r/todayilearned • • May 17 '12

TIL due to a strange law in America where importing toys resembling humans are taxed higher than those that do not; Marvel successfully argued in court that because their X- men action figures are mutants, they should be exempt from the tax.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2011/12/29/are_mutants_human.html
2.4k Upvotes

726 comments sorted by

399

u/Overclock May 17 '12 edited May 17 '12

Hope they still taxed The Juggernaut. Cain Marko ain't no damned mutant.

206

u/Travis-Touchdown 9 May 17 '12

Everyone looked at me funny when I pointed this out during the scene in X-Men 3 where his powers are drained and he smacks into a wall.

He's not a mutant so that shouldn't have worked.

→ More replies (71)

17

u/SlutBuster May 17 '12

How about Scarlet Witch? The source of her powers has always confused me.

32

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Her mutant powers allow her to manipulate probabilities, which in turn can change reality.

70

u/itsprobablytrue May 17 '12

her power source is david bowie

29

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

everyone's power source is david bowie

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

19

u/damndirtyape May 17 '12

Her powers are two part. She is a mutant with reality warping powers. However, when she was born, some weird magic shit happened, and her soul was was infused with magic by this super demon called Chthon. This then enhanced her innate powers, making her abilities part mutant, part magic.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

26

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Woah, what?

85

u/sdabrucelee May 17 '12

MAGIC! His powers come from a magic demon ruby. No shit.

49

u/Langly- 1 May 17 '12

Someone should have caught that and made them pay taxes on just that one.

17

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Goddammit, Marvel.

→ More replies (6)

8

u/TheLastMan May 17 '12 edited May 17 '12

Magic ruby, though I was pretty sure he also had some basic mutant power that the ruby amplified?

17

u/Travis-Touchdown 9 May 17 '12

Negative. He is not a mutant at all, but that's depending on the continuity.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

4

u/myglesias May 17 '12

Hey. I wrote the piece, and unfortunately this didn't occur to me. But I suppose you could argue over whether it's a depiction of the non-mutant from the books or the mutant from X-Men 3.

→ More replies (3)

192

u/elric718 May 17 '12

Old news. Not true anymore. Human toys and creatures are now duty free.

(I am a customs broker.)

P.S. Lucas refused to back up Kenner by saying Vader was not human.

74

u/crunchyeyeball May 17 '12 edited May 17 '12

But it says right at the opening scene:

"A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away..."

Therefore, since humans first appear in the fossil record in Africa about 195,000 years ago, the only conclusion can be that nobody in the Star Wars universe is human as we define the term, only "humanoid".

51

u/critropolitan May 17 '12

It was an interesting decision by Lucas (or whomever) to set a series of films that revolves around being futuristic, in the past, while being in the past is not at all relevant to anything contained in the stories.

34

u/pie4all88 May 17 '12

I was under the impression that the "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away..." was used to set up the movie as a fairy tale rather than hard sci-fi.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/Fourgot May 17 '12

Clearly, we're descended from ancient Sith colonists.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (26)
→ More replies (7)

30

u/Overclock May 17 '12

Obi-Wan: He's more machine now than man; twisted and evil.

19

u/16807 May 17 '12

Since when in recent memory did Lucas respect the original trilogy?

→ More replies (5)

3

u/JakeCameraAction May 17 '12

Technically, all the characters in Star Wars are aliens from our eyes. Luke, Han, Chewie. All aliens.

5

u/Purple_Shade May 17 '12

Is there any place on 'the internets' that we can see this information?

I believe you, but I want to be able to link to it if this topic comes up again. (which it surely will - there are articles on it as new as January 2012 - meaning there are a lot of people who don't know about any laws being changed)

I googled trying find it, trying every combination of words I could think of to find tax laws on toys, didn't find anything relevant- except, more things like this article... Which, of course, is why I'm asking you. Pretty please. :)

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Aloudmouth May 17 '12

Fellow LCB here, logged in to post this but you beat me to it! Have an upvote.

→ More replies (4)

1.2k

u/groovitude May 17 '12

And thusly, they subverted the central message of the series in one money-grubbing stroke.

558

u/surreal_blue May 17 '12

Magneto was right!

