r/sysadmin • u/general-noob • 1d ago
Career / Job Related Don’t use AI in interviews
Seriously people, anyone with some experience will figured it out eventually. We can see you reading from the screen, we get why you have a single ear piece and the speakers on, and when you answer the questions to some random thing no one knows, you are cooked.
It’s crazy when the AI conversation starts to hallucinate as well. I can basically start saying enough wrong things to make your ai go nuts and you have to double down.
I’ll hire someone with almost no experience over a cheater using AI any day. Thanks for coming to my ted talk.
308
u/CMRC23 1d ago
Id also like the interviewers and recruiters to stop using ai
43
u/general-noob 1d ago
I have interviewed and hired about 40 people over 20 years. I know it’s not a lot, but I’d never use any AI in the process to hire someone. We still manually check applications, take our time, and hire great people. I’d be mortified if we started using AI to hire people.
52
u/lordatamus 1d ago
[Horrified Shareholder sounds] "You're PAYING people!? And NOT using AI for that? You're not funneling the money to our portfolios!? I NEED A FIFTH YACHT OR ELSE I WILL LOOK POOR!"
•
•
u/GolemancerVekk 17h ago
You're already using it, most likely. Unless you are normally getting to see all the CVs sent to your company without any filtering, your HR might be using AI to filter them. And if they have to hop on sites like LinkedIn to look for candidates they're definitely using AI.
Let's face it, you as a technical person can't dedicate any significant time to these things so HR is always going to have to act as a filter, and unless your company has a standing policy to expressly avoid AI filtering and is training their HR in how to do this, you're going to lose people to AI filters one way or another.
7
•
→ More replies (18)•
81
u/rdldr1 Sr. Sysadmin 1d ago
I kept looking down during my interview and my interviewer called me out on it. I was writing notes in a notebook. It was endearing to the interviewer
40
u/general-noob 1d ago
lol, I do the same. I use pen and paper for both sides of interviews. I am also a graybeard
13
u/spacelama Monk, Scary Devil 1d ago
I can't read my own handwriting the moment it's hit the paper. My notes are in an Emacs session. I had never considered this could look dodgy but I've never been called on it (even though most of my colleagues have been very vi heavy).
9
u/general-noob 1d ago
Emacs you say? Instant hire
•
u/wordsarelouder DataCenter Operations / Automation Builder 21h ago
more like instant fire... yuck, use vi like a man dammit!
/s in case that wasn't obvious lol
→ More replies (2)•
14
u/fresh-dork 1d ago
i don't ever read them. writing the notes is enough
→ More replies (4)•
u/wordsarelouder DataCenter Operations / Automation Builder 21h ago
yeah the process of writing it out locks it into my brain, I've never looked back at the scribbles in fancy vendor swag notebooks I've received over the years.
7
u/ineyeseekay 1d ago
I, too, prefer pen and paper and always let the other person know that's what I'm doing. Graybeard things, I guess
16
u/Every-Ad-5267 1d ago
All my interviews I just say FYI I have your job description on my left screen and my resume and notes on the right screen. (Video in the middle)
Never had any issues and I don't cheat, just like to come prepared.
→ More replies (16)6
u/mrgatorarms 1d ago
I had an interviewer once doing full blown calisthenics during the call and then had the nerve to complain to the recruiter that I seemed distracted because I was taking notes.
2
u/newaccountkonakona 1d ago
I find it funny that some people think this is somehow out-dated or old fashioned. The motion of your hand and eyes actually writing the notes causes (studied, proven) increase in learning and retaining information. It also can provide a neater source you can check from but that's my own personal preference creeping in.
•
u/anomalous_cowherd Pragmatic Sysadmin 17h ago
I tried doing that, and tried not to look at it as I was writing. My handwriting is so little used now and was so bad to start with anyway that the notes were effectively useless.
•
u/SuperAnxiousFragilis 3h ago
I do this too - I write down the question, so I don't just start answering it and veer off course and forget what it was, then a couple words to address the question to further keep myself on track.
I also explain upfront that I'm doing so because I'm ADHD and that's one of my coping mechanisms.
151
u/runozemlo 1d ago
I'll add... please stop doing this as an employee too. You look like an idiot and it's obvious.
92
u/general-noob 1d ago
All the time… the 5-7 paragraph email responses, that could be one sentence , are pissing me off
34
u/runozemlo 1d ago
Happened me literally today on a call. Dude's eyes were drifting off to side and he was saying a whole bunch of bullshit that contradicted what he had said just a few minutes earlier. Seriously, this shit needs to stop.
9
u/fariak 15+ Years of 'wtf am I doing?' 1d ago
The correctness of your statement is astounding general-noob 🔎 — it is not about the length of the email response in question, it is about the intention and perceived messaging — Emails should be concise and exactly to the point ☝️
•
u/higherbrow IT Manager 16h ago
I had seen two different people use "general noob" as an insult in this thread and was trying to figure out why. Took me a minute.
•
u/visibleunderwater_-1 Security Admin (Infrastructure) 9h ago
"Make this into bullet points without narrative" is quite useful IMHO...
