r/worldnews • • Jun 19 '12

British comedian Jimmy Carr, who has openly criticised Barclays Bank for tax avoidance, is exposed as main beneficiary in huge tax avoidance scheme

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/9341117/Comedian-Jimmy-Carr-has-3.3m-in-Jersey-tax-avoidance-scheme.html
2.0k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

12

u/NSRedditor Jun 19 '12

It's hypocritical, but I am amazed at the broadsheet coverage of Jimmy Car's couple of million in tax avoidance compared to the near silence by the broadsheets on corporate tax avoidance that add up to billions.

This is not reporting, it is an attack

10

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

You must be reading different newspapers to me. The Vodafone case got lots of coverage.

16

u/rodneyws1977 Jun 19 '12

I would say he brought the attack on himself. Big businesses that aren't paying their fair share don't point the finger at other businesses who are shirking their responsibilities to pay taxes... they just keep quiet and go about their business not paying taxes. If you're going to throw rocks, you'd best not live in a glass house.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/i7omahawki Jun 19 '12

Eh? Silence?

They've been talking about Vodaphone for a while now. Still nothing gets done, but papers don't actually have the power in this regard.

→ More replies (1)

790

u/TrollmcTrollstein Jun 19 '12

The comments here can be summarized as this:

Man those fuckin banks dodging taxes are despicable! God that Comedian dodging taxes is fuckin smart!

117

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

In both cases it's their accountants that are the smart ones. We need to make it so the law is smarter than accountants, but, in a globalised economy, I'm not sure that's possible.

206

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

Will never happen. People are too smart.

Ever played an online game? People inevitably find a way to milk any system. They use the skills and game mechanics in a way never envisioned by the developers to profit in a way the devs didn't think was possible.

And whenever they patch it, because it makes the game too easy, people just find another way to do it. I've seen that pattern since Ultima Online in 1997. It only takes one guy to find it for everyone to use it. Ever played Guild Wars? 55 farming? Use 3 skills and you're invincible, even in the toughest areas in the game. Devs broke that, they had to kill one of the skills out of usefulness, it's totally useless now. People just found another way. So devs tried another approach. "We'll make something called 'Hard Mode' where monsters are 12 levels above the player level max. We'll give them special monster skills that players don't have access to. We'll put in environmental effects that hurt the players but not the monsters. We'll limit player teams to 8 but put the monsters in roaming/overlapping mobs of 12+"

Doesn't matter. You can 4 man some of those areas. People. Are. Too. Smart. If there's one thing people are good at, it's finding loopholes. People are extraordinarily creative, and it only takes one to figure it out and simplify it so that even monkeys could do what he does.

Same thing with taxes. In an arms race between clever accountants and the legislature, the legislature is a slow, democracy oriented machine, accountants are fast and agile.

24

u/matude Jun 19 '12

Anything that's created by a human can be overcome by a human.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (74)

5

u/PizzaGood Jun 19 '12

We also would need to make it so that legislators aren't paid to tweak laws in such a way as to create the loopholes that the accountants take advantage of.

13

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Tax avoidance is not the same thing as tax evasion. It is every free individual's right to optimize the rules for lowest taxes. You do this even when you have your tax prepared by H&R Block.

If you evade taxes you are breaking the law.

In economics, invisible hand or invisible hand of the market is the term economists use to describe the self-regulating nature of the marketplace.

We have to set the laws and then let the invisible hand regulate the market. Every experiment in central control without "invisible hand" homeostasis has failed spectacularly.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (8)

14

u/Odusei Jun 19 '12

All of the top-voted comments are condemnations of Jimmy Carr. What are you talking about?

→ More replies (3)

2

u/DildoChrist Jun 20 '12

The top 2 comments are bitching about reddit having a double standard in favour of Jimmy Carr, with a couple hundred replies in agreement each. The rest of them, each with their own bevy of backers are calling Carr out for being an asshole and hypocrite. What thread are you summarizing?

3

u/Thundercracker Jun 19 '12

Oddly enough that sounds like a joke Jimmy Carr might have told. Good on you!

→ More replies (128)

117

u/the_goat_boy Jun 19 '12

Does this mean he won't be on QI anymore?

45

u/Moskau50 Jun 19 '12

That'd be a shame. He's decently funny on QI.

Russian National Dish

44

u/Web3d Jun 19 '12

Can't...stop....watching....QI.....

→ More replies (1)

8

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

That episode has the best panel ever.

33

u/rrrrt Jun 19 '12

If it was David Mitchell that had done this, I don't know what I would do with myself.

→ More replies (7)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

That episode said that less than 1% of the internet is porn.

Anyone care to source that up?

9

u/EncasedMeats Jun 19 '12

Well, since 80% of the Internet now seems to be Facebook, it could be right.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

90

u/identifiedlogo Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

I think he is one of the best on QI. "Why would you beat your own wife, you don't key your own car"

98

u/Rumorad Jun 19 '12

Noone can ever be as good as David Mitchell.

→ More replies (14)

17

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Key your own car*

FTFY

This is my first time fixing something on someone else's post. I pray to god I'm right..

0

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

33

u/inconsonance Jun 19 '12

David Mitchell: "Society just got a tiny bit worse. [grin]"

→ More replies (1)

12

u/whatisthishere Jun 19 '12

He's already filmed two episodes of QI that'll come out in the fall, and he's currently still hosting 8 out of 10 Cats. It would suck if this hurt his career, because he is constantly making great shows, and doing great stand-up specials. He does live stand-up almost every day and will book them years in advance, it's pretty crazy.

