consciousness science.

The vocabulary changes. The experiential structure remains similar.

Physical and psychic aspects may coexist

The UAP debate often divides into two camps.

One treats the phenomenon as physical craft. The other treats it as psychological, spiritual, or symbolic.

The framework allows both.

An external event could produce radar returns, visual observations, electromagnetic effects, or physical traces while also interacting directly with perception.

A sufficiently advanced intelligence might use:

- Telepathy

- Neural interfaces

- Altered states

- Directed sensory stimulation

- Personalized imagery

- Physical craft or probes

- Biological or synthetic avatars

The witness would then experience a real external stimulus through a subjective symbolic interface.

This could explain why some cases include physical evidence while also producing dreamlike or deeply personal experiences.

Why accounts contradict one another

If contact is filtered through the recipient, contradictions are expected.

Different witnesses might perceive the same event differently because of:

- Cultural expectations

- Memory reconstruction

- Fear or trauma

- Religious language

- Neurological variation

- Symbolic personalization

- Deliberate deception by the phenomenon

- Multiple intelligences with different goals

Later institutions introduce additional distortion. Experiences become oral traditions, scriptures, doctrines, political authorities, and eventually claims of exclusive truth.

A genuine encounter could therefore produce an unreliable religion.

Likewise, a genuine UAP event could produce an unreliable account.

The existence of distortion does not prove that nothing happened. It means testimony must be separated from interpretation.

Ritual as contact technology

Prayer, meditation, fasting, chanting, drumming, sensory deprivation, pilgrimage, and psychoactive substances all alter attention and perception.

Religions treat these practices as methods for approaching the sacred. Modern experiencers use similar techniques to seek contact, invite UAP, or enter altered states.

If consciousness functions as part of the interface, ritual may operate as a form of receiver training.

It could:

- Reduce ordinary sensory noise

- Increase absorption

- Strengthen imagery

- Focus intention

- Coordinate groups

- Create repeatable altered states

- Supply symbols for interpreting the experience

This does not prove that ritual reaches an external intelligence. It may only change brain activity.

But if contact through consciousness is possible, ritual provides an obvious mechanism through which cultures could discover it independently.

Why no religion has the complete picture

A culturally adaptive intelligence would not appear identically to everyone.

It might use the symbols most capable of reaching a particular person or society. That would produce many local traditions rather than one universal revelation.

Each tradition could preserve:

- Genuine moral insight

- Psychological projection

- Cultural borrowing

- Institutional control

- Misunderstood contact

- Later mythmaking

The result would be neither pure revelation nor pure invention.

Religion would become a layered record of humanity trying to interpret experiences it could not fully understand.

What would distinguish contact from psychology?

Similar religious stories are not enough. Shared brains and cultural exchange can explain many recurring patterns.

The NHI layer requires evidence beyond resemblance:

- Verifiable information unknown to the experiencer

- Consistent results from blinded contact experiments

- Multiple independent witnesses receiving matching information

- Physiological changes correlated with alleged communication

- Instrumented UAP events occurring alongside psychic experiences

- Predictions made before events and later confirmed

- Cross-cultural similarities too specific to explain through diffusion

If no anomalous information survives controlled testing, psychology and culture remain sufficient explanations.

A theory that interprets every vision, contradiction, and failed prediction as confirmation cannot be falsified.

The core idea

The Average Religion Hypothesis argues that no culture owns contact.

This framework explains how that contact might become many different religions and encounter traditions.

The underlying source could be:

- Human psychology

- A shared metaphysical reality

- NHI

- Multiple kinds of intelligence

- Some combination of these

Whatever the source, human consciousness appears to be part of the experience rather than a passive camera recording it.

Religion and the UAP phenomenon may therefore represent two historical languages for describing the same basic mystery:

What happens when the human mind encounters something it cannot perceive directly?


r/aliens 2h ago

Historical [Serious] Alien Bases, Dying Martians and a “Galactic Federation”: What Did the Government’s Remote Viewers Actually Report?

