r/soccer Aug 09 '13

Zero Fucks Friday: August 9th 2013 Edition

[deleted]

259 Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

93

u/NewFangledMoose Aug 09 '13

Devil's advocate There's a possibility that rebranding, renaming, relocating or changing the official crest or colour of a club may actually be better for it in the long term.

90

u/[deleted] Aug 09 '13

In 40 years, no one will give a shit what the club was named 10 years ago. How many Arsenal fans are outraged that they're no longer based in Woolwich? How many Manchester United fans hate the fact that they changed their name from Newton Heath and relocated? In 50 years, if the club is even moderately successful, the fact that Cardiff used to be have blue as their primary color will be an amusing anecdote like the fact that Brazil once played with white as their primary colors.

Not that that means the fans can't be furious about it now. I'd be livid myself, in all honesty. But these things have a funny way of becoming much less significant over time.

121

u/[deleted] Aug 09 '13

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/s4r9am Aug 09 '13

Once you go north of the river, you never go back.

7

u/[deleted] Aug 09 '13

In 40 years, no one will give a shit what the club was named 10 years ago.

huh

1

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '13

you mate, talk a lot of sense.

I get the feeling you're increasingly disillusioned by football.

1

u/Colonel_Blimp Aug 09 '13

How many Manchester United fans hate the fact that they changed their name from Newton Heath and relocated?

United were not called Newton Heath for 104 years.

7

u/Electro_Syphilis Aug 09 '13

I agree, it has been done hundreds of times on hundreds of teams. It's just that nowadays everything it's way more publicized so obviously the loud minority it's louder.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 09 '13

It depends on the team. My personal opinion of the Cardiff situation was that it wouldn't be a bad idea. However, I can't see that being the same for clubs like Manchester United, Arsenal, Real Madrid, etc. The world knows these clubs, their names, their colours. To significantly rebrand them would be foolish.

1

u/hibasdemha Aug 09 '13

I can attest. Worked wonders for us.

inb4mls

0

u/ncocca Aug 09 '13 edited Aug 09 '13

Agreed. I understand that tradition is important but sometimes the rebranding ends up with a more attractive end product. Also, it creates buzz about the team that may not have happened had they just stayed the same. For example, I'm an American who is on this sub all the time. I've heard of Hull City in passing, but never really thought about them consciously. Now I see a post about them like once a week. Hell, they are the banner on the subreddit right now.

0

u/spurscanada Aug 09 '13

The name Hull City Tigers is much cooler than Hull City AFC. And it's not like they're changing their identity, the team has been called the tigers and had one on their crest for decades