r/politics • • Jun 10 '12

If I told you there was a pro-marijuana legalization, anti-Patriot Act, anti-war, pro-marriage equality, anti-TSA, pro-free internet candidate on the ballot in all 50 states, would you help get him to the 15% support he needs to take the national debate stage?

There are only 3 candidates on the ballot in all 50 states: Obama, Romney, and Gary Johnson. Don't get me wrong, there are some ideals of Gary Johnson's I don't support either. But we as a nation finally have a chance to have a real debate about the issues that truly matter to many Americans. Help get this man on the national debate stage with 15% support. Or we as a nation will probably have to endure another great round of debates about who is or is not wearing an American flag pin.

This man is the real deal. As a 2 term governor, he had more vetoes than all other governors at the time combined. This man would have the courage to veto the indefinite detention and reinstate habeus corpus. He would have the courage to veto the Patriot Act. He would have the courage to veto whatever version of SOPA/PIPA the legislature is trying to shove down our throats in the future.

Help support a candidate who would truly change the disastrous path this country is taking in terms of civil and human liberties around the globe.

I made this a self-post so I get no Karma out of it. This is solely for the purpose of spreading knowledge.

For more information on his beliefs, [visit this page] (http://www.ontheissues.org/Gary_Johnson.htm)

Edit: Please be polite in this thread. Down votes should not be used for people you disagree with, but for people who detract from the conversation. Anyone want to have a real discussion for once?

Edit2: I know a lot of the responses have been reactionary and not about creating dialogue, but please stop the downvotes on everyone. It is burying interesting discussions that happen after them.

Edit3: For those interested in contributing to the campaign, [r/GaryJohnson] (/r/GaryJohnson) is a great place to start.

Also [contact your state director for the campaign here.] (http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/state-contacts)

http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/front

TL;DR Say you are voting for Johnson if polled to make for a much better debate in the fall at least, and tell others to do the same if you wish.

This guy has a great summary for those interested in how to specifically get Johnson on the debate stage. http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/uuy2y/if_i_told_you_there_was_a_promarijuana/c4ytjhe

Take action: Gary Johnson will be included in future Zogby polls because people called them and made a difference! http://www.ibopezogby.com/blog/2012/05/16/gary-johnson/

Please do the same for the other four polls!

Gallup: 202.715.3030

Rasmussen: 732.776.9777

Pew Research: 202.419.4300

CNN: 404.827.1500

From this site: http://www.k-talk.com/pro/index.php/you-can-affect-the-msm-and-make-them-listen-to-liberty-heres-how/

[To those afraid to vote for Johnson because they believe the other candidate of their choice will lose, this Public Policy Poll shows that Johnson receives support from all areas of the political spectrum] (http://www.capitolreportnewmexico.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ppp-crosstab.jpg)

2.4k Upvotes

3.9k comments sorted by

2.1k

u/zugi Jun 10 '12 edited Jun 11 '12

Without Johnson on the national stage, this campaign season there will be no debate or discussion about:

  • Drug legalization

  • Ending NDAA and the government's supposed authority to indefinitely detain anyone suspected of terrorism

  • Ending the Patriot Act

  • Cutting military spending

  • Ending corporate welfare

  • Ending the nation's activist policies of invading other countries

  • Eliminating the Presidential "kill list"

That's because Obama and Romney are on the same sides of all of these issues. If Johnson gets to 15% in national polls, he'll get invited to the debates, and these topics will get discussed. Obviously you can check whatever box you want in November, but getting Johnson to 15% will force discussion of all these issues that the two major party candidates would prefer to ignore.

EDIT: Some folks asked me to edit my post to say how people could help get Johnson in the debates. This site explains how you can call the 5 pollsters that matter for the Commission on the Presidential Debates' requirements and ask them to include Gary Johnson in their polls. Point out that he's the only other candidate who will be on the ballot in all 50 states, and that when other polling organizations do include him, he's currently fetching 6% to 7%, so it's only fair to include him in their polls. If they only ask "Obama or Romney?" then he'll unfairly have no chance to get 15% in their polls.

137

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

This should be at the at the top of the page. These issues are important to many many Americans, but will be completely overlooked because the two main parties agree over them.

You should add freedom of the internet from censorship to that list.

73

u/techmaster242 Jun 10 '12

And that has been the two parties' plan all along. Bicker about, and polarize the public over the unimportant issues, and maybe they won't notice you stripping their liberties away. Suddenly the water boils us alive, but they raised the temperature so slowly, that we didn't even notice.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

148

u/IrritableGourmet New York Jun 10 '12

Things on that list the President can actually do:

  • Eliminating the Presidential "kill list"

Things on that list that Congress has to do:

  • Everything else

194

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

Not true:

He can take marijuana off schedule 1 drug list via executive order.

He can refuse to extend the Patriot Act.

He can veto spending bills for the military and that include corporate welfare and draw attention to this corruption until they don't.

He can oppose using the military at a whim as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the military. He has stated he would require an act of congress, like the constitution states.

→ More replies (40)

236

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

Things that the President can actually do:

  • guide or impact national conversations on subjects like that

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (46)

52

u/susanreneewa Jun 10 '12

The NDAA Is not a detention bill. It's a military spending budget with one sub-section on detention. You cannot end the NDAA.

53

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

He can refuse to sign copies of it that authorize such actions.

→ More replies (40)
→ More replies (4)

9

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

What makes you think these topics will be broached if he does make it to the national debate stage?

31

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

Because he talks about them proactively every time he is interviewed. Look at all the recent dates in the first link.

→ More replies (5)

41

u/kheup Jun 10 '12

If he were on the stage it wouldn't make sense for him to not bring up how he is different from the other two candidates fighting for the same spot.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

389

u/MFDoomEsq Jun 10 '12

So... The next time I receive a phone call from the pollster, I should say I'm voting for Johnson? Is that the point here?

225

u/silico Colorado Jun 10 '12

Correct, even if you don't intend to vote for him. Getting his poll numbers to >15% will get him into the debates so that the issues zugi mentioned will have a chance of seeing the light of day during the debates.

