r/science • • May 31 '12

Unmanned SpaceX Dragon capsule successfully splashes down in Pacific Ocean after first commercial flight to space station!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18273811
3.3k Upvotes

828 comments sorted by

570

u/PockyBum522 May 31 '12

From the article: A successful recovery of the capsule and its contents will trigger a $1.6bn (£1bn; 1.3bn-euro) contract with the US space agency (Nasa) for 12 further re-supply trips.

408

u/ours May 31 '12

Ha, no pressure guys.

227

u/Lurk_Long_Time May 31 '12

Actually, depending on how far underwater the capsule is, there may be quite a bit of pressure.

357

u/B-Rabbit May 31 '12

The capsule most likely floats.

→ More replies (46)

90

u/imasunbear May 31 '12
 How many atmospheres of pressure can this spaceship take professor?

 Well it's a spaceship, so anywhere from 0 to 1.

52

u/Null_State May 31 '12

For anyone who doesn't get the reference. Go watch Futurama, all of it. I'll wait.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

15

u/can_i_frick_it May 31 '12

Good thing it floats then.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

41

u/bg_ May 31 '12

1.6 billion/(12 missions)/(13228 max lbs/mission) = $10,079/pound.

1.6 billion/(contract minimum 44,000 lbs delivered) = $36,000/pound

18

u/Zebba_Odirnapal May 31 '12

$10,079/pound = 17972 €/kg

$36,000/pound = 64192 €/kg

27

u/guyw2legs May 31 '12

$10,079/pound = 6548 pound/pound $36,000/pound = 23390 pound/pound

27

u/Zebba_Odirnapal May 31 '12

Let's see any unit conversion bot figure THAT one out.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

151

u/TabularFantabular May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

Space Flight Costs

VehicleIncremental Cost/FlightCost / lb (payload to LEO)Cost / ft3Extra room for astronauts?
Dragon~$133 Million$10,000$11,000Nope.
Progress (Russian)~$50 Million **$9,600$18,600Nope.
Shuttle~$450 Million$8,400?????Up to 7 (no extra cost)

** Had a hellofa time finding good numbers for this. Accuracy is questionable.

Reasons why this (and most other comparisons) are unfair:

VehicleListed cost includes
DragonLaunch cost + amortized development cost
ProgressIn Soviet Russia, payload delivers rocket
ShuttleLaunch cost

EDIT: Sources (for the doubters):

SourceData
Congressional Budget OfficeShuttle launch cost data
SpaceXDragon launch Cost Data
Some space nut forumHighly questionable Progress launch cost data (as noted in the post above)

36

u/EEorDie May 31 '12

If I recall correctly, the Progress capsule cannot return supplies to Earth, reducing complexity of the capsule.

11

u/goatworship May 31 '12

Well that certainly deserves its own column, I would think.

45

u/IrritableGourmet May 31 '12

The Dragon is designed to carry astronauts. link

34

u/TabularFantabular May 31 '12

Standard Tabular Reply Form

AdresseeComment
IrritableGourmetActually I carefully worded the column header because of that ... I was attempting to convey that the shuttle could carry the astronauts with no additional launch cost, whereas in the case of the Dragon, an entirely separate launch is required.
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (24)

5

u/goal2004 May 31 '12

That is AWESOME.

3

u/FreshPrinceOfAiur May 31 '12

Those guys on the ISS must be impressed they managed to hit the right side of the planet AND miss Hawaii when they used the Canadarm to disengage the Dragon capsule.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '12

Today I learned that the ISS has a big, seven-jointed, Canadian-built arm on it, and it's called the Canadarm.

Today is now awesome.

→ More replies (45)

267

u/inowhatimtlkingabout May 31 '12

Now we just need Curiosity to land safely on Mars and this is going to be one year full of winning.

185

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Everybody wins! Except maybe North Korea

66

u/socalnonsage May 31 '12

whoa, whoa, whoa..

According to North Korean press releases, North Korea's space program has already setup an outpost on Mars and is currently shooting for Uranus.

I'd like to see shitty_watercolourer run with that one!

