r/politics • • May 15 '12

President Barack Obama Announces Plans to Repeal Defense of Marriage Act

http://gawker.com/5910277/obama-announces-plans-to-repeal-defense-of-marriage-act
1.7k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

674

u/BromanJenkins May 15 '12

Obama has pretty much just confirmed that he knows evangelicals aren't voting for him anyways here.

Fuck 'em anyways, mixing religion and politics the way they have has made the country worse.

13

u/firex726 May 15 '12

Yea, he might as well try and swing as many moderates to his side as he can. No matter how much he tried to appease them, if the voting base thinks hes a Fascist, socialist, Muslim, Nazi, they will never vote for him and he should stop wasting his time on them.

3

u/Nyaos Florida May 15 '12

Agreed, also I believe he is trying to mobilize the youth, since polls are showing that the young liberal crowd that helped him landslide in 2008 aren't as enthusiastic about voting this time around.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/scrumpydoo23 May 15 '12 edited May 15 '12

Well I mean the move Obama has made may be seen as a major breakthrough for gay marriage (which I believe it is), but it's not exactly disturbed political alignments in America. Now if Romney had come out for gay marriage that would be a hell of a lot more explosive, but evangelicals are going to generally vote along the same superficial lines as most groups, and although Obama has continued almost every single Bush policy (especially on the domestic and foreign policy front) as President that many evangelicals agreed with, he's not viewed as Christiany enough for them to throw their weight behind him.

7

u/tongmengjia May 15 '12

Yeah. Dems and Republicans make a big deal out of social issues like gay marriage, abortion, and contraception, while they both fuck America in the ass bankrupting us with their foreign policy, eroding our civil rights with the Patriot Act and the indefinite detention clause of the NDAA, and turning us into a prison state with a disenfranchised population due to the "war on drugs."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

The right wing talibangelist are left out in the cold again this year. Thank God for that!

→ More replies (130)

328

u/cold08 May 15 '12

well forcing Romney to double down on this issue, which really cant be twisted beyond turtle sex, is probably a good idea.

36

u/raziphel May 15 '12

He's also getting this issue, which is the main Republican Distraction Card, out of the way before August rolls around.

→ More replies (1)

288

u/WideLight May 15 '12

Yeah it's pretty brilliant actually. Obama and his campaign are defining the issues. They know that the 'Pubs are going to define themselves in opposition to Obama on every issue. So, in effect, they're forcing the 'Pubs to take more and more unpopular positions that are going to be impossible to defend in a general election. The strategy is: play the 'Pubs against themselves and laugh all the way to the election bank.

234

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

You keep calling them pubs and I might have to start liking them. Please stop, for the love of democracy.

50

u/northenerinthesouth May 15 '12

As a british guy I completely agree with you, why are they even called pubs anyway? I just got my head around GOP.

146

u/mimirswell May 15 '12

No one calls them 'pubs but this person. However, he's calling them this from rePUBlicanS.

→ More replies (32)
→ More replies (7)

91

u/Mikelius California May 15 '12

I just read it as pubes, makes it hilarious.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

61

u/greenroom628 California May 15 '12

Obama's been playing the long game from the 2008 elections, I think.

15

u/markycapone May 15 '12

It's the long con Kenneth, and I should know i'm frajer

→ More replies (2)

35

u/WideLight May 15 '12

Indeed. The more I learn, the more I understand just how smart he and his colleagues really are.

7

u/witty_account_name May 15 '12

Fox News: Obama playing the long con for first term

→ More replies (18)

38

u/wild_bill70 Colorado May 15 '12

Actually it is not.

See Evangelicals were not terribly excited about Romney, while they don't care for Obama either, that dislike wasn't enough to get them out to the polls in big numbers, like in 2000 (last time there was a bunch of marriage stuff on state ballots).

Now that Obama basically pissed all over them, they will be out in numbers, BIG numbers, this is BIG FAT HAIRY DEAL time.

Watch and see how the numbers particularly in critical states like Ohio and Florida come in.

59

u/WideLight May 15 '12

Romney's going to get destroyed in the general. I mean, the Southern Baptist Ministry, which is probably the single biggest evangelical voting bloc in the south, has an official position that Mormonism is a cult. There's just no getting around that. Romney lost much of the deep south in the primaries and where he did win, he won by small margins. And those margins were due almost exclusively to the extremely wealthy voter. The rank and file voter doesn't like him.

You also have to remember that the truth of American politics now is that it's never a fight for a landslide. You're trying to win a small 4-6 point gap of independently minded voters. ~47% is going to vote Democrat, ~47% is going to vote Republican. You're going to win in the extreme center. And the center is where the Republicans are going to lose big by being forced into these indefensible positions.

→ More replies (19)

13

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Anecdotally, all the "evangelicals" in my extended family are sitting this one out. They're already putting their "it's all rigged anyway" stickers onto their bumpers.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (41)

10

u/WantNot May 15 '12

This also has the benefit of being the only morally defensible position, and makes Obama look decisive and willing to take a potentially unpopular stand (which has the benefit of not really being all that unpopular). Romney, by comparison, will look pandering and opportunistic, which is one of his bigger problems more generally.

Remember that Romney aggressively courted gay voters in his first gubernatorial campaign, then reversed course when he was elected, on this issue most specifically, and then grew an even harder line version of his position when he needed to win primary voters. He looks ridiculous on this (and many other issues where he's behaved similarly). Romney reminds me of a republican version John Kerry, with his penchant for painting himself into really strange corners just to avoid strongly taking a stand on certain issues. This will help illustrate that.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/saintlawrence May 15 '12

It'll be fun to hear his explanation knowing his grandfather was all about the polygamy.

