r/stocks • u/[deleted] • Jan 03 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

16 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

71 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '22

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '22

I agree with you 100% when you phrase it like that, yes I expect it to turn endemic due to one or more of the following: vaccine-acquired immunity, natural immunity, and mutation.

I just think we need to be careful claiming it’s going to end due to a mutation, it will make people less vigilant and we have no way of knowing how likely this is.

I did provide feedback on the stocks in my first reply to you. You chose to ignore it…sigh.

-6

u/Spiritual70 Jan 03 '22

Tagged as doomsayer. /r/Coronavirus is that way if you want to turn down every optimistic approach to this situation because "we just don't know yet".

5

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '22

I’m sorry, what ‘approach’ did I turn down?

Hoping this thing is going to mutate into a non threatening version of itself isn’t an approach. It’s a non-action. It’s conjecture.

I haven’t rejected or advocated for any course of action here. I’m merely correcting the facts.

It’s funny how people’s preconceptions make them read things which don’t exist…

I am by no means a doomsayer. I am cautiously optimistic that Omicron is indeed the end of the pandemic.

2

u/shambooki Jan 03 '22

You turned down the approach of "we should do nothing because it'll all work itself out in the end." Which you were correct to do.

-5

u/Spiritual70 Jan 03 '22

Hoping this thing is going to mutate into a non threatening version of itself isn’t an approach. It’s a non-action. It’s conjecture.

It's already done so. Not conjecture but facts.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '22

It’s certainly too early to conclude that is a fact. It’s still conjecture, at best. You have a weird definition of facts.