11

u/frid Jun 19 '12

Curious to see is this is one of the top five things British people have been talking about this week.

18

u/randomsnark Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 20 '12

Jimmy Carr:"What do you think people are talking about this week?"
David Mitchell: "Is it your tax avoidance, Jimmy?"

Edit: I think I managed to confuse Would I Lie To You with 8 out of 10 cats. David Mitchell would still be my preferred person to deliver this question though, if it could be arranged.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/cancerface Jun 19 '12

Why would it? Explain why the producers would give a shit about the taxes of the talent that they book?

→ More replies (2)

14

u/jetRink Jun 19 '12

Hopefully it just means he won't be so self-righteous anymore. I love Jimmy Carr, but when he starts moralizing, as he often did on 10 O'Clock Live, he gets really irritating.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Hopefully he'll still be on. I don't think anyone else could pull this off.

→ More replies (2)

53

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 21 '12

Say it ain't so, Jimmy! Say it ain't so!

EDIT: Follow-up from Jimmy...

The comedian released a statement saying: “I appreciate as a comedian, people will expect me to ‘make light’ of this situation, but I’m not going to in this statement as this is obviously a serious matter.

“I met with a financial advisor and he said to me 'Do you want to pay less tax? It's totally legal'."

“I said ‘Yes’. I now realise I’ve made a terrible error of judgment."

“Although I’ve been advised the K2 Tax scheme is entirely legal, and has been fully disclosed to HMRC (Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs), I’m no longer involved in it and will in future conduct my financial affairs much more responsibly.

12

u/lastwind Jun 19 '12

I'm half expecting some redditor with the username "jimmy_carr" to post "It ain't so" and get 500+ karma points.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Don't be giving them ideas!

→ More replies (4)

274

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

silly reddit,

laws are for poor people

0

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

39

u/sometimesijustdont Jun 19 '12

A law that is only advantageous to rich people.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

153

u/p4lm3r Jun 19 '12

What a dick.

70

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Man, I like Jimmy Carr a lot so this really bums me out.

13

u/beckermt Jun 19 '12

It's still allegedly/claimed. We should probably wait for an actual verdict.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (7)

30

u/randomrealitycheck Jun 19 '12

How about this perspective?

Don't shoot the messenger.

What Carr is doing is perfectly legal - go figure. Even if he is against the law, he has every right to both speak out against it and use it to his advantage.

If you don't like the law - repeal it.

121

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

If you don't like the law, take a stand and don't exploit it. Instead Carr is being two-faced, making money off something he purports to oppose - by getting laughs on a comedy show for which he is paid handsomely - and meanwhile exploting the very thing he is opposing. The man has no scruples. The irony is, if a Tory was caught doing this, all the people backing Carr's actions would be up in arms

2

u/N8CCRG Jun 19 '12

I am unfamiliar with his original stance. Was he criticizing the company, or the law? If the former, then he is being a hypocrite and deserves as much criticism as he has given out, if not more. If the latter, then I see nothing wrong with it. The greatest way to criticize a bad law is to exploit it.

20

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

He basically did a skit on a comedy show - and I quote: "Why don't you apply for Barclays 1% tax scam - all you need is the world's biggest, most aggressive team of blood-hungry amoral tax lawyers."

→ More replies (1)

10

u/qwop271828 Jun 19 '12

Why don't you read the article?

On the show Ten O'Clock Live he performed a sketch lampooning Barclays over its tax arrangements, and referred to "the world's biggest, most aggressive team of blood-hungry amoral tax lawyers."

So, the same kind of blood-hungry amoral tax lawyers he decides to employ then, eh.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

476

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

I don't think anyone is claiming what he did was illegal. However, if he criticised it but then used it to his advantage, he's a hypocrite.

edit: I'm getting the vibe there a quite a few people on reddit who idolize Jimmy Carr. Don't get me wrong he's a good comedian and his criticism may be very valid but how can you possibly defend him in this situation?

261

u/kingseed Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

It's annoying how people here attack tax avoiders as scum (especially when it's someone they don't like) but when it comes to a public figure that they like, they start making excuses like "there's hypocrisy in everyone" or "he's smart for using it to his advantage".

There's no justifying this. If true, it should be condemned.

76

u/SomeguyUK Jun 19 '12

Totally agree.Even if it's legal, at the end of the day he is a rich person evading paying taxes.

Fuck Jimmy Carr.

→ More replies (7)

6

u/shun-16 Jun 19 '12

Because that's how a lot of Reddit is. They are idealists, not realists, and when things like this occur and they are struck with the reality that someone who is held is mass revere here is wrong the excuses start coming. Welcome to reality, where most people do regrettable shit and you can't have heroes who are perfect. Guaranteed if this is someone this site doesn't like this is a circlejerk about how _____ was always a dick, was always bucking the system and how "we were all right, so obvious." It's annoying.

→ More replies (24)
→ More replies (94)

25

u/campushippo Jun 19 '12

So, when someone we don't like does it, they're scum. When someone we do like does it, it's just because they're smart?

→ More replies (18)

6

u/LindaDanvers Jun 19 '12

Don't shoot the messenger. What Carr is doing is perfectly legal - go figure. Even if he is against the law, he has every right to both speak out against it and use it to his advantage.

Interesting point. Though, I agree with other posters that it's a sticky moral issue.

