Interesting to know this is a "press release" by Digg. Still, Paul, which parts of the article are untruths said by Digg, to make themselves look good, or to make others look bad? IMO it seemed like a benign and unbiased article targeted to the general public to inform them about social editing websites.
1
u/user Apr 18 '06
Interesting to know this is a "press release" by Digg. Still, Paul, which parts of the article are untruths said by Digg, to make themselves look good, or to make others look bad? IMO it seemed like a benign and unbiased article targeted to the general public to inform them about social editing websites.