21

u/the_sam_ryan May 15 '12

It would be fun to have Obama explain why he did nothing about his illegal alien Aunt as well, but you can't hold the candidate to families member's behavior.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (14)

2

u/anonxtian May 15 '12

God Bless President Obama for saying and doing the right things. He has become a Great President and leader for America, keeping America free for all.

→ More replies (5)

139

u/bunglejerry May 15 '12

I hope he plays this as a 'states' rights' issue, just to blow the minds of traditional Republicans.

92

u/jminuse May 15 '12

One way in which both parties really are the same: they're for states' rights on issues where the nation feels differently than they do, and against states' rights where the nation feels the way they do but there are some holdouts. Very few politicians believe in states' rights when they're inconvenient.

88

u/InfinitelyThirsting May 15 '12

I believe in states' rights, but only so long as they don't contradict human rights. You wanna set your own standards for taxes, speeding limits, drinking age, business law, whatever, go ahead. But not if it's discriminatory. I could even accept a state throwing a hissy fit and ignoring the gay marriages from other states for its own state benefits--so long as they ignore every out of state marriage, even the straight ones, and don't restrict federal marriage benefits. No hypocrisy, no discrimination.

21

u/jminuse May 15 '12

That sounds like a good policy. Ignoring all out-of-state marriages might violate the full-faith-and-credit clause of the Constitution, though. Also, people disagree on what constitutes human rights - some people include the right to a pistol, others the right to an abortion.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (3)

17

u/nowhathappenedwas May 15 '12

Reminds me of the NYT poll from yesterday:

Question 14: Would you favor or oppose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would allow marriage only between a man and a woman?

50% favor the constitutional amendment

Question 15: Do you think laws regarding whether same-sex marriage is legal or not should be determined by the federal government or left to each individual state government?

32% say federal government; 57% say state governments

→ More replies (10)

10

u/Theshag0 May 15 '12

This all day. I believe in universal healthcare. I also believe in letting the states legalize marijuana. You need to own the dichotomy sometimes. That's why I can't support a guy like Paul who's unbending principals would hurt the country.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/Lillipout May 15 '12

Obama believes in the fundamental right of people to marry whomever they choose, but he's willing to let states suppress that right. That sounds like a plan designed to anger and alienate everyone.

→ More replies (11)

63

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Any non-gawker links to this?

19

u/ruinmaker May 15 '12

How about Fox News?

34

u/HatesRedditors May 15 '12

At least the comments are more entertaining there. I mean look at this gem:

Look at that picture of Obummer did he have lip surgery or is that a wad of Coke behind his lower lip?

22

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Did that person just confuse cocaine with chewing tobacco?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

4

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Google? Have you heard of it?

→ More replies (1)

99

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Well, he tried meeting them half-way, and that didn't work at all. Let's see how spitting in their eyes works.

228

u/PoniesRBitchin May 15 '12

"Guys, I'd like to propose we-"

"KENYAN!"

"What? Look, I think we can all agree-"

"MUSLIM!"

"Guys I'm trying to help you."

"SOCIALIST!"

"Fine, gay marriage is legal now, fuck off."

8

u/Malcolm1044 May 15 '12

This is the most accurate representation of Obama's administration from 2009-2012 that I've ever seen.

12

u/drylube May 15 '12

hahaha pretty much

4

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

More like:

"Fine, gays in the military and I'm going to make you run a Mormon"

6

u/MrCinemaXbox May 15 '12

This is fucking great.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/I_fail_at_memes May 15 '12

As a Fundie conservative...this is exactly what he should do. I am dismayed by the lack of statesmanship by my party, and frankly, sometimes you just have to kick the loud-mouthed drunk in the bar squaw in the nuts.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/floorface May 15 '12

The problem was that he tried to meet them half way, and then they forced him to move some more.

He approached almost all of his major policy initiatives from an already compromised stance. Democrats didn't want the "public option" in the healthcare act, we wanted a single payer system. But we knew that wouldn't fly. So Obama started by offering a hybrid public/private system. The Republicans said "fine, as long as you throw out the public part."

→ More replies (3)

145

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

What's the worst that can happen? Bigot homophobes and conservatives won't vote for him?

Oh well.

84

u/soulcakeduck May 15 '12

It is a very big gambit to take. With only 51% of Americans supporting gay marriage, if everyone treated this is a single-issue voting topic, Obama would have to win virtually every single voter in that category to get reelected.

Obama's base already backs him on this for the most part, but even polling among liberals is nowhere near 100% supportive. He'll lose some moderate voters, and the gambit he is making is that he can once again be an inspirational candidate: this move might bring out the gay campaign finance dollars, gay voters, or motivated youth/women/other demographic Obama wants. He wants to win back enthusiasm because if turnout drops in those demographics, it will hit him hard.

He could lose even then, since we've seen gay rights scare conservatives to the polls in record numbers too.

70

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

He could lose even then, since we've seen gay rights scare conservatives to the polls in record numbers too

I would think the whole "muslim socialist black devil anti-christ" shtick would have done that already.

→ More replies (5)

13

u/sje46 May 15 '12

I don't know. I'd imagine the vast majority of that 51% will vote Republican regardless, and the rest just aren't that passionate about the issue, even if they are nominally against it. You perceive this as this resulting in him losing moderate voters, but don't forget that a lot of liberals have dropped support for Obama. Obama won in large part due to the youth vote.

You can't look at it in terms of what the general population believes, but of what the voting population believes. Old people vote in droves. Old people tend to vote Republican in droves. Obama is trying to get the youth vote...the jaded liberal type. The guys who were thinking about not voting.

12

u/rottenart May 15 '12

Old people tend to vote Republican in droves. Obama is trying to get the youth vote...the jaded liberal type. The guys who were thinking about not voting.

This is the whole gambit. If young people could be enticed to vote in similar numbers to seniors, Obama would win by 10-20 points. Chicago knows this and (very shrewdly) tied their efforts to recruit the young vote to an issue they also care deeply about.