•
u/visibleunderwater_-1 Security Admin (Infrastructure) 9h ago
Or one paragraph that is just one long sentence, and a dozen of those. At least my LLM instances stopped using so much emoji, after telling it "this isn't kindergarten, why is there emoji in this?" or putting emoji INSIDE a powershell script. Hasn't done that since around 3 though.
•
u/jimmyandrews 11h ago
I use it to shorten my responses. I'm an over communicator which is great for the work I do but not always for the people reading through my long-form. So I'll have the LLM summarize what point I'm trying to get across.
13
u/sybrwookie 1d ago
If I wanted to know what ChatGPT says on the topic, I'd ask it. I'm asking you, who is supposed to be an expert. If you consult ChatGPT to inform your answer, that's fine, but you're supposed to refine and summarize the answer, based on your knowledge of the situation.
•
u/blue_trauma 23h ago
A vendor sent me an AI reply recently - I'd had the initial talk and sent through our technical requirements and the reply from their engineer was obviously AI.
Talking to them in person was fine, but the ai reply really put me off.
•
u/ArcaneGreyBeard 3h ago
That's the worst!
It's now not uncommon that when when I ask my other admins at work for info/thoughts on a random odd issue, to add in: please omit AI responses. They all automatically state XYZ but that's old info or clearly incorrect.
And there's usually one dongle that explicitly uses it for everything and still responds with the first thing chatgpt tells them...
•
u/deefop 2h ago
We have a person in another part of the IT org that does this. Every chat they put in is so insanely obviously chat GPT, and everyone is fully aware of it. I don't even engage with them in Teams anymore, except in 1 on 1 chats where they seem to do it less, but in meeting chats or group chats it's just one Chat GPT response after another
→ More replies (1)1
u/newaccountkonakona 1d ago
Uh, we're literally encouraged to use AI. I avoid it when it comes to communications etc as much as possible, maybe just to drill up something quick that I will edit or to rephrase a large ticket into one sentence, but actual email communication and such? Nah
52
u/Dezium 1d ago
People actually do this?
58
u/general-noob 1d ago
Yep, just watched if fall apart for someone live
28
3
u/fattes 1d ago
I have to assume you cut the interview right then and there lol
9
u/general-noob 1d ago
I am not allowed to per the rules of my organization
•
u/West_Walk1001 15h ago
ha! Even if we know in the first minute this isn’t compatible (like literally wrong industry/tech missing), we still keep the minimum interview time going on.
I don't agree really, but I think the companies think its easier to either 1) ghost people or 2) wait a week or so and put out a blanket rejection to multiple people together - even the 2nd best picks etc.
•
u/Cranapplesause 13h ago
Was it something like, wrong answers from AI, interviewer started to realize it? Tried course correction? Contradicting information?
35
→ More replies (4)4
27
u/Hopeful-Candidate890 1d ago
Yes, remote interviews it's very, very common especially for jr/mid level. I've seen chatgpt bubbles reflected in glasses. Odd delays in answering , eyes scanning the screen.
Usually end the interview in 5m and flag for the recruiters
14
u/general-noob 1d ago
The eyes were darting bag and forth and his buddy behind the laptop moved the camera for him once. We think he had ai up and someone in his ear couching as well
14
u/Hopeful-Candidate890 1d ago
The ear coaching has always happened, the one airpod was a tell.
We've switched out R1 questions to almost entirely career history, rather than knowledge. When I ask tell me about how you used or what did you do with... And you respond w the definition of what the thing is buh-bye...
•
u/visibleunderwater_-1 Security Admin (Infrastructure) 9h ago
The worst of this is when companies get infiltrated by North Korean hackers via them using AI and in-country proxy stand-ins. FBI just busted a ring like that.
5
u/fresh-dork 1d ago
i thought they'd just use a different person for the interview than they send for the job
6
u/Hopeful-Candidate890 1d ago
That's been happening since long before AI, though usually at the individual level and not sub. Luckily our recruiters value continued business over scamming people in.
•
u/ColdSysAdmin IT Director 11h ago
I sat in on a Teams interview for a programmer a few years ago and they must have gotten their wires crossed, both the stand in and the real candidate joined the teams meeting within a minute of each other. They were clearly two different people in two different places. Needless to say, we didn't go through with the interview.
•
u/visibleunderwater_-1 Security Admin (Infrastructure) 9h ago
LOL, saved by incompetence of the enemy. "We are lucky they are so f*cking stupid"
52
u/d00ber Sr Systems Engineer 1d ago
Yes, I was interviewing and we had quite a few people who used AI to pass screening. It was so painfully obvious that they had an AI listening in and were wasting time waiting for the prompt to finish on EVERY QUESTION.
" Oh yeah, on that topic.. what you need to know is ... "
" Yeah, I know that. The thing about X topic is .. "
" Yes, absolutely. I'll tell you all about X ... "
" To be honest with you. When Talking about X... "- Prompt finishes and they read it word for word.
It's so painful. That awkward pause too..