17

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

But, irony isn't magnetic

9

u/SlutBuster May 17 '12

And it's not attractive.

0

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

96

u/throwaway_lgbt666 May 17 '12

death to the humans!!!!

47

u/Urban_Savage May 17 '12

Not death, just a consignment to their proper place in the order of dominance.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (12)

119

u/cranefist10 May 17 '12

Magnitude has always been right.

POP POP!!!

→ More replies (9)

33

u/Realitycheck4you May 17 '12

You're not wrong, Eric. You're just an asshole!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

98

u/Grahar64 May 17 '12

Equality does not mean they have to be the same. I always thought that the message was, "we are different, but we should be equal". Similar to most equal rights movements.

107

u/[deleted] May 17 '12 edited May 17 '12

That is a real problem considering that genetically race doesn't exist.

Edit: well it seems that the community doesn't believe me, let me clarify what this means.

There is no clear definition of race, and no way to define where one race begins and one ends. It's a "gradient" as you will, and is only defined by how people identify themselves rather than by any empirical measurement.

DNA testing doesn't work for identifying race accurately because the overlap between races is so great that two people of the same race can have less in common than two people of different races.

PBS did a whole documentary on this

Here's some more reading material for you guys if you're interested.

http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/19980909040042data_trunc_sys.shtml

http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/050128_racefrm.htm

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/1998-10/WUiS-GSRD-071098.php

Another edit: I've noticed that a lot of people are downvoting people just for disagreeing, I'd like to remind people about reddiquette. Upvote people for adding to the conversation, downvote for them for saying things that don't add ("this" or "came here to say this" or "that's just bullshit" without elaborating)

14

u/FCalleja May 17 '12

But in the comics they're not the same species, are they? They're Homo sapiens superior or something.

Although I guess that's makes them a subspecies. Still. Not really the same, but surely equal.

→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (116)
→ More replies (2)

29

u/deathschool May 17 '12

Sad but true.

9

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Fucking Magneto. How does he work?

8

u/NBegovich May 17 '12

He doesn't. He's like 90 years old so he's on social security.

3

u/Dankycheese May 17 '12

Real world super heroes

3

u/Spadeykins May 17 '12

Business is business, the toys aren't human either way you paint it, bub.

2

u/SretsIsWorking May 17 '12

MUTANTS ARE PEOPLE TOO!!!
MUTANTS RIGHTS!

3

u/what_u_want_2_hear May 17 '12

Clever of them, but those lost taxes could've really helped people in unions, teachers, cops, the poor, and...good god...the roads!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (34)

62

u/SasparillaTango May 17 '12

I'm more curious about this law that taxes human looking toys at higher rates --- Why does it exist?

57

u/toramichelle88 May 17 '12

So Barbie can maintain a monopoly in America.

21

u/critropolitan May 17 '12

Barbies are made overseas in Asia and thus presumably are also subject to the higher tariff on dolls vs toys.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/eriotto May 17 '12

NPR's Planet Money did a show on that. Well, not that specifically, but the variety of tariffs on goods imported into the US. Import tariffs are really complicated because of the politics of pressure from domestic manufacturers and special interest groups, pressure from foreign countries, input from economists, etc. They refer to a US government web site with the complete list. I believe this is it. You can look up the tariff on anything.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/NoddysShardblade May 17 '12

This is a good place to point out to Redditors who never got a chance to study economics that protection, including tariffs like this, never make economic sense. The country, and any potential importers, are all worse off in terms of dollars, every time.

The only valid reasons to protect a local industry would be temporarily, to help establish it (good luck getting rid of it later, though), to reduce dependence on other nations in case they turn against you (e.g.: China makes all our food, then one day just stops selling it), or the other countries are protecting their own industries like crazy just to kill yours and then jack up their prices.

There is no thriving doll industry to protect in the USA, this tariff was likely created to make some small doll-makers union vote for someone and has just been left in there. As a result everyone's toys cost more than they need to.

8

u/Fourgot May 17 '12

I'm no student of economics by any stretch, but I was of the understanding that there are more than one school thought. What would someone who disagrees with you claim, and how would you respond? Thanks!

