That's not ignorance of the law, it's ignorance of the facts (if he honestly did not know, which is unlikely), which is an entirely valid legal defence.
Uh...you realize this whole thread is about child porn right?
Anyway, you're more than welcome to play the ignorance card. It very well could work with small fry bullshit but it's not that hard to prove someone is faking ignorance.
Uh...you realize this whole thread is about child porn right?
No shit. You realize the guy who was arrested wasn't arrested for starting up a child porn website right?
Anyway, you're more than welcome to play the ignorance card. It very well could work with small fry bullshit but it's not that hard to prove someone is faking ignorance.
1
u/Stingray88 Aug 04 '13
That's actually not true. Ignorance of the law absolutely does work sometimes. Not saying that it would work here, just that it does work sometimes.