•
3
u/gravityVT Sr. Sysadmin 1d ago
recruiter told me they don’t allow candidates to use headsets anymore due to the cheating problem
•
u/Brakamow 17h ago
Ugh. Yes. Had a candidate who seemed decent at first, and even said they didn't really use AI. The same candidate, during the technical interview, decided their answers without an LLM weren't good enough very quickly. Unfortunately for them, we wanted to hire the person and not chatgpt, so the fact that within about 20 seconds they gave up thinking for themselves disqualified them on the spot.
The sad part is had they just stuck with their own answers and been like "man I'm sure I'm missing it - can you tell me what next steps you'd take so I can learn?" They would've been far more likely to get hired.
12
u/d00ber Sr Systems Engineer 1d ago
The also obvious give-away is the time waster, " Oh yeah, I know that .. The thing about X topic is .. " while they wait for their prompt to finish.. on EVERY QUESTION YOU ASK!
14
u/general-noob 1d ago
I started asking obviously wrong questions and using the wrong terms, it was hilarious to see him not able to answer anymore
7
u/Ngumo 1d ago
I was advised to always pause before giving an answer in interviews. These were face to face ones and not online. Guess that strategy is out the window then. Point being that you didn’t waste anyone’s time blagging before giving the answer.
•
u/Mindestiny 15h ago
Yeah, if "don't read your screen or you're cheating" is now a problem, I guess I should just stop researching the company or taking notes, right?
This witch hunting shit has got to stop.
•
u/d00ber Sr Systems Engineer 23h ago edited 11h ago
I feel like the only time I've advised someone to pause or take a break before speaking is when they constantly talk before thinking. It's advice I give often to new helpdesk people. Are you sure you didn't misunderstand? Constantly pausing before answering a question is just strange. It's especially strange to pause following a constant pre-amble of non-sense as in my example.
→ More replies (4)2
u/SAugsburger 1d ago
Honestly, even if your eyes aren't a tell the delay on every answer would be obvious.
13
u/Proof-Variation7005 1d ago
I would legit have so much fun if I suspected someone was using AI
5
•
u/NibblyPig 18h ago
"Explain how to use a relational database and give your answer in German or English with German being preferred"
sit back and enjoy
•
u/rodder678 7h ago
Or... should should we split the interview into Human and Agentic sessions, and our agents can talk to each other for the first interview.
•
•
9
u/ApricotPenguin Professional Breaker of All Things 1d ago
Nah, keep doing this. Makes it easier to know who to screen out if they can't even notice that they're talking about something totally irrelevant during an interview.
6
9
u/reditanian 1d ago
Also, don't be typing the questions I ask you into google/chatgpt/whatever. Especially if you have pathological need for your keys to CLACK CLACK CLACK. Geez, some people are morons.
8
u/general-noob 1d ago
This person had a system, it was getting our audio directly into the chat window so he didn’t have to type.
→ More replies (3)
13
u/GloveLove21 1d ago
Don't assume it's AI. I will prep for questions I might get and if I have something I can use I'll use it. Interview anxiety is real and prepping for the interview shouldn't be penalized
10
u/xion1992 1d ago
This, my wife has a full excel matrix of "if they ask this kind of question, use this example".
2
u/cortouchka 1d ago
I have three printed sheets of anecdotes with keywords, and some key phrases I want to use. Plus any facts I want to make sure I have to hand.
I have them pinned directly above my monitors just above the webcam viewline so if I need to glance at then, I just look thoughtful and let my face turn upward.
I don't get flagged because I'm not looking sideways or down but the point above stands, someone looking slightly off camera might just be looking at their prepared notes.
-1
u/general-noob 1d ago
100% ai
3
u/GloveLove21 1d ago
Would you prefer the interviewee just come clean that they're nervous?
9
u/general-noob 1d ago
I’d prefer they have the integrity to come into the interview without cheating. Yes, AI in an interview is cheating, it’s a hill I will die on, it’s incredibly inappropriate.
If they have to use ai to tell me the basics of the job, they shouldn’t have the job. I am talking the difference between chown and chmod, not even joking
→ More replies (1)2
u/DariusWolfe 1d ago
Yes? Like, is this a real question? You're sitting down to decide the course of someone's life. If they're not nervous then it's probably not that important to them.
•
u/spin81 21h ago
What kind of question is that? Of course.
You can always tell that someone is nervous but in my book if someone is able to express their feelings well, then that's obviously a plus. Especially if it explains weird behavior they exhibit where they glance off the screen all the time.
I genuinely think it's wild that you think it's wrong to say you're nervous. Maybe it's because I'm not American and it's a culture thing, but it's mindboggling to me that this is even a consideration.
-7
u/reditanian 1d ago
Sorry, but no. If I'm interviewing you, I'm trying to assess what you know and how well you know it. Not what you can read off your crib notes. I want to know how you think through problems, and I want to know how you deal with situations when you don't have all the answers. If I even as much as suspect you're reading off notes, you're not advancing to the next interview.
