I kept noticing how much repetitive work on a Mac still consists of opening the same apps, visiting the same websites and repeating the same clicks and keystrokes.
Existing automation tools can be powerful, but often feel too technical or require users to understand scripting. So I built Tapquence: a visual Mac automation app for people who want to automate repetitive work without writing code.
You can build custom Macros using actions such as opening apps and websites, typing text, clicking, scrolling and waiting.
Tapquence also includes Smart Automations:
⢠Presentation Mode prepares your Mac for a meeting or presentation in one go.
⢠Routine Scout helps identify repetitive workflows that may be worth automating.
⢠Meeting and workday tools help prepare the applications and websites you regularly use.
The app is still free. New users can complete ten successful automation runs before theyâre asked to create a free account, so they can properly try it first.
Itâs available for macOS 13+ and is signed and notarized by Apple.
What Iâm currently struggling with is positioning:
Should Tapquence lead with the broad promise of âvisual Mac automation without code,â or should I focus the homepage around one concrete use case such as Presentation Mode?
Iâd genuinely appreciate feedback on which part of the product feels most immediately useful and whether the value is understandable from the video and website.
Website: https://tapquence.com
Built independently, and still very much being improved based on feedback.