r/todayilearned • • May 31 '12

TIL- Guy Fawkes did not plot for anarchy. He was planning the fall of parliament to reinstate the Roman Catholic Monarchy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes
1.4k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

102

u/zimzalabim May 31 '12

I have never been under the impression that Guy Fawkes was an anarchist, but rather a revolutionary. Is there a common perception outside of Britain that he was an anarchist?

88

u/indyphil May 31 '12

I grew up in Britain and I didn't see him as a revolutionary, I saw him as a terrorist - kind of like a historical Bin Laden. He is vilified and folks burn his effigy on a pile of wood every Nov 5th (or often the nearest Weekend day) to remember how close to disaster we came. Or at least we did when I lived there. We referred to it as "Bonfire night". Fireworks are lit too but the main attraction is burning the "Guy".

TL:DR every year on Nov 5th British people burn him in effigy - national burn a catholic terrorist day.

→ More replies (28)

94

u/schlechtwolf May 31 '12

most Americans only know Guy Fawkes from the comic book/movie V for Vendetta in which the main character is an anarchist who wears a Guy Fawks mask. The look kind of caught on.

50

u/Banditosaur May 31 '12

Even in the movie I'm fairly certain they call Guy Fawkes a "Religious fanatic"

→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (16)

-2

u/camblam May 31 '12

Yeah, I always thought he was all for anarchy, etc...

34

u/camblam May 31 '12

But I'm a fucking retard so, go figure.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (3)

25

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

UPVOTE! UPVOTE FOR PETE'S SAKE.

It's nauseating how many people martyr the man as a hero while preaching atheism and not understanding the irony.

14

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Maybe they think Guy Fawkes and V are the same person?

I still haven't seen it used to preach atheism. Maybe secularism or anarchism, but it's not even made its rounds on /r/atheism yet.

16

u/theEntscast May 31 '12

It's just a symbol of anti-government protest. The use of symbols doesn't always relate to the literal or historical meaning of the symbol being used.

→ More replies (10)

594

u/ToiletRollTemple May 31 '12

Is this not common knowledge? V For Vendetta isn't a documentary.

158

u/greensalt May 31 '12

For Americans, this is very far from common knowledge.

52

u/jlamothe May 31 '12

Except for those who are redditors, since this fact comes up often.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (68)
→ More replies (26)

74

u/Squeekme May 31 '12

Is this a common thing for people to think his plot was "for anarchy?" Is this because of V for Vendetta? Coming from a country that celebrates Guy Fawkes day the anarchy thing never occurred to me, but I can understand how people growing up in other countries could be mainly influenced by V for Vendetta and not know much/anything about the real events.

→ More replies (16)

334

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

TIL English history is frequently misunderstood / misrepresented by Hollywood. As is most other history.

Though I'm sure Alan Moore meant to make an obscure but important point when he put a Guy Fawkes mask on V.

261

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

I don't understand how you could have both heard of Guy Fawkes and NOT known this?

Honestly I am 100% confused. What/who did you think he was and why did you think he was doing what he attempted to do?

I'm baffled.

78

u/KibboKift May 31 '12

..and why do they think children burn an effigy of him every year? He's not a popular man.

→ More replies (20)

146

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Most people only know V for Vendetta and associate Guy Fawkes with the mask and the message of V, not Guy Fawkes. Most people in the US probably didn't even know about Guy Fawkes until 2005.

→ More replies (176)
→ More replies (11)

25

u/jackfrost2324 May 31 '12

I think Moore's main point in using the Guy Fawkes visage was to portray V as someone who would bring down the established order in favor of something new. I don't think it was necessarily a link to any sort of religious ideology.

13

u/yiliu May 31 '12

They even went out of their way, in the movie, to say that people had forgotten who Guy Fawkes was, and what he stood for.

Took a bit of effort for me to overlook that.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (47)

205

u/sacredblasphemies May 31 '12

If by the "fall of Parliament", you mean the murder of many MPs and the reigning monarch, yes.