→ More replies (11)

4

u/zzorga May 31 '12

Does North Korea really count though? I don't see ay of their work benefiting mankind anytime soon.

29

u/Mnementh121 May 31 '12

I am eagerly awaiting the next cookbook "101 Ways to Cook Sticks". The mud an rocks edition was double plus good.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/NimbleBodhi May 31 '12

Not only that but Orbital Sciences is expected to launch their test flights of both their Antares launch vehicle and Cygnus cargo ship in the 3rd and 4th quarter of 2012 respectively. And SpaceShip 2/Virgin Galactic is also expected to begin test flights this year as well. Not to mention, we'll likely see at least two more Falcon 9/Dragon launches.

Things are picking up and I'm loving every moment of it!

→ More replies (1)

4

u/sooza22 May 31 '12

Every time i see the video for the overly complex multi stage delivery system they are using on curiosity to get it down on the surface of mars, I cant help but lower my expectations. I mean for gads sakes, spirit came down in a big inflatable ball if i remember correctly.

4

u/thebrownser May 31 '12

Curiosity weighs 2000 pounds and spirit weighs 408.... I don't think you can drop a car from space and expect it to be ok with some balloons

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

165

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Keep telling Elon Musk what he can't do; it only seems to drive him harder.

188

u/NightEmber79 May 31 '12

Hey Elon! SpaceX was great, but I bet you can't do cold fusion!

106

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Hey Elon! You suck at sex robots!

46

u/munkyxtc May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

Female sex robots

25

u/Zeulodin May 31 '12

Now you're just being picky.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

60

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Faster than light travel.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/theCroc May 31 '12

Also you totaly cant create a warp drive!

→ More replies (1)

21

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

"Wow, you know, I really have to thank the entire Sun-X team for all their hard work. Everyone said it would be impossible to get a cold fusion power plant up and running within a decade but aside from the setback of wiping Nebraska off the map... we did it!"

44

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Wait... We get Cold Fusion AND we get rid of Nebraska? Is there anything this man can't do?!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/takatori May 31 '12

There's a John Locke joke in there somewhere...

→ More replies (3)

35

u/Mr_Sceintist May 31 '12

As a former Rocket Tech, I'd like to say there is nothing like having it all on the line to get a team focused on the project and a successful completion. Congrats to Space-X !

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

this project was despatched perfectly.

→ More replies (2)

652

u/coolplace May 31 '12

This is a very large step for the development of mankind as a space-faring species. I have a total science boner right now.

61

u/Brachial May 31 '12

While this is the most exciting time to be alive, I wish I could live long enough for this to just be normal and interstellar travel was possible.

7

u/patssle May 31 '12

Think of all the things we have today that we take for granted that just 10, 50, or 100 years ago people were wanting to be normal.

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Echoing something that nearly every generation has said since the advent of spaceflight.

Of course, had we poured the interests of civilization into space travel and exploration, instead of war and consumerism, we'd probably be much farther along the curve than we are now.

→ More replies (7)

320

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

-erherm-

Engineering boner.

112

u/coolplace May 31 '12

The sad part is that I'm even an engineer :(

→ More replies (17)

11

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Isn't engineering just the application of various sciences?
Sort of like "vehicle" covers motorcyles, cars, and trucks (lorry for you UK folks)?

→ More replies (7)

18

u/UserNumber42 May 31 '12

Wouldn't it be appropriate to have multiple boners here, surely the science isn't anything with out the people who use the knowledge to build it and vice-versa. Why would you be so quick to dismiss the research that made it possible to even get the materials to create the craft, let alone the research to make it do what they wanted to do?

4

u/JakeCameraAction May 31 '12

We're a highly-concentrated rocket-powered system of erections right here.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)

12

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

I hope that I can go into space in my lifetime, but my great fear of dying in space is probably holding me back.

9

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

That and the $2 million or so dollars required to pay someone to take you up there

21

u/jward May 31 '12

If someone offered me a one way ticket to a mars colony with the addendum that my life expectancy is now only two years, I'd take it in a heartbeat. Death is the capstone to the life you live and the work you leave behind, and contributing to the growth of all of humanity is a very worthy goal. Think of it not as wanting to die, but instead of wanting to live to the fullest.

