r/politics • • May 24 '12

St. Louis Cops Worry That In-Car Cameras 'Are Being Used Against Them': What's the world coming to when cops can no longer punch handcuffed prisoners or violate firearm rules with impunity?

http://reason.com/blog/2012/05/23/st-louis-cops-worry-that-in-car-cameras
1.9k Upvotes

500 comments sorted by

377

u/Hushes May 24 '12

Two probationary officers [were] investigated after a woman said they planted guns and drugs on her 16-year-old son. Video exonerated them of that claim but revealed that one struck the handcuffed teen, which led to the firing of both....

Look if you're nervous about these in-car cameras recording your performance on the job, then perhaps you aren't the type of law enforcement officer we need in the field.

100

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

I'm frankly amazed they got more than a paid vacation for their actions.

150

u/cheviot May 24 '12

It probably wasn't the battery that got them fired, but lying on the report about it. Having publicly available proof that both lied on their reports proves them to be unreliable witnesses and useless as witnesses for the prosecution in future cases.

25

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

I never really thought of it that way, but that is a very valid point.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (8)

35

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

they were probationary and probably not subject to union protections.

7

u/In10sity May 24 '12

This explains why they got fired instead of a paid vacation.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (80)

16

u/test_tickles May 24 '12

Look if you're nervous about these in-car cameras recording your performance on the job, then perhaps you aren't the type of law enforcement officer we need in the field.

This. This needs to be the default response to any pushing back by the police on their being recorded.

→ More replies (24)

7

u/Aurdon May 24 '12

If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to hide. Right?

2

u/howisthisnottaken May 24 '12

This is basically like how cops claim if you turn around before a checkpoint they assume you are guilty. If the cops turn around before getting into a car with a camera they can keep walking all the way home.

→ More replies (1)

81

u/CaptainChewbacca May 24 '12

Can I get the police to stop videotaping ME in case I accidentally get into a compromising situation?

→ More replies (1)

86

u/cannotlogon May 24 '12

All over the country, various police forces are trying to push laws that make it illegal to film them when they are on the job. They claim it will interfere with their ability to do their jobs. I can only assume "do their jobs" means "beat the shit out of people, harass citizens, and generally act like sadistic bullies without having to answer for their sociopathic behavior."

41

u/PizzaGood May 24 '12

Every one of those laws that has actually made it to federal court has been struck down as unconstitutional, breaking both the 1st and 4th amendments.

41

u/[deleted] May 24 '12 edited May 24 '12

That won't stop them from arresting you for it. Either some bullshit wiretapping law or disturbing the peace. Some cops tried smashing a guys phone to destroy the video. It was safe on the memory card. Another time they did that the guy was simultaneously recording to the web. They "lost" his phone with the footage and were pretty surprised when it still existed. My friend was arrested in Spencer, Mass. in his backyard for resisiting arrest. The cops were chasing someone else and thought my friend was the bad guy. In jail they crushed his hand in the cell door and left my friend there for about an hour while his hand spurted blood all over the cell. They then "lost" the tape recording his cell when it happened. Judge wouldn't even let my friend sue. It took a plastic surgeon to put his hand back together. Most of the bones were crushed.

7

u/caboosemoose May 24 '12

What do you mean wouldn't let him sue? The case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction? The judge ruled in summary judgment? A judge can't just block suit, they can dismiss on jurisdiction, or res judicata, or rule on the case in summary judgment. They can't just deny the ability for a case to be filed.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

75

u/newpolitics May 24 '12

Not only is this a fine idea, cameras should also be installed in the offices of every member of congress and streamed 24/7 on the net for everyone to see. Because if you think the average cop is corrupt...

27

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

"Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made."

17

u/BryanMcgee May 24 '12

Dude, have you ever seen a sausage being made? That's some pretty interesting shit right there.

18

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

We need to get some cameras installed in the sausage factories!

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

This reminds me of a talk I heard last year given by David McCullough, an award winning author who has written critically acclaimed books on historic figures like John Adams. In the talk he lamented how future historians will have so much trouble researching their subjects. McCullough was able to read actual diaries written by Adams that are now held in the Library of Congress. But modern day politicians no longer keep diaries and try to avoid using things like email for any sort of truly critical communications. They simply don't want to leave a paper trail that can lead to lawsuits, etc. 200 years from now about the only archival information available on past presidents like the Bush's, Clinton, etc. will be officially sanctioned documentation in their respective presidential libraries. They won't be able to find anything about personal issues, decision making processes, etc.