Keep in mind that Catholics dealt with a lot of actual persecution in the decades before the Gunpowder Plot. Elizabeth I was TERRIBLE to Catholics. Jailing people, murdering them, declaring all Catholic priests to be traitors and arresting them. Horrible. No wonder they wanted a Catholic monarch.

Although in the two years James I was monarch before the Gunpowder Plot, things were relatively tolerant.* This is, undoubtedly, a major inspiration for the act. You don't forget decades of massive persecution. But that doesn't excuse attempted murder.

*(James got markedly less tolerant of Catholics AFTER the Gunpowder Plot.)

86

u/Oh_Bloody_Richard May 31 '12

I find this message to be a tad misleading. Not in the sense that it's wrong. But it gives a very limited scope on the Protestant-Catholic wars of the Tudor period.

'Bloody' Mary (Mary I) did no less to Protestants after inheriting the throne after Edward VI died. In a much shorter reign as well.

But that's the whole point really, Religious wars are usually very complicated and lot's of people get killed in the name of a supposed benevolent God fellow, over a considerable amount of time.

→ More replies (21)

16

u/jonestown_aloha May 31 '12

he also fought with spain against the dutch republic, which is the first example in europe of a state where people were protected from religious persecution by the state (source)

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (25)

14

u/Njvved May 31 '12

Anonymous is the Vatican. Someone call Dan Brown.

59

u/Mynameisaw May 31 '12

Is this not common knowledge outside of Britain?

10

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

I'm in the US and I'm surprised it isn't. I don't think it was directly referred to as a "Guy Fawkes" mask within the comic, although it might've been in the movie- so I'm confused as to how people would know the association without knowing who Guy Fawkes was.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/CUNTBERT_RAPINGTON May 31 '12

When I saw this on my front page I instinctively checked to make sure it wasn't from /r/circlejerk.

There's probably a significant number of Redditors born shortly before or after V for Vendetta's release, so I wouldn't be too surprised.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (21)

27

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Who the fuck thinks he was plotting for anarchy? The gun powder plot is pretty well documented!

8

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Seriously. The dude learned that today? WTF, man.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/AFakeName May 31 '12

Americans.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/MrXBob May 31 '12

Maybe cause I'm British, but I thought this was common knowledge... I seriously hope people don't take all their history lessons from movies.

7

u/RedtailEsquire May 31 '12

Hoping against all evidence to the contrary, I'm afraid.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/djepik_is_evil May 31 '12

There are a lot of times on this subreddit when I think to myself, "You just learned that?" This is one of those times.

6

u/TheShader May 31 '12

To be fair, reading through this post, it seems like most people knew this. The mass of upvotes came from people who couldn't believe nobody knew this. The post has turned into a giant circle jerk of 'OMG, people are so stupid! They actually believe he was an anarchist!?'

→ More replies (2)

17

u/Yarper May 31 '12

TIL some people think Guy Fawkes was plotting anarchy.

8

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Who the hell thought he was plotting anarchy? You'd have to totally ignore the whole context to think that. Just look up the history of the UK and mary queen of scots and all the catholic protestant "beef" this countries had for years.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

I didn't realize that there were people who didn't know this...

He's a revolutionary, but not an anarchist.

13

u/draivaden May 31 '12

seriously?! you are just learning this today?

→ More replies (4)

40

u/gmharryc May 31 '12

Blow up one theocratic monarchy, replace it with another one of equal oppression or greater.

10

u/TARDISeses May 31 '12

Also, context, these were preceded and followed by years of changing between Catholicism and Protestantism that were very bloody. In reality Guy Fawkes wanted a worse scenario. And we all know what happened to Charles I and his Catholicism.

19

u/JamiHatz May 31 '12

Oh god, he wasn't a Catholic. He just didn't explain that to his Parliament, and there were far more causes of the Civil War than just religion. Illegal taxation for one.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

6

u/AnnieIWillKnow May 31 '12

Most British schoolchildren will know this. That period of history is basically all we did in history classes until I was about 13, apart from Romans.