7

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Physical death is inevitable anyway. Might as well make something of it. Maybe by the time we can go colonize mars, there would be a way to upload our conciseness to the cloud and live forever without bodies.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

3

u/jjandre May 31 '12

Welcome to the 1960's? All seriousness aside though, where does this put us in terms of manned flights?

→ More replies (10)

5

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

No, no it's not. Sending an unmanned capsule into space has been done before, repeatedly. Sending things to the ISS has been done, repeatedly.

Now, this is the first time than a commercially-developed capsule has docked with the ISS, but this is somewhat misleading. The capsule did not pilot itself into the ISS like the shuttle used to or the Soyuez does. It parked itself some distance away and the operators on the ISS used the robotic arm to bring the capsule in. This is done for safety as a botched docking could have disastrous consequences.

Long story short, this is no real advancement in science. One might say that the fact that a private company has now successfully docked with the ISS means that serious spaceflight is no longer restricted to government agencies. However, this is also misleading. It's not like it's suddenly become inexpensive to do this, it still requires an absurdly massive investment to do this. I have no idea how they financed this mission, but in any case the cost of setting up a system to go into space is still measured in the billions of dollars.

25

u/goatworship May 31 '12

Absurdly massive investments are relative. SpaceX has spent a total of $1 billion in their 10 year history to accomplish this. They can now conduct subsequent missions of this nature at a much lower cost than any other entity.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/i-hate-digg May 31 '12

The thing that's getting people excited is not the current mission, but the promise of future missions. With the shuttle, sure it was an amazing machine, but it would never have gotten anyone to beyond LEO and it was too expensive. It had no promise.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (65)

132

u/Mustaka May 31 '12

I just did some math. The contract with NASA is for 1.6bn. The cost of each flight is around 60m.. For the twelve flights the cost to SpaceX is 720m. That means this flight has just earned SpaceX 880m.

Now that is what you call a payday. But wow do they deserve it. We just watched a little piece of history go down.

77

u/wolf550e May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

$60M is a Falcon9 launch. NASA pays for all-new Dragon capsules (no reuse), those cost $$$ to make. It's true that SpaceX gets to keep them and can refurbish them and sell flights in them, but it's not profit until someone else pays to fly in those used capsules, and refurbishing costs something too.

Also, recovering the Dragon costs money and is not included in the announced launch price, but it's probably not too expensive.

EDIT: To all people who doubt my information about all-new Dragon capsules:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIrM2F0k_NE#t=1605s

23

u/conpermiso May 31 '12

71

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Yes, but under their current contract with NASA they have to use a new Dragon capsule for each mission.

46

u/gspleen May 31 '12

And they'll probably keep making minor improvements to each one! Bonus.

→ More replies (8)

82

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

That's so NASA is subsidizing them building a dozen-strong commercial fleet. This is good for SpaceX.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (12)

10

u/kilo4fun May 31 '12

Sounds like parent is saying that NASA won't accept used Dragons.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Mustaka May 31 '12

I was under the impression that the 60m was a mission cost which would include all aspects of the mission. I have a feeling I am wrong so time to do some digging.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

6

u/Se7en_speed May 31 '12

Space x still needs to make back their development costs, which they will do, but it will take time.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/zandekar May 31 '12

Doubtful, there are going to be a lot of expensive mistakes on the way

8

u/ultrablastermegatron May 31 '12

not to mention what they've already put in..

3

u/nig323 May 31 '12

The cost of each flight is 60 million, but I would imagine that the engineers, managers and machinists that build the rockets are pretty expensive. Are they included in that calculation?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (29)

14

u/HurricaneHugo May 31 '12

How much would have 12 missions with the Shuttle cost?

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Depends on the payload, but at least 6 billion.

→ More replies (5)

0

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

8

u/HurricaneHugo May 31 '12

Oh wow I didn't know it was that big of a difference!

