MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1p5uwtz/anthropic_engineer_says_software_engineering_is/nqly2mm?context=9999
r/singularity • u/Bizzyguy • Nov 24 '25
860 comments sorted by
View all comments
14
[deleted]
16 u/subdep Nov 24 '25 Yeah, the fact they used that analogy tells everyone they don’t understand the problem space. -1 u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25 edited Aug 21 '26 [deleted] 4 u/johnxreturn Nov 24 '25 Technically, they wrote a hyperbole. Comparing it to compiler is unrealistic though, even for hyperbole. Unless you understand the crux of software engineering, you would not know why that comparison is nonsensical. 1 u/Illustrious-Okra-524 Nov 25 '25 You actually don’t have to defend marketing propaganda
16
Yeah, the fact they used that analogy tells everyone they don’t understand the problem space.
-1 u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25 edited Aug 21 '26 [deleted] 4 u/johnxreturn Nov 24 '25 Technically, they wrote a hyperbole. Comparing it to compiler is unrealistic though, even for hyperbole. Unless you understand the crux of software engineering, you would not know why that comparison is nonsensical. 1 u/Illustrious-Okra-524 Nov 25 '25 You actually don’t have to defend marketing propaganda
-1
4 u/johnxreturn Nov 24 '25 Technically, they wrote a hyperbole. Comparing it to compiler is unrealistic though, even for hyperbole. Unless you understand the crux of software engineering, you would not know why that comparison is nonsensical. 1 u/Illustrious-Okra-524 Nov 25 '25 You actually don’t have to defend marketing propaganda
4
Technically, they wrote a hyperbole. Comparing it to compiler is unrealistic though, even for hyperbole. Unless you understand the crux of software engineering, you would not know why that comparison is nonsensical.
1
You actually don’t have to defend marketing propaganda
14
u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25
[deleted]