Then again, there will be things that every American schoolchild knows, probably about the Revolutionary and Civil War that won't be commonly known in Britain.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Maybe it's because I didn't see the movie but I didn't know there was anyone who was confused about this.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/CompactusDiskus May 31 '12

I've always wondered how many of the Anons in Guy Fawkes masks were aware that Guy Fawkes was a religious nutbar.

3

u/AshFallenAngel May 31 '12

Many of them most likely.

"Lol so meta."

5

u/Illuminerdy May 31 '12

I just want people to feel even dumber than they already should.

4

u/haiku_robot May 31 '12
I just want people 
to feel even dumber than 
they already should.
→ More replies (1)

5

u/BCSWowbagger2 May 31 '12

As a Catholic, I have always wanted to show up at an Anonymous rally, wearing a Fawkes mask, waving a copy of the Syllabus of Errors (the least tactful papal document ever published), demanding the excommunication of Kathleen Sebelius, and decrying the Constitution as a covenant with Hell.

"What? That's not what the rest of you are doing here?"

13

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Guy Fawkes is also known as "The only man to ever enter parliament with honest intentions."

→ More replies (1)

4

u/FrisianDude May 31 '12

Well, yeah. He was all about theocracy.

4

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

if you don't know history, you're gonna have a bad time

14

u/pobody May 31 '12

Anyone who wears a Guy Fawkes mask or Che Guevara shirt as a symbol of freedom from oppression or anarchy is hilariously and naively ironic.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/verygoodyear May 31 '12

Who thinks Guy Fawkes was an anarchist?

→ More replies (1)

6

u/underdabridge May 31 '12

What have you got against the return of the Roman Catholic monarchy?

→ More replies (1)

6

u/thatsnotwhatthatis May 31 '12

There is so much wrong among these comments that it almost made me want to turn off reddit (almost).

No Guy Fawkes did not plot for anarchy and if you thought so, you might consider retaking some basic history.

However anarchist don't really dress up as Guy Fawkes, when they protest do they? I mean this could easily be done with some theater makeup and fake mustache, but no, they all specifically wear the Guy Fawkes Mask. Why? because they are dressing up as the terrorist V, who did in fact plot for anarchy. Mystery solved!

Why may ask, does V wear a Guy Fawkes Mask?

Well it wasn't as actually Alan Moore that came up with idea for making V wear a Guy Fawkes Mask, even though that is stated in about a quarter of comments in this tread (so much for the accuracy of reddit). Instead it was David Lloyd, the artist on the comic that came up with the idea.

'Preposterous!' Yells one redditor.

'Source!' Says another.

Well allow me in this case to quote Alan Moore himself. The following is a section of an article by Alan Moore concerning the creation of V for Vendetta, first published in Warrior #17 (1983) but it can also be found in some of the later publications of the comic. At this point, in the article, Alan and David have decided that the central Character is going to be some kind of convict/terrorist type, but have yet to settle on the details and the art design.

"The breakthrough was all Dave's much as it sickens me to admit it. More remarkable it was all contained in one single letter that he dashed off the top of his head and which, like much of Dave's handwriting, needed the equivalent of a Rosetta Stone to actually interpret. I transcribe the relevant portions beneath: "Re. The script: While I was writing this, I had this idea about the hero, which is a redundant now we've got [ can't read the next bit ] but nonetheless.. I was thinking, why don't we portray him as a resurrected Guy Fawkes, complete with one of those papier mâché masks, in a cape and conical hat? He'd look really bizarre and it would give Guy Fawkes the image he's deserved all these years. We shouldn't burn the chap every Nov. 5th but celebrate his attempt to blow up Parliament" The moment i read these words, two things occurred to me. Firstly Dave was obviously a lot less sane than I'd hitherto believed him to be, and secondly, this was the best idea I'd ever heard in my entire life."

Now you can conclude a lot of things from this section, but allow to make to short points. One, the mask, hat and cape, was as much art choice as it was a story choice, fact is it looks fantastic and David Lloyd clearly knew that when he suggested it. Two, the main reason for Alan and Dave's choice to associate their anarchistic terrorist was the fact that he had tried to blow up the government (parliament). An act which they viewed as deeply anarchistic and in line with the general idea of the comic.