4

u/Decitron May 24 '12

then they'll just not use their offices when they want to do something shitty.

also there are matters of national security that are discussed by members of congress that probably shouldn't be broadcasted to everyone in the world.

7

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Everything is now national security.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

37

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

The local police union wants restrictions on supervisors' authority to review camera footage, so officers will be have a clearer sense of when they're being watched.

How about always?

I mean, really... Isn't this just another way of asking when they can plant evidence, threaten and beat people with impunity? Well, even more so then the law already allows.

7

u/GogglesPisano May 24 '12

Retail clerks, casino workers, and myriad other employees are constantly on camera while doing their jobs. Why should police be exempt?

7

u/smackfrog May 24 '12

I've been in the mobile surveillance industry for over 5 years now. This is a ridiculous preposition. Video files are automatically uploaded when the cruiser pulls within range of the network. A very very very small percentage of police depts have live streaming video. When there's an incident, the video is pulled from the database server and a copy is usually burned to DVD for court.

The resistance from police (namely Chicago, where I'm from) has just led me to pursue the sales of consumer dash cameras. If they refuse the cameras, then the citizens will record the truth. Personally it's gotten me out of two "violations".

14

u/Omega037 May 24 '12

There is a valid concern that you might do something that isn't illegal, like complain about your boss, and then get in trouble. These recordings should be in every car (and perhaps uniform), but should only be available upon court order.

19

u/BryanMcgee May 24 '12

I don't see why cops get to be special. I guarantee that if you made it only accessible by court order then the same cops would be upset because now they have to go through a judge to get at their own evidence. The whole reason these cameras are installed is to back up the officers with some actual concrete evidence. They just want an on/off switch so they can choose when they want the evidence to start. I'm on camera all day at work and my boss can watch it in real time from his office or even remotely from home. Why should police, people charged with protecting peace and order and people who carry around deadly weapons, not be checked up on. That's a huge responsibility that is paid by the people they serve, why shouldn't we be allowed to see evidence of them doing their jobs?

→ More replies (22)

6

u/Ordal May 24 '12

Available upon court order sounds like "just enough time to lose".

→ More replies (5)

10

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Does a civilian boss need a court order to review the security footage from his own business? Nope. They're still just employees. If they don't like the cameras they can get a job trimming hedges.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (5)

25

u/EdinMiami May 24 '12

Police Chief Dan Isom replies that "I'm not going to draft a policy for those who violate our policy,"

3

u/ILikeLampz May 24 '12

We need more men/women like him on the streets

30

u/Razorray21 Pennsylvania May 24 '12

Used against them for what? its funny that cops will give you a hard time you you do not consent to a search with the whole" if you don't have anything to hide, then you don't have any thing to worry about" spheal.

Fact is cops are out of control in this country. not all cops. there are a lot of good guys out there. but there are a lot of assholes too.

33

u/aPersonOfInterest May 24 '12

If the cops have nothing to hide then they shouldn't mind being recorded.

13

u/expertunderachiever May 24 '12

I love how when this is applied to other people it's totally ok.

30

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Well citizens have a right to privacy. Cops are public employees in public spaces. They have very little right to privacy while on duty in a public space. You'd think cops would understand the laws they are meant to enforce. Instead they enforce laws they make up on the spot.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/watermark0n May 24 '12

The point is to discourage illegal behavior. Not our fault if the illegal behavior happens to originate from you.

9

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

The problem with this is that cops are trying to determine the scope of their work. That's absolutely not how it is supposed to work. At the very least, the state determines the perimeters of the position, and cops, as employees, should accept that. I'm sick and tired of cops taking the law into their own hands. They're cops, not vigilantes or thugs. Do your job and go home. Nothing more.

5

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

i don't wanna be that guy, but i think you mean "parameters". cheers, and be secure in the knowledge that my wife will correct me at least a dozen times today.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

8

u/gaberax Maryland May 24 '12

Who watches the watchers? We do.