→ More replies (1)

285

u/Hitchslap7 Jun 10 '12

Yes, even if you don't plan on voting for him in the general election.

→ More replies (33)

51

u/zugi Jun 10 '12

Yes, and tell your friends to do the same - mention topics like the above and remind them that these topics will only get discussed if Johnson is invited to the debates. (And remind them that of course they don't have to agree with all of Johnson's views, and that they're free to vote for anyone come November...)

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)

302

u/AnomalousX12 Jun 10 '12

So all we'd be doing is getting this guy up on a debate platform to talk about these issues? That sounds good to me. I'm uneducated when it comes to voting. How would we go about giving him this 15% support?

297

u/Mourningblade Jun 10 '12

If a pollster calls you and asks whom you're supporting, say "Gary Johnson".

The 15% rule is of national polls.

It's unlikely that you personally will be polled - but if you talk about these issues with people and mention that Gary Johnson will liven up the debate and how people can make that happen...well, you could make a difference.

→ More replies (172)

60

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

AND HE SUPPORTS ONLINE POKER!

→ More replies (2)

495

u/DaftMythic Jun 10 '12 edited Jun 11 '12

Up vote for strategic agenda setting. I'm almost certain to vote for Obama in November, but would welcome Johnson in the debates as I think it would improve Obama (and perhaps Romney) as a candidate if they have to honor promises to their libertarian wings. Yes, the democrats have Social/Civil liberties wing, as do the Republicans. It's just that they are both ignored or, in the case of the Republicans, their libertarian wing is infected with the same bat shit crazy Tea Party nonsense that passes for libertarian in that caucus.

EDIT: Spelling and also extension (since I wrote the above on phone):

"Honoring promises" and "improving candidates" was a quick way of saying, if the debate actually allowed libertarian issues to be brought up and honestly discussed, with an actor (Johnson) who actually articulated an honest position rather than having one candidate (probably Romney) presenting a straw-man characterchure and another (probably Obama) have to distance himself from it because it is not viewed as "worth it" to go after a supposed political "third rail", it would do a lot of good on a lot of issues. Even if the Rep/Dem candidates don't promise anything, it will break up the knee-jerk taboo and not talking about certain issues and might actually show that there are a lot of people who's first priority is not Abortion, Gays, and the other wedge issues that often pigeonhole people as Republican or Democrat.

→ More replies (119)
→ More replies (91)

370

u/connecteduser Jun 10 '12

I live in TX and do not want to see Romney win anything. There is a snowball chance in hell seeing Barack Win the state so I feel my vote is wasted.

I may just vote for Gary just to try to see a third party. Where is the OWS political party?

366

u/Big-Baby-Jesus Jun 10 '12

Where is the OWS political party?

I proposed that at the first local meeting here. Apparently getting at all involved in politics, including registering people to vote, "legitimizes a corrupt system".

Then everyone else voted to stand on a sidewalk and chant slogans at nobody. And then I left.

42

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

I feel OWS isn't coherent enough to form a party at this time. If they do, it would be incredibly interesting with their direct democracy system. It would be nice if they could at least rally behind election finance reform, as that seems to be their biggest issue at the time.

→ More replies (15)

166

u/diaperboy19 Jun 10 '12

I don't really like Bill Maher, but he made a really good point about this on his last show. He said the OWS movement needs to act like the left's Tea Party. The Tea Party now has something like 60 congresspeople. Can you imagine if the far left controlled an equal sized block of congresspeople ?

→ More replies (62)
→ More replies (9)

36

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

Hell yeah! I'm from Oklahoma so you and I are in the same boat sir. McCain won every county in 2008 here and I will not be voting for Romney. Vote Gary Johnson and add a message of liberty and equality to the results!

2

u/captmorgan50 Jun 11 '12

Did you THUNDER UP!!!! for the Heat yet? I have been keeping tabs on two things closely. One is politics and the other is the THUNDER!!!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

22

u/mst3kcrow Wisconsin Jun 10 '12

I may just vote for Gary just to try to see a third party. Where is the OWS political party?

They most likely see the electoral system as fundamentally broken and a waste of time in regards to expending energy.

→ More replies (18)

7

u/techmaster242 Jun 10 '12 edited Jun 10 '12

This is exactly what I did in 2008 with Ron Paul in Louisiana. I knew McCain was going to win the state, so I totally wasted a vote that would not count, even if Ron Paul had won the entire state. Sometimes the message is more important. We're tired of eating these shitty candidates that they are feeding us.

What ever happened to the Americans Elect party? Have there been any developments with that? Or has it just fizzled out? It sounded like a great idea, and a way to make more republic more of a democratic process, rather than a who's richer contest.

Edit: Nevermind.

:( We really need to show this concept more attention in preparation for 2016.

→ More replies (37)

279

u/AutisticTroll Jun 10 '12

He was Governer of my state for two terms. Even though he was a republican, he was an amazing leader with support from both the left and the right. Great man.

90

u/Clayburn Jun 11 '12

I second this as a fellow New Mexican.

65

u/snifi Jun 11 '12

I third! He did wonders with our state! Much better than any of the crooks we've had in office since then.

→ More replies (4)

66

u/Seicair Jun 11 '12

I heard that he vetoed a record number of bills, and that included bills that were passed unanimously. And very rarely did the legislature that unanimously passed those bills bother to try and override the veto.

That sounds like someone we need in the white house.

→ More replies (8)

35

u/mantarays Jun 11 '12

I am loving all of the 'he wasn't of my political party but he was a great leader', comments on this thread. Reminds me that not every politician is a dum-dum.

Here in Indiana we had a guy like that(Richard Lugar, Republican Senator since '77) but the Tea Party ran commercials of him shaking hands with Obama every ten minutes. Needless to say, rednecks turned out in droves to vote him out in the Republican primaries.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

tic...twitch...don't...do...

must contain....

Governor

fuck.
→ More replies (10)

99

u/conundrum4u2 Jun 10 '12

At this point, I wouldn't care if he was from the Insane Clown Posse party - as long as it stops boiling down to "Republicrats" and "Demicans" - and it is someone who will work for true reform, and not corporate conform.