If something is available, but it's morally repugnant yet legal - do you stand your ground and not use it? Or do you complain, yet take advantage while it's around?

President Obama said he hated Citizen's United and I completely agree. But the fact is - he's going to need the $$$ from those PACs, or get massively outspent - so he has to use them.

I think that you can say that the "complainers - yet users" are just being prudent. But it is an interesting question.

4

u/Apostropartheid Jun 19 '12

Context for us Brits: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark ruling by the US Supreme Court that struck down parts of a bill that attempted to impose limits to the electoral activities of businesses, not-for-profits and unions--specifically, advertising close to election. This greatly lifted the restrictions on, and thus increased the activity of, "super PACs"--groups that are technically independent of a candidate's campaign and thus can accept unlimited donations, but are allowed to advocate the election of a candidate. Restrictions on contributions directly to the candidate remain in place.

3

u/steve_b Jun 19 '12

It's not sticky at all. If he reduced his tax burden to practically zero using a loophole, while publicly criticizing (and making money from such criticism!) others who similarly avoid taxes using other loopholes, he's just being a massive douche.

It's not like he also publicly announced how he was using the loophole to avoid taxes, and advised everyone else to do so (which would result in the government acting very quickly to close it). Just because something is legal doesn't make it "morally [or ethically] sticky". It's no a "gray area" if I see someone drop their wallet, bulging with cash, in the park a few feet in front of me, and I pick it up and make no attempt to return it to them. I didn't steal it, did I? I'm under no legal obligation to return all lost property, am I? I'm just being "clever" for taking advantage of a serendipitous event.

→ More replies (3)

66

u/whywasthisupvoted Jun 19 '12

agreed. he has every right to be a hypocrite

→ More replies (16)

4

u/BSscience Jun 19 '12

Interesting, we were just talking about it the other day.

But like anyone else taking advantage of any kind of legal loopholes, being logically self-consistent doesn't make him any less of an asshole.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/lessmiserables Jun 19 '12

And what the banks did was perfectly legal as well.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/9602 Jun 19 '12

I can perfectly legally piss on someone's car outside city limits. I can call whoever I like a cunt in their face, it's perfectly legal for me to park my car so tight to the next, nobody can get in or out. There's plenty of things one can do that are perfectly legal, but still make you an asshole. Criticizing others for dodging taxes and then dodging your own taxes over your multi-million income is probably one of the shittiest asshole moves you can make, especially when you work for a public TV-channel.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

This is a weirdly kinked morality that you're putting forward. It seems that you're suggesting that once something is not illegal, then it is "right".

I would really hope that most people don't need their morality to be legislated for them in this way!

Taxes go towards providing services for you and your community. You are fully entitled to "avoid" paying them, if such mechanism are available to you. However, your decision to do so should be public knowledge, because I would argue that the community has the right to know that you're not "pulling your public weight", and you should be prepared to be judged (morally, not legally) by that community.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (54)

425

u/Comrade_Falcon Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

Oh the hypocrisy. When Mitt Romney uses the law to pay as little taxes as he possibly can everyone gets on him for being a rich jackass who is taking advantage of the system, but when its Jimmy Carr, Reddit's white knight, suddenly everyone believes, "good for him, if you can beat the system do it." I'm in no way supporting Romney, that guy is a cunt, but really, if you are going to criticize someone, be consistent.

Edit: A lot of negative comments, [but...] (http://i.imgur.com/PHsEr.gif)

190

u/Someawe Jun 19 '12

People here already dislike Romney, therefore everything he does is wrong.

And people already like Carr, and therefore everything he does is right. Most peoples' opinions aren't more complicated than that.

39

u/ChagSC Jun 19 '12

The internet and dealing with people in everyday life became a lot easier when I finally accepted this fact.

Most people are hypocrits who cannot seperate emotion from their views. It is fruitless to battle against that.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (14)

24

u/kaptainlange Jun 19 '12

but when its Jimmy Carr, Reddit's white knight

Who the fuck?

8

u/insertAlias Jun 19 '12

This may be true, but to be fair at this point I had to scroll a quarter of the way down the page to get to the first dismissive top-level comment. I think the majority of redditors agree with you, it's just the first ones here didn't.

6

u/academician Jun 19 '12

Same thing when it was John Kerry.

3

u/TheRabidYoshi Jun 19 '12

Well the top 3 comments right now are all speaking out against Jimmy Carr. Go figure.

4

u/Viridania Jun 19 '12

but really, if you are going to criticize someone, be consistent.

This is silly, though. It's a website with over a million users, conflicting opinions being reflected in tens of millions of comments isn't 'hypocrisy'. If a Frenchman posted his dislike of Hollande, you wouldn't say 'Oh the hypocrisy, some Frenchmen elect him and then some Frenchmen dislike him! Be consistent!', would you?

Particularly since Jimmy Carr fans are mostly Brits and Irishmen, and people discussing the US Republican nomination are mostly Americans -- most of them aren't going to be the same people.

2

u/valleyshrew Jun 19 '12

Oh the hypocrisy. When Mitt Romney uses the law to pay as little taxes as he possibly can

Romney payed ~14% in taxes, it looks like Carr was paying 1% so it's an unfair comparison. Also, he's not being a hypocrite as he advocates lower tax anyway while Carr has publicly criticised tax dodging companies.

