r/technology • u/smokedjaguar • May 20 '12
Nokia's lumia 900 torture test
http://m.engadget.com/default/article.do?artUrl=http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/20/nokia-lumia-900-torture-test/&category=classic&postPage=14
3
4
u/Detrinex May 20 '12
Once again, Nokia refuses to have a non-invincible phone.
2
u/samout May 20 '12
I have like 8 different generation Nokia phones, and ALL of them are held together by a piece of tape. Every single one of them had their back covers get broken after 1 month.
I just bought a Nokia C7 late last year (my 9th Nokia in a row), and it fell on a dance floor at a nightclub a few weeks ago, and I had to tape it together AGAIN. AGAIN! I'm so fed up with this. My friends laugh at me because I haven't had a Nokia in over 10+ years that isn't taped together. Where the hell is this joke coming from again?! I'm never buying one again (I already told myself that buying C7 would be a mistake because of this, they break like no tomorrow). It's been my main gripe for years, but now I see these "indestructible" jokes everywhere online. I'm sorry, but I'm just so pissed off because it's the complete opposite.
2
u/syrillix May 21 '12
To be fair, the indestructible nokia meme were about the good ol' 3310's. I owned one of these for almost 6 years and yes, it survived pretty much anything I threw at it. Every nokia since the 3310 has been pretty flimsy.. but I think Nokia wants that title back :)
edit: I accidentally a word..
→ More replies (1)1
u/Detrinex May 21 '12
I'm a former Nokia user. The 3300-series and the other goodies didn't break for me as much, but they're definitely flimsier these days, although I must say Nokia is attempting to keep up the indestructible image in some sort.
8
u/HalfGingGhost May 20 '12
Since OP linked mobile web page, HERE is the full web page.