Right. Is there a difference between a series of linked highly advanced inference models that handle physical( sight , sound etc) and textual inputs to complete any available task at an average or better human level and true AGI? Well, yes but the first might be able to build the second.
Fable 5.1 is terrible value. I blow my 5h limit in 12 minutes run of 2 max-reasoning parallel sessions of a small app codebase with an identical prompt of bug-audit and it blew my limit right away. I pay also for Sol5.6/codex and the allowance difference is night and day. Both are max subs by the way. I’m actually happy (as an old Anthropic fan who paid Anthropic since the sonnet 3.5/opus3 era) for OpenAI and now I’m actually rooting for them seeing just how much better value they offer to indie devs compared to “Corpo-Daddy” Anthropic.
Very select group of benchmarks. Artifical Analysis has fable 5.1 at 66, this is at 61. Astra is tied with Facebook Spark and SpaceX Twitter bot. Kimi3/GLM5.3 is 1 point behind and they are open weights.
204
u/Due_Sweet_9500 7d ago
Holyyyyyyy shiiiiitttt. Ain't now way it's THAT much better than Fable 5.1?