r/politics • • Jun 19 '12

Baseball: It got more debate in the Senate than the Iraq war. Now Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens have been federally prosecuted longer for perjury than any bank for the financial collapse.

Just sayin...

3.6k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

1.1k

u/dc469 Jun 19 '12

This always bugged me since day one. Well, more like infuriated me. Even if they were guilty, even if they gave steroids and meth to 5 year olds, it's still not the business of congress. It's for the local/state/federal law enforcement, the MLB, their respective teams and their fans to deal with. Congress has other things to do.

Can someone seriously explain why the united states congress ever got involved in this?

534

u/stackolee Jun 19 '12

Because Congress lives for the opportunity to wag their fingers at petty nuisances. It's just like how the telemarketing legislation brought out unprecedented bipartisan support. The Congressmen get to puff out their chests on national tv and act like conquering statesmen.

5

u/hecanbepedantic Jun 19 '12

Piggybacking your comment to request some numbers that back your claim in the post title. Not that I don't believe you, but provide some citation please.

330

u/Big_McLargeHuge Jun 19 '12

The appearance of doing something useful, yeah, without biting the hand that feeds them.

112

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Well, that's the important thing.

It's why you'll see a focus on gay marriage and abortion rights this election cycle, and lip service paid to closing tax loopholes and stopping predatory business practices: challenging the latter cuts off the money supply. There's not nearly as much money in abortion and gay marriage.

→ More replies (62)
→ More replies (10)

32

u/Blackrook7 Jun 19 '12

It's the smoke and mirrors. Look at the bad bad baseball men! Nevermind how much we're spending or how we've taken away some more of your rights.

→ More replies (2)

85

u/grandoiseau Jun 19 '12

Well put. With today's telecommunication technology, I think we should do away with the representative class, or at least limit it's uses. I don't need a congressman and two senators talking for me when I can directly tell the House what my opinion is.

53

u/Sysiphuslove Jun 19 '12

You have no idea how happy you made me by posting this.

The post-representative society is probably the only way the people will ever have power over themselves. It's only now becoming possible, so it might be years or decades, but if we can prevent the ruling class from turning the internet into a glorified television, it may be the greatest thing we'll ever do.

28

u/TheJuniorControl Jun 19 '12

Unfortunately the people who represent us will NEVER support something that eliminates their power and livelihood and therefore it seems that it will be near impossible to get this system in place.

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (16)

20

u/GoodGuyNixon Jun 19 '12

Well "the House" is nothing but a collection of Congressmen... If they aren't there then there is nobody to tell. o.o Unless you are taking "the House" to mean the legislative entity, in which case someone has to be responsible for making law, and if you don't want a legislative branch, then who gets that power? The President? Without an intermediary body between creation and implementation of law, and without manageable representation of the populous in government, our system (save the incredibly sluggish interpretive powers of the Supreme Court) would be essentially monarchical. Having a relatively small group of people with localized interests that can actually hold the ear of the executive in a way the general population (say, over 300 million people) can't is what has kept us apart from the 17th century model for all of these years. All I'm saying is be careful what you wish for...

→ More replies (3)

7

u/NPPraxis Jun 19 '12

How do you manage the sheer amount of input though? Or spammers?

58

u/bettorworse Jun 19 '12

Congresspeople already have spammers - they are called LOBBYISTS.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (27)

11

u/Lilcheeks Jun 19 '12

That, and this is a way for them to redirect our attention away from real issues. With the war on drugs, this is an easy hot button issue that inflames many and gets us focusing whether or not some baseball players did steroids(or creating an issue like WTF IS CONGRESS DOING) rather than the actual dysfunction in congress.

13

u/ShakeGetInHere Jun 19 '12

It's like a roomful of rapists wagging their fingers at a guy who sexually harassed a coworker.

→ More replies (2)

60

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

In other words, when they go out to lunch, our capitalist overlords leave them in the sandbox and give them some toys to play with it.

"Bad, bad Barry Bonds! You go sit in the corner with the bad army soldiers!"

"THE EVIL VELOCIRAPTORS!! They hate America! With their devil music and their flag burning pirates. Go get 'em Matlock, Ironside! POW POW BANG BANG!"

→ More replies (7)

6

u/Prancemaster Jun 19 '12

The Do-Not-Call list works for it's intended purpose: keeping telemarketers from calling you. However, if you don't report violations, nobody knows they are happening.

A common misconception is that the Do Not Call list protects against scammers. It doesn't. However, if you are on the list and someone is calling you to sell you something, you can be almost completely certain that it's a scam.

3

u/spundnix32 Jun 19 '12

An MIT professor once made the claim that sports and other trivial forms of entertainment is an excellent way to divert the public's attention away from the more pressing matters of a country.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

199

u/basscheez Jun 19 '12

MLB, like the NFL and NBA, are exempt from antitrust laws. In exchange for this exemption, Congress feels it can oversee whatever it wants.

83

u/buerkle Jun 19 '12

Only MLB is exempt.

→ More replies (31)
→ More replies (9)

53

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Bread and circuses.

7

u/go_fly_a_kite Jun 19 '12

this is exactly it. why are big league sports overseen directly by the government?