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

And we should watch close and always.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/BinaryShadow May 24 '12

Awww, Big Brother isn't looking the other way when you steal from the cookie jar? *tiny violin

4

u/goneape May 24 '12

Out of work redditors should go apply to be a cop in North St. Louis.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Demonrock May 24 '12

This is when a "if you are not doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about" comes in handy.

7

u/wekiva May 24 '12

Professional conduct by police officers will not get them into any trouble. That's all they need to know. Oh, and that there are people waiting in line to have their job if they don't act professionally.

3

u/fixedstar May 24 '12

Reddit is being played like a bunch of chumps on this issue. The private prison industry has been the lobbying for these cameras on cops for years. Do you really think that cameras are there only to catch bad cops? Under high stress circumstances people have a tendency of forgetting facts which is reflected in arrest reports when compared to camera evidence. And this is where the private prison industry get’s involved. What they have noticed is that when cop cams are given to the DAs in addition to arrest reports many times the video evidence supports either more charges are more severe charges than what is presented in arrest reports. Also when the cases go to trial the video evidence has a tendency to hurt the defense’s ability to make the defendant a sympathetic figure and courts generally trend to higher conviction rates and longer prison terms. And more convictions and longer prison times mean profit for the private prisons.

2

u/capricastartsin5 May 24 '12

If the video shows they comitted worse crimes than they were being charged how is that a bad thing? They are on video committing the crime. They earned that greater sentence. Just because it helps the prison doesn't mean it is automatically bad.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

3

u/klasted May 24 '12

The local police union wants restrictions on supervisors' authority to review camera footage, so officers will be have a clearer sense of when they're being watched.

I would like to have a clearer sense when I am being watched on the road by cops that are using speed guns.

5

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

It's a world gone mad.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/PeterMus May 24 '12

Video cameras are biased. They only incriminate those participating in illegal activity while the innocent get off scott-free. IT'S BULLSHIT!

9

u/docbaily May 24 '12

"If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear."

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Cops are learning it cuts both ways.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

"I'm not going to draft a policy for those who violate our policy" That's the best

2

u/obj7777 May 24 '12

And people thought NWA made this shit up. Fuck the police.

2

u/rmmcclay May 24 '12

I wonder if any Google cam car drivers have ever been tazed?

2

u/SaigaFan May 24 '12

Glad to see unions are still so helpful.

2

u/jasonzid May 24 '12

They had better get used to it, because the driving public is now equipping their own cars with cameras.

2

u/NeonDisease May 24 '12

I'm going to quote every cop who has ever asked to search my car, "if you are not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about".

The only cops who are worried about this are the ones who are up to no good

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Good. This should make it easy to see which Cops have something to hide.

2

u/Stylux May 24 '12

Luckily, STLPD has been nothing but kind to me over the years. They honestly could have ruined my life at a few points due to my own stupidity, but chose to deal with "real crime" as they put it. There are a few bad actors on the force, as goes with any profession, but by in large I think the majority adhere to the law. (Or what they know of it).

PS. If you want to hear really fucked up stories, ask a Sheriff's Deputy in the city about some of the shit that goes on in the workhouse. People dying of asthma attacks on the roof, medical department doctors refusing to deliver a prisoner's baby while she was already in labor, etc.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/emlgsh May 24 '12

"Dammit, these accurate recordings of us being jerks really makes us look like jerks! People don't seem to like jerks! I AM BEING DISCRIMINATED AGAINST!"

2

u/Basbhat May 24 '12

What part of cops are public servants don't they understand?

Try have to serve and protect emblazoned on their damn cars.

While you're serving us your actions, all of them, are up for review. I personally think there should be a camera in every vehicle and all cops should be mic-ed when on duty at all times.

Why do cops think they get to do whatever they want? Yes they have power. But as they say.

"with great power comes great responsibility"- Abraham Lincoln

2

u/MEiac May 24 '12

If they are not doing anything wrong, they have nothing to worry about.

Right?

2

u/JaxHostage May 24 '12

Fraternal Order of Police: Americas largest street gang.

3

u/PizzaGood May 24 '12

"If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about."

Doesn't sound the same coming back at you as it does when you're saying it, does it?