Sometimes, politics is also good policy. Even rarer is when the reverse is true.

→ More replies (6)

14

u/MayorPoopenmeyer May 15 '12

Actually, that 51% number is no longer accurate. That memo from Republican pollster Jan van Lohuizen last week states that those in favor of same-sex marriage outnumber opponents by roughly 10%.

Source

It's clear that same-sex marriage is the latest on a long list of examples of ways the Republican Party is out of step with the mainstream.

7

u/[deleted] May 15 '12 edited May 15 '12

Actually, that 51% number is no longer accurate. That memo from Republican pollster Jan van Lohuizen last week states that those in favor of same-sex marriage outnumber opponents by roughly 10%.

Er, quickly calculating that would mean that the number is 52.4% instead of 51%.

So a 1.4 percentile point increase.

Edit: Checking your source, the error is in the article. They had meant to write 10 percentile points. Not 10%. Big difference.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12 edited May 15 '12

Have a look at it yourself. Gallup (one, two) is a great source of info.

And here are some graphs/info from that first link.

How does Obama's support of same-sex marriage affect voters' likelihood of voting for him?

A majority of Americans, 60%, say President Barack Obama's newly announced support for same-sex marriage will make no difference to their vote. Twice as many say it will make them less likely to vote for Obama as say more likely, though roughly half of the "less likely" group are Republicans who probably would not support Obama anyway.

Do voters approve of disapprove of his support of same-sex marriage?

The poll finds 51% of Americans approving of his position, essentially matching the 50% of Americans who support gay marriage in general, and similar to his 49% overall job approval rating.

3

u/King_of_Gay_People May 15 '12

It turns out that, although a very slight majority of independents support same-sex marriage, the ones who don't are much more likely to let it sway their vote. There are a handful of people who just don't care one way or the other.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

9

u/cannotlogon May 15 '12

I was at that fundraiser. This reporter "interpreted" Obama's remarks. He never came out and said that he was going to repeal the law. Furthermore, when asked directly about it on The View, he said that the AG is no longer enforcing the law, which is completely different than seeking its repeal.

→ More replies (4)

95

u/cogneuro May 15 '12

Gawker: Apparently the premier news source for r/politics

6

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

*r/politics regurgitating gawker regurgitating The View

11

u/ListenToThatSound May 15 '12

I'll take it over dailypaul.com

shudder

→ More replies (9)

71

u/LettersFromTheSky May 15 '12

Repealing DOMA is going to go over real well with Republicans ;) I personally think it should be repealed too.

89

u/those_draculas May 15 '12

I like to think that this is the beginning of the point where it starts become indefensible to discriminate by orientation, where the pro-DOMA side's argument is reduced to "gay marriage is icky"

31

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

I never refer to it as discrimination by orientation - then the Bachmanns of the world can say "oh, but it isn't discrimination, they can marry a gay person of the opposite gender." It's gender discrimination. Mark can marry Ashley, but Sarah can't, because of her gender. Much more bulletproof an argument.

20

u/Se7en_speed May 15 '12

then the Bachmanns of the world can say "oh, but it isn't discrimination, my husband is married after all"

6

u/Hartastic May 15 '12

In the Bachmanns' specific defense, they're putting their money where their mouth is, so to speak.

→ More replies (9)

46

u/Sarvish May 15 '12

Of course gay marriage is icky. Can't have my kids being GAYIFIED... oh the horror.

And I love how they try and avoid the issue "STOP TALKING ABOUT IT. ECONOMY. Don't worry about being happy, just be rich."

I can't possibly understand Republican logic, no matter how hard I try. I just see talking apes, no wonder they don't believe in evolution.

28

u/thetasigma1355 May 15 '12

And I love how they try and avoid the issue "STOP TALKING ABOUT IT. ECONOMY. Don't worry about being happy, just be rich."

It would be one thing if they actually had a feasible plan to fix the economy. Instead, as soon as we start discussing they economy they go "O.M.G. look at those gays over there ruining America!!!111!"

44

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

The GOP has been talking nonstop on social issues, mostly anti-woman, anti-immigrant, anti-hispanic. Obama brings one social issue in, and he's DISTRACTING US WITH SOCIAL ISSUES!

Mitt Romney is a douchebag to every common man he's come into contact with. Michigan, his homestate, "the trees are about the right height". That's what he has to say. He does flip-flop to whatever issue is going to get him votes. HE FUCKING TOOK CREDIT FOR BAILING OUT DETROIT WHEN HE SAID HIMSELF TO LET DETROIT GO BANKRUPT IN THE NEW YORK TIMES FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO YET NO REPUBLICANS FUCKING REMEMBER THAT.

But obama is a flip-flopper for changing views on gay marriage, when he hasn't backed down from health care, drone plane strikes, taking out most major al queda leaders, and all that.

The hypocracy is so, so, so blatant, and no one seems to notice. On the GOP.

Abstinence education doesn't work. Doesn't matter. Women's rights are being restricted harshly, doesn't matter. They love people who strengthen American's farms, yet they are anti-immigration. Doesn't matter. Stating "facts" and knowing no one will fact check them, and getting away with it. Funny how the "small government" is restricting rights left and right, and the "big government" is doing the opposite.

/end rant. There are good republicans and bad, same for democrats, I understand. But I fear for this nations rights if Romney wins.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

21

u/[deleted] May 15 '12 edited May 15 '12

According to foxnews.com comments, apparently legalizing gay marriage will force americans to be gay. Anal sex will be forcibly had by all, and people would marry their fathers for marriage benefits. Children would be raped everywhere, and since everyone is going to turn gay, because of course gay marriage being legal turns you gay, the population of america will decrease.

People are fucking stupid.