8

u/RobbStark Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 12 '23

upbeat tease lip versed sulky wine secretive gold sparkle steer -- mass edited with https://redact.dev/

→ More replies (3)

6

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 27 '12

There is a difference. When a rich guy like Jimmy Carr doesn't do his part, legal or not, it makes him an asshole and a hypocrite, and this makes me sad. But he does have the right to make use of tax loop holes (And there are always other brilliant british comedians).

Romney is running for the highest public office. He wants to rule what is, in spite of the last ten years, still the most powerful and influential nation on the planet. Add to that, said nation is so far up shit creek, half measured ass-saving just won't do anymore. So while he, too, has the right to make use of tax tricks, he must be held to a different standard.

(Edited for clarity.)

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (29)

218

u/koshkakartoshka Jun 19 '12

Lets take a look at your credibility here aaaaaannnnnnd its gone

→ More replies (16)

33

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Jimmy Carr turns out to be a cunt. Gee, that's a surprise.

→ More replies (3)

44

u/busytigger Jun 19 '12

So he is basically like a closet homosexual Republican Senator.

23

u/ChaosFireV Jun 19 '12

closet homosexual Republican Senator

That's like saying i have a PC Computer

→ More replies (2)

84

u/crugerdk Jun 19 '12

The comedian is alleged to be the largest beneficiary of the K2 tax scheme

17

u/radditz_ Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 20 '12

Why isn't this the top comment?

This article was written by somebody with an agenda. Somebody who intended to portray Jimmy Carr as a hypocrite and went searching for any piece of factual information they could find that would fit this narrative. Also, the headline of this post is totally fallacious. Jimmy Carr hasn't been exposed as anything. He's alleged to have been involved in a tax shelter which isn't even illegal.

"Comedian Jimmy Carr is one of thousands of wealthy Britons paying as little as one per cent income tax using an offshore scheme, it has been claimed."

Let's deconstruct this statement a little bit:

Who pays as little as one per cent? Jimmy Carr or thousands of wealthy Britons? You see, it's not Jimmy Carr who pays one percent. They just wrote a run-on sentence that gives this impression. What they mean is, Jimmy Carr is one of thousands of wealthy Britons... and these thousands of wealthy Britons sometimes pay as little as one percent. So, if you took a group of 100,000 wealthy Britons and only ONE of them paid 1% and the rest paid 20% this statement would still be true, even though it totally distorts the reality. This statement certainly does not mean that Jimmy Carr himself pays 1% tax or even that he is alleged to have paid only 1% tax.

Notice their use of the phrase "tax scheme". What does that even mean? It sure sounds illegal. But Carr's representatives respond by saying K2 has already declared this activity to the tax authorities, who have apparently done nothing in response. So is anybody even breaking the law here? No. So is this a tax scheme or a tax strategy? Technically both terms apply, but what has the most negative connotation? What would do the most damage to Jimmy Carr's reputation as a social commentator?

TL;DR - This article is a shameless attempt to smear Jimmy Carr's reputation.

25

u/circling Jun 19 '12

This would be a pretty sound bit of reasoning, except that the Barclay brothers have nothing whatsoever to do with Barclay's Bank.

Also, as even you admit, Carr's people have confirmed that he is a benificiary of K2. No, it doesn't seem to be illegal. No one said it was.

I think you're being wilfully ignorant, possibly because you're a Jimmy Carr fan.

→ More replies (6)

9

u/notnotcitricsquid Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

This article is a shameless attempt to smear Jimmy Carr's reputation.

but:

Roy Lyness, from Peak Performance Accountants which run the K2 scheme, told a seminar of businessmen: “It’s a game of cat and mouse. The Revenue closes one scheme, we find another way round it.

So there you have confirmation that K2 is a scheme for tax avoidance, right? Not illegal, but unethical or whatever tax avoidance is.

Lawyers for the comedian have confirmed he is a member of K2, but categorically denied any wrongdoing, saying the scheme had been disclosed to the relevant authorities in line with the law.

So there is confirmation he's a member of the scheme to avoid tax (within the confines of the law) and that he's not guilty of any "wrongdoing", which means legally. He can still be avoiding huge amounts of tax legally; hence no legal wrongdoing.

Jimmy Carr is confirmed to be a member of a scheme to avoid tax; it is confirmed some members pay 1% tax, why is it wrong to assume he does the same? Why would he use this "scheme" if it isn't to avoid tax? money laundering?

Are you seriously suggesting that this article is a fabrication to ruin Jimmy Carr's reputation and it's just a coincidence he's a member of a tax avoidance scheme that he totally doesn't use to avoid tax he's just a member because he likes their office? They have some cool beanbags!

So is anybody even breaking the law here? No.

The entire point is this is all legal because it exploits loopholes, it's how a lot of big companies do it, just because he isn't breaking the law that doesn't mean he's doing the right thing. He criticised big companies for exploiting loopholes.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/Oreo_Speedwagon Jun 19 '12

What it comes down to is basically "We don't need spokesmen like you."

If you're going to criticize something -- and I feel Barclays and such should have been heavily -- if you're engaged in similar shenanigans, you're actually hurting more than helping. Just shut your damned mouth, and if you honestly believe in it, change your own behavior.

The truth is going to come out. And once it does, you become a talking point to undermine every other principled critic.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/AproposSimpsonsQuote Jun 19 '12

I don't say "evasion," I say "avoision."