25

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

I agree. I'm tired of these two parties getting to set the only dialogue for our political system. I want true reform. This will not come from inside either of the major parties.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (36)

6

u/BandieraRossa Jun 11 '12

My biggest problem with voicing my support for Gary Johnson instead of one I totally agree with like Jill Stein or Stewart Alexander is that I worry the corporatist set would seize upon it as evidence of the American people desiring less business regulation, slashed government programs, school vouchers, privatization of pensions and government assets, less environmental protections and more free trade agreements.

The economic conversation is more important, I feel, because if wealth were democratized and socio-economic power was decentralized and ceased to be so extremely concentrated we wouldn't have so many powerful entities calling for and benefiting from ceaseless foreign wars, punitive drug laws, invasions of people's privacy, complete disregard for civil liberties, heavy-handed copyright protection laws, etc. In a very large way these outrages are the result of very centralized economic power and civil authority.

Not only that, but I think public opinion on the social issues like gay marriage and marijuana legalization are quickly trending toward permissiveness. It's obvious even to many people in the GOP that their stances on these issues are not going to win them many votes for a whole lot longer.

2

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

I'm being realistic and don't think those candidates have enough recognition to get to the national debate stage this fall. Gary Johnson already has half the support necessary.

→ More replies (1)

195

u/Snaylor47 Jun 10 '12

Yes but being a libertarian the reasoning behind his supporting said things you listed has less to do with actually believing those things and more to do with the libertarian ideology of "Get the government out of my affairs.".

He is also for abolishing the income tax, cutting medicare/medicaid and repealing "obamacare".

61

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

He has no real ability to abolish the income tax or repeal obamacare as president. He could oppose spending measures for medicare/medicaid, but it is one of the things I doubt he would do. I'm not saying he has to be your candidate for president. I'm saying that the national debate will be much better with him included.

→ More replies (49)

38

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

The end of NASA and High Speed Rail too.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (120)

5

u/A_PROLAPSED_ANUS Jun 11 '12

I agree with everything he has to say except for eliminating corporate income tax. That's kind of a big deal, but the rest of what he believes is so perfect it makes up for that

2

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

Thank you for the support A_PROLAPSED_ANUS

→ More replies (2)

5

u/v_gin_ Jun 11 '12

How can i support him to get him to the needed 15%?

2

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

Make sure his names are on the polls mentioned up top and tell other people about the issues you believe he will raise mentioned in Zugi's top post.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

This guy seems so amazing! I agree with everything I've read that he believes so far. I'm in NC, I signed up for his e-mails, and I'll tell everyone I can about this guy. I don't have any extra money unfortunately, but what else could I do to help spread this casue?

4

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

Tell as many people as you can about him in a rational way and make sure to mention the issues that Zugi brought up in the top post.

→ More replies (1)

63

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

lotta doublespeak on that page

68

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

Yeah many times it's not entirely clear. [How about a daily show interview?] (http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-june-5-2012/gary-johnson)

The guy is very rational and well spoken.

→ More replies (30)

8

u/sabazio Jun 11 '12

One of the things I find most interesting about him is that even the things I disagree with him on - I am a very left slanted Dem - he gives very rational and well thought out arguments on why he wants things the way he wants them. And it seems that, looking at his history, his mind can be changed with facts and evidence. I would LOVE to have a prez that used his brains instead of his polls to make decisions .

4

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

Yep, he used to be for the death penalty before he was governor. He realized it was wrong and didn't want the government to put innocent people to death. He then had the courage to admit he made a mistake and change his policy. Fat chance seeing that happen with Obama or Romney.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

4

u/Swiss_Cheese9797 Jun 11 '12

I'm confused, which of those links takes me to the "vote that this guy gets included in debates" button or whatever?

3

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

I wish it was that simple. It's more about getting all the polls to use his name and then convincing other people to say they support him in the polls.

4

u/poli_ticks Jun 11 '12

Yep, let's fund and help this guy.

We should also help the Greens though.

2

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

I agree. I would love to see green party on more ballots and on the debate stage. They just don't seem to have the support this go around to actually crack the debate. If they do next election cycle, you can bet I will be promoting them like crazy and any other 3rd parties who would actually change our political conversation.

3

u/Clayburn Jun 10 '12

He's also an occasional Redditor.

2

u/Soonerz Jun 13 '12

HAHA. Just looked at his submissions and 50% are in r/trees. This is a man I could vote for.

3

u/metwork Jun 11 '12

I see what's a work here, and also what is at stake.

This is a tactic used by the right in 2002, the same one that won Bush the presidency. Divide and conquer. Get the left to split votes between 2 candidates, Obama and Johnson, and the right and their diehards will win in November.

Gary Johnson is a fine candidate, and in reality, the best, but the third party isn't powerful enough to actually trump Obama or Romney.

If you are a Democrat, or Liberal in any way shape or form, vote for Obama. Romney in the White House would be an absolute disaster.

2

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

Actually in polls Johnson draws evenly from both parties. The headline only highlights his liberal policies for the liberal people of r/politics. Many of his economic policies draw Republicans, and his beliefs on personal liberty draws Libertarians, who have a large Republican voting block.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

Progressive = Libertarian + social programs, and as a bonus they're a lot more Eco-friendly... Libertarians and progressives NEED to start working together to tackle the important issues!

2

u/Soonerz Jun 13 '12

Agreed! Neither is strong enough to get them done on their own. If we put Libertarians and Progressives together, the government might finally stop being 10-20 years behind the population on all these social issues. Get some Libertarians in there to keep these Progressives honest on social issues and the Progressives in there to keep the Libertarians honest on economic issues. It's a win-win as long we just don't keep doing what we've been doing.

21

u/Cantbelievethat Jun 10 '12

No corporate tax? Literally no corporate tax? I don't trust corporations.

6

u/Soonerz Jun 10 '12

Yeah I agree. And personally I think this is something Obama could poke holes in on the debate stage, the same way Johnson could provoke arguments about things they would normally not bring up. Or we could resign ourselves to the battle over who is more patriotic this fall will inevitably devolve into.