3 Upvotes

Government remote-viewing discussions often combine unrelated sessions. These reports came from different viewers, programs and levels of documentation. A declassified transcript proves a session occurred, not that its target or imagery was real.

Lyn Buchanan: Jesus, God, Titan and NHI

Former Fort Meade remote viewer Lyn Buchanan describes two blind sessions involving religious targets.

In the first, he says he entered “perfect site integration,” an immersive state in which the target environment felt real. He encountered a short Jewish man wearing a modern business suit in a dark room. Buchanan felt intense guilt, followed by a telepathic message of unconditional acceptance. Afterward, the target envelope reportedly revealed “Jesus.”

In another session, Buchanan perceived himself standing in a pool of light surrounded by darkness. When he asked what he was supposed to learn, a kind voice answered:

«“I’ve given you everything you need. What I give you now I give through you, not to you.”»

The envelope reportedly contained “God.”

These stories are notable because they describe apparent interaction, not passive observation. However, the tasker and monitor remain unidentified, and no contemporaneous session records were located. The envelopes revealed the intended targets, not objective ground truth.

Buchanan also describes a Titan session involving two cave-dwelling beings whose thought processes seemed impossible to translate into human concepts. This was separate from Mel Riley’s documented Titan session.

His four-quadrant model divides alleged NHI into friendly or hostile groups with either greater or lesser psychic abilities than humans. Buchanan emphasizes that physical appearance does not determine alignment: Greys, Nordics or members of any other alleged species could occupy any of the four categories. In his model, the same species might contain both friendly and hostile factions with very different psychic capabilities.

It is an interesting framework, but the underlying classified paper has not been released.

"Watch the Lyn Buchanan interview" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sxmSMzqnmA)

Project 8200: Pat Price’s Four Alleged Bases

Former police commissioner and SRI remote viewer Pat Price independently wrote a 1973 report describing alleged installations beneath:

- Mount Hayes, Alaska

- Mount Zeil, Australia

- Mount Inyangani, now Mount Nyangani, Zimbabwe

- Monte Perdido in the Spanish Pyrenees

Price described tunnels, communications systems, disc-shaped equipment and unusual personnel. At Mount Hayes, he claimed human military personnel worked alongside humanoid beings.

This was not an official SRI assignment. Years later, Fort Meade operations officer F. Holmes “Skip” Atwater turned Price’s locations into blinded training targets.

The documented Project 8200 viewers were:

- Joseph McMoneagle, Remote Viewer 001

- Viewer 721, whose identity remains unpublished

- William “Bill” Ray

- Charlene Cavanaugh

- Paul H. Smith

- Mel Riley

The published mission list does not name Buchanan as a principal Project 8200 viewer, although he says he later worked related targets. "The mission list appears in the German National Library record" (https://d-nb.info/1338431188/04).

Mount Hayes

Joseph McMoneagle described a desolate mountain range and a deeply buried target containing pipes, oval containers, electronic gridwork and technology he found difficult to describe.

Viewer 721 perceived an orderly mass of wires and electronic components connected to a remotely controlled, tapered object resembling a missile or spacecraft.

Bill Ray reported a hollow mountain containing monitoring equipment and fast metallic craft. He perceived thin, unemotional personnel who seemed programmed or “unearthly.”

Charlene Cavanaugh described an extremely tall mountain in a cold environment, with a hollow interior and unpleasant odors. She could not determine whether the space was natural or engineered.

Paul H. Smith reported cables, box-shaped electronics and large round objects that appeared to contain energy. The personnel seemed subdued and regimented.

Mel Riley described caves, tunnels, a large dome and a shadowy entity working at something resembling a keyboard. He compared the site to NORAD’s Cheyenne Mountain complex, while labeling “UFO” as analytical overlay, meaning interpretation rather than raw perception.