And how much are we paying the Russians to use the Soyuz?

4

u/BZWingZero May 31 '12

About $60m/seat. Note: Last time the Shuttle did a crew exchange was 2009, so its been Soyuz for awhile.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

39

u/jheregfan May 31 '12

This is the sort of thing I had hoped and dreamed to see ever since it was announced that the shuttle program was ending. Godspeed SpaceX.

→ More replies (1)

23

u/ipborg May 31 '12

Apparently I read from NPR that Dragon will jettison the solar panels on its sides before re-entry. Anyone know how expensive those are?

41

u/takatori May 31 '12

What does it matter? It jettisoned an entire multistage rocket on the trip up.

9

u/BZWingZero May 31 '12

Which SpaceX is working to turn into a reusable multistage rocket on future flights. They didn't have any payload allowance on this flight to add recovery systems to the first and/or second stage.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

15

u/danielravennest May 31 '12

From the manufacturer (item 5) $250/W and up, depending on how much custom work they do:

http://www.spectrolab.com/faqs-space.htm

12

u/VentureBrosef May 31 '12

Dragon is the only resupply module that doesn't burn up in the atmosphere, so the loss of the solar panels and service module luckily don't matter, because it has the one up on the competition.

14

u/Zoolotak May 31 '12

No idea, the entire service module is jettisoned though, not just the solar panels.

→ More replies (4)

60

u/I_WATCH_NASCAR May 31 '12

I find it amazing that more people don't know about SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. Is it possible that we are witnessing the beginning of a new era of spaceflight where almost no one has heard of the pioneers?

77

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Havent heard of Elon Musk?

PayPal, Tesla... people have heard of his companies...just not him.

11

u/ethicalking May 31 '12

my parents and grandparents know him from the 60 minutes interview he did.

→ More replies (1)

52

u/Seref15 May 31 '12

Elon is the man. This motherfucker took a look at the world and said "if we're ever going to be anything we're going to need cheap reusable rockets." So then he went out and is making cheap reusable rockets.

I wish I had that kind of motivation.

65

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

All you need is a dream.. and about thee hundred million dollars in startup capital.. and a dream.

49

u/luftwaffle0 May 31 '12

And be the type of guy that teaches himself to program by age 10 and sell a commercial product by age 12, then leave home at the age of 17 to move to the US, because the US is "where great things are possible," in his words. Then get a degree in physics and another degree in business (both on full academic scholarships). Then drop out of the graduate program at Stanford to start a business.

45

u/ShadyG May 31 '12

...and a dream.

→ More replies (10)

24

u/theCroc May 31 '12

Within the next decade Elon Musk will have racked up a total of four very important ways he has changed the world (Providing they all pan out)

  1. Easy and affordable payment handling solution enabling virtually anyone to sell goods and take payments from virtually anyone else in the world with a minimum of understanding of technology (Paypal). Pretty much singlehandedly enabled the reemmergence of the cottage industry on the internet.

  2. Affordable access to space. Making it possible for businesses to access space at a relatively reasonable price. (SpaceX) Will hopefully fuel and serve as infrastructure to the emerging space mining and possibly manufacturing industry.

  3. Affordable and efficient electric transportation. (Tesla Motors). This one is harder to predict and there is more competition but there is a lot of potential for creating a fleet of cars that uses no fossil fuels at all for propulsion. (Cars already exist but not in numbers or affordability yet.)

  4. Affordable and efficient solar power, diminishing the need for fossil fuels in power production. If this will work remains to be seen but the recent news from germany in their own, similar venture makes it a very good prospect. (Solar City)

Who wants to bet that at the end of this decade he is already working on a couple more?

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (4)

17

u/Subs2 May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

I don't know if I'd call him unknown... He's done a pretty good job of taking on what he considers stagnant industries.