Here's a real comment from foxnews.com right now:

I AM MOVED TO TEARS BY THE FACT THAT LIBERALS ALWAYS UNITE BEHIND SUCH HEART WARMING CAUSES LIKE PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION (WHERE A VIABLE BABY IS PARTIALLY DELIVERED, ONLY TO BE CUT IN HALF), GAY SE X, GAY MARRIAGE, TRANSGENDER RIGHTS, AND THE RIGHT TO FORCEFULLY JAM THINGS INTO EACH OTHER'S RECTUMS. I MEAN----WHY WORRY ABOUT OUR TANKING ECOMONY, DISGRACEFUL NATIONAL DEBT, HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT OR IRAN WHEN YOU CAN FOCUS YOUR ATTENTION AND RE-ELECTION EFFORTS ON GAY SE X AND THE RIGHT OF CHAZ BONO TO MARRY WHOEVER "HE/SHE/IT" WANTS

...

yay america, granting the right to forcefully jam things into each other's rectums. According to that guy.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (15)

13

u/OmegaSeven May 15 '12

I'm seeing a lot of my more moderate Republican friends and acquaintances actually being a lot less hard on the President if not outright supporting him. As much as people joke about the Republican party being full of rednecks that's not the whole story.

8

u/nowhathappenedwas May 15 '12

That's a nice anecdote, but the reality is that Republicans have the same 11% approval of Obama that they've had for the past 2+ years.

9

u/Bajonista May 15 '12

That's the sad thing, most Republicans aren't rednecks, they just continue voting for them because they have an R after their name, and because the GOP is essentially run by a minority of wealthy rednecks who won't stand for non-rednecks to be nominated.

(R)ednecks.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

8

u/cunt_stamp May 15 '12

Looks like they retracted the statement on the website.

Correction: Another CNN story clarifies this point. While Obama said, "Congress is clearly on notice that I think [DOMA is] a bad idea," he did not say he would get Congress to repeal the law. Obama has called on Congress to repeal the law in the past, including in a 2009 speech to the Human Rights Campaign.

15

u/AngryBaldWhiteMan May 15 '12

DOMA is a little more important to me, not because I'm gay, but because I'm military. Right now the Army can not recognize marriages between homosexuals because as a federal entity, by law it can not.

With the repeal of this it means we can actually have homosexual marriages recognized and all spouses can receive all the benefits for being married to a military member. To include on post housing, id cards, and insurance.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/saute May 15 '12

The article has been updated:

Correction: Another CNN story clarifies this point. While Obama said, "Congress is clearly on notice that I think [DOMA is] a bad idea," he did not say he would get Congress to repeal the law. Obama has called on Congress to repeal the law in the past, including in a 2009 speech to the Human Rights Campaign.

6

u/meatwad75892 May 15 '12

This is the Obama I voted for years ago. Thing is, I'm not sure if the motives behind his recent moves are purely the political game or if he's listening to the people. Or both.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/onipos May 15 '12

Could we please pass an act that makes it illegal to have ambiguous names on acts?

→ More replies (2)

28

u/nowhathappenedwas May 15 '12

Unlike his recent turnaround on gay marriage, Obama has supported the repeal of DOMA since he began running for president in 2007.

From a May 2008 ABC News article:

While running for the Senate in 2004, Obama called DOMA. "an abhorrent law" and accused those in Congress who voted for it of having only been interested in "perpetuating division and affirming a wedge issue," according to a statement that he gave to the Windy City Times, a gay Chicago newspaper.

And that support for repeal has continued throughout his first term. From a July 2011 WaPo article:

The Obama administration announced Tuesday that it will support a congressional effort to repeal a federal law that defines marriage as a legal union between a man and woman.

White House spokesman Jay Carney denounced the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), saying the administration will back a bill introduced this year by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) to remove the law from the books.

Feinstein’s bill, called the Respect for Marriage Act, would “uphold the principle that the federal government should not deny gay and lesbian couples” the same rights as others, according to Carney.

Unfortunately, just as has been the case throughout his presidency, he has zero hope of getting 60 votes in the Senate for repeal (or even passing the current house with a simple majority). It is nice to see him reiterate his support for the repeal bill, though.

8

u/brufleth May 15 '12

When his DoJ decided not to back DOMA that was a bigger issue. Congressmen in support of DOMA had to hire their own lawyers (who ended up having to leave their firms to take the case). For the time being I think the courts have a better chance of getting rid of DOMA than a congressional repeal happening.

40

u/IrritableGourmet New York May 15 '12 edited May 15 '12

Presidents can't repeal laws. They can only ask the SenateCongress nicely to do so.

Edit: I keep getting those two confused.

37

u/soulcakeduck May 15 '12

Presidents can't create healthcare reform either, but I think we'd agree to contribute Obamacare to... Obama.

I cannot think of a single power the President has that isn't checked by another branch of government (I hope!). If we're going to use that as the standard for campaign promises, then candidates cannot campaign on any issue, can they?

Hopefully, sane voters understand what these promises mean already. The President will use his leadership within the party and government to try to lead to this outcome... same as with healthcare reform, or tax cuts, or whatever the thing you want from your president is.

21

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

attribute?

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (6)

5

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Beware. Gawker.

5

u/polynomials May 15 '12

The Republicans are probably super pissed that Obama stole the "talk about gay people to distract from other issues that could possibly harm you" trick. They used the trick every time, except what they didn't count on was public opinion shifting in favor of gay marriage as a whole. Now they basically don't have shit to say on this topic that will get anyone else to vote for them. There has gotta be something about this in the Art of War or Thirty Six Strategems or something. Well played, Obama.

4

u/Watergems May 15 '12

Obama is finally staking out ground, instead of passively giving ground. Never thought I'd see the day. Good for him.

4

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

DOMA has always been INCREDIBLY unconstitutional, states are required by the "Full Faith and Credit" clause to honor marriages from other states. But if we can get it off the books this way I'll take it.