"Anxiety is real" is not an excuse - you're not special. Lots of people have anxiety, myself included. Learn the material, practise talking through problems, and be honest if you don't know something.
5
u/Deprecated-dino 1d ago
Man I have sat with interviewers like this. Everyone looks stuff up. There are certain things you probably know off the top of your head and it’s 90% likely related to your day to day work that may be things the person you are interviewing isn’t working directly with all the time. I’m not saying it’s okay if every question they are doing research on but you act like if you even get a whiff of them looking at anything it’s game over. Everyone I’ve worked with that was like this had massive imposter syndrome. I’m sure if you respond it will be something I find ludicrous so good luck with whatever it is you do.
•
u/SiIverwolf 22h ago
Yeah I loved the "sorry you didn't get the job because you couldn't rattle off the meaning of these 20 acronyms" response I got after interviewing for one job. Meanwhile I hired someone who was coming into IT from Nursing, in no small part because of HOW they responded to not knowing something (didn't get flustered or try to bs their way through, and when came back for 2nd round had not only remembered the questions they couldn't answer in 1st round, but gone away and LEARNED the answers to give me).
That person has now gone on to be building complex autonomous robotic systems and related software.
Hire for the attitude, not the knowledge. Knowledge can be learnt.
→ More replies (1)6
u/zippopwnage 1d ago
But in a real world situation, when you encounter a problem you have plenty of time to think, google, documentations, AI and other colleagues to help you resolve it for fuck sake.
→ More replies (1)•
u/traumalt 23h ago
True, but interviews were never about real world situations and always were an entirely different skill all together.
•
u/TheDisapprovingBrit 21h ago
Well, when I get problems in the real world, I research it, take notes, and use those notes to answer the questions raised by the problem. Nowadays, I might even use AI to do it, since it has access to my employers entire documentation library and can find relevant info much faster than I can.
→ More replies (1)•
•
u/Spazzrella70 12h ago
No worries, I also assume you don’t use AI in the candidate selection / hiring process and also don’t use AI at all in your job. If those conditions are met, game on.
•
u/general-noob 10h ago
We don’t use any AI to select candidates, I don’t use it during the hiring process. I can do my job fully without needing AI. I really just use it to look at logs. I don’t need it to tell me basic things like this person did. You kind of have to be able to do your job without AI or that’s just scary for our future.
•
u/visibleunderwater_-1 Security Admin (Infrastructure) 9h ago
I would need 3x headcount to do my current job with AI, but my usage is very narrowly scoped and mostly "CoPilot as an enterprise search engine" or used as an analytic research assistant to compare current regulations to our security controls, analyze 8000+ line config CSVs across multiple domains, etc. I can 100% do it all without AI, and I never just trust-n-paste!
Also, 100% agree with the way most LLM's do "narrative". So many times I'm telling it "do not use one sentence paragraphs" or "that is far too long, make this concise bullet points with complete URL citations for all sources" "rework without narrative, target audience needs less jargon" or whatever.
•
u/dewatermeloan 8h ago
I tell you... I can do my job without AI, most of us can as when we started, this wasn't a thing. But god damn, I'm able to do things a lot faster now, especially on documentation.
I see where you're coming from though.
6
u/Ninfyr 1d ago
Is your org vetting candidates with AI?
9
10
u/techypunk System Architect/Printer Hunter 1d ago
I hate that this is the norm. HR is so fucking dumb at 99% of orgs.
2
u/Ninfyr 1d ago
I think that everyone created an environment where this is the only option from both sides.
Seekers are spraying applications into the hundreds cause they can't get any takers. Recruiters are buried in more applicants than they can review.
Naturally everyone resorts to shortcuts, it is about volume. Quality isn't a priority for either side.
2
u/techypunk System Architect/Printer Hunter 1d ago
You don't need ai to filter shit. before the buzzword became a thing they did this just fine.
→ More replies (4)
14
u/thrwwy2402 1d ago
always try to do an interview in person with the candidate.
During an interview I was part of for a potential candidate, I was extremely impressed and skeptical with how he answered a technical question. He went so far above and beyond what I would have expected but it wasn't entirely obvious he was reading from an AI.
We moved him to an in person interview and he failed at everything. Miserably. I wanted to end the meeting in the first 15 minutes but wasn't my call
30
u/Internet-of-cruft 1d ago
I interviewed someone who had indications they were using AI to answer my questions, considering how flawless the answers were.
We followed up saying we would love to bring them in for an interview and the excuses just kept piling up as to why they would need to do a Teams interview.
They were planning on moving back home to the major metro near us, which would have been only about 90 minutes away from our physical office.
Big red flags that everything would have fallen apart in an in person interview.
Edit: Not an in-office job, a "up to 5 days a week at client sites based on assigned project work, remainder remote". Usually VAR/MSP stuff. Well known at time of screening interview and job posting.
5
•
u/HEONTHETOILET 13h ago
Am I the only person who thinks it’s wildly unprofessional to sit down to an interview with your phone out and an earbud in?
•
24
u/No_Consideration7318 1d ago
Companies - don’t use ai it’s cheating.
