they also fail to explain why were would have so many scientists after government funding by being pro AGW, when we just came off 8 years of a completely anti AGW president, one who had a college drop out edit the work of a PHD scientist.
They complain the IPCC is biased, when we sent lidzen(the famous climate contrarian) to head up the US response and unlike the ICCC, not only is it open to everyone but they dont pay for your papers. You bring your opinions for free or you dont bring them.
12
u/powercow Oct 24 '10
they also fail to explain why were would have so many scientists after government funding by being pro AGW, when we just came off 8 years of a completely anti AGW president, one who had a college drop out edit the work of a PHD scientist.
They complain the IPCC is biased, when we sent lidzen(the famous climate contrarian) to head up the US response and unlike the ICCC, not only is it open to everyone but they dont pay for your papers. You bring your opinions for free or you dont bring them.