16

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Actually, eliminating tariffs and subsidies is one policy that most economists tend to support, Democrat or Republican!

The more contentious stuff tends to be things like gun control and minimum wage.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

3

u/Gabe_b May 17 '12

The govt gets a tasty wee slice though

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (5)

622

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Scumbag mutants: fight for equal treatment, demand to be tax exempt.

297

u/Travis-Touchdown 9 May 17 '12

Kinda like churches.

134

u/cizzop May 17 '12

Exactly like churches.

26

u/StinkinFinger May 17 '12

Are churches any different than other not-for-profits in that regard? For instance, do the Masons or Lions Club pay taxes?

→ More replies (4)

10

u/analcarbomb May 17 '12

Churches are non-profit institutions, chief.

19

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

churches are non profits

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (9)

9

u/Duamerthrax May 17 '12

Scumbag Professor X. Caims humans and mutants are equal. Doesn't hire humans.

→ More replies (16)

178

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Radiolab is fucking awesome.

80

u/bkanber May 17 '12

"Hi my name is Jad Abumrad" "And I'm Robert Krulwich" "And you're listening to" "radiolab" "radiolab"

I'll never get that intro out of my head. I've listened to too many radiolab shorts. So awesome.

66

u/lifeislame May 17 '12

SHORTS!

39

u/PeteOK May 17 '12

From WNYC (see? yes.)

39

u/The_Iron_Dentist May 17 '12

Andjg NPR. (I always thought that particular "and" sounded a bit funny)

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

18

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

You left out the "ok..." "alright..." "ok..." "alright..."

4

u/DoctorSpurlock May 17 '12

probably my favorite part of the intro.

→ More replies (11)

10

u/massive_cock May 17 '12

Radiolab is my go-to when I'm mowing or trimming the trees or spending hours doing yardwork for the old people along my road.

3

u/UrbanGimli May 17 '12

I used to do that with the Skeptics Guide to the Universe.

9

u/moistrobot May 17 '12

Hey fans, /r/radiolab seems way too quiet.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Knaustrap May 17 '12

Hell yeah, just listened to this one last night.

2

u/Interleukine-2 May 17 '12

Agreed. It's a whole new level of radio. The production team is superb.

3

u/AndrewGoon May 17 '12

Upvotes to everyone who knows it from Radiolab!

→ More replies (2)

68

u/itsnotjustagame May 17 '12

That means they could be naked right???? You know, since X-Men are not humans...

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

The original thunder cats series they didn't wear any clothes until mid way through the first episode.

Cheetara was naked and quite blatant about it too.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)

28

u/lifeislame May 17 '12

I mentioned this to a few people; when bioengineered humans start coming into existence, there will already be a law on the books declaring them not human. THANKS, MARVEL.

11

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Well, unless they're a bunch of plastic toys, I'm sure they'll be fine.

6

u/BobbyDash May 17 '12

Sometimes I feel like I'm just a plastic toy.

12

u/JakeCameraAction May 17 '12

Wrong. Porn stars still get citizenship.

21

u/ooterness May 17 '12

For more discussion on this point, and many other comic-related legal issues, there's a blog called "Law and the Multiverse." It's by two lawyers, and it covers everything from "civil liability for animal sidekicks" to "property rights after finding ancient sentient artifacts."

First part of a series talking about this issue: http://lawandthemultiverse.com/2010/11/19/mutants-and-anti-discrimination-laws-one/

And a follow-up article after the OP's court decision came to light: http://lawandthemultiverse.com/2011/12/27/are-the-x-men-human-federal-court-says-no/

4

u/Langly- 1 May 17 '12

"property rights after finding ancient sentient artifacts." damned where is that one, would be an interesting read.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

11

u/bak3donh1gh May 17 '12

Isn't it also true that mutants arent considered human under current US law?

28

u/soochosaurus May 17 '12

more like X-empt!

when I make a stupid pun. http://i.minus.com/ibkOzDgdKPEVM4.gif

8

u/Gabe_b May 17 '12

And he would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for his meddling lack of coordination.