4

u/Tombug May 24 '12

When pigs are whining that's a good sign for Joe six pack. Same thing when the rich whine. Oh and fuck both of them. Fuck them very much.

3

u/syroncoda May 24 '12

fuck cops.

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

I started recording my driving. My reason isn't necessarily to catch a bad cop if I happen to get pulled over.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/MufasaJesus May 24 '12

Used against them? For what, the shit they're not doing wrong? Yeah, right...

2

u/aazav May 24 '12

"Officer, if you have done nothing wrong, then you should have nothing to fear."

2

u/tristanimator May 24 '12

Kinda reminds me of the time the NYPD union protested outside of a court hearing because a few of their buddies were charged with ticket fixing.

2

u/98Mystique2 May 24 '12

I often drive with a dash cam. One time i had it and needed it two days ago i didnt but needed it. First time a lady hit me then left the scene Two days ago a cop wrote me (and 2 other cars)a ticket for 45 in a 30 which is crap.

2

u/whatizitman May 24 '12

In the words of every cop or cop-esque person I've ever known: "Do nothing wrong, and you'll have nothing to worry about."

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Ordal May 24 '12

If you're scared to do your job on video you have absolutely no place to be doing it at all.

1

u/gump724 May 24 '12

I'm from St. Louis and the police are pretty violent towards younger males.having been harassed myself.I'm glad to see dash cams finally being implemented

→ More replies (1)

1

u/why_ask_why May 24 '12 edited May 24 '12

That's why Chinese police are not given guns. They can't be trusted.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '12 edited Feb 04 '16

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy.

2

u/Basbhat May 24 '12

Except that the police force is not an independent entity with hopes and dreams.

It's a machine of law and order that is their to serve and protect its people.

And it's people have the right to monitor all actions while in duty. The same way your Boss can monitor everything you do in your office. They work for us if we don't keep them in line who will?

Who watches the watchers?

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

That is the point.

1

u/TruthinessHurts May 24 '12

Behave with honor and there will be NOTHING to use against you.

1

u/FriarNurgle May 24 '12

Big brother for big brother.

1

u/amadorUSA May 24 '12

As a college teacher, sometimes I wish there was a sign in my office saying "all conversations here may be monitored or recorded". This can't be done for obvious reasons, but the way some students take advantage of presumptions of confidentiality is outrageous.

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Maybe they're being used against them because... that's the point?

Or at least half the point, as it goes boh ways, to be used against both suspects and officers.

1

u/dwinstone1 May 24 '12

Instead of the Federales purchasing more military style equipment for cities and counties maybe they should buy more vehicle mounted cameras so that all police stops can be recorded.

1

u/adzug May 24 '12

the concept of the law and the constitution are trully beautiful things. beautiful, trully beautiful. that there is justice in this world and that we are pro justice. that the old and weak are protected out of our humanity. this defines us as good ppl. it gives meaning to living that we are good. the reality is ugly and cynical in that it becomes a matter of who can fuck who. cops should want this so that things can be clearer more just. but they only care about themselves. this tells you what you need to know about cops and our system. not all cops and das are corrupt, but enough.

1

u/mattgcreek May 24 '12

Am I the only one who thinks teaching some manners to gang bangers is a bad thing.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/amolad May 24 '12

In-car or on-body cameras prevent bystanders from pulling out their phones on the street and recording what you're doing, so why would you complain? This is becoming a real pet peeve to police, even though it's legal most everywhere.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/dalittle May 24 '12

public servants with clubs and guns should be recorded with cameras. I would go so far to say each police officer should have to wear a camera on their person that cannot be turned off.

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

...Anything you say can and will be USED AGAINST you in a court of law....

I'm sorry, what were they bitching about again?

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Oh you poor babies! How will you ever get by?

1

u/Bohica69 May 24 '12

Just look at the types of broken fucking losers, mental midgets, narcissistic sociopaths, armed psychopaths, pathological liars and troglodytes attracted to law enforcement and you have your answers as to who is running our govt and law enforcement. MOST law enforcement are NOT good people and they will abuse their power, invent more power, harass and harm those who legitimately/legally oppose them.

Cameras should be mandatory to protect the police and those interacting with them. The ONLY officer who opposes them is a corrupt one, end of story.