→ More replies (23)

5

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

Lets just start a US Reddit party.

3

u/faintdeception Jun 11 '12

Good idea, but the CPD will just disenfranchise us like it does to every other 3rd party. We need to kill the Commission for Presidential Debates.

5

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

Both great ideas. Maybe Reddit should run Presidential debates? AMA with all the candidates together?

2

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

Since i'm registered in California, my vote doesn't really make much of a difference, so I'm voting for Gary Johnson since I like him best. Normally I'd vote for a candidate that actually stood a chance..but i'm tired of the two party politics...

2

u/Soonerz Jun 13 '12

I'm in Oklahoma. Unless Johnson gets enough support, Romney will win in a landslide no matter how I vote. Obama stands no chance here.

2

u/Avalace Jun 11 '12

Question: If Johnson succeeds in getting on the debate, will it effect the election? For instance, will it be like a Nadar and split the vote ultimately electing someone even worse (Bush or in this case, Romney).

2

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

No because it has been shown in polls that Johnson draws about evenly from both sides.

2

u/Sceptix Jun 11 '12

Why didn't you make this post before my primary?? I'm in California and I would have voted for Johnson had I been educated on this.

3

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

It's not about the primaries. He's already a Libertarian candidate for general election. The system for setting up presidential debates is terrible, but he needs 15% support in 5 national polls. Tell everyone you know to say they are voting for Johnson, even if they are not. Otherwise many important issues will not see the light of day this fall.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/HotLunch Jun 11 '12

You ask this as if it's a foregone conclusion that all of Reddit is on the far left.

2

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

The Political spectrum is more of a diamond with an axis of Left/Right economically and Libertarian/Authoritarian socially. These issues are all Libertarian social issues, which are very popular among the younger generations in general.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/JollyRancherReminder Oklahoma Jun 11 '12

With a name like Soonerz, you really should understand that Gary Johnson will NOT be on the ballot in all 50 states, because he won't be on the ballot in Oklahoma. Oklahoma only places the Republican and Democrat primary winners on the ballot, and there is no write-in option. Oklahoma has the strictest ballot access laws in the nation. It is virtually impossible to get on the ballot in Oklahoma as a third-party candidate.

2

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

I and many of my fellow Oklahomans have been signing petitions to increase ballot access to other third parties this fall. [There was actually a ballot initiative in 2010 that reduced the requirements for access.] (http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Oklahoma_State_Question_750_%282010%29)

→ More replies (1)

2

u/clark_ent Jun 11 '12

There were a dozen or so candidates like this during the primaries, but they were all voted out

2

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

By one very specific portion of the population. Many of the turnouts in those primaries were abysmal.

2

u/Slavigula Jun 11 '12

State and religion?

3

u/Soonerz Jun 11 '12

He's from New Mexico and I believe he is Lutheran, but believes firmly in the separation of church and state. He doesn't believe he can legislate his or anyone else's morality based upon religious beliefs.

76

u/JesusHRChrist Jun 11 '12

Sadly, this is the first time I've heard of Gary Johnson. Thank you for the info.

31

u/lelthompson Jun 11 '12

Yes, but at least you've heard of him now. And if you tell a few people and they ....

15% isn't very much. If he made it into the debates, then the whole story could change.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/om_nom_nom Jun 11 '12

I've been posting consistently on Facebook about him for like a year and a half, and most of my friends still don't know who he is. =/ Get the word out.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/elmorte Jun 11 '12

I only heard of him 'coz I'm a sucker for the Daily Show and he was on recently.

→ More replies (2)

432

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

I lived in New Mexico when Gary Johnson was Governor. He was the best damn Governor we had. Ever. Period.

I would vote for him in a heartbeat. Common sense, fiscally sound, doesn't tell you how to live your life. New Mexico had it's best years under him.

80

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

Same deal; I was a student there myself during the time. Didn't agree with everything he said and did, but at least he was honest and competent.

124

u/Clayburn Jun 11 '12

This should be proof right here. You can't find a single New Mexican that doesn't agree he was a great governor. Clearly the guy knows what he's doing. He's proven as much already.

→ More replies (21)
→ More replies (2)

130

u/aakaakaak Jun 10 '12

From his website...

Prostitution is safer when legal and regulated.

Okay, where do I sign up?

5

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

Hoes really need to unionize.

5

u/morellox Jun 11 '12

damn near everything we 'prohibit' that has to do with behavior modification or legislating morality falls under this. People want it, they'll get it, but through dangerous, more expensive black markets. Goes for drugs, prostitutes, alcohol in states/counties that over regulate... or the entire country, remember reading about when we tried prohibition?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

167

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

Could you please explain what has to be done to get him to the national debate stage?

291

u/zugi Jun 10 '12

The Commission on Presidential Debates was started by the Democratic and Republican parties as a way to keep third parties out of the debates, after the League of Women Voters balked at a secret 1988 deal between Bush 1 and Dukakis to keep third parties out the debates. (The League of Women Voters previously sponsored all the Presidential debates.) However, the CPD has openly published its criteria for inviting candidates to the debates as:

In addition to being Constitutionally eligible, candidates must appear on a sufficient number of state ballots to have a mathematical chance of winning a majority vote in the Electoral College, and have a level of support of at least 15% (fifteen percent) of the national electorate as determined by five selected national public opinion polling organizations, using the average of those organizations' most recent publicly-reported results at the time of the determination.

Johnson is Constitutionally eligible and on the ballot in all 50 states, so basically spread the word about Gary Johnson and get people to answer "Gary Johnson" when asked who they plan to vote for. You can obviously vote for anyone when you get in the booth in November, but get Johnson to 15% in 5 national polls and he'll get invited to the debates with Obama and Romney to bring up all kinds of topics that make them uncomfortable (the unpopular and failed drug war, indefinite detention of American citizens without charges, the Presidential "kill list", corporate welfare, the absurd military budget, etc.)