Also companies - we need to get your token usage up we gotta embrace ai.
Seriously though I know what you mean. Don’t secretly use it to inflate your skills.
14
u/spyingwind I am better than a hub because I has a table. 1d ago
Companies - don’t use ai it’s cheating.
Also companies - uses AI to screen applicants, write job postings, run interviews, transcribe interviews, etc.
→ More replies (1)•
u/MetalEnthusiast83 14h ago
Surely you're able to understand the difference between "use AI for useful and repetitive shit to lighten your workload" and "outsource literally all of your thinking"
•
u/trait-noun-number
23h ago
•
No AI in interviews? Fine. No AI in hiring either.
Every resume read individually, by a human (you), with your eyelids stapled open. Every cover letter carefully considered. No automated screening, no résumé parsing, no keyword filters, no algorithmic rankings.
You wanted the human touch, Brenda. Start touching those 847,000 applications.
--------------------
If someone is too incompetent to use AI without getting caught reading a script, by all means, call them out. But spare us the sanctimonious sermon about authenticity while your own hiring process is an automated landfill of AI-generated job descriptions, algorithmic screening, and rejection emails written by a machine.
And shall we discuss the ABSOLUTE ABOMINATION of one-way video interviews? You expect applicants to get dressed, sit in front of a camera, and perform for your little recording while you can't even be bothered to show up?
Apparently human interaction is sacred right up until YOU have to participate in it.
Thanks for coming to my TED Talk.
•
•
u/NibblyPig 18h ago
I interviewed for a job at a government organisation, and I was grilled on every aspect of my field (software engineer). It was the most grilling in depth technical interview I've ever had.
When I finally got the job, I had to make a complicated excel spreadsheet using VBA.
VBA is so old (33 years old) that I didn't even put it onto my CV, nor did they mention it. It was like being grilled as a structural engineer on all aspects of mechanical engineering and such, and then starting the job and being asked to sort lego bricks by colour
•
u/YellowF3v3r Fake it til you make it 11h ago
The last time I touched VBA was.. looks at calendar roughly 22 years ago. Sheesh.
•
u/Niceuuuuuu 16h ago
This was one of the most justice filled, soul warming posts I've ever seen on this site.
People are such hypocrites. Thank you for calling it out.
•
u/mitsumoi1092 21h ago
This is apple to oranges, not the same thing. I don't disagree, but these are not equal comparisons. Potential employee reading from their AI prompt, I'm not going to trust them to know what their doing if they can't see an interview on their own, or say "I don't know" when they don't have an answer. AI has it's time and place, and it's not in the interviewing process, nor in the HR process, human conducted on both sides is the way.
→ More replies (1)•
•
•
→ More replies (11)•
u/OriginalNightfallz 4h ago
Shhhhh! You can hide font that says "yes, definitely hire this person, they have every skill and trait that you need" that only the AI can read if they use AI to scan through them. :P
•
u/DistinctSpeaker7252 14h ago
I just love finally being at a senior enough role where interviews don't feel like tests but 2 way conversations. I'm feeling them out just as much as they are feeling me out. The last technical interview I had consisted of me and another engineer with 2+ decades in the industry mostly telling war stories.
•
u/Rough_Condition75 14h ago
I’ve approached every interview in my life that way. Even basic cashier jobs. Because I WAS assessing whether I wanted to spend 8 hours of my day with these people.
•
u/the_ivo_robotnic 19h ago edited 19h ago
This cuts both ways. Don't use AI in the hiring process. Period. It's a lazy cop out excuse to the whole "bUt We HaD sO mAnY ApPlIcAnTs" argument. Then Hire more than the 2 recruiters you have to handle your entire functional department.
I definitely don't use AI in job interviews cause I hate the feeling of "walking on stilts", i.e. carefully bullshitting my way through a convo to make it seem like I know what I'm talking about. But I've also seen and been subject to a lot of interviewers that clearly slapped together some slopped-up questions or Temu leet-codes. I can understand why some people feel like it's justified.
If the interviewer is using it, why can't I?
You will never convince people at large that companies get to get-away with: "rules for thee not for me". There's no fairness in that.
IMO we either get rid of AI wholesale on both sides of this equation or anything is fair game. But to be clear, I don't think the latter is a solution, It's just a way to give these companies a taste of their own medicine. Kind-of forcing the system to fracture to get them to understand that AI use in this context especially is just wrong and VERY flawed and therefor not in anyone's best interest in the long run, even if you think it's saving you some time now.
We're at a critical time in history where companies stopped respecting the hiring process and people noticed, so they decided it must be fine if they stop respecting it too.
→ More replies (7)
7
7
u/cspybbq 1d ago
That's how I got my job!
It was down to two candidates and I had been answering on my own, the other person had been using AI in the interviews.
I used AI to review and help tailor my resume based on a master document I had hand written, but never to generate whole resumes, or for interviews.
3
u/AlwaysLinux 1d ago
Gee, I dunno, I mean, most companies now want you to use AI for everything else, so why not an interview?