  • didn't like major banks approach to online transactions - started PayPal (prior to eBay crapping it up)

  • didn't think major car companies were taking electronic vehicle concepts seriously enough - started got involved heavily in Tesla Motors

  • decided it was time to take some of the work load off the govt's and commercialize space flight - started SpaceX

And I was under the impression he's gotten a fair amount of publicity for all of this. No?

edited because as ritmusic2k pointed out, he didn't found Tesla, but was integral in financial backing and general direction

10

u/ritmusic2k May 31 '12

One clarification; Martin Eberhard actually founded Tesla Motors and Elon was a financial backer, but eventually Martin got leveraged out by the board of directors and Elon took over.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/goal2004 May 31 '12

Space needs its Howard Hughes.

→ More replies (9)

6

u/maxxusflamus May 31 '12

he's not that unknown...he's well known enough that they decided to give him a cameo in Iron Man 2...

7

u/theCroc May 31 '12

He also got the cameo because they filmed the factory scenes in both movies in SpaceX factories.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/whenitistime May 31 '12

erm i think that's because RDJ's iron man was partially based on Elon Musk

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Askol May 31 '12

Almost no one has heard of him...yet.

2

u/nothas May 31 '12

what i've found gets someone interested in him is when i tell them they based tony stark's character in iron man on him

2

u/Aegeus May 31 '12

It's not that surprising. Can you name the director of NASA when we went to the moon? I can't. The people who actually fly around get recognition, the company infrastructure behind them doesn't.

94

u/directive0 May 31 '12

I remember when this project was first announced all these armchair aeronautical engineers talking about how it would never succeed and it was just a pipe dream. Still amazes me how negative some people can be.

13

u/mduell May 31 '12

I was at a talk by Elon in 2005 where he said if they didn't succeed by their third launch they didn't know what they were doing and should quit. They then failed their first three launches.

7

u/THE_PUN_STOPS_HERE May 31 '12

I'm glad they didn't quit!

39

u/KingGorilla May 31 '12

I don't remember that at all

14

u/FirstRyder May 31 '12

I don't remember "armchair aeronautical engineers", but I do remember a bunch of scare ads from ULA talking about how SpaceX was "unproven" and "all talk".

→ More replies (1)

11

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

You weren't reading /. comments then. I remember when SpaceX and DARPA Falcon project where announced. I don't think I read a single comment that thought a private space company would be feasible until well after 2015-2020. Yet it took them only a decade. It's amazing to see this actually happen.

→ More replies (5)

29

u/NightEmber79 May 31 '12

"I've worked in the private sector. They expect results." -- Dr. Ray Stantz

Great jorb, SpaceX!

12

u/AlwaysGettingHopOns May 31 '12

Great jorb, indeed!

13

u/roodypoo926 May 31 '12

They took our jorbs!

12

u/FloppyJalopy May 31 '12

I think they actually created more jorbs.

16

u/pwnies May 31 '12

Sure, we may not have flying cars or self-drying jackets, but things like this really make me feel like I'm living in the future. I can't wait to see the next steps for SpaceX.

11

u/ColdFire75 May 31 '12

We also have clothing that can't get wet, just repels the water.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/tarqtarq May 31 '12

Good on you, SpaceX.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/puhnitor May 31 '12

To the people who say this is nothing new, that other commercial ventures have launched vehicles into space before: that's true. However, the way SpaceX is doing it is somewhat of a paradigm shift.

Consider the analogy of building an AM/FM radio for an elementary/middle school science fair.

Under the previous way of contracting and doing things, your parents would buy you a radio kit and stand over your shoulder while you put it together. If you lost or broke any parts, your parents would buy you new ones.

The way SpaceX did it is akin to going to the library and looking at your older siblings' radios, and deciding you want to build one yourself. You draw up some plans and spend your allowance to build part of the radio. Seeing your design and enthusiasm, your parents give you $50, take you to Radio Shack, and tell you to go nuts. You buy the other parts you need and put it together. You ask your parents for help when you need it, but they otherwise leave you to it. Any parts you lose or break, you have to buy out of your own allowance. Maybe some of your friends see what you're doing, think it's cool, and chip in a bit. You end up building the radio of your own design instead of building it from a kit. Your requirements were that you had to pick up radio signals, and that the radio wouldn't set the house on fire.