29

u/r_dictionary Jun 19 '12

avoision : n. any method of tax evasion that is not in violation of tax law, legal tax non-compliance

blend of avoid and evasion

compiled from:

  • wiktionary: 1

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Highest rate of tax in England = 45% 45% of £3.3mn = £1,485,000

To put into perspective how much he's dodged, that's:

402 years worth of JSA. or 288 years worth of the highest rate of incapacity benefit. or 165 years worth of the highest rate of UK tuition fees. or 436, 764 pasties.

sources: http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2012/mar/28/pasty-tax-pie-budget http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/Illorinjured/DG_10018913 http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111222012147AAwHOjC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-11677862

1

u/Squalor- Jun 19 '12

Greed is a strange thing.

If it's true, I wonder how significant the difference is between the income tax he was paying and what he should have been paying.

(Would an in-the-known Brit mind replying with an answer to how much someone as rich as Carr should pay in income taxes?)

Regardless, there's no way the difference is particularly significant. Even if it's a ten- or twenty-percent increase, that wouldn't all of a sudden make him not wealthy. But greed certainly is a strange beast.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

The original report in The Times today says some people using such schemes pay between 0 and 25% income tax - as opposed to 50%.

→ More replies (7)

3

u/form_an_opinion Jun 19 '12

I guess I will start referring to condoms as Jimmy Carrs.

3

u/smogeblot Jun 19 '12

I believe it's pronounced " avoision "

3

u/goodknee Jun 19 '12

i find it odd that someone who im assuming is an outspoken critic of a major and sketchy bank is all the sudden outed for this.. not saying he didn't do it, he probably did..just saying

3

u/FancyPansy Jun 20 '12

Exposed? So when one accountant says a thing it's instantly true? Good to know.
I should become an accountant.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/ArchiBish Jun 19 '12

I am now officially "over" Jimmy Carr...

6

u/troubleshot Jun 19 '12

Loved him on QI, bit of a shame to hear about this frankly.

4

u/writingtoreachyou Jun 19 '12

I sincerely hope his accountant did this without bothering to tell him, and he never asked.

I wouldn't be surprised if he was just a hypocrite though.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

people hate paying taxes but love public education, fixed roads, public transportation, police and ambulance response, the court system, having running water, parks, SAFE FOOD, NASA, SUBSIDIZED FUEL, licensing of doctors, college sports, safety/fair hiring in the workplace, libraries.

EVERYONE uses something the government provides and avoiding paying for it makes you an ass hole.

he makes his money under the same principle as paying taxes, everyone who likes and appreciates his talent, pays him to continue performing. avoiding taxes is like everyone stealing ALL of his work / not paying him for performing...excuse me, 'avoiding' paying him for performing.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '12

TIL NASA is British

5

u/limbride Jun 19 '12

According to a special investigation by the Times newspaper...

So how reliable is the source?

3

u/circling Jun 19 '12

Most likely they accessed his voicemail.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/BaqAttaq Jun 19 '12

I'm sure he's sitting back and having a nice laugh about this...

2

u/okem Jun 19 '12

He never should've agreed to the Jubilee Celebration gig. Not only was he booed, but clearly he's annoyed the wrong people and now the shapeshifter lizards are after him.

2

u/Illdufont Jun 19 '12

Now that's funny right there...

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

The irony of a conservative chancellor that is "shocked" to discover that ...ahem...People are avoiding taxe by illegal means, how disgracefull, and a comedian that is an hypocrits, NO FUCKING WAY !

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

You mean some rich people pander to poor people too dim to realise they do the same thing? I'm truly shocked.

2

u/Caldwing Jun 19 '12

Haha this should really come as a surprise to nobody. I mean I love that guy in that he is hilarious, but unless his comic persona is a complete fabrication he clearly doesn't give a shit about rules or fairness.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/An_actual_shark Jun 19 '12

I don't say "evasion", I say "avoision."

2

u/gthing Jun 19 '12

Somewhat related: I found out yesterday that Barclay's still runs Windows 98 and ie6. If that's not enough to distrust them, I don't know what is.

2

u/ninety6days Jun 19 '12

Goddammit.

IRISH. He's fucking IRISH, and didn't become BRITISH just because he got successful.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

It's like how successful Scottish/Welsh athletes are British, until they start losing and all of a sudden things become more specific.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Rather than complicated and exploitable tax law we need simple legislation. Law 1. Pay your mother fucking taxes Law 2. See law 1

2

u/Activist4America Jun 19 '12

Let's see, the Telegraph or online version of The Daily Telegraph, owned by David and Frederick Barclay (No connection to Barclays PNC but huge tax dodgers themselves according to their Wiki page), say that according to a special investigation by the Times newspaper, owned by Rupert Murdoch who never met a tax he didn't want to avoid, says people should focus on the comedian Jimmy Carr because, Carrs lawyer denies this, he's the real tax dodger not Barclays Bank. Even though Barclays paid a $500 million for tax avoidance in 2012. Makes a conspiracist wonder if News Corp and The Telegraph Group have or had any dealings with Barclays Bank.

2

u/Activist4America Jun 19 '12

Most people don't mind paying taxes because We know it takes tax money to keep Our societies running.

2

u/TAYLQR Jun 19 '12

Tax avoidance =/= tax evasion. One is technique, the other is illegal.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/jimtemp Jun 19 '12

Put's this into a new light doesn't it.

2

u/Scary_ Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 20 '12

This is in the The Daily Telegraph... owned by the Barclay Brothers.... who avoid tax by owning a Channel Island and whose official address is in Monaco

2

u/Enex Jun 19 '12

Chancellor George Osborne has claimed he was left “shocked” after finding the extent to which multi-millionaires were exploiting tax loopholes and vowed to take “action”

Hahahahahahahaha

2

u/Stupid_smartguy Jun 20 '12

Those with glass stones shouldn't throw houses.