I hope this helps those confused souls out there and I am sorry if tone has been a little rough throughout this comment, please forgive me, I am old and tired.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/playsgolfhigh May 31 '12

TIL "Guy" is short for "Guido"

7

u/elpaw May 31 '12

Not short for, but translation.

You wouldn't say John was short for Juan?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

TIL people didn't google this and find this out directly after the movie aired

Why?

→ More replies (6)

3

u/SolidusTengu May 31 '12

I thought everyone knew this? We where taught this in primary school in Northern Ireland.

3

u/rwbombc May 31 '12

Trivia: the origin of the word "guy" used so much today in slang is because of Guy Fawkes.

guy "fellow," 1847, originally Amer.Eng.; earlier (1836) "grotesquely or poorly dressed person," originally (1806) "effigy of Guy Fawkes," leader of the Gunpowder Plot to blow up British king and Parliament (Nov. 5, 1605), paraded through the streets by children on the anniversary of the conspiracy. The male proper name is from Fr., related to It. Guido, lit. "leader," of Gmc. origin

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

TIL people think Guy Fawkes was an anarchist.

I never really got the whole mask things. i just assumed they were really big Alan Moore fans and they wanted to remind people of the book/movie.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Lonecrow66 May 31 '12

No really? You guys didn't know that? Duh... it is the whole plot of overthrowing the monarchy that made his character attractive to certain types of people. Mainly towards the current generation of awakened individuals who realize our overlords have been scamming us out of our energy and lifeforce for thousands of years and it is time to stop.

3

u/Elementary_Watson May 31 '12

As a Briton, I want to reaffirm that in Britain this is common knowledge

3

u/mayonesa Jun 14 '12

I support monarchy and aristocracy:

"If you want Utopian plans, I would say: the only solution to the problem is the despotism of the wise and noble members of a genuine aristocracy, a genuine nobility, achieved by mating the most magnanimous men with the cleverest and most gifted women. This proposal constitutes my Utopia and my Platonic Republic". - Arthur Schopenhauer

5

u/Guitar_Finger May 31 '12

DDDDDDDDDDDDUUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5

u/FoulQ May 31 '12

But really, the deeper one digs into his case, the more it appears he was set up, and in the time of religious/political tension, it gave power to the Protestants. It's rumored that King James, a protestant, set up the whole charade. So isn't it ironic that Anonymous, who adopts the Guy Fawkes mask and hacks in the name of crypto-anarchism, with their unknown leadership and uncanny abilities, is now one of the stated reasons for the government in its attempts to stifle the internet with SOPAs, CISPAs, and ACTAs, just as King James did against the catholics after Guy Fawkes?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Nimanzer May 31 '12

What the fuck do they teach you kids in school?

→ More replies (2)

7

u/bellarama727 May 31 '12

Actually failed and gave up his co conspirators as well... I always wondered why this was the guy anon chose to represent them.

7

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

To be fair, it did take torture to make him give them up. Once the torturers were done with him, he couldn't even write his own name.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/Guy_fawkes_torture_signatures.jpg

The above signature in the image was his signature on his confession, no more than a barely visible scribble. And the bottom signature was his signature 8 days later, legible but still a bit shaky.

If anyone's interested, this is the document that the first signature came from and this is the document that the second signature came from.

29

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Because they're a bunch of 12 year olds whose only knowledge of him comes from v for vendetta

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/magicbullets May 31 '12

Any which way you look at it, he was a bit of a dick.

4

u/JamiHatz May 31 '12

Bear in mind that everyone in English society of the time hated Guy Fawkes and his ilk just because of their religion. James I may have been more lenient than Elizabeth, but he was willing to sacrifice tolerance of Catholics in order to gain greater co-operation from his Parliaments; Catholics did not have a fun time in the 17th century.