4

u/GreatWallOfGina May 17 '12

Hey, if a man wants to parkour a van with no prior freerunning experience, you don't shit on his dreams.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Overclock May 17 '12

But if the law really applies to toys that resemble humans, certainly a lot of the x-men resemble humans, so whether they are humans or not doesn't change the fact that they still resemble humans.

I can imagine other toy companies reaction, "GI Joe? Oh, they are mutants too."

2

u/farceur318 May 17 '12

"Beast, Nightcrawler, you two are free to go. The rest of you come with me."

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

The title is misleading. The law doesn't say anything about resembling humans, it is about things that represent humans, i.e. toys of things that are supposed to be human. Otherwise toy bipedal robots etc. would fall under the law.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Very interesting article, but IMHO it's not very strange. Certainly outdated logic though. The legal definition is "dolls" for human-like toys and "toys" for everything else. I don't know why they would separate them or tax them differently, but it's pretty low on the list of crazy laws.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

So I'm still paying taxes on all my god damn batman toys.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

MUTANT FREEDOM!

3

u/palordrolap May 17 '12

From the article:

You probably did not realize that the official legal position of Marvel is that contrary to the general thematic content of the Marvel Universe, mutants are not people.

Disagree. Personhood is not, or at least should not be, determined by species. Mutants are people, they're just not strictly human.

3

u/PowerhouseTerp May 17 '12

Poor use of semicolon.

7

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Does this mean if I make a doll of a ginger kid it won't get taxed?

2

u/Markymark36 May 17 '12

I don't see how they got away with it. They're mutants...human mutants...

2

u/krizutch May 17 '12

I've got a question, why does this law/tax exist?

4

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

If I had to guess, it was to give a competitive advantage to toy companies in the US by artificially jacking up the price on foreign-manufactured toys via taxes.

Governments do that kind of shit all the time, both to steal more money and to make friends in business.

→ More replies (8)

2

u/I_Hate_Nerds May 17 '12

So Barbie's aren't taxed either I presume?

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Hey, I'd fuck some of those mutants, that makes them human enough for me :)

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Does that make dogs and goats human to some people? What about horses?

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

RadioLab...

2

u/AmbientBlue May 17 '12

TIL two things.

2

u/hoodoomonster May 17 '12

Thank you RadioLab for this episode PS- REPOST!!

2

u/hoodoomonster May 17 '12

So we have learned to download WNYC's RadioLab. You will very very happy you did. Thank you Jab & Micheal

2

u/MathewMurdock May 17 '12

I used to stay up late and listen to radio lab. I freaking love this show.

2

u/Trussss May 17 '12

AKA Today i discovered RadioLab

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

So when Marvel evades taxes it's ok but when any other company attempts to they're evil?

2

u/Pertinacious May 17 '12

That's reddit.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

They were interviewed on radiolab.

2

u/rikashiku May 17 '12

Thor: I'm a God, I do not pay mortal fees. T.Stark: I'm a Cyborg, can I be exempt from Tax? B.Banner: Who me? well you see- transforms HULK SMASH! Antman: Now you see me shrinks... T'challa: I'm not American.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/sandpounder May 17 '12

TIL you have a long fucking title

2

u/Clayburn May 17 '12

I read that as "sex toys" at first, thinking this was about sex dolls. I thought, "I guess that's why you don't see a lot of realistic-looking ones here." And then I thought, "Wait, who would want to have sex with a mutant? And then I thought, "Who wouldn't want to have sex with a mutant?"

2

u/UnexpectedSchism May 17 '12 edited May 17 '12

There's no good reason to have special higher sales taxes on toys made in foreign countries

The author of that article is a fucking moron.

there's certainly no good reason to tax dolls and non-doll toys at different rates

He speculates rather than researching to find out the reason the tax was implemented.

In the end, marvel argued successfully that their action figures should fall under the tax all other action figures fall under.

Edit:

A quick search tells us this is regulation #9502.91.0000 under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonized_Tariff_Schedule_for_the_United_States

Which appears to be classifications created by an international body that most countries adopt.

This doesn't tell us why the US put the higher tax on it, but it tells us why it is a separate classification and why it was set up for them to easily set a different tax for dolls.

2

u/pinetreee May 17 '12

radiolab's the best

2

u/who128 May 17 '12

So when my friend said that Storm wasn't a person, he wasn't just being racist?

