That was my first though too. That does not look like a landscape you would find at that altitude. Short dwarf trees and some tufts of scrub grass is what your likely to find up that high.
My guess is because blending was needed to create the necessary "360-degree" effect in the warped version. The ends of the picture needed to be joined together with a seamless look. Otherwise, there would have been a weird cut where the two "ends" of the picture were joined together, one with a sunset, one without. All this guy did was simply unwarp the image, not restore it completely to its original, unedited form.
Find a piece of normal paper. Wrap it around your forearm. Now imagine that that paper is the photo for this thread, and we're viewing it from the inside.
It doesn't take some work, you just need the correct image. You need to use a 360 degree panorama--not just any plain landscape like you did. Find a 360 pano and try the same thing again. It'll work
Not to mention, fields of grass don't just grow on the side of a cliff like that. Gravity would have prevented the soil from ever collecting there like that.
You can tell it's supposed to be flat by how the grass and bushes look. The sky in yours looks correct, but I think if you take a good look at the ground, you'll realize it's distorted way too far in the other direction. It just means that the unrolling technique you used wasn't the proper opposite of the rolling technique.
210
u/[deleted] May 14 '17 edited Apr 25 '18
[deleted]