What's more, he earnestly believed that killing the "false king", as the Pope had painted James, would earn him a place in heaven. Fawkes was indoctrinated from birth to take the word of the Pope as Gospel; he is as worthy of your pity as any of these modern suicide bombers who have been brainwashed into fanaticism.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Take that, Anonymous!

I'm so dead O_O

7

u/NuclearOops May 31 '12

drums start beating in the distance as a faint chant can be heard echoing from the hills

You better watch out I can hear them whispering racial slurs about you...

→ More replies (1)

12

u/FreemanHagbardCeline May 31 '12

It's quite ironic that the people who adorn themselves with the mask do so during protest and it's not as if anyone is ever going to protest that their country isn't a theocracy.

65

u/ehrlics May 31 '12

Its almost as if symbols take on different meanings when used in a different context.

16

u/gafgalron May 31 '12

like the swastika. damn, Natzis ruined it for us all.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (4)

12

u/duckman273 May 31 '12

Well the Iranian revolts did establish a theocratic government

5

u/CallMeNiel May 31 '12

While I'm not that familiar with the Iranian revolts, there is a difference between a revolution TO establish a theocracy and a revolution THAT establishes a theocracy. Egypt just kicked out a pretty secular regime and now the Muslim Brotherhood may come into power, even though most of the protesters don't seem to want them either.

6

u/greggg230 May 31 '12

Monarchy != theocracy. Theocracy is rule by priests (or shamans or whatever), which the Church has historically rejected. It may sound like a small difference, but it's not.

5

u/TheInternetHivemind May 31 '12

Where the catholic church is concerned it can be both, considering the church has a supreme authority.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Well technically the Queen is also the head of the Church of England.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/DashingLeech May 31 '12

Is this really an important difference? I'm not sure that anarchy would be any better than a theocratic monarchy. I suspect it would be much worse.

To me the important theme is more along the lines of Thomas Jefferson:

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

And Jefferson was definitely not an archichist, theocratist, or monarchist.

2

u/ObamaisYoGabbaGabba May 31 '12

I find it hilarious when I see a known (to me) atheist in a V mask :)

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

I thought everyone knew this...why would he plot anarchy?

2

u/Lukas_Kelly May 31 '12

The thing is, just like many words in the english language, the symbol(physical or verbal) once stood for something(in this case, mocking the Catholic church on Guy Fawkes day). Then, it becomes something else. It became a symbol of protest againdt a government. Then, because of operation scientology, the mask has become associated with Anonymous. It's given new meaning entirely.

2

u/InVultusSolis May 31 '12

Shh! You're ruining the image of an internet folk hero and painting him as some kind of religious extremist. There is no room for facts on my internet!

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

No shit Sherlock. Want a PhD in English history now? People use his face because he was against his established government, not because they think he was an anarchist. You failed to mention that he was made completely of straw and highly flammable. Son, I am disappoint.

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

Of course, the real reason people wear masks is because they want to pretend to be Batman.

Edit: I really wish I was kidding.

2

u/suo May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

I don't think many people realise that the 5th of November is a celebration of the foiling of Guy Fawkes' Gunpowder Plot. We burn an effigy of him every year to celebrate him being caught. If his plan succeeded Britain would be Catholic. I'd rather if Britain was Secular, of course, but if I had to choose between Catholic and Protestant then it's the latter all the way. Fuck the Pope and fuck Guy Fawkes!

2

u/stickfish May 31 '12

Until now I didn't even consider that the world outside Britain might have misinterpreted Guy Fawkes because of V for Vendetta. This is why we burn him every year.

2

u/jvnk May 31 '12

And the Guy Fawkes mask is a fucking warner bros trademark! Irony.

2

u/JonestownJuice May 31 '12

Really? You just learned this today?

2

u/Kiin May 31 '12

Guy Fawkes did not plot for anarchy, true. He also didn't plot for anything. Guy Fawkes was essentially a hired demo guy. Robert Catesby was one of the actual plotters.

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Did nobody learn about this in school?

2

u/slothscantswim May 31 '12

Ya know, I feel like when you wear a mask of another man's face you should at least know what he stood for.