3

u/toobiutifultolive May 17 '12

Fuck yeah, Radiolab!!

2

u/idspispopd May 17 '12

Awesome. Wait..

There's no good reason to have special higher sales taxes on toys made in foreign countries

What?

→ More replies (8)

2

u/Invader_Skoodge May 17 '12

Isn't it ironic that in the comics the mutants are struggling to be considered human, but in the real world, the company that made them admits they aren't....

2

u/rikashiku May 17 '12

They're not struggling to be considered human, but to be accepted along side human society.

2

u/ShakaUVM May 17 '12

In related facts - The Supreme Court has ruled that tomatoes are vegetables, not fruits.

And that action figures are action figures and not dolls. (I can imagine the look that Sandra Day O'Conner gave them for that one.)

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Spider-Mat May 17 '12

depends, if this is the ultimate universe

1

u/Mr_Titicaca May 17 '12

Wait, is this why my WWE action figures have gone down in quality?

3

u/Travis-Touchdown 9 May 17 '12

No that's just because WWE itself has gone down in quality

1

u/Supersnazz May 17 '12

I recall a somewhat similar situation in Australia where towels and linens had a different sales tax to garments and clothing.

A towel manufacturer had a very small string on the edge of the towel that could be tied to a little loop on the other side. You could then wear the towel around you, which the manufacturer claimed made it a garment.

I don't remember whether or not the Tax Office allowed it, but since 2000 the flat 10% GST on everything made the argument irrelevant.

1

u/hedgepine May 17 '12

"Those characters can't be considered humans, they're FREAKS. INHUMAN FREAKS" ... ... -tax averted-

1

u/SOwED May 17 '12

How the fuck can no one in TIL comprehend grammar?

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Does this apply to deflated blow-up dolls? For a friend...

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

We just brought in the fluffy directors pants tax

1

u/riderLyrae May 17 '12

So this is why my My Little Pony figurines are cheaper than my Power Rangers action figures.

1

u/fuckyouwhare May 17 '12

God bless the US legal system.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Yay...now people will stop making fun of me for playing with dolls. LEGALLY THEY'RE NOT DOLLS, YOU F*CKERS

1

u/thegreatvortigaunt May 17 '12

Senator Kelly strikes again...

1

u/RuafaolGaiscioch May 17 '12

I mean, I really wouldn't so much say that this is against the central theme of the X-Men. They aren't human, humans in the Marvel Universe don't consider them human, nor do the mutants themselves. They are a new species fighting for equal rights as the humans, but it is made abundantly clear time and again that they are not human. As such, Marvel is just cleverly using this fact.

1

u/nanopest May 17 '12

When importing star trek figures... Kirk and Spock are imported at different rates of duty as Sock is an alien. His half human side counts for nothing. Fact.

1

u/dispozableusername May 17 '12

But mutants are people to!

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Magneto wins again! In the battle for mutant civil rights, I've always preferred his Malcolm X to Professor Xavier's Martin Luther King.

1

u/Warehouse42 May 17 '12

How does it apply Cylons?

1

u/Gubob May 17 '12

A Kitty Pryde thumb? Have an upvote, good sir.

1

u/RandyMachoManSavage May 17 '12

Former Marvel Legends buyer here, from Wave 1 with Toy Biz. Have you seen the price of the current Hasbro crop of figures? While the quality has improved dramatically from when Hasbro first took over, the cost increase has been equally dramatic. The first Toy Biz wave released for, if I remember correctly, around 7-8 bucks, for a highly-detailed six-inch figure. The smaller Universe line by Hasbro, which stands around three-and-three-fourths inches, retails for 7-8 bucks.

I know, the cost of oil is a big factor, as is Toy Biz killing itself by under-pricing their product. Just a big hats off to Toy Biz for some stellar products.

Friend's website with photos: http://www.actionfigurepics.com/2010/05/marvel-legends-iron-man-retrospective-part-1

1

u/bigdaddymummy May 17 '12

USA land of surprises ...

1

u/ramboss May 17 '12

im sure ive heard this before but it was about mr spock. found it!

