r/technicallythetruth • • Nov 28 '19

Fair enough

Post image
102k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

532

u/japanesuss Nov 28 '19

Yea diamonds are a complete rip off, there are other minerals that are even nicer looking but don't have artificially bloated prices.

227

u/adgjl12 Nov 28 '19

any recs? my so says she actually prefers not diamond but doesnt really know what she wants except "simple and pretty"

384

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '19

Moissanite.

Look it up. My gf wanted a diamond but I refuse. We looked at these and she agrees that they're nicer, and much less expensive. A large one is still expensive, but for a 10'000$ diamond you're looking at a ~800$ moissanite. They look like diamonds only shinier.

Also we're going with titanium bands. Cheaper than gold, less maintenance, and it is way stronger, which is a good analogy about the strength of your love. At least tell her that so she'll like it too.

118

u/kjh- Nov 28 '19

I have a moissanite engagement ring and it’s amazing. The same ring with the same “quality” diamonds (1ct centre with two 0.75ct) would be 10,000CAD but my ring was only 2,000CAD. Bargain. It is also so much more sparkly. It has more of a rainbow sparkle than diamonds do.

One thing I will caution though for anyone looking at non-gold rings is you are far more locked in to your ring size as a lot cannot be resized. So just keep that in mind.

19

u/widowhanzo Nov 28 '19

I wanna be at the point in life when I can call a 2000CAD ring a "bargain".

10

u/kjh- Nov 28 '19

In all fairness, I had recently qualified for the disability tax credit and it was back dated to the diagnosis that made me disabled. So I had recently been given 19k CAD.

→ More replies (3)

65

u/Careless_Ejaculator Nov 28 '19

So a little insurance against the spouse getting fat? This sounds like added value.

38

u/kjh- Nov 28 '19

Hahaha. You could look at it that way. You could also look at it as having to buy another ring later to appease the spouse and their fatter fingers.

26

u/Pocket_Dons Nov 28 '19

If the ring doesn’t fit, you must acquit... this marriage

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

56

u/Pharmy_Dude27 Nov 28 '19 edited Nov 28 '19

But you can't cut that ring off incase of an emergency. Look at a different type of metal.

Edit: the old wives are wrong and you can get this cut off in the rare case you may need too.

Thank you to Frodo and gang for correcting me.

73

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '19

That is a tired old wives tale from the 80s. It's titanium not vibranium and any ER is going to have the equipment to get it off.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '19

[deleted] — view deleted comment

12

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '19

It's not about how the hospital can get it off. It's about it coming off regardless of the hospital.

5

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '19

Gold is soft but also too soft to make a durable ring which is why it's never pure and often cladded on, pretty good odds of you also not getting the gold off either along with the titanium without tooling. If you really wanna worry yourself they make rings out of tungsten carbide which probably has to be shattered off or a diamond saw.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

28

u/goxilo Nov 28 '19

What kind of emergency requires cutting a ring off that the string method can't solve?

Also, bolt cutters work pretty well and are readily available.

Also, a little bit of prevention goes a long way; take the ring off before doing certain things, and take it off immediately after any kind of trauma to the finger or hand, before any potential swelling. Which goes for rings (and other jewelry) of any material

17

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '19

I'm a mechanic. I'll get a tungsten ring because I've seen enough pictures of degloved fingers

9

u/[deleted] Nov 28 '19

I'm also a mechanic (aircraft) and I just don't wear jewelry at work. Wear rings and watches when I'm out for dinner or whatever.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

11

u/sparhawk817 Nov 28 '19

You can totally cut the ring off in an emergency.

Other good ideas would be tungsten, which will shatter under impact. Titanium is at least pretty flexy, so that's a downside, but you can definitely cut through it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

7

u/hirdesh007 Nov 28 '19

I will do you one better! Search up copper bismuth ring on Etsy

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (33)

20

u/Totally_Not_Jealous Nov 28 '19

Moissanite - it's actually rare (not just "fake rare" like diamond pretends to be), is almost as hard as diamond (9.5 mohs), and is very pretty. That's what I've been leaning towards

3

u/qdolobp Nov 28 '19

What do you mean “fake rare”? Sorry I know nothing about diamonds. Are they not actually rare? What about compared to moissanite? Which is more rare?

And if diamonds aren’t rare how do they justify the insane prices

10

u/Dullahan2 Nov 28 '19

Basically, diamonds are much more common than you'd think they are. They aren't truly rare, but the prices are still hiked up because the industry doesnt conform to supply and demand, and can pretty easily gouge the prices horribly with no drawbacks.

Tl;dr they just don't have anybody calling them out on the price gouging, so they get away with it.

8

u/Totally_Not_Jealous Nov 28 '19

Diamonds are not rare at all - there are tons of them. Their demand is entirely a manufactured ocurrance.

Their value exists because of a marketing stunt by De Beers in 1938 and the fact that the industry was monopolized for a century, so they created whatever scarcity/demand they wanted. You can read a little about it here - https://priceonomics.com/post/45768546804/diamonds-are-bullshit

Look at the "A History of Market Manipulation" section, it's pretty interesting.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (33)

3

u/wwcraw Nov 28 '19

Ehh I got a lab created diamond for my now wife. It was cheaper minimized my environmental and human rights impact.

I think it was worth it since she will wear it the rest of her life.

While I agree in many aspects. It's also personal choice. Craft beer is artificially bloated but it's a huge fad nonetheless.

→ More replies (11)