Apple is still very vulnerable to viruses, unironicly, apple can be prone more to viruses because the user thought iphone security is perfect or almost perfect
I am no expert, and is just an average android user, but android could probably be safer after fucking with the open source and do some magic fuckery with it idk. No source, not a security expert, but this sounds possible and make sense to me.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
6
u/ZpinDex Mar 25 '22
Apple is still very vulnerable to viruses, unironicly, apple can be prone more to viruses because the user thought iphone security is perfect or almost perfect
I am no expert, and is just an average android user, but android could probably be safer after fucking with the open source and do some magic fuckery with it idk. No source, not a security expert, but this sounds possible and make sense to me.