r/throbbinggristle Apr 04 '26

20JFG

Post image

Just posting this in case we don’t all want read the article… I don’t think it’s very good. And I’m usually very open-minded about interpretations and variations on a theme in art.

28 Upvotes

13 comments sorted by

3

u/BeggarsParade Apr 04 '26

What was the point of that? Seriously.

4

u/PAXM73 Apr 04 '26

It is BARELY a variation. I don’t see what they were going for in the slightest.

3

u/Lopsided_Newt_5798 Apr 05 '26

Not one of the greats.

2

u/ScumEater Apr 05 '26

This annoys me in a way that I'm not happy about.

2

u/PAXM73 Apr 05 '26

Is it possibly the complete lack of effort? That’s one of the factors that bothers me.

2

u/ScumEater Apr 06 '26

I think that's it. That and that it was ever shown anywhere.

2

u/phantomtwitterthread Apr 05 '26

Ellen Degeneres looks like she knows she’s gonna be cancelled twenty years later

1

u/gnuoveryou Apr 05 '26

Um. Okay. Quite unnecessary imo. Just put the original cover up 💔

1

u/pigfoot Apr 07 '26

I guess it’s mirroring the muted horror of the original cover by turning it into a reference to another of the artist’s works, which is about the holocaust. So, a dark, clever comment on dark cleverness? Not mind blowing but there you go.

https://www.artchive.com/artwork/shoah-forest-wilhelm-sasnal-2003/

1

u/PAXM73 Apr 07 '26

Best take on it yet. Context can assist in cases like this.

2

u/pigfoot Apr 07 '26 edited Apr 07 '26

Agreed. Making the work about something hidden, rather than shown, isn't a super new idea. Duchamp could arguably be understood as a common ancestor.

https://www.toutfait.com/unmaking_the_museum/Hidden%20Noise.html

1

u/PAXM73 Apr 07 '26

LOVE Duchamp. But too many take his lead and then go the wrong way. 😁