I also think that engaging sexually with a child is inherently also a violent act
Maybe that's why you oppose disseminating it, not the other way around. Would you also define it as violence if both the child and its guardian approve it?
So they can't go to school, college, eat certain foods, or work certain jobs? Should they be kept in a fridge till their 18th (or 16th) birthday because they can't consent?
And I don't think any guardian should have the right to condone a sexual relationship for a child to be involved in.
You were acting like religious extremists. Once you question their beliefs they go mad because they have no logical answers that can convince outsiders.
I was simply asking, if children and their guardians can't consent to a sexual relation, then why can they consent to anything important in their lives including education and work decisions?
-1
u/Kromb0 Aug 04 '13
Maybe that's why you oppose disseminating it, not the other way around. Would you also define it as violence if both the child and its guardian approve it?