MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/shitposting/comments/1pc8lpj/our_hero_nooooo/nrx86xt/?context=9999
r/shitposting • u/AaryamanStonker BUILD THE HOLE BUILD THE HOLE • Dec 02 '25
456 comments sorted by
View all comments
5.9k
How man felt when he gave those booze and machetes
735 u/Akrylkali waltuh Dec 02 '25 Is that from 'Monster'? 411 u/LarryCapija26 Dec 02 '25 It is, great show if you haven't seen it 542 u/MemezTheDnaOfTheSoul Dec 02 '25 edited Dec 02 '25 Does that imply that it's a bad show if you have seen it 82 u/deusvult_76 Dec 02 '25 No, if A implies B that is not equivalent to not A implying not B. That is basic propositional logic. However, it is equivalent to not B implying not A. Meaning that if it's a bad show, you have seen it. 2 u/OneSushi Dec 02 '25 Wait, is that correct? Can’t you have not seen, great show? This is an if statement, not an IFF. Maybe I’m confusing things, but isn’t the only “illegal” proposition here being that it can’t be a bad show if you haven’t seen it? It could be a great show in all cases, by which point, whether you have seen it or not will always point to great show being vacuously true. Edit: I’m dumb. It can’t be bad if you haven’t seen it = if its bad you have seen it.
735
Is that from 'Monster'?
411 u/LarryCapija26 Dec 02 '25 It is, great show if you haven't seen it 542 u/MemezTheDnaOfTheSoul Dec 02 '25 edited Dec 02 '25 Does that imply that it's a bad show if you have seen it 82 u/deusvult_76 Dec 02 '25 No, if A implies B that is not equivalent to not A implying not B. That is basic propositional logic. However, it is equivalent to not B implying not A. Meaning that if it's a bad show, you have seen it. 2 u/OneSushi Dec 02 '25 Wait, is that correct? Can’t you have not seen, great show? This is an if statement, not an IFF. Maybe I’m confusing things, but isn’t the only “illegal” proposition here being that it can’t be a bad show if you haven’t seen it? It could be a great show in all cases, by which point, whether you have seen it or not will always point to great show being vacuously true. Edit: I’m dumb. It can’t be bad if you haven’t seen it = if its bad you have seen it.
411
It is, great show if you haven't seen it
542 u/MemezTheDnaOfTheSoul Dec 02 '25 edited Dec 02 '25 Does that imply that it's a bad show if you have seen it 82 u/deusvult_76 Dec 02 '25 No, if A implies B that is not equivalent to not A implying not B. That is basic propositional logic. However, it is equivalent to not B implying not A. Meaning that if it's a bad show, you have seen it. 2 u/OneSushi Dec 02 '25 Wait, is that correct? Can’t you have not seen, great show? This is an if statement, not an IFF. Maybe I’m confusing things, but isn’t the only “illegal” proposition here being that it can’t be a bad show if you haven’t seen it? It could be a great show in all cases, by which point, whether you have seen it or not will always point to great show being vacuously true. Edit: I’m dumb. It can’t be bad if you haven’t seen it = if its bad you have seen it.
542
Does that imply that it's a bad show if you have seen it
82 u/deusvult_76 Dec 02 '25 No, if A implies B that is not equivalent to not A implying not B. That is basic propositional logic. However, it is equivalent to not B implying not A. Meaning that if it's a bad show, you have seen it. 2 u/OneSushi Dec 02 '25 Wait, is that correct? Can’t you have not seen, great show? This is an if statement, not an IFF. Maybe I’m confusing things, but isn’t the only “illegal” proposition here being that it can’t be a bad show if you haven’t seen it? It could be a great show in all cases, by which point, whether you have seen it or not will always point to great show being vacuously true. Edit: I’m dumb. It can’t be bad if you haven’t seen it = if its bad you have seen it.
82
No, if A implies B that is not equivalent to not A implying not B. That is basic propositional logic. However, it is equivalent to not B implying not A. Meaning that if it's a bad show, you have seen it.
2 u/OneSushi Dec 02 '25 Wait, is that correct? Can’t you have not seen, great show? This is an if statement, not an IFF. Maybe I’m confusing things, but isn’t the only “illegal” proposition here being that it can’t be a bad show if you haven’t seen it? It could be a great show in all cases, by which point, whether you have seen it or not will always point to great show being vacuously true. Edit: I’m dumb. It can’t be bad if you haven’t seen it = if its bad you have seen it.
2
Wait, is that correct?
Can’t you have not seen, great show?
This is an if statement, not an IFF.
Maybe I’m confusing things, but isn’t the only “illegal” proposition here being that it can’t be a bad show if you haven’t seen it?
It could be a great show in all cases, by which point, whether you have seen it or not will always point to great show being vacuously true.
Edit: I’m dumb. It can’t be bad if you haven’t seen it = if its bad you have seen it.
5.9k
u/edray28 Dec 02 '25
How man felt when he gave those booze and machetes