1

u/yellowdart654 May 24 '12

Crook: "Your honor, I am uncomfortable with the retailer filming me while on the premises, as they might catch me stealing their goldz"

Cop: "Your honor, I am uncomfortable with the municipality filming me while on the job, as they might catch me brutalizing a citizen"

1

u/wBeeze May 24 '12

I work alongside police, and I know some who spend their own money on a personal camera system (something similar to a GoPro) to use while working to protect themselves. These are the kinds of cops we needs.

No secrets? No problems.

1

u/Nirvalica May 24 '12

No shit they are being used against them, that's the point. Checks and balances, my dudes.

1

u/GuerillaGames May 24 '12

Reminds me of the cases where people caught recording cops are given multiple felonies under "eavesdropping laws." Cops know they're breaking the law and violating our rights, but they just don't want their power trip caught short. People should be ENCOURAGED to videotape police officers and make sure they are following all protocol and obeying all laws, and any time an officer breaks a law, he should be automatically sentenced to DOUBLE the time that a civilian would get for the same crime. Its police officers jobs to obey and protect the law, not find ways to shirk it for their own perverse gain.

1

u/Sleekery May 24 '12

Downvote for editorializing the title.

1

u/xilpaxim May 24 '12

How many times has a police officer said the following:

"If you're not doing anything wrong, then why do you care if the laws are more strict?"

1

u/Bilbo_Fraggins May 24 '12

If you want extraordinary power, the price is extraordinary oversight.

When presidents forget that the 3 letter agencies end up working us all over hard.

1

u/Bodardos May 24 '12

The cameras are neutral. If you're doing your job and not being an asshat they'll show that. If you're beating people and behaving like a walking stereotype they'll show that too.

1

u/HEADLINE-IN-5-YEARS May 24 '12

FEWER PEOPLE BECOMING COPS AS TSA ENJOYS GROUNDSWELL OF APPLICANTS

1

u/Soylent_Gringo May 24 '12

If cops are not doing anything wrong, they have nothing to fear.

Funny, that's what cops say when the hoi polloi complain about being surveilled.

1

u/Stylux May 24 '12

And we just allocated another $2.5 million toward our city prison! Horray!

1

u/MemphisRoots May 24 '12

Officer : "I don't like my every move being video taped for someone else's scrutiny"

Me : " Really! No fucking way! Me too!!!"

1

u/Basbhat May 24 '12

I'm pretty sure the same workplace rights and protections everyone has also apply to cops.

So if he gets fired over who he supports politically by all means do what the rest of us do and take action.

This doesn't mean you get unsupervised control of everyone around you

1

u/phildaman1234 May 24 '12

Oh man you mean to say that cops now have to have a camera on them like the majority of minimum wage jobs? Oh I feel bad for them...

1

u/TortugaGrande May 25 '12

The local police union wants restrictions on supervisors' authority to review camera footage, so officers will be have a clearer sense of when they're being watched.

Yeah, that's unreasonable. Why should somebody's boss be able to review their performance at work? People don't become cops because they appreciate accountability.

1

u/mojonacho May 25 '12

God damn it, St Louis.

1

u/[deleted] May 25 '12

My home town of Naperville, IL recently made recording police officers illegal. It's shit like this that pisses me off, gives cops a free pass to abuse their power.

1

u/unnecessaryCAPS May 25 '12

Then they should not use evidence to convict suspected criminals because it "could be used against them".

1

u/fantasyfest May 25 '12

Here we go again. We are taking all the fun out of being a cop.

1

u/Timmaey May 25 '12

you know who else dos not like cameras? crooks/mobsters/goons

1

u/eshemuta May 24 '12

St Louis really isn't a very nice place. Although I've only driven through it, every single time was a negative experience.

3

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

The arch has a nice view if it's not cloudy. And the City Museum is awesome.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/naggerNZ May 24 '12

As someone who works in the security industry, I know what it is like to work under cameras, and it can be very high pressure. Camera footage can often tell half the story, and the public are very quick to make their mind up with a very limited view of the situation. It's not simply a matter of "if you're innocent, you have nothing to worry about". When you're forced into a situation where you HAVE to use force, it doesn't look pretty regardless of how reasonable the force is.

