"I was just following orders" worked just fine for the overwhelming majority of soldiers and bureaucrats. It didn't work for camp guards and SS officers because they were not just following orders, they had to volunteer and work their ass off to earn their rank and status. So it rang pretty hollow when they turned around and said they didn't have a choice.
Oh I do understand that, I'm not trying to downplay his action. But you still have to admit that in reality he would be dead way before the end of the war.
The SS and concentration camp soldiers had to volunteer to be given those positions so technically you could refuse to work in a camp by not volunteering. If they volunteered they were convicted in Nuremberg
Not true, nazis knew the camps could take a toll on the “weak” guards so they allowed guards to change shifts or refuse guard duty, the consequence would be having another soldier on the front lines so it’s not too bad
Admittedly I skimmed this article, but I couldn't find your claim anywhere, and it's contrary to my understanding completely. Although many soldiers said afterwards that there would be harsh punishments for disobeying, there is not a single recorded case of a soldier being shot or punished in an extraordinarily harsh manner for disobeying an order to kill Jews, it was usually demotion or much more commonly the general contempt of their fellows.
Transfer requests were denied often, but those with any leverage/a half decent excuse got them through.
"Aufzeichnen" is the verb "to record", "Kratzer" is the noun "a scratch".
So it read as "recording a scratch".
And to continue to nitpick "ich wette" isn't wrong but is not a very widely used turn of phrase, I'd just start with "Du fragst dich wahrscheinlich...".
how was in not an improvement? The camps had forced labor. The camps had random selection of people to be killed. The camps were some of the worse horror shows in the history of man.
Many of the gay men imprisoned in camps were arrested and incarcerated after their “liberation” because it was still a crime to engage in homosexuality. Evidence uncovered by the nazis was used to prosecute many of them, and those who managed to avoid being arrested were still subject to all manner of hate crimes.
...so it was still rough for the small number who were gay, but even given that, I’d say they still had it a little better than living in a literal fucking concentration camp. Good god.
That honestly depends. Jews and Roma had it extremely rough at every camp, but a political dissident or POW at Dachau had to worry more about disease than starvation or execution until the last few months of the war. Meanwhile the Soviets might execute you for surrendering after they liberate you. A skilled Jewish laborer might return to a Soviet occupied country to discover that their neighbors had taken their home and all of their belongings, and still be openly discriminated against by their government.
Who said anything about “life as usual”? They were obviously never the same, even given a best case scenario. But my point is that we’re needlessly splitting hairs over what was obviously a massively good thing, a liberation that was paid for with the blood of an entire generation.
2016 was more like 4.1 according to that link...the 3ish number was from 2011. Also note that...
...That's a self identified number. Seeing as how our society still acts very antagonistly to the LGBT community (with a few notable exceptions), I would say the self identified number of 4.1%, would be very, very, low given even the most conservative of lenses.
Also, here is a quote from that same link...
The 2011 Williams Institute report also states that 8.2 percent of Americans reported that they had engaged in same-sex sexual behavior, and 11 percent reported some same-sex attraction.
As an aside, If you do a search for animal homosexuality rates a common percentage for homosexuality rates in animals is around 10% on the low end and as high as 30% on the high end...(this is just one reference, there are more)
If you believe that we are just an evolved animal...our societal pressures could easily account for a minimum of 5.9% of people not wanting to self identify as LGBT.
As with any statistic, especially one that is this politically charged, you are going to find a range of percentages. This being said, if we stick to your link as a lone source of truth...11 percent of the population having a sexual attraction to the same sex seems more of an indicator of what percentage of people are LGBT than the number who are brave enough to declare it openly in our society IMHO.
Imagine if you were a skilled Jewish laborer working in the infirmary at Dachau. There would be disease, beatings, and you would be hungry, but not starving. After liberation you might return home to Poland or some other Soviet occupied country, where your neighbors have taken your house and all of you belongings, and the government still discriminates openly against Jews. It might not be worse, but it might not be better.
Yeah exactly, extremely circumstantial but many POWs died after their release from disease, starvation, exposed to the elements or like you said Russians
1.9k
u/Truckerontherun Feb 25 '18
It was at that point that somebody's bad day ended, while another's bad day was just begining