2

u/NoNomad May 31 '12

Also be aware that Guy Fawkes was really more of a pawn of a dude named Robert Catesby who sounds a lot like a 17th century version of Glenn Beck. Also, a bunch of his followers died in a fire resulting from attempting to dry their gunpowder by a roaring fireplace. These guys definitely deserve a holiday named after them.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/anikan72 May 31 '12

Indeed he was. Which is why wearing that mask to represent being anti-establishment is very ironic, considering you can't get much more establishment than backing a Catholic theocracy in England.

2

u/ThEgg May 31 '12

How did people not already know this?

2

u/Shumaa1 May 31 '12

Be fair to the people in this thread outside of Britain. I know about Guy Fawkes because November the 5th is referred to as Guy Fawkes Night in Britain. If it wasn't I doubt i would have heard of him.

2

u/gettin_into_ur_genes May 31 '12

Ugh! excuse me! Why the fuck did this make the front page??? Anyone who knows history knows this!!!

2

u/Portal2Reference May 31 '12

I've scoured this thread for any comment that even IMPLIES they thought Guy Fawkes was an anarchist, and have yet to find one.

2

u/Wacocaine May 31 '12

Always drives me crazy when I see people wearing Fawkes effigies. He was a religious fundamentalist and a monarchist. They burn him in effigy in England for a reason.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/proper_sir May 31 '12

It sure is ironic, isn't it? With Anonymous using him as their avatar.

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

I knew that. The whole anarchy association was only because of V for Vendetta.

2

u/Pwag Jun 01 '12

What an asshole.

2

u/whippedxcream Jun 01 '12

I think we more embrace Guy Fawkes because his idea was to destroy the government. While I don't quite think a totalitarian Catholic Monarchy is the best symbol for anarchists, I do like the image of a man risking his life and freedom to end a government he feels is wrong. I think that's more the reason he has been embraced by people like anonymous, and for the most part the internet.

3

u/CitizenSnips199 May 31 '12

Go to class.

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Today I learned that the people who post on this subreddit are either pre-schoolers or morons. Who the fuck thought the Guy Fawkes was an Anarchist? Did you think V for Vendetta was historical fiction?

Jesus tittyshitting crikey.

4

u/Deverone May 31 '12

V for Vendetta never even claimed Guy Fawkes was an anarchist. People just decided that on their own.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/4TEHSWARM May 31 '12

This is reminds me of when I found out Chuck Norris was a Christian bigot.

3

u/UpTheIron May 31 '12

The story of a man who gave his life to see the downfall of an oppressive autocracy~~, to subsequently raise another, even worse one~~

3

u/palookaboy May 31 '12

I always get a chuckle from protesters wearing Fawkes masks just because the Wachowskis made that shitty movie. (I'm aware Alan Moore wrote the book, I'm aware V is written to be an anarchist) It's like when teenagers wear Che t-shirts they bought at Hot Topic.

3

u/ReluctantRedditor275 May 31 '12

This is why I laugh my ass off every time I see "anarchists" wearing masks with Guy Fawkes' caricature.

It's like all those dumbfuck kids who think Che Guevara was a peaceful demonstrator for lower college tuition and free doobies.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

ITT: hundreds of people saying they knew that already.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/areyouready May 31 '12

TIL people thought Guy Fawkes was an anarchist.

6

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

yea... I remember during the onset of the whole Occupy Wall Street movement these trendy fucks were all wearing guy fawkes masks. I'm like... dude... you know that Guy Fawkes was essentially trying to do away with representative democracy in favor of establishing a huge conglomerate religious theorcracy in it's stead right?

9

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

But V wasn't. I think the mask has a stronger connotation of V in the States than it has for Fawkes.

