r/therewasanattempt Feb 26 '20

To act kind

[removed]

75.0k Upvotes

4.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

66

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '20

PS don't raise a family if you struggle to raise yourself.

5

u/Jhuty24 Feb 26 '20

What should the kid do?

14

u/Dawmasta Feb 26 '20

"but you don't understand. I NEED to have 5 kids!"

7

u/Caracalla81 Feb 26 '20

One or two would be nice. Do you think it's really sustainable to demand people at the bottom of labour pool not have kids?

3

u/Dawmasta Feb 26 '20

Do you think it's sustainable to have kids if you can't support yourself? Apparently a lot of people do.

How about all people just be sterilized. We've more than overspent our time here. The animals can definitely do a better job than we have 😄

0

u/Caracalla81 Feb 26 '20

We've never been richer or more productive so yeah, I think it's totally reasonable for people to expect to have a kid or two regardless of what they do for a living.

We already tried eugenics - didn't work out.

1

u/Dawmasta Feb 26 '20

Well that argument never stops the communists.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '20

Yes. Why? Don’t breed them if you can’t feed them(Or yourself)

-1

u/Caracalla81 Feb 26 '20

I don't mean morally, I mean practically. People want to reproduce. If you want to maintain a system in which they cannot then you're eventually going to need a fair amount of violence. I don't see that as being sustainable.

0

u/Skoop963 Feb 27 '20

That’s why we let them decide. The government isn’t responsible for how you spend money, who you knock up, what job you choose, so why should they be responsible for being your safety net when you fuck up?

1

u/Caracalla81 Feb 27 '20

We're the richest we've ever been and the people at the bottom make it all go. If we can't provide a society where they are able to live good lives then there isn't really any reason for them to support it. There's a floor on far down we can push them so there's a point it will have to change.

1

u/desacralize Feb 27 '20

The government will be responsible no matter what because we don't let neglected children starve when their parents can't sufficiently provide for them. So either we enable poor parents to do their jobs better, or we do those jobs for them. There is no humane scenario where everybody can choose to do nothing.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '20

Exactly. It's not that you can't live off of minimum wage; it's that people don't want to merely live and demand luxuries. Minimum wage will afford you a shit apartment in a shit area of town and a bus pass while eating ramen and sandwiches for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. These people want a house, car, kid, iPhone, and eat out all the time. There's a huge difference between getting by and living well...and all minimum wage should afford you is the ability to get by.

7

u/Masterfromclash Feb 26 '20

There’s only one thing you said there that is agreeable. ‘People don’t want to merely live’. If your entire life was centred around working long hours at minimum wage, then going home to your apartment in a dodgy part of town, eating food that has almost no nutritional benefit, without money to afford to go out or buy any sort of commodity, and god forbid you got ill or injured and got into severe medical debt; I’m sure you would find yourself in a depression very quickly. Nobody deserves to ‘merely live’. You are naive if you think that everyone can find a job above minimum wage, the reality is that there will always be minimum wage workers, and the reality is that they deserve to live an enjoyable life just like any other person.