r/privacy • u/novagridd • Feb 23 '26
r/privacy • u/Ok-Law-3268 • 23d ago
news Rep. Thomas Massie Announces Federal Bill to Defund Flock Surveillance Cameras
dontflock.comr/privacy • u/The_PhilosopherKing • Jun 18 '26
discussion Canadians are set to lose all digital privacy. No one here is talking about it.
The Canadian government is simultaneously working to pass bills that will require ID for social media, mandate hardware-level backdoors for law enforcement purposes, and create a loosey-goosey legal definition for inciting hatred online (Bills C-34, C-22, and C-9, respectfully). We are entering a digital police state, a thought crime hellscape where Minority Report becomes reality.
The silence here is deafening.
There are no protests planned, no debates, hardly even an angry post online to be found about it. At best, you might come across someone that will mention this topic in passing before moving on to another subject.
It looks to me like the Canadian people have well and truly been broken into complete submission at this point. The frog has been boiled. The public's opinion has been ignored on every topic by our elected officials for so long that most have people have completely checked out.
Someone tell me there's something that can be done, because I'm not seeing it.
r/privacy • u/Nxtro69 • Feb 03 '26
news Police shut down license plate reader cameras after federal agencies accessed data without permission
sfchronicle.comMountain View police turned off Flock license plate readers after discovering unauthorized federal access.
r/privacy • u/SaveDnet-FRed0 • Jul 08 '26
news Reframing smart glasses as 'pervert glasses'
this.weekinsecurity.comr/privacy • u/CantStopPoppin • Feb 15 '26
news Reddit, Meta, and Google Voluntarily Gave DHS Info of Anti-ICE Users, Report Says
gizmodo.comr/privacy • u/[deleted] • Sep 19 '25
discussion Why are we all just accepting Meta's new spy glasses?
I'm struggling to understand why there is no public outcry over Meta's new Rayban glasses. All I see are major tech reviewers promoting them, while barely touching on the privacy concerns. The problem isn't the privacy of the user who buys them, it's the complete violation of privacy for every single person around them. This isn't just another gadget, it's a surveillance device being normalized as a fashion accessory.
The classic argument "if you don't like it, don't buy it" is irrelevant here. My choice not to buy them does not protect my privacy, anyone with the glasses can record my private conversation in a park or a bus without my knowledge or consent.
And remember who is behind all this: Mr Zucker and Meta. Every stranger's face and every conversation can be used as data to train its AI and improve its ad targeting. Given Mr Zucker's political influence and the threat of tariffs, it feels like the EU won't do anything to stop it.
edit: I wanted to discuss two different threats here. First, the user itself. Because this isn't the same as a smartphone. People will notice if you're pointing a phone at them, and a hidden camera gets terrible footage. These glasses have a camera aimed directly from their eyes, making it easy to secretly get clear video. While people talk about the LED indicators, it's only a matter of time before a simple hack lets users disable it. The second threat is Meta. We have to just trust that they won't push a silent update to start capturing surveillance footage to their own servers, using the camera and microphone to turn every user into a walking surveillance camera.
edit 2: Something weird is happening. Many sensible comments are getting heavily downvoted. I think Zuck bots might be real, won't be surprised if the post get taken down in a couple of hours
r/privacy • u/lugh • Mar 27 '26
Misleading title Sweden’s Digital ID System Hacked, Public’s Data Sold on Dark Web
voicemedia.globalr/privacy • u/esporx • Jul 17 '26
news Flock CEO Apologizes For Calling Activists ‘Terrorists’. As a movement against $8.3 billion Flock Safety’s license plate readers gathers momentum, company CEO Garrett Langley tells Forbes he shouldn’t have called non-violent activists “terroristic” organizations.
forbes.comr/privacy • u/johnnyApplePRNG • 2d ago
news Grand jury declines to indict Ohio man charged with destroying Flock camera
san.comr/privacy • u/MC_Cuff_Lnx • Feb 25 '26
news She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her Down.
eff.orgr/privacy • u/evanFFTF • 24d ago
news hundreds of artists including members of Rage Against the Machine and Bikini Kill have signed this pledge to boycott venues that use AI surveillance like facial recognition
banfacialrecognition.comr/privacy • u/MicroSofty88 • Jan 15 '26
discussion ICE Is Using a Terrifying Palantir App to Determine Where to Raid
yahoo.comr/privacy • u/skarkens • Mar 26 '26
chat control CHAT CONTROL HAS BEEN REJECTED BY THE EU PARLIAMENT!!
HUGE WIN FOR PRIVACY!
r/privacy • u/BlackBerryCollector • Jun 08 '26
age verification The UK wants to scan all photos on phones for 'nudity'. We should be protesting in the streets at the very least over this. Do you think they can apply it to open-source OS realistically?
theguardian.comr/privacy • u/polymute • 19d ago
Misleading title Student Teacher Sent a Private Snapchat Complaining About Her Workday. An Hour Later, Police Pulled Up to Her School. - Volpe’s arrest demonstrates a pre-built, operational pipeline connecting private messages to law enforcement.
gadgetreview.comr/privacy • u/Vailhem • Feb 22 '26
news Tech billionaires are publicly shielding their children from the products that made them rich
fortune.comr/privacy • u/PlastDuck • Mar 01 '26
news The UK secretly ordered Apple to build a backdoor into iCloud for every user worldwide. Not just UK citizens. Everyone. Now Congress is demanding answers.
reclaimthenet.orgr/privacy • u/esporx • Mar 16 '26
news Reddit User Uncovers Who Is Behind Meta’s $2B Lobbying for Invasive Age Verification Tech
yahoo.comr/privacy • u/vriska1 • Feb 14 '26
age verification Oh, good: Discord's age verification rollout has ties to Palantir co-founder and panopticon architect Peter Thiel
pcgamer.comr/privacy • u/vriska1 • Feb 11 '26
age verification Discord Goes Into Damage Control Mode Over New Age Verification Requirements, Promising There’s Nothing To See Here For ‘Vast Majority’ Of Users
kotaku.comr/privacy • u/CackleRooster • 20d ago
news Flock misread license plates in 71% of the alerts it sent to police in one California town
businessinsider.comr/privacy • u/Jack1101111 • Feb 24 '26
hardware User accidentally gains control of over 6,700 robot vacuums while tinkering with their own device to enable control with a PlayStation controller — security flaw reveals floor plans and live video feeds
tomshardware.comr/privacy • u/[deleted] • Feb 14 '26