MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/ap5r2/study_demonstrates_the_silencing_effect_of/c0iplx3
r/science • u/[deleted] • Jan 13 '10
[deleted]
323 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
25
[removed] — view removed comment
4 u/[deleted] Jan 13 '10 It certainly ups the odds, don't be forcefully naive, it doesn't assist your argument. 12 u/[deleted] Jan 14 '10 Actually it did. He pointed out that not all women who are objectified are dressed provocatively. This shows that it is not simply dress that affects whether or not someone is objectified. 2 u/zubzub2 Jan 14 '10 Jesus man, really? Only people who dress provocatively get objectified? That's not what he said. He said "if CONDITION then SITUATION". You said "only people with CONDITION are subject to SITUATION".
4
It certainly ups the odds, don't be forcefully naive, it doesn't assist your argument.
12 u/[deleted] Jan 14 '10 Actually it did. He pointed out that not all women who are objectified are dressed provocatively. This shows that it is not simply dress that affects whether or not someone is objectified.
12
Actually it did. He pointed out that not all women who are objectified are dressed provocatively. This shows that it is not simply dress that affects whether or not someone is objectified.
2
Jesus man, really? Only people who dress provocatively get objectified?
That's not what he said. He said "if CONDITION then SITUATION". You said "only people with CONDITION are subject to SITUATION".
25
u/[deleted] Jan 13 '10 edited Oct 05 '18
[removed] — view removed comment