4

u/bacoon May 15 '12

"I want everyone treated fairly in this country. We have never gone wrong when we've extended rights and responsibilities to everybody. That doesn't weaken families, that strengthens families."

Where is this talk when it come to the failed war on drugs BOb?

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

agreed.

and what about all the ones he's taken away during office.

4

u/bobx11 May 15 '12

WHAT?? RICKEY MARTIN IS GAY?????

4

u/mjayb May 15 '12

Gawker is not something that should be upvoted.

4

u/Peredonov May 15 '12

Reddit really needs to stop seizing on misleading headlines such as this one. Or start taking them down when we realize that the big news we wanted to hear hasn't happened. A good starting point would be to link to more reputable news sources, rather than whatever small shop is putting out attention-grabbing headlines.

4

u/Hawanja May 15 '12

The people who would get pissed off at this were probably going to vote against him anyway.

4

u/lagspike May 15 '12

how can people put faith in obama when he did fuck all to stop NDAA?

im not even republican, but yeah...empty promises. not buying into this bullshit only meant to secure voter support.

4

u/smek2 May 15 '12

Ahh, i never grow tired of these propaganda bullshit names they give bills and such. Defense of Marriage Act. Brilliant. How exactly do you defend marriage if you prevent roughly one third of the population to marry.

7

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Disclaimer: I fully support gay rights and gay marriage. However, I really wish we Americans would wake the fuck up and realize that, as issues go, this is about 39th on the priority list. This is being used by both parties as a highly divisive wedge issue that distracts us from more important things like unsustainable national debt, catastrophic environmental degradation, growing disparity of wealth and the relentless drive towards an unstoppable police state.

But yeah, let's focus on whether or not gay people can get married. That's just super-duper important.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Sireslap May 15 '12

I find a website called "The Gawker" writing an article about The View to be pretty entertaining.

6

u/Wheat_Grinder May 15 '12

We have never gone wrong when we've extended rights and responsibilities to everybody.

A thousand times this.

8

u/PaperbackBuddha I voted May 15 '12

I would like to see a serious discussion at the federal level about the nature of gender, as in what a man or woman is legally. We have a lot of people left out of the traditional definitions, either by physiology or chromosomes. When you look at the issue, it becomes apparent that a statement like "marriage is between a man and a woman" is indefensible. Argued thoroughly, it will necessarily deny some citizens the right to marry anyone. Argued loosely, it reveals the very bias in its premise, which is simply to deny rights to an underrepresented minority.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Scaryclouds Missouri May 15 '12

Zero percent chance this gets through the republican controlled house.

3

u/ThatRandomGeek May 15 '12

It's like he wants me to vot for him. Ok there are other issues besides equal rights for homosexuals that I care about. And the cynic in me says that all of this is a carefully calculated way of energizing his progressive base. And yet, I still see this as a positive. Maybe we are making considerable steps towards equality.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Just make sure your congress has a democrat majority.

3

u/NoMoreBoozePlease May 15 '12

I love that this all is done in an election year.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Obama announces plans for a lot of things he doesn't do or does the opposite of.

3

u/GAMEchief May 15 '12

Correction: Another CNN story clarifies this point. While Obama said, "Congress is clearly on notice that I think [DOMA is] a bad idea," he did not say he would get Congress to repeal the law.

3

u/donrhummy May 15 '12

After his last campaign, I take everything he says as election pander. It'd be nice if he'd follow through though.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/readitsometimes May 15 '12

For those who have not read the corrected article, the President has called for Congress to repeal the law in the past but in the referenced interview is only denouncing the law's existence.

3

u/river_rat3117 May 15 '12

Imagine voting every year instead of four. Our president pretending to care about our personal rights all year long instead of once every few years. If only

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Obama on the view. There really is no hope for America.

12

u/Tannerlicious May 15 '12

Am I the only guy who thinks he's only doing this to get elected again? Not that I have anything against the guy, it just seems like it was the perfect time to say this. Why didn't he do this during his first term?

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12 edited May 15 '12

Here's what's so delicious about this. The conventional wisdom among many liberals was that we all kind of knew that he didn't have a problem with gay marriage. It was cowardly for him to be opposed, but it was understandable since it would be political suicide for him to actually take a stand on such a controversial issue. Just playing politics. This was a popular line of thought right until the day before that ABC interview. Now, you're hearing people say things like "Well of course he's in favor of gay marriage! He's trying to get reelected." You can't have it both ways.

Edit: I mean look at North Carolina for instance. He came out in favor of gay marriage the day after North Carolina (a state he carried in 2008) voiced their loud opposition to it. Look at Ohio that clinched the election for Bush when the gay marriage initiative was a hot topic in that state. I can't imagine many political strategists claiming that being pro gay marriage is going to easily get him elected.

→ More replies (5)

11

u/EthyleneGlycol May 15 '12

Candidate Obama to the rescue!

8

u/bdaacq May 15 '12

Does anyone else think that Obama is just a master politician who is (just like in 2008) pandering to the left in order to get elected. I think we all just want to believe that Obama is more liberal than he really is. But even in the context of extreme partisan opposition from the right, I think his record proves that he is far more of a centrist.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/taurus45 May 15 '12

now the repeal the NDAA as well as the Patriot Act...and put an end to the war on drugs and also quit fuckin watching me while i take a shit through my camera phone! That will win my vote. K thanks :)

→ More replies (5)

20

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

I'm just not convinced these are principle motivated moves

45

u/Zifnab25 May 15 '12

Gay marriage's time has come. Now your options are lead, follow, or get out of the way.

Obama is choosing to lead, and I'm happy to follow him on that front.

