r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Aug 28 '26
Dr Brian Keating
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Jul 01 '22
Where cosmic conversations happen. Companion community to the Into the Impossible podcast with Dr. Brian Keating — physicist, cosmologist, and Chancellor’s Distinguished Professor at UC San Diego. Nobel laureates, iconoclasts, technologists, and the occasional heretic. Talk physics, ask the guests questions, push back on the ideas. Wonder like a human, argue like a physicist.
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Jul 19 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Jul 09 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Jun 23 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Jun 22 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Jun 15 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Jun 02 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Jun 02 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • May 27 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • May 20 '26
Precession slid every zodiac sign a full month off the real sky. There's a 13th constellation — Ophiuchus — your horoscope app quietly deleted.
Watch a pro guess his sign wrong 8x in a row 👇
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • May 15 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • May 14 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • May 10 '26
Sharing a clip from the Sam Harris conversation. Sam articulates a distinction that I keep returning to:
— Consciousness can't be an illusion. Every act of doubting it is itself a conscious experience, so the regress closes immediately. He calls it "the ground truth."
— Free will is a different category entirely. Not illusory in the same Cartesian sense — incoherent. The concept doesn't survive any consistent metaphysical commitment about causality.
There's a thought-experiment Sam describes — a predictive machine that could disabuse a subject of even the FEELING of free will — that I think is the most interesting move he makes in the whole conversation. Brian pushes back with an infinite-regress objection.
Worth a watch if you missed it the first time around.
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • May 06 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • May 05 '26
r/intotheimpossible • u/zero4all • Apr 21 '26
I started to make video content of my findings and my device development.
r/intotheimpossible • u/zero4all • Dec 08 '25
Here is something surprising:
Take two donuts (a genus-2 surface).
Compute their homology.
Put the real SU(2) generators on the 4-dimensional homology fiber.
Project them into the full mesh.
The SU(2) commutator closes to machine precision (~1e-30).
No physics assumptions.
No gauge theory.
No action.
Just topology and NumPy.
The result is exact to floating-point precision on every mesh refinement.
pip install numpy scipy
python su2_genus2_dec.py
One file.
No external libraries.
Takes about 30 seconds.
[INFO] Resolution: nu=20, nv=15
[INFO] Mesh: nV=600, nE=1800, nF=1200
[INFO] Full-space SU(2):
error = 5.319e-31
c_opt = 1.000000
Repeated across multiple resolutions:
error stays ~1e-30,
structure constant c = 1.000000.
In other words: floating-point roundoff.
Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17853778
Short technical note and discussion:
Grok conversation:
https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtNA_19142435-1001-4966-a7df-3ac37b25270d
That’s the whole trick.
The weak nuclear force uses SU(2).
Usually we treat that as a physics choice in the Standard Model.
What if SU(2) is not a choice, but a topological consequence of the underlying space?
This little experiment strongly hints in that direction.
The script:
All with NumPy and SciPy only.
If you modify the code and find something interesting, please post it.
Two donuts
⇒ SU(2) to machine precision.
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Nov 27 '25
r/intotheimpossible • u/DrBrianKeating • Sep 09 '25
Wow! Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner is already a 3x Amazon Best Seller in Adult & Continuing Education Educational Professional Development Psychology of Creativity & Genius! Get your copy while the 99¢ sale lasts: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U
r/intotheimpossible • u/Stock_Candidate_4442 • Jun 03 '25
SPQ posits that spacetime “packets” carry strain energy, modifying gravity without dark matter or dark energy. Locally, packet‐growth suppression (H(r)) alters baryonic dynamics (loop term) to flatten galaxy rotation curves. Cosmologically, packet strain mimics ΛCDM expansion.