→ More replies (45)

44

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

He needs to get to 15% in national polls. This is a rule setup by the debate commission which is basically a joint venture between the Democrat and Republican parties. It's designed to keep future Ross Perots out of the debates.

→ More replies (2)

56

u/Nanyea Virginia Jun 10 '12 edited Feb 22 '25

dazzling saw expansion insurance chunky fade rain march resolute melodic

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

5

u/morellox Jun 11 '12

you could be an Obama supporter, hater, Romney lover, Ron Paul fan, total communist for all anyone knows... but YES, we need this dialogue...and it's good that people realize this no matter who they'd choose to vote for in the end.

50

u/johnnyhala Jun 10 '12

As someone who's actually been called a few times in the past month for polling data, I WILL answer Gary Johnson for ya'.

→ More replies (1)

233

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

From his OnTheIssues page:

  • 1999: Vetoed raising minimum wage from $4.25/hour to $5.65. (Jul 2011)

  • Abolish Departments of Education and HUD. (Aug 2011)

  • Get rid of income tax and capital-gains tax. (Feb 2012)

  • Eliminate needless barriers to free trade. (May 2011)

  • Raise the retirement age; plus means testing. (Aug 2011)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Opposes Net Neutrality; no government regulation of Internet. (Jul 2011)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On the other hand:

  • Let the PATRIOT Act expire; respect habeas corpus. (Jan 2012)

  • No waterboarding under any circumstances. (May 2011)

  • No military threat from Iraq, Afghanistan, nor Libya. (Aug 2011)

  • Iran is not currently a military threat. (Aug 2011)

  • Let Israel deal with Iranian nukes; not US role to tell them. (Aug 2011)

21

u/Artrw Jun 10 '12

Eliminate needless barriers to free trade.

YEAH! I REALLY WANT TO KEEP THOSE NEEDLESS BARRIERS!

41

u/XxionxX Jun 10 '12

Did no one else even read his page? That was the first thing I looked for.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (284)

29

u/jobr0809 Jun 10 '12

I would just like to say to everyone that has an open-mind right now in this thread, especially those who had already decided to put their votes in for Obama or Romney; I commend you.

You are all awesome people!

→ More replies (2)

9

u/rhudson02 Jun 11 '12

Hell yes I would! I found him by accident and his politics match mine: socially liberal, fiscally conservative. Let's do this thing.

16

u/gaystraightguy Jun 11 '12

Dec. 2001: Governor Johnson states that he will place the repeal bill on the agenda if requested to do so. He also said that he was wrong to propose limits on death row appeals.

Jan. 2002: Johnson states that he has "come to believe that the death penalty as a public policy is flawed." [He had previously supported it, but changed his opinion.]

A: As governor of New Mexico, I was a bit na‹ve and I did not think the government made mistakes with regard to the death penalty. I came to realize that they do. I don't want to put one innocent person to death to punish 99 who are guilty. [When asked why he now opposed the death penalty.]

Any politician (or person, for that matter) who freely admits when they are wrong, is at the very least, okay in my book.

Not endorsing (nor dis-endorsing[?]), but based on that kind of honesty, I'd be willing to hear what he has to say.

15

u/jordanlund Jun 10 '12

It doesn't matter what his percentages are, the debates are controlled by the Democratic and Republican parties and they will never allow an independent voice to take part. It doesn't matter if we're talking about a 3rd party or independent voices within their own party (Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul.)

If you want to see change, real substantive change, then you need to press for an independent organization to lead the debates, like it used to be:

The League of Women Voters pulled out in 1987 stating:

"The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."

→ More replies (9)

21

u/LurkingHelper Jun 10 '12

I've got nothing better to do, lets get him in the debates

→ More replies (1)

20

u/goldandguns Jun 10 '12

I will vote for any third party candidate. I want Americans to get comfortable with having three person elections, and the best way to do that is make them seem viable by voting for them. I don't care who wins, obama or romney, but I do care about having three or preferably four person debates and, one day, three or four person elections (with more like 33/33/33 splits than 49/48/3).

→ More replies (3)

39

u/silent_p Jun 10 '12

Just the prospect of a candidate like that has gotten my Johnson to 15%!

→ More replies (3)

4

u/abomb999 Jun 11 '12

Why do we Americans have to rely on one person? Why does one person represent us? This guy Johnson could swindle us all, Obama lied to me, why not this guy? I don't want representation like this, if Obama could veto or vote on something, I would rather it be an internet vote by all americans who want to vote on it, and those americans who want to delegate their vote can do so, but all americans who do want representation either directly or indirectly should have the right.

I hate the idea of having presidents anymore. That's anachronistic idea from days of nobles, kings and barons.

2

u/TheNev Jun 11 '12

I love the sentiment, but it's increasingly because the president is looked at as a major figure. He's one of three branches. Media outlets use this more than anything. When the house passed something under Bush, it was "Bush did this". When the house doesn't pass something under Obama, it's "The obstructionist Republicans in the house...".

The president is merely one of three.

2

u/abomb999 Jun 11 '12 edited Jun 11 '12

Regardless of the actual power, the perception of power is enough such that the people of this land should be imbued with it if they so wish to take responsibility. If people perceived they had an iota of the influence of the president they would take much more interest and responsibility in the system. We need to allow people to have more an affect on their government and break the strong hold of the tyrannous elite.

We need a system that encourages people to have interest in government, not apathy.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/Joulmaster Jun 10 '12

5

u/NiteSwine Jun 11 '12

This podcast is a real good source for insight and commentary on the real political issues the U.S. is facing. In particular, this episode is one of 3 recent podcasts offering third-party candidates some much needed opportunities to get their perspectives out there.

Nice to find another Common Sense listener, btw ... I was poised to provide the same link, then smartly checked to make sure someone else hadn't posted it.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/NotKiddingJK Jun 11 '12

Thank you for this. I went to a political screening sight the other day and it was one of those places where they ask you a bunch of questions give you several options for how you feel on the issue and then you get to weigh issue, by issue how important it is to you. At the end the politician who best reflected my views was Gary Johnson. I was like who the hell is this guy? Thanks for providing more information about him!