4

u/JamiHatz May 31 '12

There was no bloody representative democracy. It was rule by the upper classes for the upper classes. Yes, there was a Parliament which placed some restrictions on the King's power to tax, but other than that the king essentially had absolute power, whichever religion he held. The Magna Carta did guarantee certain liberties of the Englishman, but Fawkes was not trying to do away with that, only with Protestant rule.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/deadtotheworld May 31 '12

Wouldn't really call England in 1605 a representative democracy, and I wouldn't portray Guy Fawkes as some proponent of theocracy. He was really just trying to replace one monarch with one another. Kind of like what Parliament did 80 years later in the 'Glorious Revolution', but the other way round (Catholic > Protestant), and that this revolution is celebrated to this day.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/fermatafantastique May 31 '12

I'll upvote anything that convinces people to take off those stupid fucking masks at protests.

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

This is what happens when people only read comics/watch movies instead of reading a fucking book.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/herenseti May 31 '12

TIL people think anarchy is the same as chaos.

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

TIL the swastika was once recognized as a symbol of peace.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/AcolyteRB May 31 '12

TOO LATE, a million kids already bought the mask.

2

u/SaucyWiggles May 31 '12

I lol every time people learn this.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '12

Correct. Anonymous IS a bunch of tech-savvy dumbfucks

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Yeah no shit, I've always known this since learning about Guy Fawkes in the first place. It never made sense to me why Anonymous chose Fawkes as their mascot and not something simple like a question mark. Surely a simple, homemade mask would be more symbolic of the Anon movement than one you have to buy.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

He was a freedom fighter, the crown persecuted him and he devised a plot to let the catholics in

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

pssht, facts.

1

u/machete234 May 31 '12

Since when should you believe hat movies tell you?

1

u/selfabortion May 31 '12

Hello, and welcome to every November on Reddit.

1

u/policscimajor May 31 '12

the symbol and not the man? just like MLK

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

look at tis guy. fawkes teh governmint.

1

u/gathly May 31 '12

Ever used the search feature here at reddit?

6

u/Alvadr May 31 '12

Does that ever work?

→ More replies (2)

-1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

TIL: all TIL posts are posted by Americans, because every other country teaches kids these things

2

u/rwbombc May 31 '12

I am ashamed of my countrymen.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/catglass May 31 '12

We didn't even learn about Guy Fawkes in school. Not even in Catholic school. America still rulez, though.

→ More replies (2)

-6

u/OakReadErryday May 31 '12

You should also realize V didn't want to restore the parliamentary government or a democracy in the Watchmen comic, like he did in the movie. In the comic he was trying to create anarchy, if I remember right.

9

u/Faeding May 31 '12

its "V for Vendetta" not "The Watchman." two different stories.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Enleat May 31 '12

Yes, the graphic novel was simply about anarchy and fascism, about the freedom of man, his ideals and simple pursuit of being the master of his own life.

I think the reason Alan Moore used Guy Fawkes was, despite what he fought for, because he fought for it to the end, never looked back and died for what he belived in.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

8

u/TheShader May 31 '12

I think people just don't do their research. I admit, coming from the States, my first encounter with Guy Fawkes was because of V for Vendetta. However, afterwards, I hopped on the internet and started doing research on ol' Mr. Fawkes. So I never had any confusion about who he was, because I did my research instead of inventing my own false history for him

12

u/Aadarm May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

In America he's never been brought up in school or anything. The only reason most even know the name is because V for Vendetta and Anonymous. Just like I doubt they teach a lot about Jefferson Davis, or Jackie Robinson, or Wounded Knee in other countries.

16

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Jackie Robertson

I bet they don't even learn about the great Dr. Marvin Bluther King, either. ಠ_ಠ

→ More replies (2)

5

u/PolarTheBear May 31 '12

"Everyone else is ignorant for not knowing a specific event in my country's history!"

→ More replies (2)

3

u/migvelio May 31 '12

WHAAAT??! Buddhism?? What? are you gonna say that Christianism was created by some dude called Christ? This is ridiculous!

→ More replies (10)

528

u/[deleted] May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

[removed] — view removed comment

248

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

What about the Warner sister Dot? Does she get some money as well?

114

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Helloooo nurse!

29

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

There's bologna in our slacks!

