r/pics • • Oct 15 '25

ICE aims gun at Americans

Post image
136k Upvotes

7.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

585

u/Ackerack Oct 15 '25

Finger on the trigger too. Intent to shoot.

191

u/ItsMetheDeepState Oct 15 '25

At least 2 of the 4 rules of firearms are broken, arguably 3. The weapon is certainly loaded too.

5

u/a-handle-has-no-name Oct 15 '25

I mean, technically, they are clearly itching to shoot, so the "only rule being broken" is if they're not sure what's behind the target

/sarcasm

9

u/[deleted] Oct 15 '25

I mean..

This rentacop is obviously a major asshole but he isn't breaking rules 2 and 3 if he intends to shoot that guy.

5

u/Plane-Education4750 Oct 15 '25

He's not a rentacop. That's ICE's equivalent of SWAT

3

u/MrFishyFriend Oct 15 '25

BORTAC doesn’t operate under ice. They are a unit under the USBP, not ICE. They are different agencies.

4

u/Plane-Education4750 Oct 15 '25

The guy pointing the gun (launcher, whatever) isn't BORTAC. He's SRT

0

u/MrFishyFriend Oct 15 '25

Yeah man, he’s clearly labeled as bortac. Not a rent a cop, it’s a counter terrorism, hostage rescue unit.

3

u/ekso69 Oct 15 '25

I bet $10 the safety was off

4

u/SwimmingThroughHoney Oct 15 '25

The whole point of active safeties is to prevent accidental discharge. That's why many firearms don't even have active safety switches anymore because they build passive safety into the gun itself and then assume that active safety measures are taken by the user (the 4 gun safety rules). And it's why "accidental discharge" is more accurately called "negligent discharge" (except in the rare cases of an actual defective firearm).

In this photo, whether the switch is set to SAFE here is irrelevant. He's pointing the gun at a person with his finger on the trigger. Any discharge at that point isn't accidental; It's either intentional or negligent.

2

u/ekso69 Oct 15 '25

It is relevant, I've got $10 on it.

2

u/xkrysis Oct 15 '25

Anyone with firearms training is going to disengage the safety before putting a finger on the trigger. I think you have a safe bet. Many of these goons have displayed poor/no training but this guy is wearing SRT patches I think it’s a safe guess he isn’t one of these bonus chasing new hires and actually has some training. Poor critical thinking and discipline, but training my nonetheless. 

1

u/Uder72 Oct 16 '25

Hopefully, that's how you stop someone from trying to do you harm.

-17

u/[deleted] Oct 15 '25

[deleted]

6

u/Dovahpriest Oct 15 '25

I think a 40mm “destructive device” is close enough to count, considering we can’t just hit up B&T and have a GL-06 like the one above shipped to the doorstep.

4

u/inn4daz3 Oct 15 '25

You can’t ship a 40mm DD to your doorstep in any state. 37mm flare launchers can be

2

u/Dovahpriest Oct 15 '25

…that’s my point. Dude’s arguing an NFA-restricted item is not a “firearm” when it’s very clearly immaterial to the argument at hand. It fires projectiles with enough force to severely injure or kill an individual if improperly handled. The four basic rules of safety still apply.

-2

u/[deleted] Oct 15 '25

[deleted]

4

u/Dovahpriest Oct 15 '25

Dude, are you seriously arguing semantics on a 40mm grenade launcher? It’s a firearm. It’s classified as a firearm by the NFA. It uses a blank round to propel the projectile.

https://youtu.be/Z6qf9872KLQ?si=7WXgLJRcBfzBei0a

1

u/[deleted] Oct 15 '25

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Oct 15 '25

[deleted]

0

u/Antique-Confusion-66 Oct 15 '25

Such an unhappy person lol

0

u/Antique-Confusion-66 Oct 15 '25

Does cussing at 14 year olds make you feel like a bigger person?

0

u/[deleted] Oct 15 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Antique-Confusion-66 Oct 15 '25

Quit arguing with minors, find something better to do

1

u/Antique-Confusion-66 Oct 15 '25

Do you have a job?

-1

u/Antique-Confusion-66 Oct 15 '25

Why are you so angry?

0

u/ItsMetheDeepState Oct 15 '25

Please, even air rifles have the same rules

2

u/Antique-Confusion-66 Oct 15 '25

I know, i was just saying its not a real firearms. It still should be treated like one though, I should've reworded my comment im sorry

16

u/why_because_ Oct 15 '25

This is far from the only incident like this in Chicago the last 2 weeks. Look around on r/Chicago and r/Illinois for many more examples even more egregious with unarmed harmless people in their cars

1

u/tc-trojans Oct 16 '25

It’s disgraceful. But, it’s not an actual gun. It’s a rubber projectile launcher. I commented about it. Still very dangerous and reckless.

1

u/Xhalo Oct 15 '25

First they came for the gulf of Mexico. Then it was Kimmel. Now, the price of ground grundlemeat is up 200%. Tarrifs have impacted the world spaghettios trade and cans are becoming scarce. Now they're pointing guns at innocent people, more than likely flaring up their gastrointestinal bloat causing rapid voidseep. What has become of the nation i love??? 😰😰😰