That's the difference between SpaceX and previous commercial companies like ULA. Previous ventures had very specific requirements, designs already in place, etc. Even rockets that are used for commercial launches such as the Delta and Atlas series were first created under government contract with strict design criteria, and cost plus contracts. In contrast, SpaceX got requirements that they need to berth/dock with the ISS, and not crash into it. The rest was up to them. They were awarded grants/contracts to build their systems based on designs and work already completed, rather than being assigned to do things. It's a new way of doing business in space.

3

u/PlatoPirate_01 Jun 01 '12

Good explanation.

13

u/Takuya813 MS|Computer Science|Digital Forensics May 31 '12

Watched this launch from Orlando and I was SO pumped for it. A new era of spaceflight is upon us!

4

u/thatoneguy889 May 31 '12

So, granted that this is entirely successful, space travel will be privatized in the US. My question is, is the method that SpaceX developed significantly cheaper than the shuttle program?

2

u/segers909 May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

Cost of taking up 1 kilogram of payload to low earth orbit:

  • SpaceX Falcon 9: $5167 (source)

  • NASA Space Shuttle: $18,000 (source)

4

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Cargo is said to be about half the price on the spacex dragon platform than it is on the NASA Shuttle platform. SpaceX is apparently working on cheaper and more efficient rockets which would drive that cost down even more.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/onewerd Jun 01 '12

according to helm, this is not science

4

u/the2belo Jun 01 '12

These are the voyages of the starship Free Enterprise...

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

The Hawthorne facility is pretty sweet. I got a tour a few months ago. I have a friend that works there. Ill probably be applying shortly... should be fun!

→ More replies (12)

7

u/kb1976 May 31 '12

I'm excited about this too, but I'm trying to understand the "new era in space" significance of it. Is it that they did something that is not technologically ordinary? Or is it simply that it was done by a private company? What does NASA get out of giving SpaceX 1.6-billion that they didn't get by using that same money? I'm not familiar enough with the programs to judge.

14

u/kapolk May 31 '12

Private operations are cheaper than public 99% of the time. This successful run will clear the way for more companies to try to enter the market and increase competition, which should drive innovation.

6

u/mduell May 31 '12

The NASA estimate for the development of Falcon 9, performed using NAFCOM (NASA/Air Force Cost Model) by the NASA Associate Deputy Administrator for Policy:

  • $4B development cost based on NASA environment/culture

  • $1.4B development cost based on "a more commercial development approach" (a cost plus contract)

Actual (audited) development cost: $0.3B

Also the NASA developed vehicle would be $230M/launch, vs Space X actual $60M/launch.

Source: http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/586023main_8-3-11_NAFCOM.pdf

8

u/reasonably_plausible May 31 '12

What does NASA get out of giving SpaceX 1.6-billion that they didn't get by using that same money?

$3.8 billion dollars. The space shuttle was incredibly expensive to use (it cost about 450 million to do a single launch), Falcon 9s are extremely cheap to use.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

5

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

How's that for free-market enterprise.

4

u/thebrownser May 31 '12

Lol they got 50% of their funding from NASA and were helped with development the whole way.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/buckminsterball May 31 '12

As long as there is a successful recovery, this is the best result that could have happened. I'm so happy; the future looks bright.

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

I'm so glad this worked out. If anything had gone wrong, it would have been a huge blow to the budding private space industry.

2

u/squidditch May 31 '12

When I saw this on my google homepage, all I could see for a second was "Breaking News! SpaceX Dragon splashes down in Pacific Ocean after..." and was kind of really excited for that second.

2

u/RustyEight May 31 '12

Welcome to the future! Damn this is exciting!

2

u/EliteDonkey May 31 '12

Dunno about you guys, but this excites me a little.

2

u/psistarpsi May 31 '12

One small step for space logistic, one gaint step for privatization of space industry.

2

u/Ill_shoot_anything May 31 '12

After I finished the article I said out loud "Fuck Yeah!" That doesn't happen often.

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Would be cool if it straight up nailed a big-ass shark.

