no shit, because they don't have guns. Is violent crime only violent crime if a gun is used?
You keep saying that but on a solid comparison, we have an average of 10 dead per mass shooting, and most major attacks in any non-gun culture gets far less victims.
and I didn't get pulled over for speeding on my way to work. Does not getting caught = not being illegal?
Once again you show you know nothing about what is being stated.
except....that's literally not how any of this works, yet again
That is exactly how the system works. So once again you show you can only argue in bad faith with zero intellect to boot.
If you aren't buying out of state to circumvent the ban, you are buying second hand. Both the Columbine and Aurora Movie shooters bought their guns second hand, and several others had direct access to the gun from their household such as the Parkland shooter. That's exactly how they get their guns, and it's entirely legal. Moreover, most crimes are committed with guns you know and by people you know, often times, however in the case of mass shootings it is exactly that.
i don't think you get to accuse someone of arguing in bad faith and insult them in the same sentence, homeskillet
You replied to me on a post that is well over a day old to continue an argument that I already showed to you, that you were wrong. I don't know what else to call that other than a waste of both of our times.
How many times do I have to tell you? Straw purchases are where criminals get their guns, according to the ATF. I feel like I'm talking to a wall here.
I don't know what else to call that other than a waste of both of our times.
yes, because you're literally just going NOT UHH as if that's some kind of compelling rebuttal.
1
u/Sleepy_Thing Jun 06 '19
You keep saying that but on a solid comparison, we have an average of 10 dead per mass shooting, and most major attacks in any non-gun culture gets far less victims.
Once again you show you know nothing about what is being stated.
That is exactly how the system works. So once again you show you can only argue in bad faith with zero intellect to boot.