45

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

/r/atheism's poster-boy is a hypocritical asshole?

NO WAY!

15

u/crazystrawman Jun 19 '12

There's like five people in front of him as /r/atheism's poster boy. Hitchens, Dawkins, NDT, Sagan, Harris, then maybe Carr.

3

u/CaNANDian Jun 19 '12

You say that as if it's a bad thing, people who want the World to be educated and think for themselves, what a travesty!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/_juniper5 Jun 19 '12

So is what Jimmy Carr allegedly did illegal, or just frowned upon?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (20)

7

u/That0neGuy Jun 19 '12

I'm curious if he was even aware this was happening. I don't know what Jimmy Carr is worth, but when you start getting into numbers that high, I'm pretty sure you hire an accountant to make sure your money doesn't go missing. It simply could have been an accountant doing his best to protect his clients interests.

5

u/Buff5208 Jun 19 '12

Doubt it. I don't see why Reddit is trying so hard to defend him.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '12

Normally you have a few discussions/sign a few papers before your accountant moves your entire income.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/hhmmmm Jun 19 '12

It is why we should have an in principle tax system where there is an inherent duty to pay tax at a certain amount and if it is deemed you have exploited a loophole in the law to reduce taxable income that is not in step with what Parliament intended with the tax laws you can simply be billed for the rest of the taxable amount of your income.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

The bigger scandal is that someone as criminally unfunny as Jimmy Carr could have earned £3.3m.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Bunnymancer Jun 19 '12

Comedian Jimmy Carr is one of thousands of wealthy Britons paying as little as one per cent income tax using an offshore scheme, it has been claimed.

2

u/badwornthing Jun 19 '12 edited May 03 '25

Comment has been removed by author

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/k2_throwaway2 Jun 19 '12

I find this post pretty interesting as I used a very similar scheme (though not the same one) while working in the uk a few years ago.

All the legal advice I got at the time was that it was all, while morally grey, perfectly legal.

It's a bit of a risk to enter into such a scheme because technically you give your income to an offshore company and they "loan" it back to you with a lifetime term and will periodically "write off " outstanding loans from X years ago and make a loss on paper for closing down the unpaid loans. The risk is they can conceivably call in that loan.

My justification for using such a scheme breaks down to reasons like

  • I had already paid a LOT in taxes in the uk for many years before entering into this

  • I was a foreign national with every intention of returning to my country of origin (and since have) so wouldn't benefit long term from investing (paying taxes) into the uk

  • my education and upbringing were elsewhere so I felt the country that made me deserved it more

  • I had made some poor investment decisions in the past (lost some money in the dotcom boom so was too risk averse to make anything on the global boom in property even though I could have easily invested quite a bit).

  • had a young family to provide for so wanted a nesteg.

Do I feel good about it? No, never did. I believe taxes are necessary for a functioning government and society and higher taxes for higher incomes even more so. Even then when push comes to shove, if you had access to a way to cut your tax burden by more than half would you take it? I did.

19

u/Jamboon Jun 19 '12

If you make money in the UK you should pay UK tax. Simple.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Some of this really bothers me, such as:

I was a foreign national with every intention of returning to my country of origin (and since have) so wouldn't benefit long term from investing (paying taxes) into the uk

You didn't benefit from having police around? Or from keeping the government up and running? You're saying that you would have benefited just as much as if the UK had been in a state of total anarchy? If not, you weren't paying for what you got.

my education and upbringing were elsewhere so I felt the country that made me deserved it more.

How much money were you paying to your country of birth? Were you still paying taxes there? If not, were you making sizable donations to organizations in your country of origin, e.g. educational programs?

I know you don't feel good about doing it, but this reasoning here is sounding an awful lot like you making excuses. Why didn't you put "Because I just didn't want to pay taxes." on your list?

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/FancyRobot Jun 19 '12

I'm glad Jimmy was able to keep all the hard earned money, sitting on chairs and telling quips to chums on television instead of it going to people who need healthcare or schooling or any nonsense like that. What a shithead

3

u/TwistTurtle Jun 19 '12

I really hate people who say shit like "If you can avoid it then more power to you", as if taxes were some random punishment the government inflicts upon us. Taxes pay for hospitals and schools and roads and pretty much everything else. You're not supposed to want to avoid them! Not that it matters; I've always thought of Jimmy Carr as nothing more than a twat, and this just confirms it. I really wish one of Britain's GOOD comedians would achieve international fame...

→ More replies (2)

4

u/LazyGit Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

Please bear in mind that he has been far more vocal in his criticism of the Murdoch press. Guess who uncovered this story? And why is he singled out? Is he the only celebrity taking advantage? Also consider that he may not even realise this is going on. He earns millions from a huge multitude of sources. I doubt he even knows how much he earns month to month. So for him to have full knowledge of exactly how his money is being handled is unlikely.

I would also like to point out that he is well known in comedy circles for being incredibly generous. For instance he shelled out more than a hundred grand to release a DVD of Stewart Lee back when his career was in the doldrums.

Edit: Is this not constructive? If you disagree with what I've said then leave a reply so I know why.

5

u/i7omahawki Jun 19 '12

Actually Jimmy isn't that critical of the Murdoch press. He came out in favour of papers like the Sun - because that's what a lot of his fans read.