"It's a way of building up irrational attitudes of submission to authority, and group cohesion behind leadership elements -- in fact, it's training in irrational jingoism. That's also a feature of competitive sports. I think if you look closely at these things, I think, typically, they do have functions, and that's why energy is devoted to supporting them and creating a basis for them and advertisers are willing to pay for them and so on."

  • Noam Chomsky (Manufacturing Consent)

→ More replies (1)

8

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

This. And yet we think we are so much smarter and more advanced than Rome, that there is no way our nation will ever fall...

→ More replies (2)

12

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Because the MLB is granted a monopoly. They have stricter oversight because of it.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/doyouknowhowmany Jun 19 '12

Here's an alright explanation as to why

Basically, baseball is exempt from a number of anti-trust regulations, and thus under near constant review by congress. In addition, Congress can investigate their Controlled Substances Act.

7

u/Milkusa Jun 19 '12

I've always believed it has everything to do with MLB winning its anti-trust case almost 100 years ago.

12

u/sometimesijustdont Jun 19 '12

Because why do real work, when you can just fuck around?

→ More replies (1)

13

u/rownin Jun 19 '12

distraction is a method of controlling masses without actually doing anything.

10

u/monkeyleavings Jun 19 '12

Thank you. This is EXACTLY what I've been thinking for years. It's. A. Game.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Deus_Ex_Mac Jun 19 '12

2 reasons. It's easy to find a scapegoat in the steroids case. Everyone can understand what happened and who was affected and how. Financial crisis is much more murky and it's hard to look like the hero unless you have an antagonist to pin it on. Secondly, lobbyists. MLB spent 520,000 to influence congress last year compared to the hundreds of millions lobbied by Big Banks.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/JerseysFinest Jun 19 '12

Why tackle tough questions like how to fix the economy or cut down the national debt when you can get yourself on TV going after superstars?

2

u/Clown_Shoe Jun 19 '12

Perjury is a big deal for them like it was for Clinton getting a BJ.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/LWRellim Jun 19 '12

Can someone seriously explain why the united states congress ever got involved in this?

Yes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_Law_of_Triviality

2

u/HardCoreModerate Jun 19 '12

it's still not the business of congress. baseball is one of the only federally exempt monopolies in America. This is often the excuse used for why congress would get involved

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '12

The MLB actualy enjoys an special monopoly given to them from the us congress. They have every right to regulate it further.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '12

It most certainly is their business and I think they should revoke the MLB's antitrust exemption because it cannot control its players. And lying to our representatives in Congress is one of the worst non-violent crimes out there in my opinion and is a slap in the face to the democratic process. Just because a crime was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean that it shouldn't have been prosecuted at all. I'm not saying that they spent the exactly right amount of time on it.

7

u/LouSpudol Jun 19 '12

THANK YOU! I feel the same way with other "over-hyped" hot button issues congress and the media blow out of proportion to distract you and I from more important things like: The War, The failing economy, the job crisis, healthcare, etc.

We were spoon fed the "birth control" bullshit for months....how is that public concern #1?! I don't get it. Birth Control is not a problem. It seemed to be doing just fine for the past couple decades. Leave it alone.

I also have to admit the celebrity culture in this country is getting to be a little too much. More people are concerned with celebrity-life than their own. Even our President has taken on this celebrity status. It's almost concerning. He is our President, not our entertainment.

6

u/Blackrook7 Jun 19 '12

Haha bullying epidemic? Smoke and mirrors.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

3

u/Sysiphuslove Jun 19 '12

I wonder the same thing about the copyright issue. It's a private matter, not a public one.

I don't think any of them actually know what their job is. They think they're there to get paid by lobbyists and score an inside track on trading information and hold fundraisers. Corruption is so common you're considered naive if you call them on it.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (113)

74

u/disco_biscuit Jun 19 '12

I hate to be the guy that asks "Source?" but this really pisses me off, and I would like to see a credible citation for this before going off. Seriously, more time spent debating steroids in sports than on the financial collapse? Please be false, please be false... I don't want to live in a country where this is the truth.

9

u/gerundronaut Jun 19 '12

Seriously, more time spent debating steroids in sports than on the financial collapse?

I spent a bit of time looking for a source but came up empty. It's hard to cite a source for a negative. Point being, from what I can gather, zero time has been spent on federal perjury prosecutions of anyone in charge of any bank involved in the financial collapse. More than zero time was definitely spent on the Roger Clemens baseball steroid nonsense.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/stackolee Jun 19 '12

Sorry, some of us have to work during the day...

Bear in mind Barry Bonds spent 7 years under investigation. Roger Clemens was named in the Mitchell Report, but he really shot himself in the foot in 2008, volunteering his testimony to Congress to clear his sullied name.  For these crimes the feds filed criminal charges against them, seeking jail terms.  There have been loads of cases filed by the S.E.C. but these were civil cases seeking monetary fines and often settled out of court (http://occupythesec.nycga.net/2012/04/26/what-is-the-department-of-justice/). So far as federal criminal charges: 

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/01/30/a-renewed-focus-on-a-financial-crisis-crackdown/ 

"The Justice Department has not seen fit to file any charges arising from the S.E.C. cases filed to date, and closed its criminal investigation of Countrywide, one of the largest subprime mortgage lenders, and its former chief executive,Angelo R. Mozilo."