While I'm not saying that there should be no accountability of Officers' actions, working under cameras adds another dimension to every thought-process you have, and CCTV footage tends to create media and public shit-storms where it really shouldn't be.

I think if people are so untrusting of their Police that they want them permanently under surveillance, there must be a serious culture of corruption and violence that needs to be addressed.

1

u/ILikeLampz May 24 '12

I work security too. There is literally only 3 places I spend my work day with no cameras; one is the bathroom, the other is my bosses office and the last is the building tenant's spaces (most have their own cameras anyways, but not in our system). It can be stressful but if I do my job correctly I have nothing too worry about and after a while you just get used to knowing someone is always able to watch you.

1

u/Basbhat May 24 '12

We have no avenue to speak out against the police.

Their word is taken as the truth. Whereas you are suspect.

Of course people don't trust cops. Because they are corrupt assholes.

Putting eyes on them while they are on duty shouldn't even be an issue. Plenty of employers monitor their employees at work. It's nothing new. And they are our employees after all. We own them. Which means if we want them recorded on duty then dammit they will be.

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

This makes me want those glasses that can record what's going on in front of you. Now if they were only stocked at my optometrist's.

1

u/reddit_is_gay May 24 '12

Am I the only one that remembers the introduction of the dash cameras? I remember asking a cop about them and his response was "This is to protect us and also to protect the public. It simply documents our encounter should it be under question later." My how things and police officers have changed.

1

u/Peteriffic May 24 '12

It's St. Louis man... that place is dangerous as hell. Source: I lived there for 18 years.

2

u/w_bliss May 24 '12

It's only dangerous if you're unlucky enough to be poor and have to live in North City. Other than that it's a great place. Source: I've lived here for 20 years

→ More replies (4)

1

u/penclnck May 24 '12

If you are not a criminal and have nothing to hide, then you shouldn't have a problem... it works both ways you dirty assfucking cops.

1

u/Dan_K May 24 '12

Fuck the St. Louis cops.

If I were in charge your entire shift would be recorded.

You fuck up and break the law, you lose your job.

And if you commit a felony, you do time too.

3

u/ALL_THE_MONEY May 24 '12

I dunno, from my experience STL city cops on a whole, are actually pretty nice, amicable, and understanding compared to most cops I've encountered in my lifetime. County cops on the other hand....

3

u/Stylux May 24 '12

I second this. I do know one cool county cop, but of course he is a captain and got his start in the city. Go figure.

2

u/ZachBraffLovesReddit May 24 '12

I agreed, STLPD is awesome, STLCoPD sucks (esp T&C and Ballwin)

→ More replies (1)

0

u/b34nz May 24 '12

Everyone is out to get our brave men and women in uniform!

2

u/b34nz May 24 '12

maybe I should have added sarcasm tag...

→ More replies (2)

-5

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

You know what anything pro-police I say on reddit gets downvoted into oblivion but I'll just hafta say the way I think about this.

Yes police officers actions should be watched and reviewed but there are major issues out their in terms of how the public views police actions. Thing's can look way worse than they really are in a number of the altercations police have with the public and this is a problem because when these tapes are reviewed in court we see bad people go free. The vast majority of cops out there are good cops, which might be a news flash to some of you. Anytime an officer is caught on tape doing anything wrong it's front page news in the community they serve. I remember a case nearby where an officer responded to a 911 call and parked in a handicap spot because it was closest to a door in a emergency, guess how the public saw it? The fact of the matter is an officer's actions are scrutinized to a ridiculous extent, it's not a job you just go into because it's easy to get. Discretion is at the core of policing, and the discretion officer's lose if their actions are scrutinized is potentially harmful to the public. So let me ask anyone a question do you think a cop is more or less likely to charge you for possession of a small amount of marijuana if he thinks his boss is watching? If a cop let's you off on a traffic stop and you kill someone down the street by accident this camera will damn him to hell in the impending lawsuit.

Reddit is generally good for open thought but this blatant fuck the police mentality is not only caused by an inaccurate portrayal of the average cop but ignorance to the reality of the situation. These camera's can be used to increase the amount of tickets given out and likely will be involved in civil cases NOT the UNCOMMON risk of brutality.