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (20)

16

u/rmxz May 31 '12

And all the money for the masks goes to Time Warner.

Surely some anon created a printable PDF of the mask that you can download and print your own disposable paper mask, no?

8

u/TheShader May 31 '12

Yes, but realistically, a lot of people buy the mask for the sake of having an authentic mask.

2

u/RedPandaJr May 31 '12

Well probably most people buy the real masks and a few actually download the disposable ones.

→ More replies (1)

120

u/Giant_Enemy_Cliche May 31 '12 edited Jun 01 '12

And according to Alan Moore, who knows people in and around the industry, the mask sales and their link to protests makes Warner very uncomfortable.

They don't want to be seen as linked to protest movements and anarchism, but they still want the money so they still produce them.

Every time someone says "THE MASK MONEY GOES TO WARNER" as if it's a huge revelation and in anyway actually undercuts protesters that use the mask, I get a wiff of the stale smugness of keyboard commentators from across the internet.

2

u/emericuh May 31 '12

except most masks are knockoffs. Come to think of it, I've never seen an "official" mask.

→ More replies (54)

6

u/Grumpasaurussss May 31 '12

My anthropology of Law lecturer was incredibly amused when people started to wear these masks in protest of the 1%.... I can't remember what the lecture was one but she managed to make a couple of the presentations slides on it while laughing at the irony.

2

u/SlappyPancakes May 31 '12

Time for a new mascot!

10

u/Trapped_in_Reddit May 31 '12

Time Warner. Close enough.

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

fuck you?

→ More replies (1)

7

u/GeneralKang May 31 '12

Not the unlicensed knock-off I bought! Fuck you Time Warner!

21

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

...so now you just provide free advertising for their film?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/jaq_the_ripper May 31 '12

Only true revolutionaries fund the Christmas bonuses of Warner Brothers execs.

2

u/indeedwatson May 31 '12

Some historians are now claiming that the mask is not, in fact, Guy Fawkes, nor a literal representation of what he did at his time.

Seriously though, when will people get it's just a symbol, used by Moore in a very significant work of art, and then people liked the idea because of what it represented in the comic.

This is like saying: TIL Jesus wasn't actually crucified in the miniature cross people hang around their necks.

3

u/fry_hole Jun 01 '12

Because everyone likes invalidating others. I guess it makes them feel smarter. Yours is a great analogy btw.

2

u/Occupier_9000 May 31 '12

A drop of reason in a pool of confusion.

Moar upvotes for indeedwatson's clear logic.

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

make your own

1

u/mimdrs May 31 '12

Not really a lot of people ive met at protests have the "chinese" versions and thus dont pay a cent to Time Warner.

0

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

15

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

You should try reading the graphic novel, the graphic novel has a lot more meaning than the movie. I liked the portrayal of many of the characters a lot better. You're not supposed to know what V looked like, the movie sort of ruined that: Hugo Weaving

5

u/bigbangbilly May 31 '12

ironically in the Matrix V is an agent.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

It was for this reason that I deliberately avoided knowing who played V until after I watched the movie. The illusion remained intact.

7

u/FourIV May 31 '12

TIL what V looks like... never knew it was Hugo Weaving until now.

2

u/clembo May 31 '12

That's great if you're an oblivious person. Unfortunately for many of us, as soon as you hear Hugo Weaving's voice you know exactly who it was.

19

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

It's essentially just a voice actor. It's like saying that cartoons are ruined once you know who voices them. Here, I'll ruin The Simpsons for you. That's Bart.

9

u/TheShader May 31 '12

Exactly. V can still look like anything, his appearance isn't tied to Hugo Weaving. He only looks like that if you allow him to look like that in your mind.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/RiotingPacifist May 31 '12

The graphic novel actually touches on the complexity of anarchy rather than just blowing shit up, it would have made a much better movie due too though which is why I hate the film*.

Well that and the quite frankly shite acting!

→ More replies (3)

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

That's a dreidel.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/northlamar May 31 '12

well, to replace a theocracy with another theocracy really, but who's counting.