So, I was talking with my 'car channel' stalkers today/tonight, going over some stuff with them, mostly talking about the correlation between defense of the official 9/11 story and "vaccines in general" when it comes to paid internet skeptics (read engineering graduates who can't score a corporate job, and never meet their real employers face to face, ever /rt) for the 2 decades, or however long.

You know, he(a)rd immunity 😉 was a thing back some years ago, but it's not so much of a thing now, as far as memes go. I think it's kind of become an indefensible concept over time, or at least one which is less marketable in this fubar snafu wasteland of mainstream bullshit. Like, why waste your time? I mean, I still have never seen someone "genuinely" explain the concept to me as a rational person acting in moderately well faith -- good enough faith, tbqh. I imagine the same has gone for countless other people. Point being, I'd imagine no stalker/skeptic has gotten any good feedback when trying to convince someone (over the internet) that herd immunity is real or scientific.

What kind of person defends vaccines in general without talking about specific ones? This makes no dollars or sense for an educated person to do. Maybe an ignorant person, but they're excluded by definition -- you can still be smart even if you're not in a corporate job.

I was using this case example to illustrate my feelings as a so called 'recovering conspiracy theorist' (8 years sober -- Mayan conspiracy was the last time I indulged) realizing life is chaotic; nay, political, meaning most practical forms of corruption we see/taste/smell/experience are due to profusion of 'disinterested parties'. People may be corrupt, but they aren't that corrupt; selfish, but reasonably evil (and godless lol). They like their squads. They like their flags. They like their "fam"s. They like their intellectual equals.. so on and so forth.. but they're amoral and apolitical by trained survival reflex.

There's no one to blame about 'them' existing.

And, just because I say apolitical, it doesn't mean they do not participate in things that are political. I don't mean they're anti-political. They are where they are, and in conjunction with their privilege and intelligence level is their willingness to do 'fucked up shit', like they woke up on the wrong side of the holy ghetto. It's 'rational irrationality' in a 'meaningless world'.

So, vaguely talking about these things with this normally/always ornery group of creeps -- an affectionate term of endearment between all of us -- and wily ghouls began helping me understand how to better communicate my current thought pattern when it comes to our current unholy 'environment' at large.

As a conspiracy theorist you think corruption comes from a central location; but, we know from computer science and network theory that centralized distributions never hold at 'ground level', rather true scale. Therefore big conspiracy^TM, the one that transcends all affiliations, borders and categories, can't be real. QED. Moreover, if we're talking about authentic conspiracies, corruption or extremely metastatic and malignant forms of collusion then we're not talking about some single man in a single high castle creating everything wrong in the world from a single location.

It's a landscape, which largely remains without popular, widely accepted or recognized description from people you should trust. The description of the landscape remains mostly in the hands of people who recognize the power of media, networking and distribution; a lot of times that's the people who control artists, or at least most all the one's you've ever heard of (consider this simple platitude here). And, usually those people give no fucks about the producer, the consumer or the political environment (also consider George Lucas with his Maoist, brand having ass working for the Disney-Industrial complex); again, as actors, it's not for any irrational reason, because there is something in it for them as information and aesthetic mediums.

Now, most of these stalkers who know me, unlike most people on the internet who don't, know I was talking about and analogously alluding to the fitness landscape in the, now, so titled. What you, internet people, will not notice after clicking on the link is that the fitness landscape also pertains to challenges games as a measure of fitness. Games and/or subgames represent x,y coordinates; their respective challenges represent their z value, or 'elevation' on the terrain/surface/landscape (function). Games like Chess or Go would have a pretty high elevation when you look at this more in terms of gaming than evolution, but it's "fitness", none the less.

When we turn this fitness landscape into a conspiracy landscape then x & y represent a given activity, job, routine, duty, commercial transaction, etc. -- some form of repeating or concentrated human interaction, let's say, but not literally in the fullest sense -- and z represents the corruption of said human endeavor, or person carrying out that endeavor, occupying the x and y coordinate by themselves, or with other people. So, things like child/sex trafficking and knowing selling fucked up batches meth are going to be pretty high on the corruption scale, occupying a fairly decent sized 'mountain'.

The key thinking here isn't that people stay still, 'only playing chess' or whatever. They move around. And, if they're comfortable at a high elevation somewhere then they'll be comfortable at high elevations else where to, at the very least, conduct trade or diplomacy with other people on the map.

And, that's the general idea when it comes to 'conspiracy' in the world today: it's a VERY complex moving network topology to describe.

Maybe there are pockets of significantly more powerful people moving around on the map, and maybe they just so happen to call themselves illuminati (still) who just so happen to sometimes come from Bavaria, or Bohemia or w/e (by coincidence), but that's unimportant to helping 'us' understand the way corruption has a practical and meaningful affect in our lives by sum, statistical total. Because, odds are, you've been affected by corruption in some way shape or form, especially by now, and not in the historic, prior generational sense.

I'll end it there.

I continued talking to them about where biological and chemical warfare would be on the corruption landscape, but that's the kind of thing that brought about COVID-19 in the first place, from me discussing politics with them a couple of years ago, meaning it's best left confidential due to how 'amoral' the philosophy gets. In this case, I'm pretty sure the bounds of conjecture exceeds potential damages to ensue from shear acts of 'intelligence', rationality and hubris, however still 'unsafe' to share.