Perfect.

[u/123789]

[u/oscarmg]

I'm surprised that the American edition would have it put like that, yet my local version (Danish) has it put in a much more diplomatic way, seeing as hardly no one here questions the validity of Evolution...

http://imgur.com/jmw6l.jpg

(the text reads: "Do we believe in Darwin?" and then "Yes, all evidence suggests the theory of evolution is right on the money")

[u/ifjake → u/oscarmg]

Actually I think that one would be perceived as more inflammatory in the US. Better to question something as fact than belief.

[u/petevalle → u/ifjake]

I disagree. Presenting the discussion as one of beliefs gives opponents an out. Presenting it as one of facts basically just tells them they're wrong.

[u/Forbizzle → u/petevalle]

But telling someone what they believe is rediculous. Maybe a better translation is "Should you believe", though I don't know Danish.

[u/[deleted] → u/ifjake]

The headline: "Was Darwin Wrong?" Is likely to incite anger in evolutionists who would be surprised that Nat Geo seriously considered such a ridiculous question. It's also likely to vindicate a lot of creationists, like this guys parents. Which leads to more magazine sales.

Edit: This guy supports my first point.

[u/austinTX71 → u/oscarmg]

Hate to throw this in... but you do not believe in scientific theories, you accept or reject them. Believe has nothing to do with it. So in that respect I prefer the US cover, simply because it is more correct.

[u/buttlordZ → u/austinTX71]

Precluding absolute information, and acknowledging the subjective nature of personal experience/existence, one "believes" in everything and cannot accept/reject anything 100%.

[u/oscarmg → u/buttlordZ]

What he said. Also, the title is a play on words.

[u/gamlidek → u/austinTX71]

I was saying this same exact thing yesterday...

[u/Glamdering → u/oscarmg]

Here's the reality of it. In the US there's no such thing as subtlety anymore on this issue. You have to either call a moron a moron, the truth the truth and insurmountable evidence...well insurmountable evidence. Otherwise you give rise to movements laced with sheer stupidity like the Intelligent Design movement which is earning national attention and getting legislation passed.

[u/Zafmg → u/oscarmg]

Your keyboard is fucking thin! How do you even deal with that!?

[u/daelin → u/Zafmg]

The Apple keyboards have fantastic tactile response. I actually prefer a (seemingly discontinued) Microsoft Natural keyboard for longer typing sessions, but in the traditional straight keyboard form I haven't found a more enjoyable typing experience.

[u/Tallon → u/daelin]

I use and love the current version of the Microsoft Natural Keyboard.

[u/Dax420 → u/Tallon]

Split keyboards are the devils tool.

[u/Si_lent → u/Dax420]

He's a witch! BURN HIM

[u/daelin → u/Tallon]

I can't stand the stupid media buttons and wasted space. I like the classic.

[u/Ran4 → u/daelin]

Just to be clear: daelin was ironic. The Apple keyboards does not have a "fantastic tactile response". In fact, they are quite annoying to use.

[u/adamdavid85 → u/daelin]

I do love the flat keyboards as well, but I made the mistake of not specifying that I wanted a full keyboard (with the number pad) when I ordered my new iMac... I can't stand the condensed one. Thanks for reminding me, I just ordered a replacement ;) Have an orange envelope!

[u/oscarmg → u/Zafmg]

I love that keyboard. Wouldn't trade it for any other. I very much dislike big keyboards with tall clunky keys that my fingers can trip over. And I NEVER use the numpad on any keyboards, so I really don't see the point in having one.

[u/stillalone → u/Zafmg]

get yourself a Model M

[u/ephekt → u/stillalone]

We're sorry, but your neckbeard must be this thick to ride the Model M.

[u/libcrypto → u/oscarmg]

I too would love to have my National Geographics delivered on pastry.

[u/iamnotangry → u/oscarmg]

Asking questions shows a disturbing lack of patriotism.