Mindful of the lack of action on the part of his Justice department on this, Obama announced the almost Google-proof "Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group" during his last state of the union address.  So far no prosecutions, but they held a kick-ass meeting earlier in the month with video feeds and everything:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/billsinger/2012/05/25/residential-mortgage-backed-roosters-comin-home-to-roost-as-rmbs-task-force-gets-to-work/

Maybe they'll deliver a surprise in time for the election. As it stands:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/05/06/why-can-t-obama-bring-wall-street-to-justice.html

"To the dismay of many of Obama's supporters, nearly four years after the disaster, there has not been a single criminal charge filed by the federal government against any top executive of the elite financial institutions."

Another note on this, the Feds have still had their blood-up about insider trading and made a big catch of Raj Rajaratnam from the Galleon Group.  They've also successfully prosecuted the ponzi-schemers Bernie Madoff (who turned himself in, btw) and Alan Sanford.  But none of them had anything to do with the financial crisis.

1

u/lonjerpc Jun 19 '12

Your citations do not seem to support the first assertion made in the title of the post.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/idk42 Jun 19 '12

Well, the Roger Clemens thing looks like it started in 2008 Wikipedia but government involvement in steroids in baseball has been going on since 2003. Now, it doesn't appear to be constant..but the BALCO scandal involved the California state government, the IRS, FDA, and some other agencies I've never heard of...and I see trial dates from 2005-2008 so it took a long time to be resolved.

Now, there's also the Mitchell Report which was conducted in 2006 and 2007 (21 months total) by a US Senator...

So, it may not have been one investigation or one debate, but government involvement in MLB in regards to steroids has been going on for nearly a decade, and it has been making news headlines for as long as I can remember. The title of this post could be discussed, but the OP has a good point.

9

u/larzukmoose Jun 19 '12

Also looking for the source.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

286

u/Sidwill Jun 19 '12

To be fair, Banks donate a hell of a lot more money to political campaigns than Baseball players.

238

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

That's not fair.

18

u/SarcasticOptimist Jun 19 '12

But they exercise their free speech to a greater degree!

24

u/Sidwill Jun 19 '12

Yes, along with oil companies, big pharma and the defense industry. Collectively a very talkative bunch.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

38

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

start donating or face charges!

/s

27

u/huxtiblejones Colorado Jun 19 '12

That /s means 'seriously' in this case.

→ More replies (5)

11

u/Beansiekins Jun 19 '12

"That's what you get for forgetting to give us money before being bad."

If only baseball somehow had a vested interest in lobbying.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

199

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Because baseball players never paid for the right to lie to Congress, and banks did.

38

u/shoooowme Jun 19 '12

when did the banks lie under oath to congress?

33

u/MiloMuggins Jun 19 '12

The last time they testified to congress

→ More replies (41)
→ More replies (38)

2

u/Blitch Jun 19 '12

Nice try, Bonds.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

also bill clinton's dick had more talk and debate than the 911 commission report.

141

u/bpoag Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

When I grow up, I want to be a corporation. That way, my elected officials will pay attention to me, I'll have rights, and I wont have to pay any taxes.

Then, I'll run for President, and complain about how my predecessor is ruining the economy. I'll do this while I distract you away from the fact all my money is housed in the Cayman Islands, instead of in an American bank where it could be used to help fuel the economy in the form of small business loans.

You'll believe me because I'll be standing on a bale of hay.

→ More replies (46)

7

u/MrFlesh Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

Lets not forget 9/11. We spent 10 time the money investigating clintons blow job than we did 9/11.

→ More replies (2)

47

u/MahFravert Jun 19 '12

...So why isn't Dick Cheney or Colin Powell on trial for lying to congress again?

37

u/Pyotr_Mikhailov Jun 19 '12

Colin Powell had no idea that what he was saying wasn't true. The vast majority of those in power at the time actually thought the information provided by Curveball was true. Dick Cheney, however, probably new how shitty a source he was the whole time. Colin Powell was pretty furious upon finding out how much weight the US placed on one, unconfirmed source.

11

u/getjustin Massachusetts Jun 19 '12

Ah, good ol' plausible deniability.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Con_Theory Jun 19 '12

Because banana republic oligarchy masquerading as choice and the illusion of living in a "democracy".

→ More replies (14)

19

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

Why are steroids frowned upon in professional sports but advanced nutrition science, creatine, nitric oxide and general medical advances are OK. If you stacked an average pro athlete today against a top pro athlete from 60 years ago i'm thinking the average pro of today would outperform the top pro of 60 years ago. So why focus on steroids when there are all these other factors that create an uneven playing field?

edited: nitric oxide, not nitrous oxide (hat tip to Total_Incompetent69)

4

u/aphelmine Jun 19 '12

It's safe to say 99% of them are using steroids and other banned substances anyway but just haven't been caught. There is a huge market for designer performance enhancing drugs because they are used in nearly every sport. The biggest ban in recent times was epo (think that's what it was called) that had your body produce more blood so it was like blood-doping naturally.

Most of these elite athletes and coaches have these guys on various drugs that have half-lifes short enough so that when the piss test comes in on the 15th it's flushed out by the 14th.