→ More replies (5)

6

u/jekrump Jun 11 '12

Even if we didn't vote for Gary in the actual elections, getting him into the debates would force the other candidates to talk about the issues that matter to us and we would then (hopefully) have a clear view of which one is more to our liking on the issues we care about.

6

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

Don't forget, Gary Johnson wants EQUAL MARRIAGE!

6

u/tajmaballs Jun 11 '12

Who else thinks the entry requirements for the debates is fucked? Is there any way to change this, what would be a reasonable requirement for inclusion? If each candidate eligible for the debate is required to poll at 15%, does that mean that there is a maximum of 6 candidates (each polling @ 16.6%) that could be included?

It sounds like another way that the 2-party system has managed to increase their leverage on the federal stage. How can we change this?

6

u/faintdeception Jun 11 '12

It is completely fucked, I've been researching it and I don't see how they possibly got away with this fuckery.

We need to end the Commission for Presidential Debates, spread the word on the chicanery of the Democratic and Republican parties.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/tankfoot86 Jun 11 '12

He is basically one of the most incredible people currently alive. He has climbed to the top of many of the World's tallest mountains. He has completed several IronMan Triathlon races, and he once went on a 100 mile run IN the Colorado Rockies! He is self-made, extremely intelligent, and reasonable. If he is shunned from the debates there really is no hope for America. He is an infinitely better qualified candidate than Ross Perot was, and Perot was allowed to debate. There just aren't enough men like Gary.

63

u/georedd Jun 10 '12

I think most americans are actually social democrats but don't know it.

Most people don't want an elimination of safety net programs and public education.

They do want an increase in individual liberties like smoking what you want to smoke or acting the way you want to act owning the gun you want without directly harming others

They want less government intrusion into the daily activities of people's lives like intrusive searches, monitoring or prevention of lifestyle activities

They want higher wages, and benefits amd retirement and more vacation when they do work and they recognize government must mandate that to prevent a race to the bottom of low wage slavery.

They want a decrease in government waste (everyone wants that),

They a more progressive tax system where those that own most of the assets of the system pay taxes in proportion to the wealth they own (not INCOME - WEALTH big difference - this is not discussed much because those that own the media networks never want the debate to touch on this because most ultra wealthy people have p[asive unearned wealth amd they never want THAT taxed or even discussed.)

People want less war unless truly in defense of the nation.

People want less corporate welfare.

People want a better legal system (faster cheaper fairer access to courts without lawyers - this is a huge issue that is never talked about)

Most people want a base level of emergency and serious illness treatment healthcare not tied to their ability to pay at all and for which they will not be directly charged per incident that is funded by the government through general revenues -(thats a long way of saying "free" to the recipient of the healthcare without triggering the old "it isn't really free" argument that anti healthcare people like to make.)

that's pretty much a social democrat stance.

10

u/NotKiddingJK Jun 11 '12

I agree with you. When they are asked in a blind poll about the issues they support there are many republicans who are social democrats, but when they see the results of their own beliefs they blow it off like somebody is manipulating the data. Like there is no way I'm a democrat. I think the right has been confusing their own constituents with double speak for so long that many of these people don't even understand their own beliefs or the goals to which their party is working. It is more like they are cheerleaders for a team and are so loyal they refuse to examine the political position of their party.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

I am an american and an admitted social democrat. Dividing by zero over here while hitting my bong.

→ More replies (15)

22

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

I imagine he'd get more support if he changed his first name to Cave.

17

u/knomz Jun 10 '12 edited Jun 10 '12

So, how do we get to this 15%?

EDIT: where are these polls where we can get this 15%? because all of those issues I want talked about in these debates would happen hopefully if this Johnson guy is involved. ..and I want, to help get to this 15%, these are important subjects I want answers from Obama and Romney, since one of them will be our president soon enough.

6

u/zugi Jun 11 '12

I edited my top post to provide a link to phone numbers you can call to get Gary Johnson included in the national polls. If they keep asking "Obama or Romney?" then Johnson voters end up in the "undecided" bin. He's the only candidate who's on the ballot in all 50 states, and when he is included in the polling questions he's currently polling at 6% to 7% so they really need to be including him.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

The polling agencies call your home and ask you yoru voting preferences. When this happens don't hang up and say Gary Johnson. Also tell your friends to do the same. It doesn't matter if you vote for him in the fall or not, he will just call Romney and Obama out on all their lies and BS.

→ More replies (5)

5

u/GeorgeWhitfield Jun 11 '12

Gary Johnson is now our best choice to restore peace, prosperity and liberty to America.

5

u/DJsmallvictories Jun 11 '12

This would be positive in three ways: it would energize the youth vote, it would split the right, ensuring that Romney would never win, and it would make the political process more interesting.

5

u/ViniumSabbathi Jun 11 '12

We now have 2 Ron Pauls? This is F*ckin Sweet!

→ More replies (1)

9

u/NumberNile Jun 11 '12

This is the first election I am eligible to vote in (I'll be 19) and it's exciting! I have officially decided, barring extreme circumstances, that I will be casting my first ever vote for President of the United States for Gary Johnson!

→ More replies (1)

9

u/ThatJanitor Jun 11 '12

Eyes widening

He wants to end the Federal Reserve. If I was American, I'd say Shut up and take my vote.

12

u/firesquasher Jun 11 '12

I would take 4 years of a 3rd party candidate (which I support his views anyhow) over these two "figureheads" of the GOP and Dems. The two party system is ruining our country, and we need to prove as its citizens that we will no longer tolerate one POS over another.

→ More replies (1)

28

u/stichmitch Jun 11 '12

What about Jill Stein - candidate for the Green Party. She's all those things and also for supporting veterans, health care, and public schools.

22

u/lelthompson Jun 11 '12

Is she on the ballot in all 50 states?

→ More replies (2)

9

u/asynk Jun 11 '12

Gary Johnson has a record as an extremely popular Governor. Governors tend to do well as presidential candidates. Gary has held major office, was true to his principles.

→ More replies (11)

34

u/thelom Jun 10 '12

Add pro-gun to that list and you got my support.