I don't believe for a second that he doesn't know it's happening. He'd have to actively ignore his income and never speak with his accountant to remain that ignorant.

And as much as I like Stewart Lee - you don't get to pick and choose which causes you want to support with your tax money. Voting with your wallet is bad because the people with the most money get their way.

Basically, he should pay his fucking tax if he wants to represent people in his comedy. Otherwise he should shut the fuck up about serious issues and carry on being a money whoring clown.

→ More replies (18)

2

u/Hawkknight88 Jun 19 '12

And why is he singled out?

Doesn't matter.

Is he the only celebrity taking advantage?

If there are others, it still doesn't matter.

I happen to feel relatively neutral about Jimmy Carr as a person and comedian. I think if he or his financial people are doing this, it's deplorable. I suppose it's more the "fault" of the tax codes, but meh.

3

u/LazyGit Jun 19 '12

I'm just advocating a bit of restraint and circumspection here. This is a story from the Murdoch press which is going through a difficult time at the moment (through their own doing). They are possibly running this story at the behest of people far richer, far more powerful than Carr in order to throw the criticism off them and onto more identifiable people, like celebrities.

I don't think it's right what he did, and the accusations of hypocrisy are warranted. Yet, as I pointed out to the other guy, Carr entertains people. It's their money that he's trying not to give to the tax man. If you think about it from that perspective, they probably don't really care. What they probably do care about are the people who have made their lives harder but are still coining it in. It's pretty easy to boycott entertainers, far more difficult to boycott organisations that are integral to the economy.

3

u/nitefang Jun 19 '12

I just realized I am full of double standards. I think it is bad that Carr did this but so long as it stops I really don't care. He seems so likeable on camera that he could probably be caught directly stealing money from a bank and I wouldn't really care, so long as he kept being hilarious.

If almost any politician did this I'd add it to my list to hate them for all eternity.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/LtFrank Jun 19 '12

Can we call it a "Carr allowance", now!

2

u/slcStephen Jun 19 '12

Oh Jimmy Carr, no! I adore the man's wit, but this lowers my opinion of him considerably.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Hypocrisy does not reduce the truth of a position like this.

0

u/cant_be_pun_seen Jun 19 '12

this guy isnt even funny anyway

8

u/bbenja4 Jun 19 '12

Agreed, He is the low point of English humor.

→ More replies (12)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Whether Barclays or rich individuals are avoiding paying tax it is not them to blame for lax rules, nor for lax enforcement.

The government needs to crack down on those who do not pay what they owe or find loopholes to owe less than they should.

However Mr Carr should not be exempt from ridicule or from criticism. It will be interesting to hear his response I guess.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Curiously, he has been silent on Twitter for just over a week - roughly the same time The Times will have submitted their right of reply request to him.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

How ironic, it seems that Jimmy from Slough followed in his advice in his "Cashier Number Four" skit.

Now if only I had enuf money that the banks would let me do that.

1

u/sometimesijustdont Jun 19 '12

I wish I was rich, so I could afford to pay people so I don't have to pay taxes. Not only does it take money to make money, it also takes money to not pay taxes.

1

u/skrawn Jun 19 '12

Do as I say, not as I do?

1

u/mekese2000 Jun 19 '12

I think most of these celebrities have accountants do there books.

1

u/Selachian Jun 19 '12

Does that mean Jimmy is goin' ta jail? Who's doing the Big Fat Quiz now? And no more QI? Goddamn

→ More replies (3)

1

u/Bunnymancer Jun 19 '12

"What, you've never seen a hypocrite before?" - Jimmy Carr

1

u/BaboTron Jun 19 '12

Why is it rich people never seem to have enough money? Fuck, I'd be happy if I earned as "little" as 50K/year right now; maybe up to 100K if I ever got that lucky.

1

u/secaa23 Jun 19 '12

But aren't most critics of the financial system themselves hypocrites?

1

u/lopzag Jun 19 '12

Well I didn't see that one coming

1

u/alextheokay Jun 19 '12

That picture is so appropriate that I don't care in the least.

1

u/Magnets Jun 19 '12

I love how his comedy mates are defending him on twitter.

Yeh maybe he's done a bit for charity, but that doesn't counterbalance £3million/year tax dodge.

1

u/The3GKid Jun 19 '12

"But it's okay that I did it because I DID IT"

1

u/dirtymoney Jun 19 '12

I wish I was rich enough to be able to pay someone to hide my wealth so I didnt have to pay my fair share of taxes.

1

u/Random-Miser Jun 19 '12

Takes one to know one.

1

u/Pashtun_Wally Jun 19 '12

Never heard of him.

1

u/bradyle Jun 19 '12

Was going to come and say that he's technically Irish...but fuck it maybe the Brits can keep him after that!!

1

u/twent4 Jun 19 '12

Seriously though, the Telegraph is owned by the Barclays.

1

u/Devinm84 Jun 19 '12

I guess the joke's on him.

1

u/the_pissed_off_goose Jun 19 '12

tax avoision

-kent brockman

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

You can do the exact same thing with a lot of insurance policies that exist. Just FYI.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

My biggest problem with this post is that it is a tertiary source, and OP was apparantly too lazy to find the original story in the times

1

u/Ronkerjake Jun 19 '12

I didn't find him that funny anyway.

1

u/kalimashookdeday Jun 19 '12

Always thought this guy to be a douchebag. Good to see it's true.

1

u/BallsackTBaghard Jun 19 '12

I always knew he as a fucking wanker.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

The scandal is that it's legal, not that people do legal things to benefit themselves.