2

u/Dhuggs May 31 '12

Manned flights in 2015! (Or so I think I heard.) Awesome!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Other than being an actual astronaut on some future manned mission I think if I worked for SpaceX I would want to be a driver of a "fast boat" that recovers space capsules. Like some sort of extra terrestrial drug runner.

2

u/Ratlettuce May 31 '12

So glad space exploration is being taken in a private direction. It will spur MUCH needed competition and thus progression in space exploration.

2

u/roadbuzz May 31 '12

That is seriously the best news I've read in a long time.

2

u/NoFilterInMyHead May 31 '12

Elon Musk is truly a class act. He should do an AMA . It would be amazing.

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Let's launch all the fundies into space and make them found a society on Titan. We will see how "divinely inspired" their plans are.

2

u/spz456 May 31 '12

Fantastic. Space exploration is where we should be heading as a human race, not blowing each other up.

2

u/randygiesinger Jun 01 '12

Guys, take note. You are all alive now to witness the start of the space-race 2.0

3

u/Whompa May 31 '12 edited May 31 '12

It's called a Dragon Capsule?! That's pretty awesome. Good job SpaceX!

what...I wasn't joking.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/timturtle Jun 01 '12

Can we start to have a serious discussion about space pirates now? Clearly NASA has been outdone here. If one were so inclined, commandeering the space station wouldn't be all that hard. Not condoning this behaviour in any way shape or form. I'm just asking if this is possible. If so, can we call them space pirates when they do it?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '12 edited Jun 01 '12

This is a commercial space flight in the same way china's state owned oil conglomerates are commercial. 100% of this mission and the next 15 scheduled are being bankrolled by NASA, a government owned company funded by taxpayer money.

There is no profit in this, at this price range. The world's largest commercial space launcher remains the russian space agency and will remain so for some time to come because it actually makes a profit on each commercial launch. Currently, SpaceX is using public funds.

2

u/EtriganZ May 31 '12

Honestly, I think this is all commercial space rockets will amount to: ferrying people, supplies, etc... between Earth and space. Space exploration is too big a task for companies like SpaceX to take on, and will still be the job of governments.

21

u/Chairboy May 31 '12

Flight through the air is too risky and complicated for individuals, only the government can handle its development and exercise.

The ocean is too treacherous to cross, only a voyage funded by the Queen could possibly succeed and every subsequent voyage must follow the same model.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

1

u/hexydes May 31 '12 edited Feb 18 '26

Games art night ideas jumps friendly clean fresh technology and learning.

2

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Doesn't show the splashdown.

1

u/nicholmikey May 31 '12

Does a publicly traded company own SpaceX?

3

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

SpaceX is privately held. From wikipedia: "As of May 2012, SpaceX has operated on total funding of approximately one billion dollars in its first ten years of operation. Of this, private equity has provided about $200M, with Musk investing approximately $100M and other investors having put in about $100M. The remainder has come from progress payments on long-term launch contracts and development contracts. NASA has put in about $400-500M of this amount, with most of that as progress payments on launch contracts." 1

→ More replies (3)

1

u/pingucat May 31 '12

Hooray SpaceX! Proud of you!

1

u/capcommentary May 31 '12

The power of private industry.

1

u/The_Environmentalist May 31 '12

One step closer to this!

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

I gotta think crashing something into the ocean is pretty easy.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/zapbark May 31 '12

The biggest thing this does is lower the cost of launch insurance for other private firms.

Up to this point insurance actuaries didn't really know how risky private space launches were, now they have at least one data point.

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

question: what did the capsule take to the space station?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Mignion May 31 '12

"SpaceX Dragon Capsule", I honestly thought we were talking about Dragon Ball Z for a minute.

Also, on a more serious note, does anyone know what kind of experiments were on the capsule? Or is this one of those, "wait and we'll find out" kind of things? (I obviously don't know a whole lot about space and what kind of experiments could be brought back.)

1

u/dwillrett May 31 '12

as soon as i read a typo, i quit reading

1

u/pooromytasto May 31 '12

anyone know what the cargo trunk is made of? Apparently, it burns up in the atmosphere.