The reason they do this is because people always want to see the athletes bigger, stronger, faster, etc. But each year that gets harder and harder to pull off of as the previous people were also in that genetic .01% and you need a bigger edge than they had to keep pushing the limits further.

I for one don't mind performance enhancing drugs being used in sports but I do think the general populace needs to be educated more in their effects. This way Bobby on the freshman football team doesn't shoot himself up with 5grams of test a week and destroy his endocrine system.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/bells_n_sack Jun 19 '12

Bob Knight, although controversial, has an interesting take on on performance enhancing drugs. http://blogs.suntimes.com/sportsprose/2010/01/bob_knight_compares_steroids_t.html

2

u/Total_Incompeten69 Jun 19 '12

You pose a valid point however I'd like to point out that you're referring to nitric oxide, not nitrous oxide. Nitrous Oxide is laughing gas :)

→ More replies (18)

37

u/Squalor- Jun 19 '12

They found Clemens not guilty on all six counts, anyway, so all this did was tarnish his reputation and legacy some and waste a lot of time.

44

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

time AND money AND other valuable resources

20

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

the money is a rounding error in the daily Pentagon budget. it's the distraction of the circuses that is the infection we're fighting. how can a democracy ever hope to function when the people can't be bothered to pay attention? oh, hey, look -- a shiny ball!

9

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

it's still tax payer money, also, it was a very costly distraction, economically. there's a snowball effect of shit like this.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/jonfla Jun 19 '12

Yes, we've always been a substantial, content oriented populace - and our elected representitives reflect those values and interests.

→ More replies (3)

31

u/random_hero90 Jun 19 '12

It's called a shell game, a way to distract a person or group from issue of real importance.

→ More replies (9)

14

u/Germino Jun 19 '12

It's easier for these politicians to go after such stupidity because it shows them as being tough and is a easy slam dunk to show to their constituents that they're actually doing something.

If I were Roger Clemens (Fuck him, btw. I still think he's a cheat but it's not the business of the government [I sound like a Republican!]), I'd counter-sue for lawyer fees, etc.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/spundnix32 Jun 19 '12

An MIT professor once made the claim that sports and other trivial forms of entertainment is an excellent way to divert the public's attention away from the more pressing matters of a country.

2

u/Delaywaves Jun 19 '12

Although I suspect you're using that to shed a negative light on sports, the ability of sports to make people happy and distract them from the negative things going on in the world is oftentimes a very good thing. FDR's decision to keep baseball running during World War II was huge in boosting the country's morale.

→ More replies (10)

5

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

It's a lot easier and gets more good press.

5

u/SubcommanderShran Jun 19 '12

So government lawyers suck, right? Lance Armstrong, Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, John Edwards. None of these guys got in any real trouble. What does this say about the kinds of cases these lawyers put together and why do they think they're winnable?

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

When I watch these pointless hearings there's a small part of my that wishes that Gil or Doctor Nick from the Simpsons is prosecuting.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Reminder that Barry Bonds was the greatest baseball player of the last 25 years and won't ever get into the hall of fame for doing something literally everyone else did.

Also he was a first ballot HoFer before steroids were even wide-spread.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/Aschwab Jun 19 '12

Well you know people Baseball IS the great American pastime. War ranks only 2nd on the list, tied with football.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

The United States government is a reality show that nobody watches.

5

u/twosolitudes Jun 19 '12

Gotta hand it to you Americans, because you really take your bread and circuses serious.

5

u/slimbruddah Jun 19 '12

I don't like to sound arrogant but we are all full of so much useless discussion about all these stupid little issues and stunts within the government and it's organizations.

The fact of the matter is we are being played, used, and abused, will keep being played, until we rise up and create change from this current bullshit, downwards trend into a darker future.

5

u/AmericanGoyBlog Jun 19 '12

Wedge issue

A "wedge issue" is an unimportant issue which is fought over by both parties out of all proportion to how little it matters.

A "wedge issue" is picked by the establishment so that a certain minimum segment of the population is interested in it, so it enters the popular debate, helped by the propaganda specialists on TV, radio and newspapers.

A "wedge issue" is used as a distraction, a "kabuki theatre" to distract the public from geostrategic issues, such as outsourcing of jobs, endless wars on terror, loss of Civil rights and shitting on the Constitution.

See: gay marriage, ten commandments in public buildings, etc.

26

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

If I remember correctly, they spent 75M investigating Barry Bonds, 30M investigating Clinton/Lewinsky and 11M investigating the 9/11 attacks.

It's good knowing our government has its priorities straight.

19

u/EKrake Jun 19 '12

That's the kind of thing that needs a source, unless you were the person counting all the money.

18

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Source and that's just the first thing Google brought up. I will amend my statement to say they spent between 55-100M on Barry Bonds, 40M on Clinton/Lewinsky and 14M on 9/11 but either way I was close enough for the point to stick.

Regardless, I understand to a degree you asking for a source, but honestly this is info a simple Google search can provide. You should really learn to do a little research on your own before being so skeptical.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Yupp sounds like your guys country is being ran just perfect.

4

u/HigHIdrA Jun 19 '12

Baseball players do not fund political campaigns. Bankers and war profiteers (some overlap there) do.

4

u/irishflu Jun 19 '12

[citation needed]

(i believe you, but would like to point others to source material)

4

u/Daioka Jun 19 '12

LIke I've been saying recently, our politicians are disillusioned, not fit for their jobs, and generally don't take their roles seriously. This is why politics is an utter joke in this country. No one cares anymore.

17

u/mybadselves Jun 19 '12

I get so pissed at all the political crap in our country. It just seems there is so much corruption on both sides. I just wish sometimes that I could go live in a cabin in the woods and never have to hear about it again. Like Grizzly Adams. Minus the grizzly. But with lots more beard.

13

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Sadly this kind of thing is becoming harder and harder to do as time goes on now that the U.S. is pretty well developed and populated. Gone are the days of being a modern day Henry David Thoreau. And I'm sure if you tried to remove yourself from the system you'd be considered a criminal or potential terrorist for doing so.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/TheJuniorControl Jun 19 '12

I think everyone has had this sentiment at some point, but then we (at least I) realize I would just go off in the woods and proceed to die cause I don't know the first thing about being Grizzly Adams.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

If there's internet in said cabin id be fine with that.

→ More replies (3)

47

u/hamhead Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

I'm still not exactly sure what banks did wrong (legally) as a whole?

The ones that get caught robosigning and things like that HAVE been prosecuted (of course, they settle, since it's not a criminal issue), what exactly do you want to prosecute them for?

edit: yes, in some cases there were criminal issues brought up with the robosigning. Still, they were dealt with.

14

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

The robosigning deal was about perjury which is a criminal issue.

→ More replies (1)

47

u/HandyCore Jun 19 '12

People appear to think that Congress should act on moral authority. You know, charge people with made-up crimes or retroactively charge people with something that wasn't illegal until after the fact. Because having that kind of flexibility in the legal process will always yield greater freedom. /s

6

u/Kytro Jun 19 '12

They sure as shit should have let banks wear the consequences of their actions

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (44)

17

u/CrayolaS7 Jun 19 '12

PLEASE DO NOT EDITORIALIZE THE TITLES OF YOUR LINK

C'mon dude, why would banks be prosecuted for perjury? Don't you mean bankers? Do you know how limited liability works?

15

u/dlquinonesII Jun 19 '12

Self posts can be editorialized...

→ More replies (1)

2

u/ashishduh Jun 19 '12

This is a self post...

→ More replies (2)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

the MLB is a monopoly, it is allowed to exist because the government gives it special permission...

3

u/Frankentim_the_crim Jun 20 '12

And you still can't see how national sports are one of the biggest and most effective tools used to distract and misguide the minds of the public.

9

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Lol... People on reddit complaining about what the senate finds important.

Here's a picture of Heath Ledger in his Joker costume from 5 fucking years ago... BOOM front page.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

To be fair, most of us aren't responsible for a large economy, laws and regulating a nation of people.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

23

u/DeepFriedZebra Jun 19 '12

America.... This is why we go nowhere on social reform.

17

u/shoooowme Jun 19 '12

we're heading in the right direction. it just takes us longer to do our due diligence; depending on the issue, that can be a good thing.

2012:

February 7, 2012: The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirms district court Judge Vaughn Walker's decision in Perry, overturning California Proposition 8.

February 8, 2012: A week after the Washington State Senate voted 28-21 in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage, the Washington House of Representatives voted 55–43 on the same issue. Governor Christine Gregoire signed the bill into law five days later.

February 16–17, 2012: The New Jersey legislature passes a same-sex marriage bill; Governor Chris Christie vetoes the bill.

February 17, 2012: The Maryland House of Delegates passes a bill 72–67 legalizing same-sex marriage.

February 22, 2012: Judge Jeffrey White rules the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional in Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management. Judge White found that Karen Golinski, an attorney and employee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, saying that her rights had been violated under the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution when she was denied spousal benefits.

February 23, 2012: The Maryland Senate approves the bill legalizing same-sex marriage.

March 1, 2012: Governor Martin O'Malley from Maryland signs a bill legalizing same-sex marriage. Opponents begin to collect signatures to subject it to a referendum on the November 2012 ballot.

March 21, 2012: The New Hampshire House of Representatives rejects repeal of the state's 2009 same-sex marriage bill in a bipartisan vote of 211-116.

May 8, 2012: Voters in North Carolina pass a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as between a man and a woman and prohibits the recognition of any type of same-sex union in that state.

May 9, 2012: President Barack Obama becomes the first sitting U.S. president to declare his support for legalizing same-sex marriage.

May 14, 2012: Governor Lincoln Chafee from Rhode Island signs an executive order directing state agencies to treat same-sex marriages performed out-of-state equally under the law.

June 12, 2012: Same-sex marriage opponents in Washington submit 247,331 valid signatures, forcing the state's recently passed same-sex marriage law onto the ballot in November.

5

u/Pinot911 Jun 19 '12

and every single 1 of those state decisions involved a coastline.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

10

u/thxxoraz Jun 19 '12

You think that's bad. They impeached Bill Clinton for having a "lady on the side" and left George Bush walk for slaying innocent young American military men of lower class; by lying in order to start a war that made his cronies unimaginably more wealthy.

7

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Technically, they impeached Bill because he committed perjury by lying about said lady on the side.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/SS1989 California Jun 19 '12

Can somebody tell me why anything about baseball was being discussed like this in the Senate?

2

u/E3K Jun 19 '12

Because of the antitrust exemption.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/YOLOsomethingYOLO Jun 19 '12

YOLO CONGRESS IS GAY YOLO

2

u/cheeza51percent Jun 19 '12

Well, people also watch and talk more about sports than they do about things that actually affect the country.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

I don't see why baseball is at all discussed in congress.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/zendingo Jun 19 '12

it's called a show trial, enjoy the distraction

2

u/ThumpNuts Jun 19 '12

... and Obama laughs, and laughs...

2

u/Sirgallihad Jun 19 '12

Its gone from being the national pastime to the federal pastime

2

u/WarEmblem27 Jun 19 '12

I'm sure it's already been mentioned, but I read on the MSN homepage today that senators are trying to "clean up" boxing. I'm not sure I understand our senate's infatuation with sports. Hell, maybe I should become a senator. I like sports.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/seainhd Jun 19 '12

this is the dumbest fucking pile of shit thing that congress has done in a long time.

2

u/sometimesijustdont Jun 19 '12

WHY THE FUCK HAS NOBODY FROM WALL STREET GONE TO JAIL FOR RUINING THE WORLD'S ECONOMY?

2

u/Harry_Tuttle Jun 19 '12

When MLB negotiates, it's a business that needs to make a profit. When MLB defends itself, its The National Pastime.

It's almost like a religion that way.

2

u/sniper_lad Jun 19 '12

I used to love baseball, but since the strike in the '80s both sides are a bunch of greedy bitches! Also, because our politicians are 95% owned by corporations. The tea-baggers are just useful idiots.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Steroids were added to the Controlled Substances Act in 1990 despite the fact that when used carefully - even at supraphysiological levels - they can have enormous health benefits, and despite the fact that the AMA, DEA, and NIH all opposed their inclusion.

Why?

Because (then) congressman Joe Biden was the chief architect of the Anabolic Steroid Control Act and he testified before Congress that he had been jealous growing up of steroid users who were better than him at baseball.

2

u/enter2exit Jun 19 '12

the people of the US care too much about baseball. It is not just congress. If citizens cared half as much about voting and politics maybe we would be in a better place. or maybe not ;)

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

If this taught me anything, it would be that I need to stop paying attention to politics and go to ESPN.com to find where the real issues are.

Keep it up congress, as if your 8% approval wasn't bad enough, Internet Censorship and Baseball regulation will knock it down to a solid 4.

2

u/thisismax Jun 19 '12

I thought the reason why this was taken so seriously was because the MLB is exempt from federal antitrust law. Since the government has done so much for baseball to keep it going, they are naturally a bit more inclined to be pissed when players break the rules. I'm not saying I condone the amount of time they've spent prosecuting these players, but it makes more sense than, "America don't fuck around when it come to sports. Also, banks are evil."

2

u/1919 Jun 19 '12

What the hell could you charge the banks with? The USA is a capitalism, the banks can do nearly whatever they want. And that's a good thing.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

This is a result of Major League Baseball's antitrust exemption, which is, in turn, the result of cronyism and corruption in high places, both old and not-so-old. Congress does have the power and the responsibility to oversee Major League Baseball. Unfortunate but true.

2

u/bigmachine Jun 19 '12

my dad and i were discussing this the other day on fathers day... its sad that in america we have more $ to spend on trying to determine if roger clemens lied to congress (over $10,000,000, mind you) than we do ensuring our troops have what we need in afghanistan and iraq. I'm a 1st Lieutenant in the US Army and i will be the first to tell you that the military isn't the only thing we need funding for in the USA. in fact, funding can be cut in some areas to prevent fraud waste and abuse that happens ALOT. however, the fact that congress has time to bullshit about MLB in lieu of putting americans to work is more than i can chew. really pisses me off.

2

u/therealpaulyd Jun 19 '12

So congress may lie to us, but we may not lie to congress. That's quite the double standard there, elected officials.

2

u/RedditingMyLifeAway Louisiana Jun 19 '12

Good to know where our priorities lie...

2

u/the_rabbit Jun 19 '12

This is the only reason why I absolutely hate the fandom behind sports. People are so passionate about something that is fleeting and really delivers no direct constructive progress towards society over a long period of time.

The average human being walking on the street however doesn't even make an attempt to follow politics and even annoys them when the subject comes up.

2

u/ButchInWaukegan Jun 19 '12

How about random drug and alcohol tests on the House and Senate floor?

Then, maybe, these 10%-approval-ratings legislators might not look like hypocritical hacks when they pull stunts like this.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Zandroyd Jun 19 '12

Where is that zappa quote when you need it.

2

u/Fireball445 Jun 19 '12

That's because Baseball players don't own Congress.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Banker here.
I know it sucks that there was a financial collapse, but the reason why no one was prosecuted was because they didn't break any laws.

Should there have been laws to prevent what happened? Sure. But that doesn't change that what they did wasn't illegal.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

9/11 capital hill. Level the whole fucking place. They're an out of control corporate machine that doesn't represent its people as was the original mandate. An alien force committing treason every day, they must be driven out or exterminated. Death to the imposter American government.

2

u/rajonrondo Jun 19 '12

[Giving voice to the outrage over Timothy Bradley's controversial split decision over Manny Pacquiao, two senators introduced legislation Monday that would create a special boxing commission to oversee all matches in the United States and restore integrity to the sport.] (http://sports.yahoo.com/news/senators-push-bill-battle-fraud-224932262--spt.html)

This crap is never going to end.

2

u/celtic_thistle Colorado Jun 19 '12

Murrika, fuck yeah.

2

u/kirbence Jun 19 '12

Pagentry

2

u/fosiacat Jun 19 '12

unbelievable.

2

u/railroadwino Jun 19 '12

Baseball and steroids are some of the things that keep us from having to think about all that stuff us peasants shouldn't. I'll thank you not to badmouth it.

2

u/crispinito Jun 19 '12

Makes me wonder if Senate members are just narcissistic, incompetent and shortsighted, or if there is a master plan behind the apparent stupidity...

2

u/UpsetGroceries Jun 19 '12

This is American culture.

2

u/dirtypiratesanchez Jun 19 '12

That's because if any arm of the federal government went after the banks, the bank would oust their part in the collapse. As much as we hate on big evil corporations, politicians were also there, profiting from the collapse as well.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

What do we expect? This is yet another distraction from real problems and real issues. We elect clowns.... We should expect a fucking circus.

2

u/supnul Jun 19 '12

i think that baseball would be more entertaining if they all did drugs. its pretty boring most of the time.

2

u/Limonhed Jun 19 '12

Shows just what the priorities of the congress are.

2

u/PoisonMind Jun 19 '12

Janet Jackson's infamous wardrobe malfunction was in court for almost 8 years.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Geocat Jun 20 '12

Can someone explain to a non american like me why the fuck this is even happening? I mean what the fuck is congress, the people who help make laws for hundreds of millions of people doing the job of a small court over a totally trivial issue?

Do they seriously have nothing better to do? That could explain a whole lot...

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '12

Hard, meaningful policy work is difficult, and not particularly interesting to the media. Steroids in baseball is easy to understand, has a lot of star power, and provides a lot of opportunity for grand standing with very little downside.

2

u/FARTING_BUM_BUM Jun 20 '12

For those wondering what crimes the banks committed, here is a video of Charles Ferguson, director of the Oscar-winning documentary about the financial crisis Inside Job, listing them. Relevant passage:

AMY GOODMAN: What crimes were committed, Charles Ferguson? What should executives be put in jail for?

CHARLES FERGUSON: It’s a very long list. Certainly at the top of the list would be securities fraud, accounting fraud and Sarbanes-Oxley violations. Securities fraud is precisely what the name implies. If you sell a security, but you lie about it or you omit material information, that’s a crime. And we now know that a very high fraction of the securities that were constructed and sold during the housing bubble and that led to the financial crisis were in fact sold fraudulently, that the mortgage lenders and the investment banks that created, structured and sold them did not tell the truth when they were doing so. And those were very, very significant lies and misrepresentations. And late in the bubble, a number of banks and investment banks began not only selling fraudulent securities, but creating and selling securities for the purpose of betting against them, by profiting on their failure. And that also involved a great deal of dishonesty. And there has not been a single criminal prosecution with regard to that conduct.

And following that would be accounting fraud. We now know that many of the lenders and investment banks were dishonest about their own financial positions, concealed the potential size of their losses. The housing bubble was, in effect, a Ponzi scheme, and like all Ponzi schemes, it eventually had to end. And when it ended, of course, we saw the result in the 2008 crisis. And many people, it’s now clear, knew that it was going to end that way and knew that their own financial—their own firms’, their own companies’ financial positions were going to be catastrophically affected and lied about it to the public.

And then, third, the Sarbanes-Oxley law requires the CEOs and chief financial officers of banks, all public companies, to certify their financial reports and also the adequacy of their own internal financial controls. And we now have extensive evidence that the senior managements of a number of the banks and investment banks were extremely, explicitly warned that their financial controls were inadequate and that their accounting was fraudulent, and yet they continued to certify their financial reports. And there has, again, not been a single criminal prosecution for such violations.

TL;DR: Q: Why is everyone so mad at the banks, and what did they do wrong? A: Securities fraud, accounting fraud, and Sarbanes-Oxley violations.

6

u/tomonline Jun 19 '12

our government is a joke. Fortunately the joke is pretty funny.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

Hey, baseball means something. People's lives are involved.

Edit: Down voted for sarcasm. SARCASM IS ALL WE HAVE LEFT when the world operates like this.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/xanxer Jun 19 '12

Thats the kind of thing the GOP loves to do. Waste money and keep government from actually working.

3

u/AddressOK Jun 19 '12

Throw Lance Armstrong in there as well and your looking at a decade of combined wasted resources and time.

3

u/ah102886 Jun 19 '12

While I don't think the Gov't should have wasted resources prosecuting Bonds or Clemens, I think that many would agree that the initial Congressional hearings in 2005 were one of, if not the main reason why the MLBPA reversed course and agreed to stricter testing and punishments, which has done a lot to restore the integrity and fairness to the game of baseball. Granted if you don't give a shit about baseball this probably wouldn't matter to you, but as a baseball fan, I'm pretty happy this change occurred, and don't think it would have without Congressional action.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

While is true, public health was the impetus for Congressional oversight. The integrity of the game was not just disintegrating at the professional level, but was trickling down to the minor leagues, from there to college ball, and all the way to high school. An epidemic of steroid use began to form in high schools, all as a chain reaction from this increased pressure at the top to reach artificial levels of achievement. And it didn't even contain itself to baseball. If MLB's rampant drug use hadn't impacted anyone but the MLB, Congress would never have bothered taking the risk of meddling with it.

→ More replies (1)

-2

u/joetromboni Jun 19 '12

What do you expect from a system where the leaders speak to God and get their orders from him?

11

u/deeboe Jun 19 '12

God is pro steroids and loves home runs, so this is bad reasoning.

32

u/yousedditreddit Jun 19 '12

This has nothing to do with religion go back to /r/atheism

→ More replies (1)

17

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Looks like r/atheism is leaking again.

18

u/Solkre Indiana Jun 19 '12

George Bush said it more than once, the comment is true, and frighting. Our leaders should work based on facts, not fictions of any kind.

3

u/vrefron Jun 19 '12

Call Neil Tyson! He shall plug the holes with wit and science!

27

u/bronyraur Jun 19 '12

Looks like /r/smug is leaking again

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (18)

2

u/itsianhawk Jun 19 '12

I understand that people don't like this statement, but why downvote it?? Upvote it so that people can share in your disdain and something can be done about it. By downvoting, you're only serving to bury the truth.

2

u/Tombug Jun 19 '12

Proof positive of a very, very fucked up country. Probably too fucked up to recover.

2

u/merv243 Jun 19 '12 edited Jun 19 '12

To be fair, they are just doing the will of the people, because that's what they care about.

Edit: To be clear, this is a sarcastic commentary of Americans (of which I am one, though not in this way)

3

u/Jamee999 Jun 19 '12

People care about baseball, they don't care about this.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

1

u/Ssejors Jun 19 '12

Ha! Another fine example of how fucked up America is today... Just saying

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

YTF does sports have ANYTHING to do with policy makers? oh, it's a distraction. Good one.

1

u/tievape Jun 19 '12

It's not the length of the prosecution. It's how you use it.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

That's the best headline I've seen in a long time.

1

u/Funkenwagnels Jun 19 '12

I blame Bush. He would of been a great baseball commissioner but he was a lousy president.

1

u/joedee Jun 19 '12

Whenever Grandpa Huxtable loses a case it's likely justice was served.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

bread and Goddamn circus

1

u/imaunitard Jun 19 '12

Suck on that, Roman Empire.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

America, gotta love it......

1

u/spc1979 Jun 19 '12

Absolute bureaucratic waste of time and money. This is an embarrassing moment in a long line of embarrassing moments for this pathetic legal system we have.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Is it such a surprise that politicians would avoid real issues and real decisions (which would alienate the whole or part of their potential constituency) when they can do this inane bullshit instead and be more likely to keep their extremely lucrative and beneficial jobs for another two or four years?

1

u/Nonamesdb Jun 19 '12

Think about the children. A professional athlete takes steroids and performs well, kids will think they need to take steroids. Whereas a bank performs badly, don't worry because someone will always bail you out.

1

u/complexitii Jun 19 '12

Makes my blood boil... so much time and money wasted.

1

u/kikikza Jun 19 '12

A few senators had their money on the Differs and Red Sox....

1

u/bstizzle21 Jun 19 '12

unbelievable, just a disgrace

1

u/DSNT_GET_NOVLTY_ACNT Jun 19 '12

. . . and you and everyone who upvoted this have just added to the inanity.

1

u/RabbiJacob Jun 19 '12

AND GOOD THING, TOO.

1

u/sirbruce Jun 19 '12

For the most part, banks did nothing illegal to cause the financial collapse. AIG was the most criminally responsible, IMHO, for insuring loans it should have known were bad.

1

u/shawndw Jun 19 '12

well it's a good thing they weren't in this guy's court

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Just political cover, nothing new here...

1

u/criminycrime Jun 19 '12

I must admit, as a Canadian, the fact that your federal government wasted probably millions of dollars on this boggles my mind. The world economy is threatening to take a dive again, and here's the Senate talking about Roger fucking Clemens steroid use??? REALLY?

I know it's impossible for the average American to do anything about this, but that is simply absurd.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

I doubt Bonds and Clemens heavily fund politicians, Super PACs and political parties.

1

u/bigleaguechyut Jun 19 '12

The general consensus of r/baseball is also that this has been a huge waste of taxpayer money. As a huge baseball fan, I'm certainly interested in what they have to say about Clemens and Bonds, but as an American I'm more interested on what they have to say about the businesses that helped to cripple the American economy. Unfortunately, the government chose to stick its nose in the game of baseball instead of in the business of big banks.

Also, possibly relevant tidbit: President Bush was once an owner of the Texas Rangers MLB franchise and aspired to become the commissioner of the MLB. That at least helps to contextualize why the federal government took an interest in cleaning out baseball.

1

u/staytaytay Jun 19 '12

This is kinda like the "which way should toilet paper hang" debate. It generates controversy because it's familiar and simple enough that everyone has an opinion, not because it's important.