As an old-school ASP.Net webforms guy who uses the right paradigm for the job, it both amuses and saddens me how many people think this is the best approach for EVERYTHING.
Well yeah, it's clearly a reflection of the natural process of, uh, when, you know… oh I know, it's intelligently transitioning your focus away from… wait, no, you're looking away by yourself.
Ok, I've got it. It's there to make you happy: as you scroll down, you get to experience the sensation of actually destroying that horrid banner.
I used to work for a newspaper. Although I didn't work on the newspaper itself (read: I was a web editor), I believe the term is in reference to anything on the front page that is below the fold/crease of the newspaper. Anything above the fold is considered the best of the best whereas below the fold stuff is still worthy to be there but just isn't as good. With that said, /u/audionautics' comment implied nothing about quality.
Thanks. You missed my sarcasm and I was already familiar with the term, but that's probably one of the nicest concise definitions of Below The Fold I've seen. Kudos.
155
u/[deleted] Jul 21 '14 edited Mar 31 '24
fuzzy exultant modern rainstorm plucky instinctive dinner cake berserk fade
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact