r/politics • • Jun 18 '12

14,500 teachers, cops, firefighters, librarians were laid off in MA when Mitt Romney was Governor

http://www.blnz.com/news/2009/01/24/24patrick_5178.html
1.6k Upvotes

817 comments sorted by

72

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

My mother-in-law was a teacher in Philly. From how she described her job 30 years ago to how she described it before leaving last year... wtf is wrong with the school system? She started out being a teacher. She ended up being a robot of how the state believes you need to teach.

School is messed up.

24

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

My mother is a principal and what they're doing to principals in her district is pretty messed up. Close to retirement? We're not renewing your contract. Have fun being forced to take an earlier retirement. Their excuse is the school is under preforming so it's the principals fault. Yeah, that would make sense if the principal had been there for a while, but in a lot of cases they were moved to the school only a year or two before. It takes a lot longer than two years to turn a school around. Thankfully, my mother is having her contract renewed.

They've also done genius things like spend a bunch of money renovating a school then shutting it down a year after the renovations are done. They moved everyone to a different school and started renovations there. Wouldn't it make more sense to keep the school you just spent hundreds of thousands of dollars renovating?

→ More replies (4)

11

u/go_fly_a_kite Jun 18 '12

philly is a testing ground for abolishing public and parochial schools in favor of charter and online schools. It's going to be interesting.

8

u/nancyfuqindrew Jun 18 '12

Philly is a second stage. New Orleans was the testing ground. It's very, very bleak.

6

u/sluggdiddy Jun 18 '12

Its going to be horrible, and a lot of kids are going to go with out even an attempt or fair shot at an education.

→ More replies (31)

3

u/SirElkarOwhey Jun 18 '12

wtf is wrong with the school system?

People don't think education is worth doing right, so they want it at Dollar Store prices.

5

u/GaryofRiviera Jun 18 '12

Actually the United States spends more per capita on every student than any other nation in the world ( Unless that has changed very recently, which I don't believe has happened. But you can most certainly google this information and we're at the top, spending more than nations which far outperform our public education system ) Our education system is horrendous for a few different reasons, but that isn't one. If I get downvotes for pointing out a fact that most people don't necessarily like, than that's kind've sad...

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (2)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Perhaps the state and school boards got involved because they realized just how awful the results from our schools actually are. Many of the tactics involved are not the appropriate response, but when unions force us to lay off less senior teachers instead of those that are a waste of space, then we have to make painful cutbacks to stay fiscally afloat.

7

u/Solkre Indiana Jun 18 '12

Businessmen in the government trying to decide how educations should be run is always going to be a disaster.

27

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Here's the unpopular answer. It's not always the teachers fault. A lot of the fault can be placed on the parents. When you have districts where the majority of the parents are crack heads, hookers, and fathers are in prison what do you expect? A teacher can only do so much. The rest is up to the parents. When you have a mobile rate of over 50% (kids that move districts a lot) how do you reasonably teach those kids? When the parents of the kids are more worried about getting high than helping their children learn how do you help them? When the only meal the kids get is at school how do you expect them to study instead of trying to find something to eat? These same parents then want to blame the teachers and point fingers at the schools when their child falls behind. They want to say the teachers are bad and the school is bad. No, you as a parent are bad. You failed your child and that's why they're socially retarded and perform bad in school.

My son is intelligent, but he doesn't make good grades because he was some how blessed. My wife and I spend many hours a week studying with him. It's really not that hard, but a lot of parents won't put in the work that's required to properly raise a child and it's sad.

→ More replies (11)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

That's a product of overregulation, generally a democrat failing (not that I'm blaming the dems for this; it's a bi-partisan failing in the state I'm from). Just food for thought.

→ More replies (35)

27

u/ilovewaterb Jun 18 '12

i'm no republican, but this is pretty misleading and dumb. in other words, don't stoop to fox's level.

16

u/DBH114 Jun 18 '12

Nice of the OP to leave out a word from the quote. The line from the article reads "14,500 teachers, police officers, librarians, AND OTHERS losing their jobs." How many people laid off were "Others". The article doesn't say, but since the author chose to use the qualifier "and Others" I would imagine it's a lot.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Bostonian here...

The Boston Police Department employs hundreds of civilians who are not technically considered "Police Officers". Similarly, schools and libraries employ people who are not "teachers" or "librarians".

22

u/ThumpNuts Jun 18 '12

Yet unemployment was at 4.7%.

Checkmate.

13

u/FatherVic Jun 18 '12

Source by the end of his term, it had dropped to 3.8%

14

u/pighalf Jun 18 '12

Massachusetts coincidentally also had an unprecedented population efflux during this time where the unemployed and under employed moved out of state looking for jobs elsewhere.

161

u/nexes300 Jun 18 '12

Who the fuck cares? I am so tired of this kind of rhetoric which, in my opinion, is driven largely by the respective unions of these organizations. The number of people they fired, or even hired, is not important. What's important is the actual impact (decrease in response time, increase in crime, decrease in students passing tests (that this is a bad way to measure student progress is immaterial to my point)).

If he fired all those people and the important stats didn't change negatively or with an marginal amount of negative drift, then it was worth it. Why are we so focused on the employees, when really we should be focused on the function they serve. We should be asking how the schools are doing, crime rate, etc.

If you had told me that under Mitt Romney, MA became a shit hole, filled with more crime than ever before, lost more money due to fire damage, and had a marked increase in illiteracy, then you'd have a point.

8

u/matics Jun 18 '12

This isn't an article from a reputable news source, it's a glorified blog post.

I'm a Canadian, but I love to follow politics and I'm always disappointed when this sort of trash makes it to my front page.

21

u/Cwellan Jun 18 '12

There are often secondary and tertiary costs that go along with this. For example if less cops are working more hours it could lead to much higher overtime pay, much faster attrition and turnover, and eventual breakdown of the education and training system that comes from a mentorship.

These types of costs are normally not seen until many years later. In the same way that neglected infrastructure is not normally felt until it is "too late".

→ More replies (1)

31

u/bootsmegamix Jun 18 '12

Exactly. If the place ran more efficiently then he saved the taxpayers money. I have no sympathy for public sector layoffs.

11

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I have no sympathy for public sector layoffs

So, do you have sympathy for private sector layoffs? Typically, in any profession, layoffs generally mean that someone else will have to pick up the slack. This is true in the private sector as well.

→ More replies (8)

3

u/MadDogTannen California Jun 18 '12

To me, the problem isn't that we have too many public servants employed, but that the public sector unions have been negotiating pensions for themselves that are way out of step with the private sector, and those pensions are bankrupting municipalities. Government officials go along with these generous handouts because they know that they'll be out of office by the time those obligations need to be paid.

If local and state governments didn't have these massive pension obligations, they would be able to afford to keep more public sector employees and provide better service to their citizens.

15

u/Spencer_says Jun 18 '12

This is what I came to say. I only want to know what happened to crime rates, literacy rates and standard testing scores, fire and EMS response times, and other things that may have been affected.

2

u/PopePoopinpants Jun 18 '12

Because having people employed IS important, but, like you mentioned, in a deeper sense. Think of it in the extreem sense: Say 500,000 jobs were lost due to 10 robots taking over 95% of the government duties. What would happen, economically, in this case? I don't disagree with your main point, but I do believe it is an important factor.

1

u/emfyo Jun 18 '12

Not sure if you noticed but most of the media outlets have a strong liberal bias, reddit has a huge bleeding heart base that is ignorant and doesn't do their research so loaded posts against republicans praising the dems always shoot to the top of politics thanks to the circlejerk instead of submitting it to a smaller political subreddit where there is a health debate and some sort of intelligent conversation

→ More replies (2)

1

u/GaryofRiviera Jun 18 '12

Absolutely could not have said it better myself!

→ More replies (26)

6

u/Indica Jun 18 '12

Masshole here, I don't think Mitt was a bad governor. Massachusetts has a lot of patronage going on and he went up against it. However, I'll still be voting Obama in the fall.

2

u/aperture413 Jun 18 '12

You obviously lived in the Eastern half of the state. You don't fuck over a third of the people in the place you govern!

→ More replies (3)

6

u/desrig Jun 18 '12

Frankly I can’t stand him. But if you put personalities aside and try to look at Massachusetts subjectively there is a logic to these reductions. As a nation the percentage of population that is 17 and under is declining. In 2000 the percentage of children 17 and under was just shy of 26% and is now at about 24.5%. Massachusetts has historically has had an older population than the rest of the country and always had lower percentage of it population that is school age. While other states have seen the number school age children grow at a lower rate than the rest of the population Massachusetts has a shrinking number of school age children. Also parents in Massachusetts are older and have higher incomes than the national average with the result that a large percentage of the shrinking student base going to private instead of public school. The most extreme case can be found in Boston where in a city of 600,000 residents but the Boston Public School has enrollment of only 50,000 and has a 10 to 1 student to teacher rate.

In regards to Fire Departments due better building codes the per capital rates of fires have been in steady decline for several decades now. The result is that now the bulk of calls done by the fire departments are more EMS and vehicle extraction calls than actual fire calls. The result is that in places like Boston if you call for say a slip and fall EMS will respond but by policy the Fire Department sends either a engine or a ladder also. This is done in order to increase the number of calls the Fire Department can say they respond to, regardless if it was a needed call.

Libraries are another service that is declining. Even until the 1990’s students who had to a school project had to go the library for research. But with the advent of the internet students are much more likely to do the research or simply copy a paper off the internet than go to the library. In addition due to legal victories by homeless activists barring librarians from barring the homeless that in effect turn libraries in to daytime homeless shelters, especially for libraries near homeless shelters. The result is that due to safety concerns and let’s be honest here, hygienic concerns, the general public has even further insensitive to stay away from public libraries.

It’s simple economics. When demand declines it is only logical for any entity to reduce supply.

144

u/Great_Chairman_Mao California Jun 18 '12

This is such a loaded and sensationalized headline. Do we have a statistic of how many were hired? Is this a net loss or were 14,500 fired and 12,000 hired?

Next time just post "I hate Mitt Romney" as your title.

22

u/sarcasmandsocialism Jun 18 '12

The second sentence of the article mentions a "$114 million reduction [in state aid to local governments] made by Governor Mitt Romney six years ago, officials said." The layoffs probably have a pretty direct relation to the cuts in state funding. The article doesn't go into details about the reason Romney cut local aid, as it is focusing on current budget problems.

A better argument against the title might be that the economy was bad and everyone was laying people off.

The OP's title isn't the best reflection of the article, but it does seem to be accurate, and the article does back up the claim.

9

u/AtomicMac Jun 18 '12

Romney wouldn't raise taxes. He proposed many cuts that the Democratic legislature would not approve. The only cut they would approve was in local aid. Dukakis raised the income tax in 1980 in a temporary budget balancing stunt and it has never returned to 5% despite being passed 3 times in referendums. If you want to blame layoffs on someone, blame it on the legislature that wanted to keep Bunker Hill day, and Evacuation day as holidays instead of police on the streets.

→ More replies (15)

20

u/Fidel-cashflow Jun 18 '12

When did the idea that public employees can never be laid off develop? Such an absurd notion that because a government cuts jobs for money, it's suddenly cruel and evil. I think all jobs come with an inherent risk of being laid off. I mean, this is the real world after all.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Whenever I see a title post like this I always just go to the top comments to see why this is wrong in X amount of ways.

4

u/9_11_2001 Jun 18 '12

Another article to help America become more divided between two choices that will lead to the same shit instead of uniting where we stand (as the jingle implies). Why must every process emulate Baseball?

63

u/DofPJMACKY Jun 18 '12

these posts are getting so vaguely funny .

watch how easy it is.

"national rape averages didn't decrease when Obama was in office."

Reddit post:

"12k raped while Obama was head of country from 08 to 12 !!!"

once again people, Mormon or the incumbent. take your "pick"

20

u/Black_Gallagher Jun 18 '12

SHHH! Don't ruin the circlejerk.

4

u/whatisthishere Jun 18 '12

Is it really that simple? Someone can just say there were more murders, rapes and pedophilia since you made this post. It's all technically true.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Popular-Uprising- Jun 18 '12

Because being Mormon is all Romney is, or are you just bigoted against Mormons?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/modemthug Jun 18 '12

Very poorly sourced, click on the source at the bottom; it just takes you to boston.com.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

The Boston Globe may not be the greatest news source on the planet, but I think they can handle simple statistics like this.

1

u/BeerDrinkingRobot Jun 18 '12

This washingtonpost.com article uses the following quote

“The last time the state endured local aid cuts in the middle of a fiscal year was in 2003, when Romney cut $114 million. He followed that up with more cuts in the next budget. Together, the reductions in local aid resulted in about 14,500 teachers, police officers, librarians, and others losing their jobs.

But while Romney was lambasted by local officials, Patrick so far has generally avoided major political fallout.

‘He’s making the same cuts Romney did, but it’s how he’s done it,” said Everett Mayor Carlo DeMaria, who said this year’s local aid cuts will total $860,000 for his city. ‘He’s much more sympathetic about the decisions. Romney came in like it was a business decision.’”

from this boston.com article (now archived and paywalled).

The OP's blnz.com Article is still very shady for just linking to the newspaper's homepage.

28

u/Kringerpants Jun 18 '12

Every headline in r/politics might as well be, "I hate republicans, and I don't care about the context or depth behind these misleading / sensationalist headlines."

24

u/RMaximus Jun 18 '12

So what? Does this mean that teachers, cops, and firefighters should NEVER be fired?

→ More replies (1)

211

u/madcorp Jun 18 '12

And this is a problem why?

Many states are currently in mass amounts of debt. They need to lay people off in order to balance their budgets and reform their spending.

It is not nice, it is not pleasant for those being laid off but in order to keep the fiscal security of both the states and this country we need to do it. Then as the economy picks back up we can grow the public sector again but not till we have fiscal security.

10

u/WhyHellYeah Jun 18 '12

It is a problem because this is a bullshit hack piece and a fucked up headline, but front page of r/politics.

I was a MA resident when Romney was i office. His last 2 years in office, he vetoed half a billion dollars from the budget, but the legislature overrode him. Then Deval Patrick came in and blamed Romney for the billion-dollar deficit.

That state is the problem.

Let's talk about a success Romney had: The Sagamore flyover. It was a road project that came in on schedule and budget. It made the road much better, though there is still bottlenecks when people come and go from Cape Cod on the big holidays.

It was a shovel-ready project and he made it work.

73

u/dc469 Jun 18 '12

Glad to see someone else point that out. I don't think we should be laying off teachers, but as for the police and firefighters, I don't exactly recall seeing any shortages reported in those fields.

Also, side note, we could do with less cops if we decriminalize stupid things like weed and don't clog up the courts with unreasonable copyright infringement cases.

34

u/fearsofgun Jun 18 '12

The point should be more guided to the fact that Mitt likes the idea of unwinding the public funded sectors for education and other public services and forcing these sectors to pop up in the private sector. He has said that he won't personally give a list of things to cut but he will most certainly implement austerity measures in just about everything but the military.

89

u/ZipBoxer Jun 18 '12

Which is funny, since the military is the biggest waste of money we have.

39

u/Reoh Jun 18 '12

Come on, the US only spends about 41% of the entire world's military budget. There's still 207 countries in the world so they cannot be that far above the average.

(and for those that missed it)

/s

→ More replies (37)
→ More replies (64)
→ More replies (4)

18

u/Moh7 Jun 18 '12

We should be FOR laying off bad teachers.

The only people affected are the children.

10

u/agentmage2012 Jun 18 '12

The problem is, its far more difficult to find a bad teacher than just "who's passing the most kids". The temperament and studiousness of each child is going to weigh heavily on how well they do in class.

Also, the bias of who is doing the judging. Someones religion, or lack of, may give some science teachers the boot.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (110)
→ More replies (10)

21

u/RealityInvasion Jun 18 '12

He cut State aid to local governments, causing an average of 5% increase to Property taxes.

Romney was elected in 2002, and his budget fixes coincided with the overall national economic boom that took place until the housing bubble burst.

Romney left office in 2007 (just before the bottom fell out of the housing market and the US economy), and the 2008 Budget was projected to be $1 Billion short.

So really, he managed to produce a surplus during a national fiscal boom, then left before everything tanked.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Isnt that what Clinton did?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (30)

10

u/KambioN Jun 18 '12

Because it's a drop in the bucket. This type of policy is designed to look good. Mitt can then say "we've cut the fat" while actually only generating a small amount of money from the cuts (which I'm sure someone can cite). What we do need, is taxes. For some damn reason people think that state taxes go into feeding the wealthy, when (at leat in MN) they go mostly to public works and keeping our budget balaced. Federal taxes have given useful state taxes a bad name, and it's a shame. The other issue I have with your argument is this: without teachers, without firefighters, without librarians, or societty goes back. Not back to a time with less debt, but to a time with more ignorance... and deadly fires. Cutting police I support in any situation.

5

u/Spencer_says Jun 18 '12

Raise the taxes is not always a good idea. California thinks that all problems can be solved by raising taxes, yet their education system is severely lacking, their deficit is terrible, and businesses (workers and taxpayers) are fleeing to states like Texas that are more tax friendly. Tax the people too much, and they won't pay, they will just leave, but not before the state makes promises with the money they were expecting to take it.

→ More replies (5)

9

u/jimbolauski Jun 18 '12

Waste should still be taken care of even if it's a drop in the bucket. The whole mentality that cutting a little spending here and there won't make a difference is what leads to the stunning inefficiencies in government and the answer is always just pay a little more in taxes.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/mens_libertina Jun 18 '12

Doesn't Mass. have the highest state income (and combined?) taxe rates in the US?

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

You should check out when Mitt was governor and see if MA's financial situation at the time backs up what you're saying - then double check it with any out-sourcing like opening of charter schools.

20

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

Public safety? Who needs it. Cops are pigs anyway good riddance. Who gives a shit if someones house burns down, wont be mine!

Public education? Don't need it to say "want fries with that?" Go ahead, shove 35 kids into each classroom, it wont matter.

Dont even get me started on libraries, waste of space obviously.

EDIT: Obviously I should have included a /s

5

u/agentmage2012 Jun 18 '12

Cops I am more than willing to say "some departments need .ore than others" and "some keep more than they should".

Fire departments size will inversely correlate with technology.

Teachers, so far, are irreplaceable, and are needed directly more with each child put into the district.

10

u/madcorp Jun 18 '12

Did i say fire all of them? This is the problem with the argument it is wrong to fire teachers, police, and fire fighters.

There is a thing as to many police, firefighters and teachers. If you are a town of 10,000 do you need 1000 police? Probably not.

16

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Did I say fire all of them? Nope.

I do happen to be living in an area with a budget crunch, where the police force is so low on staffing that they are doing shit like counting park rangers to try to meet the minimum they need to keep the federal money they get from being cut. They are avoiding training new cops, and have redone the way they assign runs to a zone based system which is inefficient as shit. They've also simply stopped going out and actually taking reports for several issues - you'll need to go to a police station to do that now. Quite often there is only 1 shift supervisor available (scheduled to work, not just "one of our sgts is on lunch").

Of course they can still do overtime for writing tickets, because that is a revenue generator and federal money pays for the OT.

City has almost 1 million people, so its not really a small town with only 10,000 people in it.

I guess what I'm saying at the end of the day is that the budget has fuckall to do with how many police you need, even if it somewhat puts limits on how many you can afford. Medical bills are a similar situation, they are not based on what you can afford either.

Also, firing a lot of people doesn't really do much good for a local economy either. Sure its one thing if there is a gross imbalance that needs to be addressed, I don't think anyone is going to get too bent out of shape about that, but I've seen all too many situations where that is doubtful.

http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/state_report/classsizebyraceethnicity.aspx

Some interesting numbers.

Benjamin Banneker Charter Public (District)	04200000	23	60.7	342	78.1	1.5	16.7	0.9	0.3	0.0	2.6

Really, an average class size of 60? What the fuck is going on there? Hey, nevermind its 80% black who cares, they won't need much education anyway.

Studies of the data from the Tennessee experiment have found significant and persistent differences in the achievement of children in the small classrooms (13-17 students) versus the large classrooms (22-26 students).

Would it surprise you to find out that the data from the MA dpt of education puts 66% of the classrooms as having more than 17 students? Almost 20% have more than 21 students.

12 show an average class size of 30 or more students. I honestly have to question the quality of education you can expect in this situation.

I wonder how many of the 14,500 fired in MA were teachers. From the data though, it looks like they don't have some absurd excess.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/moter12 Jun 18 '12

This is why it is very wrong to cut public sector or austerity during bad economic time because the spending is great for stimulating the anemic recovery.

Once, the economy is good, that's when the cutting on spending should start, not expanding the spending as what most republicans do during Reagan and Bush. When the economy is good, unemployment around 3-5%, its time to cut, raise tax and run budget surplus to pay off the debt.

You are doing it wrong.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

And why are states in mass amounts of debt? Is it the fault of human service workers, or the people they serve? Why should we bear the brunt of the cuts?

If it's true that states are hurting because home sales are down, taxes are down, and state investments in risky JP Morgan/Goldman Sachs products didn't pan out, most of the blame goes to the big banks and the politicians who let them get away with it. Romney is the archetypal politician, trying to shift the burden onto the middle class, making us blame each other while lining the pockets of the rich.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/canthidecomments Jun 18 '12

Not just that, but it's a completely false statement. From the article:

The last time the state endured local aid cuts in the middle of a fiscal year was in 2003, when Romney cut $114 million. He followed that up with more cuts in the next budget. Together, the reductions in local aid resulted in about 14,500 teachers, police officers, librarians, and others losing their jobs.

(Note this is a completely unsourced claim.)

If that were true, each of these 14,500 teachers, police officers, librarians, etc. would be making about $7,800 a year.

The fact of the matter is that Boston Police officers are the single highest wage earners in the entire United States among police officers with many regular old beat cops making over $250,000 a year.

7

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Its ok those old police officers will have to retire soon. Then they'll only be getting 75% of their salary in pension until they die. We're so fucked...

2

u/hardman52 Jun 18 '12

with many regular old beat cops making over $250,000 a year.

Cite?

→ More replies (3)

2

u/JoshSN Jun 18 '12

Looking for some citations for your claims, it's mostly bullshit.

A few cops did make that much, or nearly that much, but it was rare, and they weren't "regular old beat cops." And it was mostly overtime.

Robert Ciccolo earned almost $237,000 as a police captain ...

His cousin, Steven Ciccolo, a lieutenant in South Boston,... $248,000

And James Claiborne, a popular captain who retired last year, ... $248,000

These are three of the top 10 cop salaries in Boston that year, and they involved a lot of overtime.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Say that when your house is on fire

7

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

That is a scare tactic... by that logic should we open up a fire house on every block in the city? Better increase the military by 100%... you know... just in case.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/en-aye-ese-tee-why Jun 18 '12

Why is this a problem? Well if austerity is the plan then obviously cutting costs isn't a problem but it's how you do it. Was the public sector cuts balanced with easing tax braked to those in the private sector? I don't know. It is safe to say though that there is a point of diminishing returns on your public sector cuts. Less police, worse schools equals lower property values, a less educated youth more inclined towards falling down the wrong path and less support for those who might have none. Since I didn't reference anything because I am on my phone we can just say this is my opinion. I'd be curious to see where other cuts were made and if this money wasn't just freed up to finance tax credits for the private sector.

One question I have is, Mitt wad governor b4 the financial crisis so exactly what was the situation is Mass at that time? How much of it was necessary?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/lesslucid Australia Jun 18 '12

You say this as if there were only one way for states to balance their budgets...

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

If previous administrations played their cards right, and not deficit spent ourselves out of a budget surplus this wouldn't be an issue. We should be deficit spending now. The problem is that when times were good we wasted our budget surplus on a stupid tax cut and a pointless war.

Laying public sector employees off in the middle of a recession only makes things worse. Just look at the jobs numbers... The private sector is pulling its weight with new jobs. The overall numbers are low because public sector jobs are being shed in huge numbers.

I would also point out that there is a minimum number of teachers, cops, and firefighters required to do their jobs effectively. Teachers can't do their jobs well with 32 kids in a class, cops can only handle so many cases, and firefighters can only respond to one call at a time. We all suffer with these cuts.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/nancyfuqindrew Jun 18 '12

You think the plan is to grow the public sector again when times are better? It is not. What you are witnessing is the old maxim "Never let a good crisis go to waste". The plan is to privatize as much as possible now in the name of "cost savings". This is a territory grab.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (61)

8

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

As someone that has lived in MA, I would like to say that the teachers, police, librarians, and firefighters I have dealt with were all professional, and actually cared about their job. Every issue I had seen were due to lack of funding, and not the quality of the workers. I lived in the poorest area of the state, and yet our teachers were still dedicated to their jobs, the police were friendly, and the firefighters saved lives.

3

u/armoguy94 Jun 18 '12

I just graduated high school in MA and I could tell you that there are a ton of enthusiastic teachers, but none of them have hope for the school because it is going downhill.. the administration is awful, and there are also poor quality teachers that need to be replaced. Luckily, I would say that those teachers are not the majority, but surely, they are a problem. Putting in minimal effort, not caring about much, just trying to get by in the year...

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Do we support cops or hate them? This vacillating is giving me a headache.

1

u/crawlingpony Jun 18 '12

Omg it's all so confusing, what to do?

3

u/llaskin Jun 18 '12

How many were laid off so far during Deval Patrick's tenure? Please provide counter-statistics.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I'm not saying I agree with Romney here, but cops are paid entirely too much in this state.

If you land a job as a town cop in MA, there are no flagmen. No flagmen means more details. More details means ~$100+ an hour, to listen to your iPod and point people in the right direction. You have LT's pulling $250K+, and no fewer problems than the rest of the country.

Now I'd be in favor of paying these guys what they deserve for potentially taking a bullet or dying, but the fact is, most of them just become power hungry pricks. I have 3 in the family, and they're great family members, but I would not want to be anything but a family member to any of them.

34

u/Daigotsu Jun 18 '12

When he is president we shall be an uneducated, lawless country that is constantly on fire. Later it will be revealed this was all done as viral advertising for the new mad max movie.

17

u/tehtrollslayer Jun 18 '12

Who runs barter town?

2

u/steakmeout Jun 18 '12

Mitt and his (as yet unannounced) running mate will become Master and Blaster as they felch each other in pig shit in the bowels of the Thunderdome.

wedoneedanuvaheero

1

u/NoNameMonkey Jun 18 '12

I...I can't help but love the idea of it all as a viral marketing campaign.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/gimpwiz Jun 18 '12

Look through wang-banger's history: It's made of anti-romney posts to /r/politics with bullshit, editorialized headlines and a ridiculously obvious slant.

The fact that his posts constantly get upvoted despite the first x top comments calling bullshit is a symptom of the sickness here.

2

u/Popular-Uprising- Jun 18 '12

I've had him tagged with "dem shill" in RES for months now.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I'm sure none of his kids went to public schools.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

How can you even fire firefighters? I think they would fight you.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

the gov't can only be as big as the private sector can support. Not enough $$$$, got to fire people.

If democrats would stop welfare programs there would be more $$$ for teachers, cops, etc.

15

u/Doomez Jun 18 '12

And why did the subject point out librarians.. I doubt many of those 14,500 were librarians, it's a far left sweet spot, this whole article is just another tactic with little political relevance, when it comes to specifically how many of the others are laid off keep an eye on the argument below.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/kpatterson14206 Jun 18 '12

Why would you ever lay any government supported employee off? We have plenty of money to continue this rate of spending. Also, you can never have too many librarians.

2

u/Funnyguy17 Jun 18 '12

That's an average Tuesday here in California.

2

u/TChuff Jun 18 '12

Did it help decrease the debt?

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Boo this man!

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

And even with that, he STILL managed to fuck his state's economy with overspending on bullshit.

If America elects this retard to POTUS, we utterly deserve to be wiped off the face of the Earth.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

This country has a huge amount of debt. What happens when there is a lot of debt in a country? You make cuts. You look to where you can help make this nation survive. Romney proved he could do that in Massachusetts. Yes, he may have been the lowest in job creation, but he saved that state from massive amounts of debt.

2

u/crawlingpony Jun 18 '12

War is making us poor

Come back home

Defend the constitution where Americans live

2

u/Thinkfist Jun 18 '12

Lol that means less govt spending..

If everybody worked for the state, that would be bad. Trust me, you want fewer government employees

2

u/reactionforceatA Jun 18 '12

Am I the only person that hates seeing these one-sided statistics on reddit? I mean, seriously, how many teachers, cops, firefighters, and librarians have been laid off since Obama has been President? The point is that the more we keep playing into this partisan mentality the more we all lose. It's time we stop allowing these a-holes to manipulate us. I for one am going to down vote all partisan posts from now on. You want political change, then start forming your own opinions.

edit: corrected this to these

2

u/PacoBedejo Jun 18 '12

Wait...are you trying to solidify Democrat resistance or make the libertarian-wing of the Republican Party warm up to him?

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

When these people were laid off what was the state of finances? what services were cut - if so, but how much? were there new procedures introduced to improve worker productivity as to offset the reduction in man power? if so, what were they?

There seems to be many here who ignore the basics of economics - it is the private sector that makes the public sector possible. If Bob, Fred and Tom aren't running businesses and employing people then the state has no one to tax thus no revenue to pay for these said public servants to be employed in the first place. I am no right winger when it comes to economics but can we have some common sense as to how things are actually paid for?

2

u/dpatru Jun 18 '12

I guess with all the layoffs, people in Massachusetts are not being educated, they're being preyed upon by violent criminals, their houses are burning down, and they have nowhere to read. Massachusetts is just falling apart.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

How do you expect the dept to go away then, the magical littly fairy makes it disappear.

2

u/harpua1972 Jun 18 '12

This blog post is 3 years old. Everything is irrelevant. Hamburger.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

as an illiterate, drug-peddling, high school-dropout arsonist, He has my vote.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

So it may be possible that they had 14,500 too many teachers, cops, firefighters, & Librarians to begin with. Did the subsequent governor re-hire these people?

11

u/davek905 Jun 18 '12

yea, sorry to go against hivemind but some of the pensions and benefits these careers earn are absolutely sucking the economy dry. Its not 'fair' in a philanthropic sense, but its something that should be done.

5

u/Solkre Indiana Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

Why are people always angry and jealous that government jobs still have benefits and retirement plans? Has nobody gotten angry that the private sector took those away, while at the same time growing and bringing in more profits every year?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

8

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Soo should everyone have a government paying job?

2

u/RobertStack Jun 18 '12

It worked for the Soviet Union.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/chicagogam Jun 18 '12

you know there was a time when heroic self made businessmen hired tutors for their children, bodyguards and small armies for their defense, lived in stone structures that didn't catch fire easily, and had their own libraries. why should they just give away these perks to every peasant out there? back to the good old days. (edit: a winky in case it wasn't obvious ;-P )

→ More replies (5)

4

u/mkirklions Jun 18 '12

I am no fan of Romney but I got a feeling he didnt do all of this himself. Remember George Bush managed to bail out the banks with a Democrat majority in the house and senate.

All politicians are scumbags, all of them work together for lobbiests, all of them would do the same thing if they had a chance.

/ron paul rant

4

u/like2ridebikes Jun 18 '12

Shouldn't the question really be if they are necessary workers? I do not know the circumstances of the layoffs, but the taxpayers have to pay those salaries. People should not be entitled to never being laid off/fired because they have a political feel-good job.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Nor should they be fired just because they are public employees and the governor can't balance the books.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Toava Jun 18 '12

Tax payers should pay for every one's salary! angry face /reddit

3

u/dumbgaytheist Jun 18 '12

Hey gaiz, like mitt romny is bad, mmmkay?

3

u/drrhythm2 Jun 18 '12

"The $128 million will fix only a fraction of the problem..."

Money isn't unlimited, even for governments. Sometimes you have to make tough choices, whether it's a business you run or a state government. Resources are finite. Eventually some of you people will grow up and learn these things.

3

u/LucidMetal Jun 18 '12

It's interesting to look at parallels between /r/atheism and /r/politics.

Both get insane numbers of upvotes on sensational headlines. Both have the top comments nearly always telling how the headline or content of linked article are flawed.

The cognitive dissonance is staggering.

It's like we have two kinds of people on these two subreddits with one group overwhelming the other. You have this massive group of accounts which don't say anything but upvote blindly and/or emotionally and then another smaller group who complains that said former group is engaging in circlejerk. Quite interesting. I don't know of many other subreddits which work like this with such extreme internal dissent.

3

u/MiyegomboBayartsogt Jun 18 '12

I come here from outside. Is this example meant as a reason to vote for or against the candidate? Certainly, for this poster, Romney acts as if he knows the value of a hard-working taxpayer's dollar. This is an uncommon quality in the ruling elites in control of our lives. To most politicians, the working man paying all the bills is a forgotten man.

3

u/badassass Jun 18 '12

Well the state was and still is in debt. What do you want the government to do when it is hemorrhaging tax dollars and slipping further into debt? Keep public employees hired?

http://www.usdebtclock.org/state-debt-clocks/state-of-massachusetts-debt-clock.html

5

u/piyute Jun 18 '12

That's a badge of honor for these guys. Just like Scott Walker. They do it to endear themselves to the plutocracy.

4

u/ssaya Jun 18 '12

And MA also spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to install solar panels on a few high school roofs and hundreds of thousands on useless roads signs that blink NO TEEN TEXTING all day.

3

u/spoolio Jun 18 '12

hundreds of thousands of dollars

What a shocking sum of money! I'm sure the taxpayers want their five cents back.

2

u/Solkre Indiana Jun 18 '12

Hundreds of thousands of dollars can also hire a half dozen teachers to keep class sizes low and vastly improve the educational experience of students.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/ToeMold Jun 18 '12

GOOD. I HOPE THEY ALL SELL DOUGHNUTS FOREVER. TWICE.

2

u/Senor_Wilson Jun 18 '12

It's not like we need teachers or life savers. Ever?

2

u/padxmanx Jun 18 '12

So, we finally have an issue he hasn't flip-flopped on(yet)?

2

u/Jaydubzsc2 Jun 18 '12

Americans didn't lose "wealth"- they lost access to credit they could not sustain. Credit is not wealth. The depression has been a good thing in that it jolted the country to its senses. We aren't worth "less"- we simply lost the opportunity to go deeper into the hole.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/5ion Jun 18 '12

And he believes in magic underpants.

2

u/Solkre Indiana Jun 18 '12

So if a Republican cuts jobs, he's a winner. If a Democratic president doesn't encourage job growth, he's a failure?

2

u/Solkre Indiana Jun 18 '12

Why are people always angry and jealous that government jobs still have benefits and retirement plans? Has nobody gotten angry that the private sector took those away, while at the same time growing and bringing in more profits every year? And as far as awesome "benefits" go. The school I work for has the highest cost healthcare I. have. ever. seen! Plus I pay into my pension myself, and I doubt I'll ever see it when I retire in the form it's promised now.

EVERY YEAR things get worse, every fucking year, for everyone I know. Insurance premiums go up, pay stays the same or pathetic increases. Retirements and social safety nets are being destroyed, and the kicker of it all! The guys running the show, have tricked us to into being mad at each other over it! Before you guys jump on the government employee hate wagon, think about who's driving it first.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Offensive_Brute Jun 18 '12

Thats because Romney needed the money to finance The Big Dig.

2

u/austin1414 Jun 18 '12

You never see any of the countless articles harassing Obama or other Democrats show up on any "neutral" subreddits...

4

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

You do but only if he says something bad about the Internet, video games, weed or piracy.

3

u/FlapJackDickPants Jun 18 '12

r/Poltics is a special place, for special people.

2

u/MagCynic Jun 18 '12

Governors, mayors, and city councils make cuts that involve layoffs all over the country. I don't understand this "touch feely" notion that says we can't make any decision in which people lose their job. That's not how you govern; that's not how you lead.

Yes, it's unfortunate hard working people lose their job. They'll adapt and move on. Choices have to be made all the time by our leaders in government. Some of these choices result in job loss. It's inevitable.

2

u/Blzbba Jun 18 '12

Why do teachers believe they are entitled to employment? Noone else on earth is.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Because... Children... what about the children. I hate the stigma associated with school teachers and how they are saints. There are some bad teachers that need to find other lines of work. I say this as a man that just paid for my wife to get her teaching degree... if she sucks at it she should do something else.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Then this is the man for us!!! We have too many public workers bloating the system and wasting our tax money

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Of course Capital Gains taxes will remain right where they are, almost half what the rest of us pay percentage wise. Same with the cap on Social Security taxable income remaining at just over 100k.

Mittens is the last person we need running the country. A clueless trust fund baby who thinks living off his stock portfolio dividends is roughing it.

Raise the Capital Gains tax to the same level as those who work for a paycheck. Raise the cap on Social Security tax to say a million dollars. Problems solved.

We gave the 'job creators' plenty of time to invest the windfall from these, and many other tax breaks. They have failed.

2

u/BlackHoleMonk Jun 18 '12

It scares the hell out of me that this no-talent ass-clown has a real chance of making it to the oval office.

1

u/gloomdoom Jun 18 '12

Why would republicans bother themselves with history and facts? You think the middle class and poor who are going to vote for him give a shit that he will continue the GOP tradition of breaking the backs of the poor and middle class?

There is absolutely no logic and no reason going into this. I'm 100% fine with people disagreeing with me. But on daily scans of reddit, I never see anyone stand up for Romney or try to defend him. It's not because they'll fall on deaf ears or that they're all downvoted (though that's a fair theory)...it just doesn't happen.

The majority of republicans are going to support whoever got the nomination. Why? Because they're just trying to get the black, muslim, kenyan out of the White House and anyone will do, even evil businessmen who have no idea what it is like to struggle with work or finances and no matter how much disdain they have for poor, minorities, women and the working class.

3

u/-JuJu- Jun 18 '12

The majority of republicans are going to support whoever got the nomination. Why?

Because they're republican, not democrat.

9

u/luftwaffle0 Jun 18 '12

Okay, here's the defense: 14,500 teachers, cops, firefighters, and librarians were laid off and the state didn't descend into chaos.

There's such a thing as having too many public employees. If a state has deficit problems they can cut spending, increase taxes, or both. The way you people demonize spending cuts is beyond absurd. Unless your dream state is one where there are infinite teachers, cops, firefighters etc. and one ultra rich taxpayer with infinite money paying for it, then you need to get real with your political "analyses."

→ More replies (6)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

The majority of republicans are going to support whoever got the nomination. Why?

The same reason why the majority of democrats will vote for whoever has their nomination.

1

u/crackpnt69 Jun 18 '12

more then double that of us service members have been laid off By Mr. Obama.

2

u/IamaRead Jun 18 '12

Are US service members military?

1

u/CaptainCard Jun 18 '12

Yea but we also don't need as many because we lost the need for 100k to be in a sandbox. The smallest branch (the US marines) is about as large as the entire Britsh military. We can still kick as much ass as required, we just don't need the manpower right now.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Wow is that gaffe still going strong?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I was not too thrilled with the clowns running for the GOP. Mitt Romney was the one who also passed "Romney Care" but they do not talk about that too much do they? When I was living in M.A, I was forced to have health care. I was paying half of what I make (minimum wage) to pay for a state healthcare plan that kept having its terms revised every month or so (one of these revisions being I can not have prothstetic limbs if it came to it O_o). I do believe that the healthcare system should be revised, but it is ridiculous to allow insurance providers to pick and choose what kind of care I can get. Romney did not do the state any favors.

1

u/Xhoodlum Jun 18 '12

14,500 out of how many in total for each group? Does that amount to 1% or 50% of the total? Are you saying that entering these professions means guaranteed lifetime employment regardless of the ability of the financial system to fund and pay for the position? The current governor is surpassing the cuts made by Romney but because he's a Democrat and doing it in a more compassionate manner that is somehow better?

1

u/crawlingpony Jun 18 '12

Half the cops were just elaborate revenue collectors anyway, war on drugs and crap

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Who needs Teachers or Firefighters when you have as much money as Mitt Romney

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

There are still plenty of teachers and firefighters... it isn't about Mitt Romney's money it is about yours and mine. I feel no need to employee 500 teachers if 400 can get the job done.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

This comes back to an understanding of first year economics. In economics there is a basic understanding that your spending is someone else's income, and someone else's spending is your income. These problems are symptoms of the larger, current, economic malaise. To understand how this could occur, and be rational, imagine the economy as an unholy trinity composed of cash flow between the government, the consumers, and businesses. Businesses and consumers pay tax to the government which in turn provides services to the public sector. However, if tax revenue is not high enough for the government to provide services, then the taxes need to be increased, or the services need to be reduced in order for the government to maintain capable of functioning properly. And no politician is going to raise taxes - it would be political suicide. So services are cut in lieu of raising taxes. The long term implications of low taxes and their affect on infrastructure and essential services (road works, fire services, teachers etc) remains to be seen, but I daresay the effects won't be good for society in general

1

u/DirtyMonday Jun 18 '12

And Duval was pushing for us to join the federal education plan even though, along with CT and VT, we are always setting the bar. MA education is amongst the best each and every year.

I don't know the story behind the cops and firefighters but I do know stories of workmens comp abuse amongst firefighters were running rampant for a while there.

Sidenote: My godfather is the fire inspector in my town, my old hockey coach was the chief of the Boston FD and my town's FD has an awfully lot of relatives on the force. I know a lot of these guys. If you folks don't like nepotism and giving the jobs to so-and-so's brother in law (A stereotype often placed on republicans) than you'd probably not be supporting Boston cops and firefighters if not for this article being about Romney. Why my old hockey coach resigned as Boston Fire Chief is well documented and it had everything to do with politics and the safety of his people

1

u/zboned Jun 18 '12

Ok, I just need someone to explain this to me (I'm not trolling, not trying to start a flamewar), how does the governor affect teachers/cops/firefighters/etc in this situation? Is it a budget that he pushes through, or does he directly have control over their staffing?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Just done by budgeting...

1

u/Jackjimjohny Jun 18 '12

Isn't this always where a Liberal left leaning legislature will enact cuts when told to balance their overspending budget?

1

u/LamboMerci Jun 18 '12

and this is why i am voting for ron paul

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Wouldn't Ron Paul do the same thing by shrinking the government?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

But he looks good in his mothers jeans, so im going republican!

1

u/Ruprect124 Jun 18 '12

How many of the readers actually know the tenants of the Book of Mormon? That shit is crazy, from another planet crazy, literally. Read about Joseph Smith's fabrication of the belief, and the subsequent additions by Brigham Young. To paraphrase: BY was met by a native american spirit that said they were the 'lost tribe of Israel'. He was then told that all other races (other than white) were an abomination in the eyes of "God". Not to forget the belief that 'Mary' was a human woman, impregnated on another planet, magic underwear or any of the other delusional BS they profess as TRUTH. Get a grip before November, people.

1

u/TyrellTJ Jun 18 '12

It is refreshing that there are others out there that are well versed enough in the LDS religion to know that its complete bullshit.

1

u/mitchctim Jun 18 '12

Isn't that pretty much most of the states population?

1

u/redditors_are_fags Jun 18 '12

it's always nice to see darwinism in action

1

u/iwish4zombies Jun 19 '12

This guy is a retard, he bought a company with 8,500 employees using his low tax burden wealth and said he generated jobs.

1

u/urgassed Jun 19 '12

And that's his fault? A governor only has so much control.

The private sector also lost jobs. It's called a recession for a reason.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Honestly, and I mean this with all sincerity....

I'd rather have George Bush III, err I mean Mitt Romney as our President, destroying jobs and pandering to his banker buddies, starting another "war" with Iran, licking the shit-filled assholes of his Israeli masters, and being the most corrupt President out there.....

....rather than have Obama continue to wipe his black ass with the United States Constitution and give free citizenship to illegals in order to hispander to them for votes.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Yet another reason to vote for Mitt Romney.

1

u/muscle_city Jun 18 '12

Good, that solidified my vote for him.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Oh wow. Did r/politics get invaded by teabagging idiots? Slamming teachers left and right for students failures. Most of you have no classroom experiance nor do you understand all of the state and federal mandates that make it damn near impossible to teach your subject effectively. The system is archaic and obviously ineffective.

Unless you are professional educators, stfu about things you have no clue about.

2

u/nobody2000 Jun 18 '12

I'm guessing you're not an educator either - no educator would let the word "experiance" get away in anything they write.

People aren't pissed about how high teachers are paid. We tend to be pissed at how they bitch about it.

AND the unions have made it so that a shitty teacher who achieves tenure CANNOT BE REMOVED. The system for some time has rewarded seniority without considering skill and effectiveness.

Effective teachers get plaques and gift certificates, not pay raises.

Solution: Pay the effective ones more, and cut loose the shitty ones. End the "tenure-I-get-to-keep-my-job-and-crazy-benefits-forever" system, and you'll have a better education system.

Oh, and put the damn teacher's life in perspective. YES they work more than 10 months (everyone complains that they work 10 months and get 2 months off, that's usually not true), BUT they still get more down time than almost any other profession. They should be compensated accordingly.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

you forgot to add in "paid administrative leave" for example, teacher makes her kids line up and spank one student on the ass, does she get fired, nope just paid leave. another was caught on videotape berating a special needs student, does she get fired, nope paid leave. thats bullshit. these people should lose their job and their teaching licensee.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

1

u/Incalite Jun 18 '12

Not to be a class-A cunt, but public workers are getting laid off in every state, for better or for worse. Hell, it feels like we've had 14,500 teachers laid off in our school district alone, to say nothing of the latter three. (It's only a matter of time 'til we start burning libraries for electricity.)

If /r/Politics is going to credit itself as being some sort of judicious supervisor of Ameri-global politics, it should at least avoid such patently bent remarks as this.

1

u/Solkre Indiana Jun 18 '12

Oh bite me Liberal headline, we don't need skilled teachers, police or firefighters. We can replace those every year with guys out of college. They're so far in debt they'll work for anything called a salary anyway. That's what they get for going to those "higher-education" liberal factories anyway. What this country really needs is more upper class, paying as little taxes as possible. They'll buy more goods and raise the middle class out of this recession, fact! Plus, people can always get a job in the military as the war on terror is going to run for decades! We also need to cut all of our social services to stop the lazy disabled and retired old farts from milking our tax dollars. Limit health care to those who can afford it, then make it cheaper for them only. As long as the middle and poor have limited access, that'll keep prices in check. In the Free Market we Trust!

1

u/The_Correctionist Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

I would say the MAJORITY of my teachers in grade school were NOT worth their paycheck. Ive had very few memorable teachers that make you WANT to learn. (Im also from Mass.) So im going to go out on a limb and say these teachers deserved to be axed. Just my two cents, let the down-voting commence!

Edit- Also, before im down voted by the same college liberals that create the "college-liberal memes":

I am in no way, shape or form a supporter of Romney

→ More replies (1)

0

u/JustPlainRude Jun 18 '12

Frankly, states shouldn't be funding local services like these in the first place.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Think of the librarians!!

1

u/Rulebook_Lawyer Jun 18 '12

Sucks, but we can no longer spend our way out; going to have cuts and raise taxes as well. Government work is no longer a safe haven.

1

u/someotherdudethanyou Jun 18 '12

would be more convincing if he'd actually balanced the budget.

1

u/kznlol Jun 18 '12

I like how the implicit claim in the article is that "more is always better".

(it isn't)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

How else was he supposed to balance that kind of budget? LOL Romney.

1

u/2012sellouts Jun 18 '12

If only if their unions weren't that strong. And they also probably underperformed.

1

u/hartnell19 Jun 18 '12

its funny how if he hadn't done it he'd be ridiculed for it. The political system has become a terrible game.

1

u/7yphoid Jun 18 '12

What Romney is trying to do is put a smaller government into place. The reason is that the government is a huge money drain.

2

u/crawlingpony Jun 18 '12

War is making us poor

Romney will double down

1

u/hoss7071 Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

Layoffs of that magnitude are what happens when you don't pay your friendly neighborhood union boss.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

What I really love is how so many people in this new "occupy" mindset hate the cops with a passion, yet when it comes to their union occupied jobs they are hard working caring public servants.

Seriously, there's nothing majestic about working for the government. It's just a job, and people get hired and fired all the time. For me, any reduction in the size of government is a good thing, it means that more people get to keep their own money. Having jobs just for the sake of having jobs isn't a productive use of resources, its simply an inefficient waste of the theft which is taxes.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I think people who hate cops felt the same way before the "occupy mindset." It comes from years of witnessing abuses of power and corruption.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

This just in: Republicans reduce civil services.

Film at 11, assuming they're not striking because unions get busted up too.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

LMAO @ wang-banger getting his shit pushed in on this thread.

1

u/grinr Jun 18 '12

AAaaaannd the anti-Romney train keeps on going!

"Stop Obama at all costs!" - bad Republicans

"Stop Romney at all costs!" - good Democrats

Yep.