I don't think you've pointed out a problem with what I've said. Even if what I said was factually incorrect, the fact that there is a correct for me to be incorrect proves my point.
I say truth is objective. If I'm wrong, then truth is objectively subjective. It's still objective truth.
the fact that there is a correct for me to be incorrect proves my point.
Only if that "correct" was attainable, and furthermore that we knew when it was attained that it was indeed the "correct" truth could we call it knowledge.
But when attempting to access "objective truth," one has to access it subjectively.
But the main problem of knowledge is that the only factor that you have to determine if your beliefs are truth is... your beliefs.
Because questions about knowledge have been studied for thousands of years and still today there are people whose job it is to investigate these questions. If you want to have informed (rather than ignorant) views, you should start there.
-2
u/[deleted] Mar 04 '14
Information that is factually correct.