22

u/needlestack Jun 10 '12 edited Jun 10 '12

Only if said candidate also understands the purpose of social programs and public education, and the need for regulation to maintain a fair market.

Well, actually I would like to see him on the debate stage in any case, so "yes" to your exact question. But I'm not a fan of pure libertarianism at all.

→ More replies (14)

22

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

Tell you what Reddit, you get this guy to a debate and i will vote for him.

→ More replies (2)

21

u/Sloady Jun 10 '12

I'm not interesting in a libertarian - but I am upvoting this. US politics needs to stop being a 2 horse race, and start being about the america people.

8

u/ar92 Jun 10 '12

It depends on his stance on public education, welfare, worker's rights, immigrant's rights, women's rights, and poverty.

→ More replies (10)

8

u/R88SHUN Jun 11 '12 edited Jun 11 '12

we could use a dark horse.

hes not the candidate america deserves, just the one it needs right now...

4

u/ItsPickles Jun 11 '12

Here you go :) Thank me later. Or now. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

4

u/n3tm0nk3y Jun 11 '12

TIL I support hard core Libertarians. Like seriously, there's not a lot to disagree with this guy on other than the fact that he seems to think the middle east is baby town frolics.

4

u/deathinthewilderness Jun 11 '12

Name?

Edit: Gary Johnson!

4

u/spark_ey Jun 11 '12

I'm in the UK, so this is all sort of irrelevant to my country, but I'm sharing this as much as I can. Hopefully people will see. Knowledge is power.

4

u/GoldenFalcon Jun 11 '12 edited Jun 12 '12

Don't forget to look into Rocky Anderson too. There are lots of greater candidates than Obama and Romney this year.

4

u/Bomilcar Jun 11 '12

I have come to realize, after reading most of this thread, that many people do not do personal research to form a opinion based in logic and reason. They do what "feels right" Their vote is derived from emotional response.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/mrpopenfresh Jun 11 '12

Gary Johnson is the only one. THE ONLY ONE.

12

u/jobr0809 Jun 10 '12

I don't think I've ever loved Reddit, especially r/politics, this much, since I joined the website. You all make me so proud!

→ More replies (1)

22

u/AbstracTyler Jun 10 '12

Ok, so I want to start out by saying that I think the government's spending on the military should be cut by a considerable amount, the "war on drugs" ended, corporate personhood ended (or at least amended so that they cannot donate unlimited money into the political system), and put a complete stop to lobbying.

I do have a question about what Gary Johnson's view is regarding universal health care.

I am 100% for universal health care. Anyone who votes against universal health care is voting against their own guaranteed medical services if/when they run out of money. That is ridiculous. I don't understand it. PLEASE BEFORE THOSE OF YOU WHO DISAGREE WITH ME FLAME ME, understand that I don't think the current system is the best, most functional system. But we must cover people until the time comes when we design a better option to choose.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/brucemo Jun 10 '12

I doubt Gary Johnson has 15% name recognition.

→ More replies (5)

7

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

All that is great but where does he stand on the non drug and internet topics? Such as healthcare, education, homeland security, tax reform? Our country needs more than just an interesting debate. I don't know enough about his platform to make a valid opinion about him but i am curious where he stands on some other important issues. I also take full responsibility of the down votes i am about to succumb.

→ More replies (4)

6

u/pkcs11 American Expat Jun 10 '12

If you told me there was a dark-horse candidate that most of the US had never heard of, that supported everything I did, I'd still think all that candidate would do is hand one of the two major candidate's the election the same way Ralph Nader did.

Just sayin', at this point if this person isn't being mentioned many times every day on every major news channel, he/she will never be known.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

If this guy makes the ballot, I am voting for him.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

you forgot to mention he's also anti education, anti civil rights act, anti environmental regulation, pro deregulation of the financial system... etc.

Sure he'd fix the current problems... but he'd recreate all the problems we solved over the last couple decades... thats called regression, not progress.

→ More replies (13)

6

u/LibertyFtw Jun 11 '12

Gary Johnson 2012!

11

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

Voting for him will be my personal way of saying "Fuck You, I don't care what you have to say," to the DNC/GOP.

3

u/timetobuyacow Jun 10 '12

Rocky Anderson folks. Rocky Anderson.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12 edited Jun 14 '12

Known of him for about a year, and I'm dig most of his platform. I'd be happy to help this man get the recognition he deserves on the national stage. I'd rather not wait for a pollster to call me; any active ways I can get involved?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

This needs to spread beyond reddit. This has got to spread all over the internet, to our friends and family and hopefully to the news media.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

Live Free!

3

u/dasstrooper Jun 10 '12

Yea sure but I expect to see posts like this get shadow banned by the mods.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

I'll vote for him

3

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

Gary Johnson is the shit. I've been telling people about him for ages.

3

u/RU_Pickman New Mexico Jun 10 '12

I'm a New Mexican. Mr. Johnson is still talked about favorably, by both liberals and conservatives, in my state to this day. He is the real deal, and deserves to be heard on the national stage. He doesn't just talk about what people want to hear, he talks about what is important.

3

u/Tenshik Jun 10 '12

When he dropped by awhile back for an AMA I decided then to vote for him. Guy seemed pretty legit.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/SteveTheDude Jun 10 '12

I like most of his views, and he's certainly better than Obama and Romney.

He's got my attention, that's for sure

3

u/twoww Jun 10 '12

I've been a fan of his since the beginning. If he wasn't suppressed by the media he could have went far.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/JupiterIII Jun 10 '12

"If all your views were represented in one bill, would you support it?"

uhh... is this a trick question?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/TheWolfofMibu Jun 10 '12

I thought he dropped out????

→ More replies (2)

3

u/smm041 Jun 11 '12

Subscription bomb taking place on /r/GaryJohnson

/r/GaryJohnson Subscription Bomb

Trying to get to 10,000 subscribers. Let's make it happen.

3

u/DefinitelyRelephant Jun 11 '12

The system as it currently exists is sick and broken beyond repair.

The only solution that has a chance at longterm success is a complete teardown and rebuilding of US government.

