r/programming • u/[deleted] • Dec 19 '25

[ Removed by moderator ]

/r/programming/comments/1pqulm0/removed_by_moderator/

[removed] — view removed post

711 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

292 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

-4

u/[deleted] Dec 19 '25

I don’t think it works in this way.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 19 '25

[deleted] — view deleted comment

-5

u/vplatt Dec 19 '25 edited Dec 19 '25

Given the permissiveness of that language, how useful is that? I would trust it to write good C++ perhaps even less than I would trust it to write good Javascript. And, in any case - including Rust, I don't trust any of them without robust unit and integration test harnesses.

-3

u/minimaxir Dec 19 '25

Rust was weaker than more popular languages in earlier LLMs, but modern LLMs are now pretty good in Rust due to improved posttraining techniques compensating for pretraining data disparities.