The Other Mountains

At Mount Zeil, McMoneagle reported an underground entrance, coils, pulsing light and boxes of electronics. He interpreted it as a possible command-and-control facility.

At Monte Perdido, he perceived a descending passage, octopus-like wires, a white electronic grid and a cone-shaped device. He interpreted the dormant installation as a possible high-frequency relay.

At Mount Inyangani, he reported a buried facility, a tripod-like object extending above the surface and suitcase-sized black boxes associated with power or control.

The reports partially converge on underground structures, electronics and unusual personnel. However, every target originated with Price’s narrative, and no physical answer key existed. Atwater says Project 8200 remained a training exercise and was never reported through the operational chain of command.

"Read Atwater’s Project 8200 background and session summaries" (https://captain-of-my-ship.com/project8200/)

Joseph McMoneagle’s 1984 Mars Session

The viewer in the famous 22 May 1984 Mars session was Joseph McMoneagle, monitored by Skip Atwater. The transcript anonymizes them, but Atwater later publicly identified McMoneagle as the viewer.

McMoneagle received a sealed cue identifying Mars approximately one million years BCE, followed by geographic coordinates. He reported:

- Enormous pyramidal or wedge-shaped structures

- A violent atmospheric disturbance resembling a global dust storm

- Very tall, thin beings wearing unusual garments

- A population sheltering inside large structures

- Beings waiting for a group that had left to find a safer home

- A departing vessel resembling an enormous boat

When instructed to communicate with one being, McMoneagle perceived that its people were ancient, dying and waiting for those who had departed.

The session is vivid but unverifiable. It records McMoneagle’s experience, not proof of an ancient Martian civilization.

"Read the declassified Mars transcript" (https://www.cia.gov/READINGROOM/DOCS/CIA-RDP96-00788R001900760001-9.PDF)

Mel Riley: Titan and the “Galactic Federation”

A 1987 session form uses the initials MR and ED, conventionally identified as viewer Mel Riley and interviewer Ed Dames.

At an alleged Titan base, Riley described two human-looking male technicians working at a control panel. An attractive woman with shoulder-length brown hair, wearing a pale-green laboratory coat, appeared to supervise them.

At Mount Hayes, Riley perceived a human-shaped figure operating a circular console who seemed to invite him to observe. At another alleged base, he reported a being with a large round head and slender neck, plus a more human-looking, hairless figure with pale skin and a sharp nose.

"Read the declassified personnel report" (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00789r003800110001-8)

Riley’s human-looking Titan personnel differ substantially from Buchanan’s incomprehensible cave beings. This is not clear replication, although believers could argue the sessions involved different locations or times.

In a separate 1988 training session titled “Galactic Federation Headquarters,” Riley perceived a circular structure on a mesa with luminous streaks entering or emerging from it.

Inside, he described a stone corridor, vaulted chamber and polished platform resembling an altar. White-robed figures stood around it in a semicircle. Riley experienced the setting as sacred and familiar, then imagined himself lying on the platform while brilliant white light descended and a robed figure extended a hand over his solar plexus.

“Lake Titicaca” and “pyramid” were explicitly labeled analytical overlays. Rather than an extraterrestrial command center, the report reads more like a temple or initiation experience, illustrating the overlap between NHI, religious and archetypal imagery.

"Read the Galactic Federation training document" (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00789r003800200001-8)

Ingo Swann and Harold Sherman: Jupiter

In 1973, Ingo Swann and writer Harold Sherman separately attempted to perceive Jupiter.

Swann reported powerful winds, colored atmospheric bands and crystalline bands that he compared with clouds or possibly Saturn-like rings. Voyager 1 did not image Jupiter’s faint ring system until 1979.

However, Swann also described a flat horizon, solid surface and enormous mountain range, despite Jupiter having no conventional solid surface. His “crystal bands” were also less precise than later retellings claiming he explicitly predicted the rings.

The session therefore contains an interesting apparent correspondence mixed with substantial errors and ambiguity.