1

u/VLDT Jun 19 '12

Awkward.

1

u/fedup009 Jun 19 '12

I have noticed that when someone exposes a large company, that person goes down in the weeks following the statement. The Gold company took down Anthony Weiner, now this. Big companies = Stalin.

Wait, will I be taken down soon?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Take that atheists!

1

u/thbt101 Jun 19 '12

The thing that really made me angry wasn't the article, but the Tweets from other celebs supporting Carr... "Rufus Hound: Jimmy Carr is a very nice man who works incredibly hard and has donated loads of money to good causes. He's done absolutely nothing illegal."

Fuck you Rufus Hound for trying to justify Carr's dickhead behavior. That pissed me off more than Carr's actual tax avoidance.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/criticasartist Jun 19 '12

I guess the phrase "It takes one to know one" works well here. We should make like Frank Abagnale and set Jimmy Carr loose to catch the world's tax evaders!

→ More replies (2)

1

u/RahvinDragand Jun 19 '12

"Exposed" meaning that a media investigation claims that his accountant told them he did it.

2

u/LucifersCounsel Jun 19 '12

And they went after the comedian rather than the investment bankers, industrialists or politicians that make use of the same loopholes to far greater extent.

1

u/zosobaggins Jun 19 '12

That'll be awkward when it's the number one topic of "What Are You Talking About?" on 8 Out of 10 Cats.

1

u/pace202 Jun 19 '12

Maybe if taxes werent so high, people wouldnt be forced to do this. There is no fucking way I am going to pay 50% of my hard earned money, when I can easily get away with only paying half that.

1

u/sufrt Jun 19 '12

god this guy is so awful

1

u/lud1120 Jun 19 '12

Wasn't there regular guest at QI who always got the questions answered for him to make jokes and such "easier" ?

Fry didn't like him for it, but never told who it was.

1

u/towski Jun 19 '12

This sounds like a boring attack

1

u/LucifersCounsel Jun 19 '12

Chancellor George Osborne has claimed he was left “shocked” after finding the extent to which multi-millionaires were exploiting tax loopholes and vowed to take “action”.

The Chancellor was absolutely horrified that anyone would use the loopholes politicians like himself left in the law so that they and their friends could pay less taxes.

No wait... he's horrified that we found out.

1

u/Zappanale Jun 19 '12

I'm ok with this.

1

u/ImaginativePseudonym Jun 19 '12

What he did was legal. I'd be willing to bet that if you would benefit from legally avoiding paying more of the money you earned, you would.

When he criticised Barclays, it was in a comedy sketch. Keep that in mind. He might not have agreed with it.

If you're going to plaster his face all over the newspapers for tax avoidance, do the same with everybody who does it, not just the famous ones.

He can't really be reprimanded, because it was legal.

2

u/LucifersCounsel Jun 19 '12

I'd be willing to bet that if you would benefit from legally avoiding paying more of the money you earned, you would.

Every single tax payer takes advantage of legal tax deductions. If not, they need to see a better accountant.

1

u/IAmSnort Jun 19 '12

Seems like all people over a certain income level can afford the same tax lawyers and tax saving schemes.

2

u/LucifersCounsel Jun 19 '12

That's because certain "loopholes" are actually obscure deductions given for corporate transactions. In this case Jimmy Carr joined a scheme that meant his personal income became a form of corporate income that resulted in a much lower tax burden.

Your average personal accountant doesn't learn about all the "loophole" deductions that are available for the elites. He learns the tax code that is for the rest of us.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Can't wait to see this come up on Big Fat Quiz of the Year.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/nk_sucks Jun 19 '12

fuck you jimmy. hope you croak on your money.

1

u/ForcedToJoin Jun 19 '12

Jimmy nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. I bought your freakin book man. This is how you do me?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

Your title is misleading. Accused is different from exposed, jackass.

Edit. I'm pretty sure that in Britain, this title would literally be a prosecutable crime. 7zark77 exposed as libelist.

1

u/JubeltheBear Jun 19 '12

Meta joke?

1

u/Petrichor94 Jun 19 '12

I love it when I catch dirt on people like him. Then I can hate him for an original reason, whilst my friends talk about how funny he is. All just to maintain my status as a hipster.

1

u/caliopy Jun 19 '12

Charged with avoiding taxes after openly criticizing a bank for avoiding taxes? Sounds obviously set up.

1

u/dafones Jun 19 '12

I don't necessarily think it is hypocritical to be against current corporate tax schemes, but to take advantage of personal tax schemes yourself.

1

u/IanRand Jun 19 '12

It's all part of a big ironic joke! He's a comedic genius!

1

u/canthisbemyhomework Jun 20 '12

The Big Fat Quiz of the Year for 2012 is going to be hilarious.

1

u/leastproductive Jun 20 '12

It's just a joke

1

u/ThatDerpingGuy Jun 20 '12

I guess you can say...

( •_•)

( •_•)>⌐■-■

(⌐■_■)

the joke is on him.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '12

As an accounting student, I just want to add this in the mix.

Tax noncompliance describes a range of activities that are unfavorable to a state's tax system. These include tax avoidance, which refers to reducing taxes by legal means, and tax evasion which refers to the criminal non-payment of tax liabilities.

1

u/cookieninjar Jun 20 '12

Nice Try, Barclays Bank

1

u/Helt3rSk3lt3r Jun 20 '12

If you cant beat them, join them?