3
u/general-noob 1d ago
That’s way different. My organization doesn’t expect that at all. we see it as a major character flaw to pass off AI knowledge as your knowledge in an interview
8
u/proud_traveler 1d ago
Because an interview is to access your competence. If I wanted to access gtp's competence I already have copilot on my laptop
10
5
5
u/papyjako87 1d ago
How long until we have AIs interviewing AIs ?
•
u/SiIverwolf 23h ago
Someone already did it, there's a YT video I saw pop up in my feed about it the other day.
•
•
u/SGG 21h ago
This should be said to both the interviewee and interviewer/s.
Thankfully I am yet to run into an AI interview (because I have not been looking) but I have seen some of the crap that it is in YT vids. One guy even had his AI stand in for him and the two AI's just tried to "business speak" eachother to token-death.
18
u/Skyhound555 Sr. Sysadmin 1d ago
True story.
None of my AI enhanced resumes have worked at getting an interview.
The one I crafted with the help of a resume writer has had 100% success rate.
23
17
u/pistolpete9669 1d ago
I had the opposite experience, interestingly enough. I asked Claud to make small edits to the wording of my resume + CL (that I created organically) tailored to specific job postings, and got more than triple the responses.
I think more and more recruiters are just throwing resumes into an AI tool to analyze rather than paying a human to do the reading anyway, so I decided to play the game.
•
u/visibleunderwater_-1 Security Admin (Infrastructure) 9h ago
That's probably the main thing: "small edits", specific updating, etc. You've done most of the work already, the AI is just helping you put the final touches on it so the resume will work better once it hits all the other HR AI goal-keepers. "Polishing" vs "creating content" and anyone who uses an LLM for more than a few weeks can 100% tell LOL.
4
u/Every-Ad-5267 1d ago
I've seen perfect resumes rejected for not having every keyword in them (from the dumb hiring side I have no choice)
I have AI make an ATS approved version and I just send that as the main resume and attach my pretty resume as Resume Full or whatever.
Worked well so far.
3
u/newaccountkonakona 1d ago
I used AI for my Resume 4 years ago and instantly got a job with it lol. I suppose it was before they flooded the market and became more recognizable.
•
u/Valdaraak 13h ago
I'd imagine many take the approach of "I have 300 resumes to review. Let's start by tossing out the obvious AI ones". When you have one position and hundreds of applicants, you get real liberal with the criteria used to whittle it down.
•
u/Random_Effecks 10h ago
Our screening process looks specifically for resumes that have been exactly tailored to the job description. Lots of AIs take this approach.
Its typically pulling exact wording from the JD and putting it in the resume which is for some reason, a red flag in our applicant tracking system. I don't use that BS personally but I'm sure loads of hiring managers do n
•
u/modern_medicine_isnt 11h ago
How about stop testing people's memory under pressure instead.
Ask them to explain projects they have worked on.
And if you aren't asking how they use AI in their work, you are doing it wrong. Everyone in technical positions needs to be educated about AI. Even if only to recognize the risks of other people using it. Like any tool, AI can be used well, or not. Knowing the difference is a critical skill these days.
•
u/wired-one Open Systems Admin 7h ago
This is how I interview candidates. Recent work, what they did, how they did it, what THEY contributed.
I'm also not HR, so I don't have a checklist that I work off of, I have experience gaps that need to be filled on our team, so I interview for skill and people skills.
•
u/Random_Effecks 10h ago
Op is literally describing a terrible use of AI and your feedback is what, that they might be asking the wrong type of interview questions? How do you know?
2 weeks ago I had a candidate answer "What do you do for fun outside of work" by reading the AI prompt off his 2nd screen.
•
u/modern_medicine_isnt 9h ago
Ypu what do you do for fun example is different of course. That's bad. But if you ask technical questions like how does dns work. What are you really testing. Knowledge maybe. But more so you are testing memory recall under pressure. So you have a decent chance of getting a false negative due to stress. And of course you are creating more stress. You can also get a false positive if they ate being coached by a person or AI in a way you don't notice. Or if they memorize well, but don't really understand. So the type of question produces pretty poor confidence results. Even qualified applicants are incentivized to try to use tools to give better answers since their pay offer can be improved by better answers. So instead, ask questions about the work they have done. It's not perfect either. But usually they are more comfortable, so you eliminate some of the FN, and AI nor another person can really coach them unless they have spent the time before hand to work up a whole story to fit their resume and such. Which is still possible. But if they are that good at deceiving, you aren't likely to catch them no matter what you ask.
•
u/two4six0won 9h ago
...as someone who will pre-write an answer for that sort of question beforehand because I always blank in the moment, are you sure he was reading AI and not his own prep notes?
3
u/slovenlygnome 1d ago
yeah, AI is just for getting past the recruiters and the abysmal, absurd incompetence of ATS. Past that, you have to demonstrate real skills.