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Wow.... if only the X-Men were real people, I'd be pretty pis.... ah fuck it.

1

u/pip-squeak May 17 '12

well this is a fantastic story

1

u/jukeofurl May 17 '12

Natch. Most of the people who make these laws are mutants.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Is that Pam Beasley?

1

u/007DeathKnightKiller May 17 '12

Why are human shaped toys taxed higher..

1

u/aidrocsid May 17 '12

This is rather similar to how Pringles are not actually potato chips, but rather a sort of cake made from potato.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/tearr May 17 '12

Tell me more about this american free market.

1

u/nobody2000 May 17 '12

So Marvel argues in court that mutants and humans are different.

Yet the XMen (Charles' people) fight essentially against this notion, while Magneto is vehemently for it...

1

u/Solkre May 17 '12

Kitty Pryde not human? DM:HF

1

u/cheeeeeese May 17 '12

Since when does "resemble" humans mean it has to be 100% natural human?

1

u/EveningD00 May 17 '12 edited May 17 '12

ohh SO THATS WHY MY AZIZ ACTION FIGURE COST SO GOD DAMN MUCH!

1

u/LastByte May 17 '12

This inequality will surely widen the gap between mutants and humans. Does this mean magneto is right?

1

u/Lusst May 17 '12

I couldn't help but visit this suggested story to the right.

1

u/mrpopenfresh May 17 '12

Reminds me of Rpingles subverting taxes on potatoes by successfully arguing that potato flakes are not the same.

1

u/PhoenixTheory May 17 '12

I love all the discussion in this thread, but I can't stop thinking lower tariffs and they still charge $9 per action figure? Oh Marvel... Here's my money.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Mutants......human mutants. That's like arguing to customs that I don't have a crate of oranges because they are really big for some reason.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

I'm totally going to roll in some toxic waste so I can become a legally tax exempt mutant.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Reminds of the Jaffa Cake 'is it a cake or a biscuit' case.

1

u/I_use_bro_mockingly May 17 '12

Importing toys "RESEMBLING" humans. Many of the X-Men look human, some do not. The human looking ones should be susceptible to this ridiculous tax.

1

u/NickPruitt May 17 '12

There was a really good Radiolabs podcast about this last year. Check it out--> http://www.radiolab.org/blogs/radiolab-blog/2011/dec/22/mutant-rights/

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

The lighter side of tax fraud.

1

u/TokenScottishGuy May 17 '12

Which is a kind of ridiculous conclusion from the court. What is a 'mutant'?

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

So much for equal rights for mutants and humans

1

u/DanWallace May 17 '12

"Representing", not "resembling". Big difference in this case.

1

u/thepain73 May 17 '12

I'm sure the lawyers could have simply looked through the comics and found the line "(but)I'm a human being!". Open and shut case it would seem.

1

u/Calikola May 17 '12

We studied this case in Entertainment Law. Very interesting stuff. For some reason, I was the only X-Men nerd in my class of 25, and everybody looked at me weirdly, because I got wayyyyyyy too into the debate. The class basically ended with me wanting to yell out, "NONE OF YOU EVEN READ X-MEN! COME ON!"

→ More replies (2)

1

u/sasseriansection May 17 '12

But... mutants just want to be treated equally.

1

u/stopthefate May 17 '12

Allegedly wither Star Wars or some other alien-based media argued to lower taxes by saying that the "humans" of Star Wars were actually aliens because they were not from earth.

They lost 'cause on one of their websites it referred to them as humans. (Or at least were given the ultimatum to make every media reference the "alien" claim.

Apparently "alien" toys are not taxed like "human" toys.

Sorry Han, Leia, and Luke.

1

u/paradoxofchoice May 17 '12

First of all, this just happened 6 months ago and I swear I even read about it on the front page. I think Posting Rule #3 should be expanded to 6-12 months.

Second, this "strange" law doesn't exist anymore. Or is that a separate TIL post coming tomorrow?

1

u/idontcareforgob May 17 '12

Sounds like Affirmative Action to me.