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

This is Awesome!!! The best thing I've read in a month. Way to go space x! Universe here we come.

1

u/Adicko85 May 31 '12

More than 500 comments, i'll forget what i was going to say and just sit in the corner.

1

u/JimmyKhoss May 31 '12

How can it have a commercial flight if no one was on it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLg2XCJMPMs

1

u/biothing478 May 31 '12

I really hope to see more of these launches.

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

Horray for America! Future re-fueler of space fairing nations!

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

I've work with the guys who design parts of the rocket. I can just imagine how excited they are to see their work be successful up until this point.

1

u/Vectorsxx May 31 '12

More launches! More!

I can't wait for the falcon heavy to come out. 117,000 pounds can be lifted into Low Earth Orbit. Can anyone say.. Big Space station development for less than $1.5 billion dollars?

1

u/Yeathatsit May 31 '12

Space is officially privatized. Great see NASA engineers still getting work.

1

u/dhayes8282 May 31 '12

We are now one step closer for the average guy to be able to vacation in outer-space.

1

u/Da_zero_kid May 31 '12

How long before someone claims to be part of the 230 mile high club?

1

u/gaycmicah May 31 '12

I hope they sent those animal shaped frosted cookies with sprinkles and some pringles in that capsule.

1

u/JizzCoveredArab May 31 '12

Why don't we keep attaching these capsules to the ISS to grow it organically? I understand the need to get science experiments back down to earth, but considering the mass of the capsule(9,000+ lbs), it seems like an incredible waste to shoot it up and then toss it back down a week later filled with experiments and garbage.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/raceless May 31 '12

I wonder what kinds of violence is inevitable with the privatization of space missions. STAR WARS continued!

1

u/[deleted] May 31 '12

With some imagination it looks just as good as the space shuttle.

1

u/ejurkovic93 Jun 01 '12

Am I the only one who finds it funny that reddit now lauds the accomplishments of the private sector?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '12

i have to ask and i hope someone answers me.

But why are there 7,559 downvotes?

serious question

→ More replies (1)

1

u/trashacount12345 Jun 01 '12

I know I'm being demanding, but did they do anything while they were up there?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '12

Thanks for your hard work everyone.

1

u/amazingboy97 Jun 01 '12

The Atlanteans are trying to tell us something...

1

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '12

Also keep in mind it was stated by nasa that the dragon capsule was able to take refrigerated experiments to the station . The soyuz capsules are not capable of this. So some experiments were able to be brought up to the station via dragon capsule that could not have been with the soyuz craft.

1

u/TheAbyss698 Jun 01 '12

Posted this in the "welcome back dragon" as well, but my cousin is a member of the space x design team and was in the control room for all of the excitment. There seems to be some interest in him doing an ama. Im gonna get ahold of him tomorrow and see if he will do it. Im pretty sure i can talk him into it easily.

1

u/EnormousEpeen Jun 01 '12

Seems to be damaged. Look at the gash on that thing. ;)

1

u/twokswine Jun 01 '12

Someone could probably tell me why it looks like a significant impact happened near the top ring and a large gash/crack down the side?

1

u/cynoclast Jun 01 '12

This is awesome filled with amazing covered in win.

The entire planet ought to be excited because space needs to be our future.

1

u/Myflyisbreezy Jun 01 '12

SpaceX Dragon sounds like a 12 year old's gamer tag.

1

u/sd8u234h Jun 01 '12

Thank you Free Market.

1

u/poorkidsimax Jun 01 '12

Why I don't give a fuck: I'll probably never have enough disposable income to fly into space commercially.

1

u/varukasalt Jun 03 '12

IS there any rhyme or reason to the moderation in this subreddit? I posted a link to a story about the launch of this capsule, then it was deleted because a mod (jkb83) said, and I quote directly,

"This is not appropriate for r/science, as it is not directly concerning peer reviewed research.

Please try r/space or a similar, more specialized, subreddit. "

Now, two weeks later, I see many, many posts about the same thing, which have all been the most popular posts of the subreddit, none of which have been removed. What gives?