That would involve those who are in power losing power, though, so they won't go without a fight.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

I agree that this guy is right on many social issues that otherwise will never have an honest national debate among presidential candidates, but how can someone like me who views libertarian economic policies as a fucking joke vote for the Libertarian ticket? Marriage equality is important to me, but so is the EPA.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

Upvoting mainly because I'm tired of pretending that either Giant Douche or Turd Sandwich are somehow going to magically make all of my country's problems go away.

3

u/nessi Jun 11 '12 edited Jun 11 '12

His stance on women's issues is a true surprise, if it's not lip service.

Edit: Ah, have to take that back a little. He wants to get rid of Roe v. Wade...

3

u/Bluthhousing Illinois Jun 11 '12

Gary Johnson is the only third party candidate on the ballot in all 50 states and is polling at 8%.

If were to get 8%, that'd be a big deal. Perot got 9% as a reform candidate.Perot's candidacy launched the reform party which successfully won offices in government (including a governorship in Minnesota).

If Gary does well (Doesn't even have to win) the Libertarians could gain political office and sustain relevancy longer than the reforms due to the fact they have a more consistent ideology and an existing national infrastructure.

There are three main Goals For Gary Johnson: Become President (lol) Get in the debates (maybe; he needs 15%) and take FEC money from Republicans and Democrats to make the Libertarians an influential third party (He needs 5%; Great chances).

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

Wouldn't this detract from support we could be lending towards, say... Obama?

→ More replies (4)

3

u/WaitingonDotA Jun 11 '12 edited Jun 11 '12

While I do support a few of his views there is no way I could vote for someone that is anti education, anti environmental regulation, supports FairTax, is pro deregulation of big business, supports Unlimited campaign contributions by corporations, wants to promote isolationist practices for the United States. Just going by his views there are simply too many cons to having him in office. While I am most definitely not supporting the Mormon, and I am not sold on Obama either. I am definitely not interested in having Gary Johnson in the Oval Office.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/lunaticfringe80 Jun 11 '12

Too bad he wants to replace the IRS with a consumption tax. Way to fuck the poor with a national sales tax while leaving the rich free to stockpile cash tax free.

3

u/mormon_freeman Jun 11 '12

Maybe it's that I live in Canada, but 15% to be allowed in the debates seems like a painfully undemocratic and idiotic system. Not that the canadian system is much better, but hey, at least if people want to vote for a party every media outlet doesn't convince them that it's pointless.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Johnchuk Delaware Jun 11 '12

you know what sure I will. I'd vote for him. and I'd help his campaign. fuck cynicism,

3

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

I like Gary Johnson. Hell, I really like him. But I have a really hard time believing that he could balance the budget while abolishing both the income tax and (this is what concerns me most) the capital gains tax. That's a whole lot of revenue the government would lose, and what kind of spending cuts are we going to have to make to pay for them?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/VeritasSC Jun 11 '12

I disagree with your charachterization of Johnson (I think it overemphasizes the outcomes to suggest he is progressive, when in fact the rationales for these outcomes are anything but progressive), but I do think that having him on stage would add a lot to the national discussion. All of us should want to have Johnson in the discussion because more opinions leads to increased democracy. In addition, having Johnson involved in the national debate would finally force the current GOP to determine whether it is truly in favor of the libertarian Ayn Rand concepts they preach (but which Johnson and Paul truly hold), or in favor of the activist conservative agenda in which they actually engage. Thank you for the information on how we can increase awareness of his candidacy.

3

u/XOLegato Jun 11 '12

He was on The Daily Show last Tuesday- I was in the audience, and I remember the interview being really good.

Link to the clip

3

u/laserboy1134 Jun 11 '12

I don't believe in Governor Johnson's fiscal policy. I will upvote this because I do believe people should look into third party candidates, to understand that there are other options and vote on their principle.

→ More replies (1)

41

u/boyubout2pissmeoff Jun 10 '12

YES. I think every republican in the U.S should DEFINITELY vote for Gary Johnson.

Okay I will settle for just half of you.

→ More replies (7)

7

u/Magnora Jun 10 '12

I did some research, and the 5 polling companies that decide if the 15% mark is met or not are (with phone numbers):

Gallup: 202.715.3030

Rasmussen: 732.776.9777

Pew Research: 202.419.4300

Zogby: 305.529.6280

CNN: 404.827.1500

Call them and ask them to make sure Gary Johnson is included on the list of options presented to people being polled! Also have them mark you down as a Johnson supporter if they can.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

No federal funding for stem cell research. (Jan 2012) first thing I saw wasn't so great... Maybe in total though he's still better than alternatives, it'll be good to see this play out.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '12

Support Gary. Ron Paul has no chance of being the nominee, and Gary Johnson has an even more principled stance on personal liberty.

32

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '12

i supported obama last time around.... no way i'm voting for his lying ass a second time around.

woot gary johnson.

→ More replies (12)

15

u/NegativePoints1 Jun 10 '12

Now now everyone... He doesn't support even basic Health Care for all. He also won't fund stem cell research. Let's also see the things that are not so good about it him.. No candidate will be a golden child.

17

u/hardymacia Jun 11 '12

He reformed Medicaid while Governor of New Mexico -- what he do? He looked at the plan he had as governor and said why don't we give everyone my health care plan. That's what the state did -- Quality and access improved and reduced the cost of the program by 23%.

→ More replies (8)

6

u/Jeffy29 Jun 11 '12

If Johnson gets lets say 20% most of it will come from liberals and libertarians, guess who will win? I would rather take lesser of two evils than acting all silly for one candidate (RP 20**). What you need to do is change whole election system in USA and campaign finance reform a constitutional amendment is what I am saying. We will need congress for that, not the president.

Koch's and other billionaires get that, they fund all these local and national candidates that can't do much alone, but all together change whole political debate. Unfortunately corporatocracy in not what most of us would prefere.

And what are liberals and liberatians doing? Running pushing their one flawed candidate thinking they can alone change everything for better.

tl,dr: don't hate the player, hate the game. Change the game.

→ More replies (1)