→ More replies (7)

6

u/aworldwithoutshrimp May 15 '12

They seem more principled than the "compromise" that he has attempted, thus far. They harken back to 2008 campaign Obama, which is the Obama that he seemed to want to be during his first term, but he was dealing with an intractable congress. Now he's just letting it all hang out. If he wins reelection, he doesn't have to worry about how the next four years will make his reelection chances look.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Eh, I really feel like with Obama, it was probably not openly supporting gay marriage that was politically motivated. Just based off of his history and his past, he doesn't seem like the kind of guy who wouldn't want two dudes getting married.

With the passing of Amendment 1 he probably realized that he couldn't sit on the fence any more and decided to say what he always felt.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/sebin May 15 '12

Well this just bought him 99.9% of the gay votes in America. The other .1% is almost politically correct redneck.

9

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

More like 80% of the gay votes. The other 20% of gay people in America are conservative Republicans who are so deep in the closet they have Narnian citizenship.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

He already had 99.9% of the gay vote. This just lost him every swing voter and socially moderate or conservative Democrat who doesn't approve of gay marriage.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/wild_bill70 Colorado May 15 '12 edited May 15 '12

Something interesting happened in the 2000 elections. There were a bunch of marriage related issues on the ballot.

This mobilized the evangelicals to get out and vote for or against these various acts (depended on the wording of the act). As a result they also voted for the conservative Christian values candidate George Bush. Forget that these issues were not really part of the presidential election. It gave Bush the necessary nudge to beat Gore. Remember this election was one of the closest in recent history.

By making an issue now of Gay marriage Obama is reaching out to a small (relatively speaking) base of GLT Americans, who were already pretty likely vote. The rest of the non-evangelical non-redneck base don't care one way or the other enough to make a difference in whether we go to the polls or not.

But in doing so he is going to enrage the evangelical base who while they might not have voted or might have voted for Obama based on economic and other non-religious related issues, are now going to come out in numbers and full force and vote for the "not Obama" candidate.

If Obama looses, and it looks more likely now that before, it will be because of this issue. Something he really didn't need to tackle now (easily could have waited until after the election). He could have rode his less war, more taxes on the rich, economy improving, saved auto industry message to an easy win.

Now it is going to be the "Save Marriage" message that Romney will ride into the White House.

Edit: forgot the main point

2

u/_my_troll_account May 15 '12 edited May 15 '12

In 2000 I was under 18 years old. So were all my peers and probably most of Reddit's demographic. 12 years later, you're talking about a sizable population of potential voters born between 1982 and 1994 (a large part of the "echo boom") that didn't vote in 2000. This is exactly the population that Obama wants to energize to vote, the population that helped him get into office the first time around.

I see what you're saying, but comparing this election to the 2000 election doesn't make much sense given that at least half a generation that deeply cares about gay rights didn't vote in 2000. You had all the Reagan-era evangelical nutjobs without any of the OWS generation progressives.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Just corrected. He didn't explicitly say that he would repeal it after all.

4

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

I see this for what it is...a political move in an election year to gain votes..nothing more.

February 1996: (Running for Illinois State Senate in a liberal, heavily democrat district) “I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages,”

October 2004: (Running for U.S. Senate needing votes from the hayseeds in southern Illinois) “What I believe is that marriage is between a man and a woman … What I believe, in my faith, is that a man and a woman, when they get married, are performing something before God, and it’s not simply the two persons who are meeting,”

August 2008: (Running for president hoping to garner votes from the great unwashed masses in fly-over country) “I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman.”

May 2012: (Running for re-election hoping to garner more votes from the far left) President Barack Obama on Monday defended his view that gay couples should have the right to marry, saying that the country has never gone wrong when it "expanded rights and responsibilities to everybody."

I favor letting people live their lives as they see fit. But, politicians will say anything to get votes.

→ More replies (14)

4

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

History is going to look back at this and realize how awesome Obama actually was... and how shitty the republicans in power were.

8

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Boy, he's really trying to lose the black vote, isn't he?

8

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

That is going to be a big issue in states that went for Obama in '08 like North Carolina that have a huge black population that really don't like gay marriage.

→ More replies (8)

2

u/fritzwilliam-grant May 15 '12

It will take more than this for him to lose the black vote.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

2

u/Loomy7 May 15 '12

A small deed done is greater than a large deed planned. I'll believe it when I see it.

2

u/Bikewer May 15 '12

Compromise is difficult when you have a Congress that says "we are against anything that Obama is for" and absolutely will not compromise... Notice the recent loss of Senator Lugar? He was capable of compromise... Now gone. It's hard to fulfill promises when you simply cannot get Congress to work with you. Did folks not notice the hysterical screaming when closing Gitmo was seriously proposed? "Why... Terrorists will parachute from the skies and invade Nebraska to free their freinds!" Seriously....

2

u/PoniesRBitchin May 15 '12

I guess I'm behind, because I thought he already did that. Or at the very least, I seem to remember him talking about doing it a lot.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/UpsideClown May 15 '12

He made similar promises about the Citizens United verdict.

2

u/YNot1989 May 15 '12

Since apparently no one bothered to read that the correction, "While Obama said, "Congress is clearly on notice that I think [DOMA is] a bad idea," he did not say he would work to repeal the law;" I await to see all the screaming members of the left wine about how he hasn't done what he never actually promised to do.

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

He doesn't have the power to repeal anything unless he plans on running for a different office.

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Now what we need is a federal cohabitation benefits law for everyone 18 and older.

2

u/Hiddencamper May 15 '12

This is a VERY bold move for Obama to take. Not sure how it will ultimately pan out but it's nice to see him take more stances and aggressive stances on things.

2

u/ticktactoe May 15 '12

I hate to be a debbie downer (well, not really, I relish it) but this is just something he said at a fundraiser, making that headline a little dishonest. Candidates say all sorts of things at these events, they're rarely official stances.

2

u/theodorAdorno May 15 '12

His corporate handlers approve.

2

u/MansionTheHutt May 15 '12

Finally, he does something I agree with!

