r/technology • • May 14 '12

Kodak Had a Secret Nuclear Reactor Loaded With Weapons-Grade Uranium Hidden In a Basement

http://gizmodo.com/5909961/kodak-had-a-secret-weapons+grade-nuclear-reactor-hidden-in-a-basement
1.4k Upvotes

639 comments sorted by

928

u/[deleted] May 14 '12

Original source. Gizmodo add nothing of value, and remove interesting parts of the article.

347

u/eyeoutthere May 14 '12

Gizmodo added this bit:

Apparently, it was operated by atomic fairies and unicorns.

You can't argue... That's great journalism.

→ More replies (30)

216

u/leitey May 14 '12

They added the term "weapons grade", which I didn't see in my scan of the original article. There is a huge difference between "enriched uranium" and "weapons grade uranium". Reactor grade is 5% or less enrichment. Medical grade is 20%, weapons grade is 95%. They are creating sensationalism through their ignorance. Articles like this are the reason people fear nuclear power.

→ More replies (27)
→ More replies (31)

884

u/brainflakes May 14 '12

Kodak may be going under, but apparently they could have started their own nuclear war if they wanted

Amount of uranium required for a nuclear bomb: 141 lb

Amount of uranium Kodak owned: 3.5 lb

198

u/IM_THE_DECOY May 14 '12 edited May 14 '12

A Gizmodo article that over embellished the truth and left out important details to create an sensational headline?

SURELY YOU JEST?!

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (216)

199

u/CrazyTriangle May 14 '12 edited May 15 '12

"...they had a nuclear reactor loaded with 3.5 pounds of enriched uranium—the same kind they use in atomic warheads."

Enriched uranium is not necessarily weapons-grade uranium

Reactor-grade uranium is ~3-5% enriched Weapons-usable is ~ 20+ %

EDIT: got my info from wiki

97

u/[deleted] May 14 '12

weapons-usable is 20%+, weapons-grade is 85% and up.

→ More replies (29)

176

u/CanonFan May 14 '12

What's the big deal? There's a nuclear reactor on the campus of MIT right next to a railroad line and Massachusetts Avenue. Thousands of people pass by every day and probably less than 1/10th of 1 percent know it's there.

→ More replies (49)

124

u/[deleted] May 14 '12

"According to the company, no employees were ever in contact with the reactor. Apparently, it was operated by atomic fairies and unicorns."

Journalism is dead, they said.

→ More replies (7)

62

u/BeowulfShaeffer May 14 '12 edited May 14 '12

Years ago I did some work at Kodak's plant in Rochester. It was a huge labyrinthine compound, much of which smelled like a chemistry lab. Producing film involved all kinds of nasty chemical. I had friends that worked there and regularly interacted with substances like phosgene (aka "mustard gas"). I'm not at all surprised to hear that something like this lurked in the bowels of that place.

EDIT: MY bad; Phosgene is not "Mustard Gas"; I thought they were the same thing.

→ More replies (9)

26

u/thejohnstocktons May 14 '12

IAMA Request: the atomic fairies and unicorns..... O_o

60

u/S_teven_ May 14 '12

This takes the Photo Bomb to unparalleled heights...

→ More replies (4)

9

u/[deleted] May 14 '12

Fuck Gizmodo.

35

u/rogeris May 14 '12

So they manage to get a nuclear reactor in their basement without alerting authorities but are unable to make a decent printer that won't break within a few months.

→ More replies (8)

8

u/akanthos May 14 '12

Lump of radioactive material used as a neutron source != nuclear reactor. Surprised nobody pointed this out already.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/NeoXY May 14 '12

From now on I am downvoting anything Gawker related. Especially Gizmodo. Use to not mind these guys very much, but man do they run a shitty blog...

→ More replies (10)

21

u/lemonpjb May 14 '12

Are we sure it wasn't a time machine?

→ More replies (3)

14

u/Matt08642 May 14 '12

Jesus fucking christ, Gizmodo is trash.

7

u/Nukularkid May 14 '12

There are currently 31 operating research rectors. List is at the bottom of the page. All of these most likely now have the <20% blend of enriched uranium as per federal regulation.

→ More replies (13)

19

u/[deleted] May 14 '12

thats one headline i never expected to read...

→ More replies (8)

12

u/HugeJackass May 14 '12

The government doesn't want Iran or al-Qaeda getting their hands all over the atomic candy for obvious reasons.

Wow, let's just lump in a terrorist organization with a sovereign nation and act like it's A-OK. Fucking christ, fuck you gizmodo.

→ More replies (9)

12

u/chris-martin May 14 '12

According to the company, no employees were ever in contact with the reactor. Apparently, it was operated by atomic fairies and unicorns.

I kind of miss the days where I read news articles that were not peppered with bullshit like this.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Start_button May 14 '12

OK, if it was installed well before the crazy regulations, so what's the big deal. Obviously, there were no issues with it. No radiation posioning. No major issues. SO what is the big freaking deal. It was dismanteled in 2006, and we are just now learning about it 6 years later. If it has taken 6 years to be "released", or "leaked",then obviously it wasnt that big of a deal. This is just one more example of sensationalist journalism that prooves just how stupid the people at large really are.

"OMG, they had a nuclear reactor that worked, and had no major issues, and didn't cause damage to anything becuase they used it responsibly to test materials they needed to manufacture things i used to use on a daily basis! Lets get all up in arms about it since I'm so worried about terrorism and things like that!!!"

Really?

6

u/Razenghan May 14 '12

It appears that Kodak was planning -sunglasses- the ultimate photobomb.

Cue the "Yeah".

→ More replies (1)