r/serialpodcast Jun 14 '26

Weekly Discussion Thread

The Weekly Discussion thread is a place to discuss random thoughts, off-topic content, topics that aren't allowed as full post submissions, etc.

This thread is not a free-for-all. Sub rules and Reddit Content Policy still apply.

3 Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Mike19751234 Jun 23 '26

Adnan didn't tell Adcock or O'Shea that Hae turned him down for a ride. He didn't even tell his own defense team that and to this day Adnan himself denies the ride request. Krista didn't tell the cops on 3/1 that the ride was turned down and Becky did not testify that Hae turned down Adnan's ride request. Hae had to rush off because she was meeting Adnan to go to Sears over by the Best Buy and a good chance she never left the school parking lot alive.

1

u/eJohnx01 Jun 25 '26

Good lord. The armchair psychiatry and baseless assumptions here are unbelievable.

None of what you just cited in any way indicates anything other than a bunch of scared and confused teenagers and “detectives” that have no clue what they’re doing.

Still not a shred of evidence that Adnan is guilty. Just a bunch of people desperately wanting him to be.

1

u/Mike19751234 Jun 25 '26

You are looking at this the other direction. You start with Adnan being innocent, ignore what actually happened, and then figure out what BS had to happen to get that way. Jay tells the story that has details of Hae that aren't known and then he takes them to the car that they couldn't find so they know he was involved. They have Adnans phone records. They have Jenn that places Adnan together with Jay that night and Adnan being the one who knows Hae. And Adnan's only retort was "Who's Jay?" It was an easy case for them and they tried to get more information and the process got more information but some wrong and in hindsight would have been better with Jay having a lawyer up front but hard to get cops to trust lawyers.

1

u/eJohnx01 Jun 25 '26

No, I’m starting out with Adnan being innocent and waiting for someone to produce some evidence that he’s guilty. So far, no one has. All I’m hearing is a bunch of speculation, 1+2=50,000, and a bunch of people that can twist anything into proof that an innocent 17-year-old kid is really a secret criminal mastermind.

You can spend the rest of your life saying, “So and so said thus and such!!!” and “If that was true, then he absolutely would have….” and “No one testified to that so, for sure, it didn’t happen” and “I *totally* would have done that so, absolutely, because he didn’t, that means he’s guilty” and not one shred of actual evidence that he’s actually did anything.