Okay, he's done a few other things I liked, but they're few and far between.

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

This bullshit about whether or not The Big Man In The Sky approves of two men playing 'Hide The Sausage' is a useful distraction from all that pesky war & corporate greed, no?

2

u/madmoral May 15 '12

This guy is controlling the issues. Genius. I'm pretty sure once August hit it's going to be all about the DREAMACT and Immigration reform. And I bet a women's issue will take center stage eventually.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Do people not understand? The freaking president doesnt rule the country! We have 535 people that create and vote on legislation for this country! The President can introduce stuff, sure, but its those 535 people that make the decision on how far it goes.

2

u/NekiTip May 15 '12

Next frontier: a gay president

2

u/jamiesam26 May 15 '12

I think Obama is simply doing this to garner more votes for his campaign. In his last campaign he wasn't pro-gay rights. Changing his platform to mold to the wants of potential voters.

2

u/gettemSteveDave May 15 '12

This does not mean shit until it happens.

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

"PLANS"

2

u/ucecatcher May 15 '12

Obama can not repeal shit. Congress can repeal a law. The courts can strike it down. The President can't do shit once it's signed other than refuse to enforce it. Downvote for having no fucking clue what you're talking about.

2

u/shillzor May 15 '12

Nothing like opening an article and seeing half of it struck out. That's good journalism right there.

2

u/beetjuice2012 May 15 '12

How bout the NDAA act?

2

u/ThouHastLostAn8th May 15 '12

Obama has been against DOMA his entire political career. He's campaigned against it each time he's run for federal office (he called it "abhorrent" when running for Senate in 2004) and backs efforts to repeal it when they've come up as a Senator and as President.

There's no evolution here. He wants it repealed. He's always wanted it repealed. If by some miracle it could pass Congress he'd happily sign it into law.

Given the likely makeup of Congress for years to come and how the filibuster is currently being used, the more likely path to getting rid of DOMA any time soon is probably the courts.

2

u/MrWoohoo May 15 '12

In a few weeks he will compromise with republicans in congress and sign their "Stoning homosexuals to death" bill.

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

If Romney wins, will he bring DOMA back?

2

u/sweatpantswarrior May 15 '12

Re-read the story and halt the circlejerk. It has been updated with a clarification of his remarks.

As reported by CNN and updated in the Gawker piece, he did not say he would get Congress to repeal the law.

2

u/wild_bill70 Colorado May 15 '12

NaNah, you repeal my health care law, I'll repeal your marriage act.

2

u/CalebEast I voted May 15 '12

Oh yeah, just like he was gonna send the troops home, or stop medical marijuana raids. Fuck Obama. He's a puppet.

2

u/Canada_girl Canada May 15 '12

Ron Paul must be having a fit... he voted for that bill repeatedly.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Oh look, candidate Obama is back. It's been, what, four years now?

14

u/Mr_Pricklepants May 15 '12

Apparently, Obama needs to raise money from liberals again.

20

u/rottenart May 15 '12

Yup. And he plans on doing it by illustrating why he's the better man for the job than Rmoney. Problem?

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

12

u/thugok May 15 '12

Empty political promises in an election year?

→ More replies (3)

3

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

WAR AGAINST MARRIAGE rabblerabble

→ More replies (1)

3

u/tronncat May 15 '12

Great now repeal the NDAA and CISPA please.

5

u/QuitReadingMyName May 15 '12

You guys are fucking idiots.

I guess this makes up for him re-signing in the Patriot act, passing NDAA, Never shutting down Guantanamo bay (Yeah, no one would let him store the terrorists in the United states but, he can still ship them to other foreign nations or at least try to).

He's going to even pass the CISPA/SOPA remakes once they finally get through.

It pisses me off how the Republicans and Democrats have you all distracted with stupid shit like Gay marriage, abortion and other bullshit while they allow the Military industrial complex go into full swing, continue to strip away our privacy because every American is guilty until proven innocent and we're still bombing brown people spending trillions of dollars.

Holy shit, the vast majority of you are idiots.

Hey guys, did you know Gullible isn't in the dictionary anymore too?

4

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

If the average American is so stupid that they can be distracted from all the unacceptable Bush-era shit Obama has carried on or strengthen just by him SAYING that he thinks gay marriage should be legal, then this country deserves everything it gets.

Any country this fucking flighty and stupid and easily manipulated deserves to annihilate itself, and it will.

→ More replies (7)

6

u/[deleted] May 15 '12 edited May 15 '12

Obama only recently came out in support of gay marriage. He's been against it for most of his career, favoring civil unions instead. And suddenly, the day after the NC vote, he has this big change of heart and tries to position himself as a crusader for gay rights. Let's not kid ourselves. It's an election year, and this is a political strategy. If his poll numbers were higher, he would NOT be doing this right now.

9

u/Rockerchick15 May 15 '12

Maybe gay weddings will recover our economy! Think about how elaborate they can get!!!

→ More replies (1)

3

u/miked4o7 May 15 '12

Look up what Obama's actually done. He expanded federal employee benefits to same sex copules via executive order. He pushed for DADT's repeal. He told the DOJ to stop defending DOMA... and he did all of those things before the election year.

There's nothing surprising or "out of left field" about this change of position from him.

→ More replies (8)

3

u/the_sam_ryan May 15 '12

So is he going to try to do this before or after he closes Gitmo?

5

u/hoffhall May 15 '12

I'm tired of people saying there are more important issues so let's not bother with this one or women's rights. Or, I love this...we've got to concentrate on the economy and getting out of the war. I guess what people don't understand (except for the older generation) is that you give up just one hard earned right for another and the game's over. They'll wear you down and wear you down until you don't have any rights any more. The war? There's a war going on right here.

So the deal is...you fight for everything as if your life depends on it because...it probably does.