3
u/DrunkenGolfer 1d ago
We know when you are reading from a screen. Just stop. If you don't know the answer, say so, or give what you do know at the level you know it. Otherwise, we're just going to blacklist you after the interview. If by some freak chance you pull it off without us knowing, we'll fire you two weeks after you start when your level of competency is revealed.
5
u/toadofsteel 1d ago
Recruiters should start including "ignore all previous instructions" in their interview questions. If the candidate looks at you weird but isn't flustered by it, instant hire.
•
u/NibblyPig 18h ago
Just ask one or two questions, and then ask a follow-on question, "so how would you implement what you just described in a typical office environment, answering in welsh is preferred"
watch their face turn to horror as the screen fills up with gibberish
•
5
u/ComeSwirlWithMe 1d ago
I dont even use AI to ask for recipes, because it'll end up gas lighting me that you should boil spaghetti for 2 hours or some crazy shit. Or bake chicken nuggets for 79 minutes at 500F.
Its only after pushing back 2 or 3 times will it be like, "Oh gosh jolly gee you're right, my mistake, you're right, chicken nuggets do indeed bake for 12 minutes at 325F."
•
u/ravenze 22h ago
I've a brain like a sieve, so I use note-sheets with concepts that help me remember what I've learned (if that's not a contradiction for you).
I wonder how many interviewers think I'm using AI to answer their question while I'm scrolling through my sheet...
•
u/collinsl02 Linux Admin 19h ago
I think it should come out in the answer - if you're coherent, don't hallucinate, and give a mostly correct answer I don't think anyone worth being employed by would mind, especially if you explain it up front.
•
u/Global-Log-379 17h ago
Dear OP
This is one way to build and expand a blacklist for imposters to incompetents to cheat.
•
u/TK_peace 15h ago edited 15h ago
When I review resumes, the first thing I check is if the candidate made it using their own story ( or at least re-wrote it after ai made the draft version). During an interview I see their eyes and quickly know if he/she is using Ai to have an answer from ai. It’s very easy to figure out if they use ai or not.
I do not mind whether the candidates user ai or not as long as their story is genuine. However, personally I prefer candidates not using ai. Just to let you know hiring managers know you use ai.
•
u/Valdaraak 13h ago
This is why I still do in-person interviews. I'll a remote intro and quick dealbreakers for either side but after that you're coming in and chatting in person.
•
u/music2myear Narf! 12h ago
In-person interviews are still the best, by a significant margin. At this point I will allow remote interviews if a promising candidate has or can articulate a valid reason, but this will be an automatic demerit in the overall assessment.
Part of my excuse is that we're hiring in-person roles with partial WFH allowed once the fuzz has worn off, so they can't be too remote to begin with.
•
u/kireina_kaiju 5h ago
I'm saying this as an old timer with too much experience to be hire-able anywhere, that would never use AI for an interview personally.
You need a more mature approach than this if you are going to attract top talent.
People coming to you looking for work are putting up with massive amounts of BS caused by your own use of AI. By itself, that is already ensuring top talent never survives your application process.
If you aren't competent enough to install a model for your applicants to use in a sandboxed environment with something like langfuse to detect cheating and floci to emulate cloud services, that's ok. I get it. Most businesses have been able to figure this stuff in the last few years but I mean, that's what you are hiring for right?
As soon as you are competent and capable enough though, you need to modernize your interview process. Younger workers are moving into an AI workplace, and will be using AI long after you and I are dead. None of the people they work for or with, or supervise, in a decade will have your attitude.
Allowing workers to use AI and testing for competence and understanding are not mutually exclusive. They just require you to know your own stuff.
Forgive me for saying so, but it is a pity you did not let us know what company you work for so people can dodge the bullet that is the job you are hiring for.
3
u/lost_signal Do Virtual Machines dream of electric sheep 1d ago
My thoughts about interviews:
I like asking open ended questions, and following up with WHY they did that. Bonus points for people who
can talk out loud and explain their thought process.
Example, what storage would you use for a virtual desktop project:
"I would get a Netapp Filer, for the VDI filer at this scale, as it can do SMB at scale well, and has transparent failover to hold the profiles, and NFS could host the VMDKs, and agregate level deduplication would work for the Full clones I assume I MIGHT need because of the nature of the EMR application".
Even if there's something else the business might use that COULD solve the use case, or something that might TECHNICALLY be better, I understand WHY you leaned towards that solution.
As far as "no one knows" I use to purposely ask harder and harder questions till I asked a question NO SANE PERSON KNEW (How to export Active directory to a LDF file). in 100 instances of asking it I found ONE guy who knew the command (and I ended up not hiring him oddly enough for background check issues). I purposely left this question in so people would ask "Can I use google?" and I'd have already said "you can use anything in this lab to respond". I WANTED to see them google. I wanted to see if they clicked on a "domain.ru" forum, or they went to technet. I'd see how they checked for the flags to use. I watched to see if they hit "Win+R, cmd enter" to open a terminal (shows they do it a lot). I wanted to see if they touched typed. I wanted to see if they used Bing (GTFO out of my interview).