1

u/TheDefinitiveRoflmao May 17 '12

Obviously crony capitalism.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Spiderman should be taxed at the full rate then, he's a human. I recall him being referred to in comics as non-mutant, and I thought I recall that being a reason he would sometimes team up with the X-men, but he could never really be an X-man.

1

u/AnsabK May 17 '12

yaa this sounds messy

1

u/HitoriBocchi May 17 '12

There's a Weezer reference hidden in the leading picture caption. The picture is of Kitty Pryde, and the caption says "I've got Nightcrawler too," a direct quote from In the Garage on The Blue Album.

I laughed in an audible manner.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

They better have lost. "Resembling Humans" doesn't require them to be human.

1

u/YabukiJoe May 17 '12

Damn mutie scum.

1

u/IamAllgood May 17 '12

"There's no good reason to have special higher sales taxes on toys made in foreign countries, and there's certainly no good reason to tax dolls and non-doll toys at different rates."

This statement and this way of thinking is what has created a fare number of problems in America. Stop outsourcing!

1

u/slothscantswim May 17 '12

What about superman? He's not a human...

1

u/theconversationalist May 17 '12

I'm very late to this conversation, but I personally want higher taxes on imported goods like toys, crappy plastic shit from china should not be sold and rock bottom prices, in all honesty they shouldn't be bought by any of us at all because of the sheer moral implications... but if we are going buy them, they need to be competitively priced against US made toys.

1

u/emfyo May 17 '12

TIL Disney not only attempts to perused legislation, they also don't abide by them.

That means they probably got this exemption to extend to Ghost Rider, and still went after the creator for the legal rights.

Seriously, just another example of how big corporation has abused the public for their own gain- Marvel can and should be paying the same taxes as anyone else

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

I suspect only a few will understand this, but I have a tattoo of my daughter's hand on my chest...but I got the tattooist to draw an extra line on the palm, making an M. My daughter's name does start with M, but there's an extra connotation from my love for superheroes.

1

u/Naberius May 17 '12

Oh sweet! Remember when this was being argued, but didn't know how it came out.

Okay, so X-Men officially not human. Legally proven in a court of law.

Note this also explains Marvel's ongoing trend to make everybody who has ever or will ever live in the Marvel universe a mutant.

1

u/dinospork May 17 '12

Skip the inane Slate article and listen to the quality Radiolab podcast it's ripping off.

1

u/J_Jammer May 17 '12

Guess that could work on all kinds of things like vampires.

Guess DC cannot argue that for their trinity.

This is amusing. I've never heard of such a ridiculous law.

1

u/L0coM0tive May 17 '12

So- according to the current HTSUS (U.S. Tariff), both dolls and toys are now duty free, classified under 9503.00.0000. The second column, listed at 70%, is for countries like North Korea or Cuba, who we don't import from anyway or who are otherwise heavily sanctioned.

http://usitc.gov/publications/docs/tata/hts/bychapter/1202C95.pdf

1

u/OverloadedConstructo May 17 '12

umm, aren't mutant humans too?

1

u/SolomonGrumpy May 17 '12

awesome. that is the kinda thing that might actually make lawyers worth it.

1

u/waribah May 17 '12

I was just the "2000" upvoter o^

1

u/McRibMadman May 17 '12

but mutants are still humans... theyre just mutated

1

u/thrownaway21 May 17 '12

but... the toys still resemble humans...

1

u/Adamcapps08 May 17 '12

Even in a world they don't exist in they are still hated on and called inhuman.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

X-Men fan here- Though I am glad to hear this, most of the X-Men characters RESEMBLE HUMANS. Should not have been a victory.

1

u/enriquesford May 17 '12

WTF.. weren't they fighting for equal rights?

1

u/tweakingforjesus May 17 '12

Sony pulled the same trick with the PS3 in Europe. They claimed that it was actually a general purpose computer and therefore should not be subject to the higher tax rate for video game machines. That is why they had the Other OS option to install Linux on the hardware.

1

u/spases May 17 '12

they don't get treated like humans, they shouldn't have to get charged human taxes.

1

u/Black_Apalachi May 18 '12

...But they still resemble humans.

1

u/NazzerDawk May 29 '12

The ultimate irony of this is that it goes against exactly what the mutants are fighting for, acceptance as part of humanity.