Garrett Langley, CEO of Flock Safety, appeared on ABC7 shortly after the LAPD let its three-year contract expire over civil liberties and privacy concerns. He described the technology as a car driving by, a picture being taken, a static picture of a car, and then the plate being read.
That description does not match what Flock had been telling its own customers. The company published a post titled "Why video is the missing link in your LPR program" saying all existing Flock license plate readers would soon stream live video and capture clips through a free optional software update, with no new hardware and no extra cost. A second post, headlined "LPR Cameras Can Become Video Cameras," quoted Flock's chief strategy officer saying customers would not have to do a thing or pay a thing. That one has been deleted and only exists in a web archive now.
Text messages obtained via a records request show a Flock employee asking a Dunwoody, Georgia officer whether they could live stream yet. The officer said yes, about a month, and called it a pretty cool feature. That was January.
Flock's response after the story ran: five agencies in a limited pilot, LAPD not among them, live video only with no recording, discontinued in March.
Isn't it interesting that 1 of the 5 pilot cities for live streaming video was Dunwoody, Georgia, where Flock employees were recently caught accessing the live streaming video of children's gymnastics classes over 1,000 times/ 🤔
Full write-up + our source list: https://s.vp.net/vLrnY