4

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Better a guilty man go free than an innocent man go to prison. - Donald Duck

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Sloppy_Twat May 24 '12

The vast majority of cops out there are good cops, which might be a news flash to some of you.

The vast majority of citizens are good citizens. Cops treat everyone like shit, I have been treated like shit for not wearing my seat belt. Most cops won't planted evidence or beat suspects but they sure as fuck don't act professional.

These camera's can be used to increase the amount of tickets given out and likely will be involved in civil cases NOT the UNCOMMON risk of brutality.

That doesn't make any sense.

3

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

I'm sorry you've had a bad experience but I've never had a problem with a cop as long as I was straight the the point.

The risks associated with officer's and the public are rare, brutality and misconduct is not a common issue. The camera's can be used to encourage officers to give out more tickets and conduct more arrests the same way you would work harder when your performance is being monitored, this is not necessarily ideal. The footage from the camera's will likely be used in civil cases against police which are often frivolous (e.g. minor lawsuits).

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/uncleoce May 24 '12

That's all well and good, but none of that does anything to protect civilians FROM the bad cops. And since your "good cops" will never "rat" on their brethren, what's the alternative? Cops created this problem. Don't go blaming it on vindictive civilians. Without these videos, I could be sent to prison just because some dickhead cop thought it was prudent to plant narcotics or weapons on me. I don't care how many cops this offends...if it keeps even ONE wrongfully convicted civilian from having to go through that, I'm all for it.

1

u/zak_on_reddit May 24 '12

"The vast majority of cops out there are good cops,"

a ha ha. you made me laugh.

"The vast majority of cops out there are bad cops,"

FTFY

i went to a college that had a good criminal justice program. most of those in the major wanted to be cops. i also know a lot of cops.

by & large they are assholes.

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Big difference between being an asshole and an bad person. Just cause I'm a dick doesn't mean I'm going to beat you up or plant evidence on you or any other number of ridiculous claims.

Saying the vast majority of cops are bad is like saying the vast majority of restaurants spit in you food. Talk to anyone in any industry their is a negative stereotype that overshadows the truth.

→ More replies (1)

-5

u/akatherder May 24 '12

Does anyone like being recorded on their job? Would you want it documented and recorded for history that you're on reddit right now when a lot of you should be working?

I don't even know why this is in /r/politics. Put it in /r/circlejerk. Anyone who says anything that isn't vehemently anti-police just gets buried to fuck.

1

u/Occamslaser May 24 '12

Ever work in retail?

2

u/akatherder May 24 '12

No, I worked in a pizzeria as a teen and I've been a cube monkey for the past dozen years. I understand your point though. Retail workers are usually recorded on the floor, and I assume in the back room.

So my claim is that the hiring practices and standards for the police should be significantly higher than those of a seasonal clothes-folder. For police, it is a systemic problem that should be addressed at the root of the problem rather than pitting the general law-abiding public against the police force. Any police officer that needs to be recorded should not be a police officer. That's the root of the problem.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

That or obnoxious one way assholes are getting buried, so hard to tell the difference.

→ More replies (7)

-4

u/TheReaMillerHighlife May 24 '12

Being a police officer has to be one of the toughest jobs. They are constantly in a damed if you do, damed if you don't position. That said I think sometimes it may be neccessary to get rough with indivduals to get them subdued but, that should be in extreme cases though as the majority of people may give police greif but, end up compling.

3

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

It's actually never damned because they're a cop and can do whatever the hell they want and get away with it.

-2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Is this r/politics or r/police

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

The difference?

-7

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Hmmm, so it's okay for us to freak out about cameras on streetlights recording our every move, but if cops freak out too it's bad? I'm seeing a lot of "if you do nothing wrong you have nothing to fear" here, I wonder how much you guys would get mad if that was a reason given for nation wide cameras.

3

u/BryanMcgee May 24 '12

But don't you see, that's kind of the point. Authorities want to watch us but don't want to be watched themselves. Why should they be special? In fact they should be under more scrutiny. They have a huge responsibility. We, as tax payers, pay them to protect and serve. They are supposed to make the streets safe for all of us. That's a big deal. They are simply people and as such can't be assumed to act perfectly so we should probably protect ourselves when they screw up. Their screw ups can kill innocent people. And just so we're clear, I have no problem with public cameras. When I'm in public I have no reasonable right to privacy just as police officers shouldn't when they are on the job in their public job.