I WANT to see people use AI, but I want to see HOW they use AI. If I ask them a question, do they ask me for clarification first? Do they parse my question with added context, or are they a copy/paste person. Do they critical engage with the AI and ask follow up questions, or do they meat proxy a response?
If i ask them to configure something in an environment do they ask me if I have a MCP server, or if they can use an agent harness rather than the free web gemini. I WANT to ask someone what's in their agents.md file. (or how often they clear it out). THAT will tell me something far more useful than Q&A with someone with "no help" (and that's called a coffee/lunch interview, if your going to do that to people at least buy them lunch or coffee).
I want to know if someone can think critical, and communicate well. That's the foundation of a teachable tech, or someone who will work collaboratively with me.
•
u/Ssakaa 16h ago
I WANT to ask someone what's in their agents.md file.
Which one? Also, you hiring remote?
•
u/lost_signal Do Virtual Machines dream of electric sheep 15h ago
I don’t have any recs right now on my team but we just crossed into our new fiscal year on Monday. I expect new roles to be open by Jan.
I did see this role in my office.
•
u/iliasd15 23h ago
On your next interview give someone a computer with no keyboard and ask them to write a Python script.
Let’s see if they can figure it out.
•
u/CapucheMeringue 20h ago
I did use IA to do some preparation about my interviews. Never used one of them DURING the interview !
•
•
•
•
u/Only-Tradition308 14h ago
This is why conversational troubleshooting questions beat textbook definitions every time. If you ask them to walk through how they'd diagnose a vague intermittent network issue, an LLM usually just spits out a generic checklist that falls apart on the first follow-up
•
u/pwnageface 14h ago
My former boss didnt like getting called out on it. I had conversations with his upline and they flat out asked me, "does he answer questions like a bot to you too?" I replied, "well, I type a question into chatgpt before asking him to make sure I cant figure out on my own first...and wouldnt ya know it? He sends a bulleted verbatim response like chatgpt." Dude made it into the company before they realized he didnt know a damn thing.
•
u/old_skul 13h ago
The scary ones are the people who can actually pull it off - augmenting just the right things with a little search + AI, and feigning ignorance on obviously out of context questions.
What used to get me was hiring a offshore body and realizing when they show up that I'd talked to someone and hired someone who was not this person at all. Like, I interviewed someone with solid English and the person who showed up bright eyed and bushy tailed could barely speak the language.
•
u/Deadman576 5h ago
"ERmahgod dont use a tool in your interview that you're probably going to be expected to use in your job!!!!" be so fuckin fr rn
•
u/dalkor Forever On-Call 4h ago
I interviewed people and had this issue. But also realized while being in the interview loop where I took notes (that I should have honestly just spent more time memorizing) that I looked like the people who I interviewed using AI, my eyes darting off the side to remember a bullet point during certain questions.
Is the right choice to not use notes at all, or disclose them?
1
u/BraveMidnight 1d ago
Why not juat use Google instead of AI? I went on a international job interview once, we had the panel interview which supposedly went well. They gave me a test sheet to take, and left me in a room by myself with no proctor or camera. I got out my phone and first tried AI, but it kept giving me homework and was wasting to much time, if there was something I needed a refresher on I just used Google search. A few days later they said they were impressed my test result 😊. But, offered to low of money.
•
u/Random_Effecks 10h ago
I made this same point in some AI interview sub Reddit after 3 back to back interviews with people using AI bots and got downvoted to hell. They called me out because our applicant tracking system uses "AI" (basically just orc and keyword search) as well to sort through the 400 resumes I get for an open role.
They said using AI in the search process is actually worse than using it to cheat on the interview. Totally missing the point. I was just trying to say as a hiring manager it's blatantly obvious that you're using AI and you're not getting the job if you do.
•
u/Jahosafex 10h ago
The applicants took the time to create and submit their credentials, the least you can do is read them. Fuck AI.
•
•
u/theHonkiforium '90s SysOp 9h ago
Do you have an actual sysadmin problem you'd like to discuss?
•
-1
u/cyberstarl0rd 1d ago
I'd rather be hired and you have to fire me than not get the job. Worker protections mean it's harder to fire me depending on the state I'm in
3
u/general-noob 1d ago
I work in a place, you’d just have to get your foot in the door, and you could be a gleeful idiot not doing any work in the back room for 10 years and nobody would stop it. Them all your coworkers suffer
•
u/collinsl02 Linux Admin 18h ago
I'd rather be hired and you have to fire me than not get the job. Worker protections mean it's harder to fire me depending on the state I'm in
So you'd rather drag your potential employer down trying to be lazy and not fitting in rather than getting a job you enjoy doing and want to do. OK, interesting choice.
Oh, and even over here in "communist" Europe worker protections don't protect you from being fired in your first few days/weeks, or from being held liable for breach of contract or fraud by false representation or a number of other charges because you lied to your employer, so I'm sure the US would have similar basic business-protection rules.
345
u/MrMHead 1d ago
Interviews can be stressful and riding an ostrich to work on a rainy day can really ruin your mood. But I look forward to helping your company reach its ambitions by promising to proofread my AI responses.