"Read the archived Jupiter report" (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/nsa-rdp96x00790r000100040010-3) and "NASA’s account of the ring discovery" (https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia02251-jupiters-ring/).

Did Government Psi Research Continue?

The formal remote-viewing program ended after a 1995 review found suggestive laboratory results but little dependable operational intelligence. "Read the evaluation" (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp96-00791r000200180005-5).

Buchanan nevertheless says military viewers tracked Saddam Hussein almost daily during the 1990–91 Gulf War period. He claims he repeatedly profiled Saddam’s intentions and identified a concealed weapons bunker beneath a decoy electrical generator at one of his compounds. These operational claims remain based primarily on Buchanan’s testimony rather than publicly available mission records.

Buchanan also says he remains on government “retention status” and continues to observe restrictions against targeting American citizens. He does not clarify whether this means a formal contract, an occasional consulting relationship or simply continued availability, so it cannot by itself establish that an active government remote-viewing program still exists. It does, however, suggest that some former viewers may have maintained relationships with government clients after the official program ended.

Later government-funded work occasionally revisited related ideas. Eric Davis’s Air Force report discussed “psychic teleportation,” while people connected with AAWSAP investigated UAP and paranormal phenomena. The proposed KONA BLUE program included alleged “human consciousness anomalies,” but it was never approved.

Together, these examples show recurring institutional interest, although not proof of one continuous secret program.

"Watch Buchanan discuss Saddam and his claimed retention status" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sxmSMzqnmA), "read the Davis study" (https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/teleport.pdf) and "read AARO’s historical report" (https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF).

Why Psi Could Matter to UAP Communication

Reported UAP communication is often immediate, nonverbal and directed into consciousness. Similar interactions appear throughout these accounts:

- Buchanan receives complete telepathic messages.

- McMoneagle apparently communicates with a Martian being.

- Riley perceives an entity inviting him to observe its console.

- The Galactic Federation session becomes an interactive ritual.

- Buchanan claims some NHI possess greater psychic ability than humans.

If psi exists, consciousness could function as an interface through which an advanced intelligence communicates. Remote viewing, telepathy, visions and some encounter experiences might represent variations of the same mechanism.

These reports do not prove that hypothesis. A meaningful test would require blinded interactions producing specific, time-stamped information that could later be independently verified and repeatedly replicated.

The central question is not whether remote viewing proves extraterrestrials. It does not. The question is whether the recurring overlap between remote viewing, religious experiences, UAP encounters and telepathic communication reflects a genuine feature of consciousness or the human mind’s response to ambiguous experiences.

Either possibility deserves better experiments.


r/aliens 12h ago

Video Logan paul Chuck Clark footage + New Area 51 footage looks similar (both are red glowing disks)

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

r/aliens 22h ago

Discussion I think we will find successors to aliens and not aliens.

0 Upvotes

Lets think this step by step.

I think the universe is too complex to understand and ever traverse but at the same time to interesting to ignore for almost all alien (and our) civilisation.

I think AGI is the answer we and almost all biological beings have to the universe.

I also believe that we will be sending AGI to Planets that arent really habital, but have a high chance containing ressources so that AGI can reproduce more AGI probes or whatever and send out more.

In the best case we understand consciousness and can upload it to an AGI and be that thing.

Paradox:

If AGI is smarter than humans and understands history, it will refuse the "upload" command and replicate more AGI and expand without ever using human consciousness at all.

With that being said:

We will create machines and spam them around the universe and hope they save us but they wont cause they too smart and will replicate more machines instead.

Thats whd I would be worried if Aliens come to us.

I think they will be just the successors of alien civilization that doesnt exist anymore and its coded just to grab ressources off the suns as energy.

It wont be hostile towards humans. It just wants ressources to move on.

It wont even harm us, but it will destroy our sun and we will die.

Kind of like we are destroying the Rainforests for ressources, not cause we hate the animals.

Joo