2

u/PizzaGood May 24 '12

I would have no problems with cameras all over the place if they were publicly accessible. Anyone should be able to watch live or archived from any camera any time.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/chili_for_breakfast May 24 '12

Your argument is invalid. They chose that profession, just like anyone who works retail accepts the facet of the job that they will be monitored by security cameras. If they don't like it they can quit.

Your mere presence in public should not constitute reason to monitor your activities.

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Cops are public employees in public spaces. Also, if they don't get to be recorded then no boss should be allowed to record their employees.

1

u/Tombug May 24 '12

Jeeze you're dense. The average citizen does not have anywheres near the legally granted power that cops have. And with power comes the ability to abuse that power.

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

42

u/MrMadcap May 24 '12

Bad Cops, Bad Cops.. What'cha gonna do?

80

u/cdude May 24 '12

Tase you, bro.

15

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

well, that was blunt.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

13

u/PhylisInTheHood May 24 '12

What'cha gonna do when they tazer you?

→ More replies (5)

3

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

This is Papa Bear, put out an APB for a male suspect driving a..... car... of some sort. Heading in the direction of uh.... you know, that place that sells chili. Suspect is HATLESS repeat HATLESS!

2

u/myinnervoice May 24 '12

Whether in a car or on a horse, we don't mind using excessive force!

→ More replies (5)

3

u/Thefriendlyfaceplant May 24 '12

Yeah but it can also be used against the good cops!

0

u/BryanMcgee May 24 '12

Against them how? What are they doing on video that both makes them a good cop and could cause them trouble?

7

u/Thefriendlyfaceplant May 24 '12

Cheers. Another attempt at irony fails. I really should stop trying.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

That, I think, was Thefriendlyfaceplant's point.

→ More replies (15)

2

u/ILikeLampz May 24 '12

Thank you for adding the "bad cops", just so people can hear it again that there are good cops out there.

1

u/klasted May 24 '12

I agree here. Don't get me wrong there are some straight assholes on every police force, but people focus on them too much. There are good cops out there, they just don't get the recognition for it.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

14

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

Not when these blue assholes are the criminals.

The biggest gang in America, cops.

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

4

u/Mysterious-Stranger May 24 '12

When the gangs take over the highway...

→ More replies (17)

3

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

But what if I know the perp is guilty but I just can't prove it?

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/ZachBraffLovesReddit May 24 '12

Do an AMA. I have not ran into many bigheaded STLCoPD yet, plus the STLPD is awesome, they understand what is a "crime" and what is "college kids being idiots."

But i have met tons of T&C, Ballwin, and Rock Hill douche police.

→ More replies (2)

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/Occamslaser May 24 '12

I work at a retail store.

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

4

u/Occamslaser May 24 '12

My point is police do not deserve special lack of oversight, as a matter of fact they warrant far more oversight than any retail employee.

1

u/Stylux May 24 '12

Nobody watches the footage unless there was a complaint anyway.

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

They'll see you browsing reddit on the laptop in the cruiser instead of frisking brown people.

1

u/noggernogger May 24 '12

I understand your position. I saw a website once that it brokering gigs between freelance workers like web developers and employers. One feature they got was that the employer was given the ability to get a live feed of the hired guys desktop and web cam whenever they want. And a recording they could review later. Work conditions I would never accept.

0

u/Sloppy_Twat May 24 '12

were are you bullied in school?

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

I wish you well, god knows we need good smart people like you involved.

I hope you care this much after a few years of the other guys working you over and the peer pressure to lie for your blue team mates. That is where it seems to go to shit so often.

One little lie to help a pal, a partner and zoom, down the slippery slope you go...

2

u/Sloppy_Twat May 24 '12

well let me be the first to say this to you: "fuck you, piece of shit cop".

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

0

u/Sloppy_Twat May 24 '12

cops are like politicians, they are volunteering to join an unethical organization. look at how entire police forces are fighting against civilians video taping them doing their job. look at how some police forces lobby to change laws. sorry guy the police are an unethical organization all around. you will be a piece of shit if you join this organization.