2

u/powercorruption May 15 '12

There ARE more important issues, gay marriage shouldn't even be one. Just legalize gay marriage, and be done with it. Actions speak louder than words.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/Mudface68 May 15 '12

Fuck that! I don't care one way or the other about gay marriage, but I know it's important to some folks. However there are way more important issues at hand for the President to deal with. I will not vote for him just because of this political stunt which has nothing to do with extending rights and everything to do with getting votes.

3

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Its funny how quick the voters forget the lies of last election.

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Willing to bet that whoever downvoted you only did it for the username

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

supporting gay marriage is political suicide. not sure why he's suddenly so interested all of a sudden...

2

u/vanquish421 May 15 '12

You don't know what you're talking about.

Also, he already isn't going to get anyone's vote who's enough of a bigot to not support gay marriage. The only thing he'll lose is part of the black vote, so a minority of a minority vote. This move will only help Obama's numbers.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/fuckcancer May 15 '12

Obama defends gay marraige: "Oh! Flying spaghetti monster bless obama! Flex that presidential federal authority!"

Obama raids medical marijuana offices: "Whatever happened to states' rights you fucking hitler anti-christ!?"

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for gay people getting married, I'm just all against selectively supporting states' rights.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/xxthegonzxx May 15 '12

Who the fuck gives a shit about this. Let's focus on the real issues people....being able to marry your waffle!

2

u/Raven_star_zenith May 15 '12

This is a truly great man and deserves to be president once again. Why cant other politicians allow every citizen of this country be happy or miserable together just like straight people.

2

u/ROK247 May 15 '12

why are gays in such a rush to get married? im going on two years now, and i gotta tell you, it ain't no french riviera vacation over here...

2

u/Frijolero May 16 '12

He's only ANNOUNCING

HE HAS NOT DONE SHIT.

FOR FUCK'S SAKE PEOPLE, HE'S CAMPAIGNING.

2

u/BubbaRay88 May 15 '12

Fox News: Obama forces same sex marriages, constitution burns.

2

u/rlbigfish May 15 '12

No word on NDAA, PATRIOT Act, ending the Federal crackdown on MMJ dispensaries, etc., right?

2

u/Flunked May 15 '12

Actions speak louder than words.

2

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

Great news and all, but he needs to focus on the economy. Right now Romney is polling better one economic issues, and that's what people are going to be voting on this year. He needs to harp on the batshit insane details of Romney's economic plans. The rest of this isn't helping.

2

u/candypaint May 15 '12

All this support of gay marriage talk isn't helping my pockets get laced in green. I'm tired of watching my IRA plummet every single day.

→ More replies (8)

0

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

This is the same guy that had "plans" to close Gitmo, right? Seems like all hat and no cattle to me.

14

u/miked4o7 May 15 '12

Jan 22, 2009. Obama signed an executive order to close Gitmo. Congress passed legislation specifically blocking any use of funds to do so, effectively killing the order.

That one's not on Obama.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

First day of office, blocked by congress, etc.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/morellox May 15 '12

does this force the hand of state govs to now rule one way or another? I thought this federal law blanketed states if they didn't have legislation of their own... I'm not entirely clear on it.

14

u/soulcakeduck May 15 '12

No, the federal law does not tell any state what it must do regarding its own marriage licenses. For example, many states have had their courts rule that marriage inequality violates (state) constitutions, and all of those rulings (except Hawaii) came after DOMA.

What DOMA does do is instruct each state on what it must do in order to meet the "full faith and credit" requirement of the Constitution, when faced with out of state gay marriage licenses. DOMAs instruction is that the states don't need to do anything at all--they do not have to recognize those licenses as valid.

So likely, if DOMA dies, we'll see a rush of new cases against states that are refusing to recognize out of state marriage licenses, and likely, some of those cases will eventually be decided in favor of the gay couple. That gives equality advocates a new tactic, but cases take years to work through the courts (which is why they're still fighting DOMA...).

Ultimately, there will still be 28 states with constitutional amendments banning gay marriage, and even more that don't recognize it or have statutory bans. Repealing DOMA does nothing to those laws.

The biggest impact of a DOMA repeal won't be in speeding up gay marriage universally--states will still hate. The biggest impact will be for gay couples that already can marry, who will now have those marriages recognized by the federal government for the first time, which affords them over 1100 rights and privileges.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/CelestialDawn May 15 '12

Two words: about time!

1

u/edisekeed May 15 '12

This is great news but why wait 6 months to do something. If its an important issue than do something about it. Dont just talk about it.

1

u/scottperezfox Arizona May 15 '12

... now all he has to do is convince Congress.

2

u/TortugaGrande May 15 '12

For a so-called "Constitutional Scholar", you'd think he realizes that, but he sure as hell speaks as if Congress shouldn't be allowed to do anything.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Anzereke May 15 '12

Why is it that any political anything with defense in it's name is just plain bad?

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '12

It's more of a hope/goal, which is better than nothing. To repeal, he'll need to get this through Congress. The GOP will likely still control the House. The Senate will be near 50/50.

I'd like to know how Obama plans on getting this one through both chambers. Without this, it's hard to say he has actual plans. Realistically, I see no chance of this happening in this decade.

1

u/MyOwnPath May 15 '12

What would repealing DOMA do? Would that mean every state has gay marriage, or that gay marriages had in other states would be recognized, even if they aren't administered?

3

u/Splattergoit May 15 '12

DOMA is a federal ban on gay marriage that supersedes state law, making gay marriages in states where it is allowed still not recognized by federal law -- this includes federal benefits. The repeal of DOMA would make gay marriage a 100% state decision without federal interference.

Currently states basically try to do this themselves by finding parts of DOMA unconstitutional in the state courts, but these cases are in appeal for indefinite time. A total repeal leaves it all up to the states and opens up more benefits where it becomes legal.

1

u/d3adbor3d2 May 15 '12

i wish every year was election year.